SEC v. James O. Ward, Jr., No. LR-26102, Southern District of Alabama (Sept. 10, 2024) — Press Release
raw: James O. Ward, Jr.
James O. Ward, Jr., No. 1:24-cv-00327 (Sept. 10, 2024)
James O. Ward, Jr. was charged by the SEC for defrauding investors of $852,000 through misrepresentations regarding his crypto fund, Apex Financial Institute Pvt. Ltd.
James O. Ward, Jr. allegedly defrauded approximately 70 investors by raising at least $852,000 in crypto assets through false claims about his fund, Apex Financial Institute Pvt. Ltd. The SEC complaint alleges Ward misrepresented that the fund was SEC-regulated, managed $25 million in assets, and utilized risk-free trading strategies. Ward faces charges for violating Sections 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
The SEC has charged Alabama-based fund manager James O. Ward, Jr. with defrauding approximately 70 investors through his private fund, Apex Financial Institute Pvt. Ltd. Ward allegedly raised at least $852,000 in crypto assets by falsely claiming the fund was SEC-regulated, managed $25 million in assets, and employed risk-free trading strategies. In reality, the fund operated entirely from home computers, lacked prior assets, and had no international offices. The SEC alleges that Ward's purported 'beta test' was merely based on the returns of a third-party fund. Ward is charged with violating Sections 17(a)(1) and (3) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The SEC is seeking permanent injunctive relief, a bar from serving as a public company officer or director, and civil money penalties.
Exhibits & Attached Documents (1)
Extracted insights
- $25.00M $25 million $10M–$100M
- $852K $852,000 $100K–$1M
- company apex as a hedge fund
- agency apex was regulated by the sec
- company bar preventing ward from serving as an officer or director of a public company
- person civil money penalty
- person pat huddleston
- person permanent injunctive relief
- agency sec investigation
- agency Securities and Exchange Commission
- person thomas b. bosch
- Securities And Exchange Commission Charged James O. Ward, Jr.
- James O. Ward, Jr. Live‑streamed Several Apex Investor Presentations
- James O. Ward, Jr. Posted The Videos On YouTube
- James O. Ward, Jr. Promoted Apex As a Hedge Fund
- James O. Ward, Jr. Falsely Claimed Apex Was Regulated By The SEC
- James O. Ward, Jr. Falsely Claimed Apex Had $25 Million In Assets Under Management
- James O. Ward, Jr. Falsely Claimed Apex Had Successfully Conducted a 12‑Month Beta Test Of Its Trading Strategies
- James O. Ward, Jr. Falsely Claimed Apex Employed Trading Strategies That Offered Investors The Opportunity To Experience Substantial Gains Without Any Risk Of Loss
- James O. Ward, Jr. Falsely Claimed Apex Had Several International Offices
- Securities And Exchange Commission Alleges Apex Never Existed Prior To February 2021
- Securities And Exchange Commission Alleges Apex Had No Assets Under Management Prior To Taking On Investor Funds
- Securities And Exchange Commission Alleges Apex Never Had $25 Million In Assets Under Management
- Securities And Exchange Commission Alleges Apex's Claimed Beta Test Was Based Solely Upon Returns Purportedly Achieved By One Of The Third‑Party Funds In Which Apex Planned To Invest
- Securities And Exchange Commission Alleges Apex Did Not Have Trading Strategies That Actually Protected Investors From Losses
- Securities And Exchange Commission Alleges Apex Never Had Any Offices And Operated Entirely From Ward's And His Partners' Home Computers
- Complaint Charges Ward With Violating Sections 17(a)(1) And (3) Of The Securities Act Of 1933 And Section 10(b) Of The Securities Exchange Act Of 1934 And Rule 10b‑5
- Complaint Seeks Permanent Injunctive Relief
- Complaint Seeks Bar Preventing Ward From Serving As An Officer Or Director Of a Public Company
- Complaint Seeks Civil Money Penalty
- SEC Investigation Conducted By Douglas M. Dykhuizen Of The Atlanta Regional Office
- SEC Investigation Supervised By Thomas B. Bosch
- Pat Huddleston Will Lead The Litigation
- Pat Huddleston Will Lead The Litigation Under Supervision Of M. Graham Loomis
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Litigation Release No. 26102 / September 10, 2024 Securities and Exchange Commission v. James O. Ward, Jr., No. 1:24-cv-00327 (S.D. Ala. filed Sept. 10, 2024) SEC Charges Alabama Private Fund Manager With Offering Fraud The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged James O. Ward, Jr., a Foley, Alabama resident, with defrauding investors by making numerous misrepresentations in selling investments in Apex Financial Institute Pvt. Ltd. ("Apex"), a private investment fund managed by Ward and his partners that raised at least $852,000 of crypto assets from approximately 70 investors in the United States and abroad. According to the SEC's complaint, in March and April 2021, Ward live-streamed several Apex investor presentations and then posted the videos on YouTube. The SEC alleges that, in those videos, Ward promoted Apex as a hedge fund, and falsely claimed, among other things, that Apex: (i) was regulated by the SEC; (ii) had $25 million in assets under management; (iii) had successfully conducted a 12-month beta test of its trading strategies; (iv) employed trading strategies that offered investors the opportunity to experience substantial gains without any risk of loss; and (v) had several international offices. The SEC alleges that, in reality, Apex was never an SEC-regulated entity, did not exist prior to February 2021, had no assets under management prior to taking on investor funds, and never had $25 million in assets under management. The complaint also alleges that Apex's claimed "beta test" was based solely upon returns purportedly achieved by one of the third-party funds in which Apex planned to invest, and Apex did not have trading strategies that actually protected investors from losses. The SEC further alleges that Apex never had any offices and operated entirely from Ward's and his partners' home computers. The complaint, filed today in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama in Mobile, charges Ward with violating Sections 17(a)(1) and (3) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The complaint seeks permanent injunctive relief, a bar preventing Ward from serving as an officer or director of a public company, and a civil money penalty. The SEC's investigation was conducted by Douglas M. Dykhuizen of the Atlanta Regional Office and supervised by Thomas B. Bosch. Pat Huddleston will lead the litigation, under the supervision of M. Graham Loomis.U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Litigation Release No. 26102 / September 10, 2024 Securities and Exchange Commission v. James O. Ward, Jr., No. 1:24-cv-00327 (S.D. Ala. filed Sept. 10, 2024) SEC Charges Alabama Private Fund Manager With Offering Fraud The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged James O. Ward, Jr., a Foley, Alabama resident, with defrauding investors by making numerous misrepresentations in selling investments in Apex Financial Institute Pvt. Ltd. ("Apex"), a private investment fund managed by Ward and his partners that raised at least $852,000 of crypto assets from approximately 70 investors in the United States and abroad. According to the SEC's complaint, in March and April 2021, Ward live-streamed several Apex investor presentations and then posted the videos on YouTube. The SEC alleges that, in those videos, Ward promoted Apex as a hedge fund, and falsely claimed, among other things, that Apex: (i) was regulated by the SEC; (ii) had $25 million in assets under management; (iii) had successfully conducted a 12-month beta test of its trading strategies; (iv) employed trading strategies that offered investors the opportunity to experience substantial gains without any risk of loss; and (v) had several international offices. The SEC alleges that, in reality, Apex was never an SEC-regulated entity, did not exist prior to February 2021, had no assets under management prior to taking on investor funds, and never had $25 million in assets under management. The complaint also alleges that Apex's claimed "beta test" was based solely upon returns purportedly achieved by one of the third-party funds in which Apex planned to invest, and Apex did not have trading strategies that actually protected investors from losses. The SEC further alleges that Apex never had any offices and operated entirely from Ward's and his partners' home computers. The complaint, filed today in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama in Mobile, charges Ward with violating Sections 17(a)(1) and (3) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The complaint seeks permanent injunctive relief, a bar preventing Ward from serving as an officer or director of a public company, and a civil money penalty. The SEC's investigation was conducted by Douglas M. Dykhuizen of the Atlanta Regional Office and supervised by Thomas B. Bosch. Pat Huddleston will lead the litigation, under the supervision of M. Graham Loomis.