SEC v. Donald Anthony Wright; and Retirement Specialty Group, Inc., No. LR-26100, Middle District of Tennessee (Sept. 10, 2024) — Press Release
raw: Donald Anthony Wright; Retirement Specialty Group, Inc.
Donald Anthony Wright; Retirement Specialty Group, Inc., No. 2:24-cv-00065 (Sept. 10, 2024)
Donald Anthony Wright and his firm, Retirement Specialty Group, Inc., were charged by the SEC for conducting a religious affinity fraud involving $2 million in fraudulent promissory notes.
The SEC charged Donald Anthony Wright and Retirement Specialty Group, Inc. with defrauding Christian investors through a 'faith-based' investment scheme involving over $2 million in fraudulent promissory notes. Wright allegedly misled clients by claiming the notes were real-estate-backed and failed to disclose significant conflicts of interest. The defendants face charges for violating the Securities Act, the Exchange Act, and the Investment Advisers Act.
The SEC charged Tennessee investment adviser Donald Anthony Wright and his firm, Retirement Specialty Group, Inc., with executing a religious affinity fraud targeting Christian clients. Between June 2021 and July 2023, the defendants allegedly sold over $2 million in fraudulent promissory notes, misrepresenting them as safe, real-estate-backed investments. Wright misappropriated much of the proceeds for personal use and used fabricated wire-transfer confirmations to hide defaults. The complaint also highlights that Wright created entirely fake promissory notes to obtain investor funds. Without admitting or denying the allegations, both defendants consented to permanent injunctions against future securities law violations. Wright also accepted a permanent officer-and-director bar, while final disgorgement and civil penalties are still to be determined.
Exhibits & Attached Documents (1)
Extracted insights
- $8.10M $8.1 million $1M–$10M
- $2.00M $2 million $1M–$10M
- person christian clients
- person donald anthony wright
- person investor alert
- agency sec's office of investor education and advocacy
- agency Securities and Exchange Commission
- person shawn murnahan
- company wright and retirement specialty group
- U.S. Securities And Exchange Commission Charged With Donald Anthony Wright and Retirement Specialty Group, Inc. for Religious Affinity Fraud
- Donald Anthony Wright Targeted Christian Clients
- Wright and Retirement Specialty Group Recommended And Sold Over $2 Million In Fraudulent Promissory Notes
- Wright Misappropriated Most Of The Note Proceeds For His Own Personal Benefit
- Wright Fabricated $8.1 Million Wire-Transfer Confirmation
- Wright Failed To Disclose His Business And Financial Ties With The Issuers Of The Notes
- Wright Obtained Investor Funds By Creating And Using Fake Promissory Notes
- Wright and Retirement Specialty Group Consented To Entry Of Permanent Injunction Enjoining Them From Violating Charged Provisions
- Wright Consented To Permanent Officer-And-Director Bar
- SEC's Office Of Investor Education And Advocacy Issued Investor Alert
- Yolanda Ross and Cody Turley Conducted Investigation
- Thomas Bosch and Justin Jeffries Supervised Investigation
- Shawn Murnahan Will Lead Litigation
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Litigation Release No. 26100 / September 10, 2024 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Donald Anthony Wright and Retirement Specialty Group, Inc., No. 2:24-cv-00065 (M.D. Tenn. filed Sept. 9, 2024) SEC Charges Tennessee Investment Adviser and its Owner with Religious Affinity Fraud The Securities and Exchange Commission yesterday charged Cookeville, Tennessee resident Donald Anthony Wright and his company, Retirement Specialty Group, Inc., an SEC-registered investment adviser, with defrauding several investors. According to the SEC’s complaint, Wright primarily targeted Christian clients by promoting his and Retirement Specialty Group’s “faith-based” approach to investing. Between approximately June 2021 and July 2023, Wright and Retirement Specialty Group allegedly recommended and sold over $2 million in fraudulent promissory notes to at least five advisory clients and one other investor. In recommending and selling these notes, some of which promised monthly interest of up to 20%, Wright allegedly misled investors concerning the nature and safety of investing in the notes. For example, Wright allegedly claimed that: the notes were secured by real estate; investments in the notes were safer and more stable than investments in the stock market; and Wright personally had invested substantial funds in the notes. According to the complaint, all of these claims were false. The complaint further alleges that, after selling the notes, Wright misappropriated most of the note proceeds for his own personal benefit and then lied to the investors about the repayment status of the notes. For example, after one of the notes defaulted, Wright allegedly fabricated an $8.1 million wire-transfer confirmation that he gave to a client to falsely assure him that repayment of his note was forthcoming. Wright also allegedly failed to disclose his business and financial ties with the issuers of the notes, which created conflicts of interest. Notably, the complaint claims that, on at least three occasions, Wright obtained investor funds by creating and using fake promissory notes that were not issued by any company. The SEC’s complaint, filed in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, charges Wright and Retirement Specialty Group with violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and Sections 206(1) and 206(2) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. Without admitting or denying the allegations in the SEC’s complaint, Wright and Retirement Specialty Group each consented to the entry of an order permanently enjoining them from violating the charged provisions and authorizing the Court to determine at a later date the amount of disgorgement, prejudgment interest, and civil money penalties that each defendant shall pay. Wright also consented to a permanent officer-and-director bar and to an injunction that permanently bars him from participating in the issuance, purchase, offer, or sale of any security, subject to certain exceptions. Investors should be aware that many fraudsters try to take advantage of the trust that having something in common creates, such as a common religion. The SEC’s Office of Investor Education and Advocacy has issued an Investor Alert with tips on how investors should be wary of making decisions based solely on common ties with someone recommending or selling the investment. The SEC’s investigation, conducted by enforcement staff in the Atlanta Regional Office, was part of the Atlanta Regional Office’s Atlanta Area Affinity Fraud Initiative. Yolanda Ross and Cody Turley conducted the investigation, which was supervised by Thomas Bosch and Justin Jeffries. Shawn Murnahan, supervised by M. Graham Loomis, will lead the litigation.
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Litigation Release No. 26100 / September 10, 2024 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Donald Anthony Wright and Retirement Specialty Group, Inc., No. 2:24-cv-00065 (M.D. Tenn. filed Sept. 9, 2024) SEC Charges Tennessee Investment Adviser and its Owner with Religious Affinity Fraud The Securities and Exchange Commission yesterday charged Cookeville, Tennessee resident Donald Anthony Wright and his company, Retirement Specialty Group, Inc., an SEC-registered investment adviser, with defrauding several investors. According to the SEC’s complaint, Wright primarily targeted Christian clients by promoting his and Retirement Specialty Group’s “faith-based” approach to investing. Between approximately June 2021 and July 2023, Wright and Retirement Specialty Group allegedly recommended and sold over $2 million in fraudulent promissory notes to at least five advisory clients and one other investor. In recommending and selling these notes, some of which promised monthly interest of up to 20%, Wright allegedly misled investors concerning the nature and safety of investing in the notes. For example, Wright allegedly claimed that: the notes were secured by real estate; investments in the notes were safer and more stable than investments in the stock market; and Wright personally had invested substantial funds in the notes. According to the complaint, all of these claims were false. The complaint further alleges that, after selling the notes, Wright misappropriated most of the note proceeds for his own personal benefit and then lied to the investors about the repayment status of the notes. For example, after one of the notes defaulted, Wright allegedly fabricated an $8.1 million wire-transfer confirmation that he gave to a client to falsely assure him that repayment of his note was forthcoming. Wright also allegedly failed to disclose his business and financial ties with the issuers of the notes, which created conflicts of interest. Notably, the complaint claims that, on at least three occasions, Wright obtained investor funds by creating and using fake promissory notes that were not issued by any company. The SEC’s complaint, filed in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, charges Wright and Retirement Specialty Group with violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and Sections 206(1) and 206(2) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. Without admitting or denying the allegations in the SEC’s complaint, Wright and Retirement Specialty Group each consented to the entry of an order permanently enjoining them from violating the charged provisions and authorizing the Court to determine at a later date the amount of disgorgement, prejudgment interest, and civil money penalties that each defendant shall pay. Wright also consented to a permanent officer-and-director bar and to an injunction that permanently bars him from participating in the issuance, purchase, offer, or sale of any security, subject to certain exceptions. Investors should be aware that many fraudsters try to take advantage of the trust that having something in common creates, such as a common religion. The SEC’s Office of Investor Education and Advocacy has issued an Investor Alert with tips on how investors should be wary of making decisions based solely on common ties with someone recommending or selling the investment. The SEC’s investigation, conducted by enforcement staff in the Atlanta Regional Office, was part of the Atlanta Regional Office’s Atlanta Area Affinity Fraud Initiative. Yolanda Ross and Cody Turley conducted the investigation, which was supervised by Thomas Bosch and Justin Jeffries. Shawn Murnahan, supervised by M. Graham Loomis, will lead the litigation.