2010-01-21 sec-litreleases litigation_release 66 KB 3,284 chars

SEC v. Bernard Daniel Braver, No. LR-21386, Southern District of New York (Jan. 21, 2010) — Press Release

raw: Bernard Daniel Braver

Bernard Daniel Braver, No. 1:08-Cr-220 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 21, 2010)

Caption
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Bernard Daniel Braver
summary

Bernard Daniel Braver, an unregistered boiler room salesman, was charged with violating securities laws for his role in a scheme that raised at least $2.77 million from over 160 investors, and agreed to settle the case with a permanent injunction and disgorgement of $49,800 plus interest.

paragraph

Bernard Daniel Braver, an unregistered boiler room salesman, was charged with violating securities antifraud and registration laws for his role in a boiler room scheme from 2006 to 2007. Braver allegedly raised $157,000 of the fraudulently obtained funds, receiving $49,800 in commissions. He agreed to settle the case by consenting to a permanent injunction and disgorgement of $49,800 plus $4,109.83 in prejudgment interest, though payment was waived due to his sworn financial hardship.

narrative

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission charged Bernard Daniel Braver, an unregistered salesman, with violating securities antifraud and registration laws for his role in a boiler room scheme from 2006 to 2007. Braver allegedly raised $157,000 of the fraudulently obtained funds, receiving $49,800 in commissions while misrepresenting the fund’s performance, falsely claiming a Wall Street address, and concealing that principal Alex Rabinovich had been barred by the NASD. The scheme raised at least $2.77 million from over 160 investors, including retirees. Braver agreed to settle the case by consenting to a permanent injunction and disgorgement of $49,800 plus $4,109.83 in prejudgment interest, though payment was waived due to his sworn financial hardship. The case was part of a broader enforcement action against Rabinovich & Associates and its principals, with Rabinovich already pleading guilty to related criminal charges. Braver’s settlement did not require him to admit or deny the allegations. The SEC previously brought an action against Rabinovich & Associates, Alex Rabinovich, and Joseph Lovaglio, and Rabinovich pleaded guilty to criminal charges arising out of the conduct alleged in the Commission’s complaint.

Enriched metadata

Scheme
boiler-room (100%)
Court
Southern District of New York
Case No.
1:08-Cr-220
Outcome
pleaded · 2007-11-27
Disgorgement
$49,800
Victim loss
$49,800
Victims
169
Entity
Bernard Daniel Braver
Classified boiler-room(confidence 100%). EDGAR detection: forms Form D· recall 50% / precision 4%. detection rule →
Parties
Securities and Exchange CommissionBernard Daniel Braver
Keywords
braverrabinovichsecuritiesalex rabinovichbernard danieldaniel braversecurities exchangerabinovich associatesexchangealexbernarddanielcommission'sallegesnovember

Exhibits & Attached Documents (1)

Extracted insights

Dollar amounts 4
  • $2.77M $2,767,811 $1M–$10M
  • $157K $157,000 $100K–$1M
  • $50K $49,800 $10K–$100K
  • $4K $4,109 <$10K
Entities 2
  • agency Securities and Exchange Commission
  • organization Securities and Exchange Commission
Triples 2
  • Securities and Exchange Commission filed a civil injunctive action against Bernard Daniel Braver for violating registration and antifraud provisions of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Exchange Act of 1934
  • Bernard Daniel Braver has agreed to settle the charges brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission
Text layers
Extracted body text (3,284c)
U.S. Securities and Exchange CommissionLitigation Release No. 21386 / January 21, 2010Securities and Exchange Commission v. Bernard Daniel Braver, 10 Civ. 0469 (PAC)(S.D.N.Y.)On January 20, 2010, the Securities and Exchange Commission filed a civil injunctive action in United States District Court for the Southern District of New York charging Bernard Daniel Braver, an unregistered boiler room salesman, with violating the registration and antifraud provisions of the Securities Act of 1933 ("Securities Act") and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act"). Braver has agreed to settle the case, without admitting or denying the Commission's allegations.The Commission's complaint, filed in federal court in Manhattan, alleges that from October 2006 to November 2007, Braver was a salesman at Rabinovich & Associates, LP, an unregistered investment company and broker-dealer (sometimes referred to hereafter as the "Fund" or the "firm") that operated out of a storefront boiler room in Brooklyn, New York. The complaint further alleges that from at least November 2003 through November 2007, the Fund's principals, Alex Rabinovich and Joseph Lovaglio, and Braver and other salesmen, fraudulently raised at least $2,767,811 from at least 169 investors nationwide, including senior citizens and retirees, through the sale of limited partnership interests in the Fund and, in a few instances, other securities. Braver allegedly raised at least $157,000 of that, and received approximately $49,800 in salary and commissions in connection with his fraudulent offer and sale of interests in the Fund. The complaint further alleges that in soliciting investors, Braver misrepresented the Fund's track record and performance, falsely represented to investors and prospective investors that Rabinovich & Associates had a Wall Street address and touted Alex Rabinovich's purported trading acumen while failing to disclose that Rabinovich had been barred by the National Association of Securities Dealers ("NASD") from associating with any NASD-member broker-dealer.As a result of his conduct, the complaint alleges that Braver violated Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act, and Sections 10(b) and 15(a) of the Exchange Act, and Rule 10b-5 thereunder.Without admitting or denying the Commission's allegations, Braver has agreed to settle the charges by consenting to the entry of a final judgment permanently enjoining him from further violations of the foregoing provisions, and ordering him to pay disgorgement of $49,800 plus prejudgment interest thereon of $4,109.83, but waiving payment of those amounts and not imposing a civil penalty based upon Braver's sworn representations of his financial condition.The Commission previously brought an action against, Rabinovich & Associates, Alex Rabinovich and Lovaglio, SEC v. Rabinovich & Associates, LP, Alex Rabinovich and Joseph Lovaglio, 07 Civ. 10547 (GEL) (S.D.N.Y.) [LR-20372 (November 27, 2007)] (the "Rabinovich case"). In addition, Alex Rabinovich pleaded guilty to criminal charges arising out of the conduct alleged in the Commission's complaint in the Rabinovich case. United States v. Alex Rabinovich, Crim. Information No. 1:08-Cr-220 (DC) (S.D.N.Y.). [LR-20637 (July 8, 2008)]. See Also: SEC Complaint
OCR text (3,284c · html-text · 99% conf)
U.S. Securities and Exchange CommissionLitigation Release No. 21386 / January 21, 2010Securities and Exchange Commission v. Bernard Daniel Braver, 10 Civ. 0469 (PAC)(S.D.N.Y.)On January 20, 2010, the Securities and Exchange Commission filed a civil injunctive action in United States District Court for the Southern District of New York charging Bernard Daniel Braver, an unregistered boiler room salesman, with violating the registration and antifraud provisions of the Securities Act of 1933 ("Securities Act") and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act"). Braver has agreed to settle the case, without admitting or denying the Commission's allegations.The Commission's complaint, filed in federal court in Manhattan, alleges that from October 2006 to November 2007, Braver was a salesman at Rabinovich & Associates, LP, an unregistered investment company and broker-dealer (sometimes referred to hereafter as the "Fund" or the "firm") that operated out of a storefront boiler room in Brooklyn, New York. The complaint further alleges that from at least November 2003 through November 2007, the Fund's principals, Alex Rabinovich and Joseph Lovaglio, and Braver and other salesmen, fraudulently raised at least $2,767,811 from at least 169 investors nationwide, including senior citizens and retirees, through the sale of limited partnership interests in the Fund and, in a few instances, other securities. Braver allegedly raised at least $157,000 of that, and received approximately $49,800 in salary and commissions in connection with his fraudulent offer and sale of interests in the Fund. The complaint further alleges that in soliciting investors, Braver misrepresented the Fund's track record and performance, falsely represented to investors and prospective investors that Rabinovich & Associates had a Wall Street address and touted Alex Rabinovich's purported trading acumen while failing to disclose that Rabinovich had been barred by the National Association of Securities Dealers ("NASD") from associating with any NASD-member broker-dealer.As a result of his conduct, the complaint alleges that Braver violated Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act, and Sections 10(b) and 15(a) of the Exchange Act, and Rule 10b-5 thereunder.Without admitting or denying the Commission's allegations, Braver has agreed to settle the charges by consenting to the entry of a final judgment permanently enjoining him from further violations of the foregoing provisions, and ordering him to pay disgorgement of $49,800 plus prejudgment interest thereon of $4,109.83, but waiving payment of those amounts and not imposing a civil penalty based upon Braver's sworn representations of his financial condition.The Commission previously brought an action against, Rabinovich & Associates, Alex Rabinovich and Lovaglio, SEC v. Rabinovich & Associates, LP, Alex Rabinovich and Joseph Lovaglio, 07 Civ. 10547 (GEL) (S.D.N.Y.) [LR-20372 (November 27, 2007)] (the "Rabinovich case"). In addition, Alex Rabinovich pleaded guilty to criminal charges arising out of the conduct alleged in the Commission's complaint in the Rabinovich case. United States v. Alex Rabinovich, Crim. Information No. 1:08-Cr-220 (DC) (S.D.N.Y.). [LR-20637 (July 8, 2008)]. See Also: SEC Complaint