2024-06-26 sec-litreleases judgment 116 KB 10,796 chars

SEC v. Frederick L. Sharp; Zhiying Yvonne Gasarch; Courtney Kelln; Mike K. Veldhuis; Paul Sexton; Jackson T. Friesen, et al., No. 1:21-cv-11276, District of Massachusetts (June 26, 2024) — Judgment

raw: On September 27, 2023, the jury in this matter found

On September 27, 2023, the jury in this matter found, No. 1:21-cv-11276 (June 26, 2024)

Caption
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Sharp
summary

Zhiying Yvonne Gasarch was found liable for securities fraud and aiding and abetting violations, resulting in a judgment for disgorgement and a civil penalty.

paragraph

The court found Gasarch liable for violating the Securities Act of 1933 and the Exchange Act of 1934, including aiding and abetting misconduct. She is jointly and severally liable with co-defendant Frederick L. Sharp for $2,522,367.00 in disgorgement. The judgment also imposes a $269,651.00 civil penalty and a permanent bar from participating in penny stock offerings.

narrative

The Securities and Exchange Commission successfully litigated against Zhiying Yvonne Gasarch for violations of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Exchange Act of 1934. A jury found Gasarch liable for employing fraudulent schemes and aiding and abetting others' violations of securities laws. As part of the judgment, Gasarch is jointly and severally liable with co-defendant Frederick L. Sharp for $2,522,367.00 in disgorgement. Additionally, she must pay a civil penalty of $269,651.00, bringing the total monetary obligation to $2,792,018.00. The court imposed a permanent injunction against future securities fraud and a permanent bar from participating in any penny stock offerings. Furthermore, she is restricted from participating in the issuance, purchase, or sale of any security, except for personal accounts on national exchanges.

Enriched metadata

Scheme
unregistered-securities (70%)
Court
District of Massachusetts
Case No.
1:21-cv-11276
Disgorgement
$2,522,367
Civil penalty
$269,651
Classified unregistered-securities(confidence 70%). EDGAR detection: forms Form D/S-1· recall 41% / precision 30%. detection rule →
Statutes
Parties
Securities and Exchange CommissionFrederick L. SharpMike K. VeldhuisWilliam T. KaitzZhiying Yvonne GasarchCourtney KellnAvtar S. DhillonGraham R. TaylorJackson T. FriesenPaul Sexton
Keywords
civilsecurities exchangeshallsecuritiescivil penaltydocument pageordered adjudgedadjudged decreedexchangeactionfurther orderedcommissionpenaltygasarchordered

Extracted insights

Dollar amounts 3
  • $2.79M $2,792,018 $1M–$10M
  • $2.52M $2,522,367 $1M–$10M
  • $270K $269,651 $100K–$1M
Entities 2
  • person zhiying yvonne gasarch
  • person zhiying yvonne gasarch liable
Triples 7
  • Jury found Zhiying Yvonne Gasarch Liable
  • Zhiying Yvonne Gasarch violated Section 17(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933
  • Zhiying Yvonne Gasarch aided and abetted Violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
  • Court imposed Injunctive Relief and Civil Penalty on Gasarch
  • Court held Issues of Disgorgement and Prejudgment Interest Under Advisement
  • Defendant is restrained from Violating Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act
  • Defendant is restrained from Violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933
Text layers
Extracted body text (10,796c)
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
___________________________________
       )
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE            )
COMMISSION,                         )
       )
               Plaintiff,          )
       )
v.                                   )          CIVIL     ACTION
                                   )          NO.     21-11276-WGY
FREDERICK L. SHARP,                )
ZHIYING YVONNE GASARCH,            )
COURTNEY     KELLN,                    )
MIKE     K.     VELDHUIS,                    )
PAUL     SEXTON,                         )
JACKSON T. FRIESEN,                )
WILLIAM     T.     KAITZ,                    )
AVTAR S. DHILLON, and              )
GRAHAM     R.     TAYLOR,                    )
       )
               Defendants.          )
       )
___________________________________)

YOUNG,     D.J.                                        June     20,     2024

JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT YVONNE GASARCH

On September 27, 2023, the jury in this matter found
Defendant Zhiying Yvonne Gasarch (“Defendant” or “Gasarch”)
liable for violating Section 17(a)(3) of the Securities Act of
1933 and for aiding and abetting others’ violations of  Sections
17(a)(1) and 17(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section
10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rules 10b-5(a)
and (c) thereunder.    On May 8, 2024, the Court, at a hearing,
imposed injunctive relief and a civil penalty on Gasarch that is
incorporated into this judgment.  The Court held the issues of

2

disgorgement and prejudgment interest under advisement.
Accordingly, the Court enters partial Judgment as follows:
I.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is
permanently restrained and enjoined from violating, directly or
indirectly, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the “Exchange Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)] and Rule 10b-5
promulgated thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5], by using any
means or instrumentality of interstate commerce, or of the
mails, or of any facility of any national securities exchange, in
connection with the purchase or sale of any security:
(a) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud;

(b) to make any untrue statement of a material fact or to
omit  to  state  a  material  fact  necessary  in  order  to
make  the  statements  made,  in  the  light  of  the
circumstances  under  which  they  were  made,  not
misleading; or
(c) to  engage  in  any  act,  practice,  or  course  of
business which operates or would operate as a fraud
or deceit upon any person.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as
provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the
foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual
notice of this Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a)

3

Defendant’s officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys;
and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with
Defendant or with anyone described in (a).
II.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant
is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section
17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) [15
U.S.C. § 77q(a)] in the offer or sale of any security by the use
of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in
interstate commerce or by use of the mails, directly or
indirectly:
(a) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud;

(b) to  obtain  money  or  property  by  means  of  any  untrue
statement  of  a  material  fact  or  any  omission  of  a
material   fact   necessary   in   order   to   make   the
statements  made,  in  light  of  the  circumstances  under
which they were made, not misleading; or
(c) to engage in any transaction, practice, or course of
business which operates or would operate as a fraud
or deceit upon the purchaser.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as
provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the
foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual
notice of this Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a)

4

Defendant’s officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys;
and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with
Defendant or with anyone described in (a).

III.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant
is permanently barred from participating in an offering of penny
stock, including engaging in activities with a broker, dealer, or
issuer for purposes of issuing, trading, or inducing or attempting
to induce the purchase or sale of any penny stock.  A penny stock
is any equity security that has a price of less than five dollars,
except as provided in Rule 3a51-1 under the Exchange Act [17
C.F.R. § 240.3a51-1].
IV.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that pursuant
to Section 21(d)(5) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)(5)],
Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from directly
or indirectly, including, but not limited to, through an entity
owned or controlled by her, participating in the issuance,
purchase, offer, or sale of any security; provided, however,
that such injunction shall not prevent Defendant from purchasing
or selling securities listed on a national securities exchange
for her own personal account.
V.

5

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that (i)
Defendant is jointly and severally liable with co-Defendant
Frederick L. Sharp for disgorgement of $2,522,367.00,
representing profits gained as a result of the conduct on which
she was found liable, and (ii) Defendant is liable for a civil
penalty in the amount of $269,651.00
1
 pursuant to Section 21(d)
of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78u].  The Court does not award
prejudgment interest.  Defendant shall satisfy this obligation
by paying $2,792,018.00 to the Securities and Exchange
Commission within 30 days after entry of this Judgment.
Defendant may transmit payment electronically to the
Commission, which will provide detailed ACH transfer/Fedwire
instructions upon request.    Payment may also be made directly
from a bank account via Pay.gov through the SEC website at
http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/ofm.htm.  Defendant may also
pay by certified check, bank cashier’s check, or United States
postal money order payable to the Securities and Exchange
Commission, which shall be delivered or mailed to

1
 In its Memorandum & Order on the Securities and Exchange
Commission’s Motion for Remedies, the Court made an error with
respect to its civil penalty award imposed upon Gasarch.  Mem. &
Order 5, 40, 62, ECF No. 494.  As this judgment confirms, this
Court imposes a civil penalty of $269,651.00 against Gasarch,
which reflects Gasarch’s frozen assets as of December 2022, as
reported by the Securities and Exchange Commission.  Pl.’s Mem.
Supp. Mot. Remedies Against Defs. Veldhuis, Sexton, Friesen,
Kelln, and Gasarch 14, ECF No. 426; Mem. & Order 40, ECF No. 494
(explaining that it calculated Gasarch’s civil penalties by
looking at her frozen assets as of December 2022).

6

Enterprise Services
Center Accounts
Receivable Branch 6500
South MacArthur
Boulevard Oklahoma
City, OK 73169

and shall be accompanied by a letter identifying the case title,
civil action number, and name of this Court; Zhiying Yvonne
Gasarch as a defendant in this action; and specifying that payment
is made pursuant to this Judgment.
Defendant shall simultaneously transmit photocopies of
evidence of payment and case identifying information to the
Commission’s counsel in this action.  By making this payment,
Defendant relinquishes all legal and equitable right, title, and
interest in such funds and no part of the funds shall be
returned to Defendant.
The Commission may enforce the Court’s judgment for
penalties by the use of all collection procedures authorized by
law, including the Federal Debt Collection Procedures Act, 28
U.S.C. § 3001 et seq., and moving for civil contempt for the
violation of any Court orders issued in this action.    Defendant
shall pay post judgment interest on any amounts due after 30
days of the entry of this Judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961.
The Commission shall hold the funds, together with any interest
and income earned thereon (collectively, the “Fund”), pending
further order of the Court.
The Commission may propose a plan to distribute the Fund

7

subject to the Court’s approval.  Such a plan may provide that
the Fund shall be distributed pursuant to the Fair Fund
provisions of Section 308(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
The Court shall retain jurisdiction over the administration of
any distribution of the Fund and the Fund may only be disbursed
pursuant to an Order of the Court.
Regardless of whether any such Fair Fund distribution is
made, amounts ordered to be paid as civil penalties pursuant to
this Judgment shall be treated as penalties paid to the
government for all purposes, including all tax purposes.  To
preserve the deterrent effect of the civil penalty, Defendant
shall not, after offset or reduction of any award of
compensatory damages in any Related Investor Action based on
Defendant’s payment of disgorgement in this action, argue that
she is entitled to, nor shall she further benefit by, offset or
reduction of such compensatory damages award by the amount of
any part of Defendant’s payment of a civil penalty in this
action (“Penalty Offset”).    If the court in any Related
Investor Action grants such a Penalty Offset, Defendant shall,
within 30 days after entry of a final order granting the Penalty
Offset, notify the Commission’s counsel in this action and pay
the amount of the Penalty Offset to the United States Treasury
or to a Fair Fund, as the Commission directs.   Such a payment
shall not be deemed an additional civil penalty and shall not be

8

deemed to change the amount of the civil penalty imposed in this
Judgment.  For purposes of this paragraph, a “Related Investor
Action” means a private damages action brought against Defendant
by or on behalf of one or more investors based on substantially
the same facts as alleged in the Complaint in this action.

VI.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court
shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of
enforcing the terms of this Judgment.  Further, the asset freeze
order imposed by Paragraph I of this Court’s Order dated October
15, 2021, shall continue in full force and effect until the
monetary obligation imposed by this Judgment is paid in full.
VII.

There being no just reason for delay, pursuant to Rule
54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Clerk is
ordered to enter this Judgment forthwith and without further
notice.

SO ORDERED.

                                             _/s/     William     G.     Young
  WILLIAM G. YOUNG
  DISTRICT JUDGE
OCR text (11,297c · tika · 95% conf)
1  

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS 

___________________________________ 
       ) 
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE    ) 
COMMISSION,     ) 
       ) 
   Plaintiff,  ) 
       ) 
v.       )  CIVIL ACTION 
       )  NO. 21-11276-WGY 
FREDERICK L. SHARP,    ) 
ZHIYING YVONNE GASARCH,   ) 
COURTNEY KELLN,    ) 
MIKE K. VELDHUIS,    ) 
PAUL SEXTON,     ) 
JACKSON T. FRIESEN,    ) 
WILLIAM T. KAITZ,    ) 
AVTAR S. DHILLON, and   ) 
GRAHAM R. TAYLOR,    ) 
       ) 
   Defendants.  ) 
       ) 
___________________________________) 
 
YOUNG, D.J.        June 20, 2024 
 

 
JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT YVONNE GASARCH 

 
On September 27, 2023, the jury in this matter found 

Defendant Zhiying Yvonne Gasarch (“Defendant” or “Gasarch”) 

liable for violating Section 17(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 

1933 and for aiding and abetting others’ violations of Sections 

17(a)(1) and 17(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 

10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rules 10b-5(a) 

and (c) thereunder.  On May 8, 2024, the Court, at a hearing, 

imposed injunctive relief and a civil penalty on Gasarch that is 

incorporated into this judgment.  The Court held the issues of 

Case 1:21-cv-11276-WGY   Document 498   Filed 06/20/24   Page 1 of 8



2  

disgorgement and prejudgment interest under advisement. 

Accordingly, the Court enters partial Judgment as follows: 

I. 
 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is 

permanently restrained and enjoined from violating, directly or 

indirectly, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 

(the “Exchange Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)] and Rule 10b-5 

promulgated thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5], by using any 

means or instrumentality of interstate commerce, or of the 

mails, or of any facility of any national securities exchange, in 

connection with the purchase or sale of any security: 

(a) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; 
 

(b) to make any untrue statement of a material fact or to 

omit to state a material fact necessary in order to 

make the statements made, in the light of the 

circumstances under which they were made, not 

misleading; or 

(c) to engage in any act, practice, or course of 

business which operates or would operate as a fraud 

or deceit upon any person. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as 

provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the 

foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual 

notice of this Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) 

Case 1:21-cv-11276-WGY   Document 498   Filed 06/20/24   Page 2 of 8



3  

Defendant’s officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; 

and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with 

Defendant or with anyone described in (a). 

II. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant 

is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 

17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) [15 

U.S.C. § 77q(a)] in the offer or sale of any security by the use 

of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in 

interstate commerce or by use of the mails, directly or 

indirectly: 

(a) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; 
 

(b) to obtain money or property by means of any untrue 

statement of a material fact or any omission of a 

material fact necessary in order to make the 

statements made, in light of the circumstances under 

which they were made, not misleading; or 

(c) to engage in any transaction, practice, or course of 

business which operates or would operate as a fraud 

or deceit upon the purchaser. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as 

provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the 

foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual 

notice of this Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) 

Case 1:21-cv-11276-WGY   Document 498   Filed 06/20/24   Page 3 of 8



4  

Defendant’s officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; 

and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with 

Defendant or with anyone described in (a). 

 
III. 

 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant 

is permanently barred from participating in an offering of penny 

stock, including engaging in activities with a broker, dealer, or 

issuer for purposes of issuing, trading, or inducing or attempting 

to induce the purchase or sale of any penny stock.  A penny stock 

is any equity security that has a price of less than five dollars, 

except as provided in Rule 3a51-1 under the Exchange Act [17 

C.F.R. § 240.3a51-1]. 

IV. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that pursuant 

to Section 21(d)(5) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)(5)], 

Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from directly 

or indirectly, including, but not limited to, through an entity 

owned or controlled by her, participating in the issuance, 

purchase, offer, or sale of any security; provided, however, 

that such injunction shall not prevent Defendant from purchasing 

or selling securities listed on a national securities exchange 

for her own personal account. 

V. 

Case 1:21-cv-11276-WGY   Document 498   Filed 06/20/24   Page 4 of 8



5  

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that (i) 

Defendant is jointly and severally liable with co-Defendant 

Frederick L. Sharp for disgorgement of $2,522,367.00, 

representing profits gained as a result of the conduct on which 

she was found liable, and (ii) Defendant is liable for a civil 

penalty in the amount of $269,651.001 pursuant to Section 21(d) 

of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78u].  The Court does not award 

prejudgment interest.  Defendant shall satisfy this obligation 

by paying $2,792,018.00 to the Securities and Exchange 

Commission within 30 days after entry of this Judgment.   

Defendant may transmit payment electronically to the 

Commission, which will provide detailed ACH transfer/Fedwire 

instructions upon request.  Payment may also be made directly 

from a bank account via Pay.gov through the SEC website at 

http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/ofm.htm.  Defendant may also 

pay by certified check, bank cashier’s check, or United States 

postal money order payable to the Securities and Exchange 

Commission, which shall be delivered or mailed to 

 
1 In its Memorandum & Order on the Securities and Exchange 
Commission’s Motion for Remedies, the Court made an error with 
respect to its civil penalty award imposed upon Gasarch.  Mem. & 
Order 5, 40, 62, ECF No. 494.  As this judgment confirms, this 
Court imposes a civil penalty of $269,651.00 against Gasarch, 
which reflects Gasarch’s frozen assets as of December 2022, as 
reported by the Securities and Exchange Commission.  Pl.’s Mem. 
Supp. Mot. Remedies Against Defs. Veldhuis, Sexton, Friesen, 
Kelln, and Gasarch 14, ECF No. 426; Mem. & Order 40, ECF No. 494 
(explaining that it calculated Gasarch’s civil penalties by 
looking at her frozen assets as of December 2022). 

Case 1:21-cv-11276-WGY   Document 498   Filed 06/20/24   Page 5 of 8



6  

Enterprise Services 
Center Accounts 
Receivable Branch 6500 
South MacArthur 
Boulevard Oklahoma 
City, OK 73169 

 
and shall be accompanied by a letter identifying the case title, 

civil action number, and name of this Court; Zhiying Yvonne 

Gasarch as a defendant in this action; and specifying that payment 

is made pursuant to this Judgment. 

Defendant shall simultaneously transmit photocopies of 

evidence of payment and case identifying information to the 

Commission’s counsel in this action.  By making this payment, 

Defendant relinquishes all legal and equitable right, title, and 

interest in such funds and no part of the funds shall be 

returned to Defendant. 

The Commission may enforce the Court’s judgment for 

penalties by the use of all collection procedures authorized by 

law, including the Federal Debt Collection Procedures Act, 28 

U.S.C. § 3001 et seq., and moving for civil contempt for the 

violation of any Court orders issued in this action.  Defendant 

shall pay post judgment interest on any amounts due after 30 

days of the entry of this Judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961. 

The Commission shall hold the funds, together with any interest 

and income earned thereon (collectively, the “Fund”), pending 

further order of the Court. 

The Commission may propose a plan to distribute the Fund 

Case 1:21-cv-11276-WGY   Document 498   Filed 06/20/24   Page 6 of 8



7  

subject to the Court’s approval.  Such a plan may provide that 

the Fund shall be distributed pursuant to the Fair Fund 

provisions of Section 308(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 

The Court shall retain jurisdiction over the administration of 

any distribution of the Fund and the Fund may only be disbursed 

pursuant to an Order of the Court. 

Regardless of whether any such Fair Fund distribution is 

made, amounts ordered to be paid as civil penalties pursuant to 

this Judgment shall be treated as penalties paid to the 

government for all purposes, including all tax purposes.  To 

preserve the deterrent effect of the civil penalty, Defendant 

shall not, after offset or reduction of any award of 

compensatory damages in any Related Investor Action based on 

Defendant’s payment of disgorgement in this action, argue that 

she is entitled to, nor shall she further benefit by, offset or 

reduction of such compensatory damages award by the amount of 

any part of Defendant’s payment of a civil penalty in this 

action (“Penalty Offset”).  If the court in any Related 

Investor Action grants such a Penalty Offset, Defendant shall, 

within 30 days after entry of a final order granting the Penalty 

Offset, notify the Commission’s counsel in this action and pay 

the amount of the Penalty Offset to the United States Treasury 

or to a Fair Fund, as the Commission directs.  Such a payment 

shall not be deemed an additional civil penalty and shall not be 

Case 1:21-cv-11276-WGY   Document 498   Filed 06/20/24   Page 7 of 8



8  

deemed to change the amount of the civil penalty imposed in this 

Judgment.  For purposes of this paragraph, a “Related Investor 

Action” means a private damages action brought against Defendant 

by or on behalf of one or more investors based on substantially 

the same facts as alleged in the Complaint in this action. 

 
VI. 

 
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court 

shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of 

enforcing the terms of this Judgment.  Further, the asset freeze 

order imposed by Paragraph I of this Court’s Order dated October 

15, 2021, shall continue in full force and effect until the 

monetary obligation imposed by this Judgment is paid in full. 

VII. 
 

There being no just reason for delay, pursuant to Rule 

54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Clerk is 

ordered to enter this Judgment forthwith and without further 

notice. 

 
 
SO ORDERED.  

 

         _/s/ William G. Young  
  WILLIAM G. YOUNG 
  DISTRICT JUDGE 

 

Case 1:21-cv-11276-WGY   Document 498   Filed 06/20/24   Page 8 of 8