2024-04-22 sec-litreleases litigation_release 66 KB 4,008 chars

SEC v. City of Rochester, New York; Rosiland Brooks-Harris; Capital Markets Advisors, LLC; Richard Ganci; and Richard Tortora, No. LR-25981, Western District of New York (Apr. 22, 2024) — Press Release

raw: City of Rochester, New York, Rosiland Brooks-Harris, Capital Markets Advisors, LLC, Richard Ganci, and Richard Tortora

City of Rochester, New York, Rosiland Brooks-Harris, Capital Markets Advisors, LLC, Richard Ganci, and Richard Tortora, No. LR-25981 (Apr. 22, 2024)

Caption
SEC v. City of Rochester, New York, et al.
summary

A federal court granted partial summary judgment against Capital Markets Advisors and its principals for breaching fiduciary duties and violating MSRB rules regarding undisclosed conflicts.

paragraph

The U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York found Capital Markets Advisors, LLC, Richard Tortora, and Richard Ganci liable for breaching fiduciary duties and violating MSRB Rules G-17, G-42, and G-44. The defendants failed to disclose material conflicts of interest related to contingent compensation arrangements and made false written representations to clients. While the order resolves claims against Tortora, litigation continues against CMA, Ganci, the City of Rochester, and Rosiland Brooks-Harris.

narrative

The U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York has granted partial summary judgment in favor of the SEC against municipal advisor Capital Markets Advisors, LLC (CMA) and its principals, Richard Tortora and Richard Ganci. The court found that the defendants breached their fiduciary duties of loyalty and violated MSRB Rules G-17, G-42, and G-44 by failing to disclose material conflicts of interest arising from contingent compensation arrangements. Additionally, the defendants made false written representations to clients claiming no such conflicts existed and failed to implement adequate supervisory procedures. The ruling specifically found violations of Section 15B(c)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This judicial order resolves the SEC's claims against Richard Tortora. However, litigation remains pending against CMA, Richard Ganci, the City of Rochester, New York, and Rosiland Brooks-Harris.

Enriched metadata

Scheme
broker-dealer-fraud (95%)
Court
Western District of New York
Entity
Capital Markets Advisors, LLC
CIK
0001620072
Classified broker-dealer-fraud(confidence 95%). EDGAR detection: forms Form D· recall 29% / precision 9%. detection rule →
Statutes
Section 15B(c)(1) of the Securities Exchange ActSection 15B(c)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act
Parties
Securities and Exchange CommissionCity of Rochester, New YorkRosiland Brooks-HarrisCapital Markets Advisors, LLCRichard GanciRichard Tortora
Keywords
cmagancitortoratortora gancimaterial conflictsconflicts interestmunicipalsecrichardclientsmsrbcity rochesterrosiland brooks-harriscapital marketsmarkets advisors

Extracted insights

Entities 5
  • company capital markets advisors, llc
  • person richard ganci
  • person richard tortora
  • agency Securities and Exchange Commission
  • court u.s. district court for the western district of new york
Triples 12
  • U.S. Securities And Exchange Commission granted summary judgment against Capital Markets Advisors, LLC, Richard Tortora, and Richard Ganci for breaching fiduciary duties and violating MSRB rules
  • Capital Markets Advisors, LLC failed to disclose material conflicts of interest arising from contingent compensation arrangements to its municipal entity clients
  • Richard Tortora failed to disclose material conflicts of interest arising from contingent compensation arrangements to municipal entity clients
  • Richard Ganci failed to disclose material conflicts of interest arising from contingent compensation arrangements to municipal entity clients
  • Capital Markets Advisors, LLC made false representations to clients stating it had no undisclosed material conflicts of interest
  • Richard Tortora failed to implement written supervisory procedures for disclosing material conflicts of interest
  • Richard Ganci failed to implement written supervisory procedures for disclosing material conflicts of interest
  • Capital Markets Advisors, LLC violated MSRB Rule G-42 by failing to provide full and fair written disclosures of material conflicts of interest
  • Capital Markets Advisors, LLC violated MSRB Rule G-17 by failing to deal fairly and engaging in deceptive practices
  • Capital Markets Advisors, LLC violated MSRB Rule G-44 by failing to establish, implement, and maintain supervisory systems for compliance
  • U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York denied summary judgment motion filed by Capital Markets Advisors, LLC, Richard Tortora, and Richard Ganci
  • Securities And Exchange Commission alleged that municipal advisors must disclose material conflicts of interest prior to or upon engaging in municipal advisory activities
View original SEC litigation releasesec.gov
Extracted body text (4,008c)
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Litigation Release No. 25981 / April 22, 2024 Securities and Exchange Commission v. City of Rochester, New York, Rosiland Brooks-Harris, Capital Markets Advisors, LLC, Richard Ganci, and Richard Tortora, No. 22-cv-6273 (W.D.N.Y. filed June 14, 2022) Federal Court Grants SEC Summary Judgment Over Claims That Municipal Advisor Breached Fiduciary Duties Owed to Its Clients and Violated MSRB Rules On April 15, 2024, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York granted the Securities and Exchange Commission partial summary judgment against a New York-based municipal advisor, Capital Markets Advisors, LLC (CMA), and two of its principals, Richard Tortora and Richard Ganci. The Court found that the defendants breached the fiduciary duties owed to their municipal entity clients and violated Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (MSRB) rules. As alleged in the SEC’s complaint, CMA, Tortora, and Ganci failed to disclose to CMA’s clients material conflicts of interest arising from CMA’s contingent compensation arrangements over a period of several years. The SEC alleged that a municipal advisor has a material conflict of interest when its compensation is contingent on the size or closing of a client’s transaction, and a municipal advisor must disclose its material conflicts of interest prior to, or upon engaging, in municipal advisory activities. The SEC further alleged that during this same period, CMA, Ganci, and Tortora made written representations to clients in which they falsely stated that CMA had no undisclosed material conflicts of interest. Additionally, the SEC alleged that CMA failed to establish written supervisory procedures requiring the disclosure of all of CMA’s material conflicts of interest to its clients, including those arising from CMA’s contingent compensation arrangements, and that even after the procedures were established, Ganci and Tortora failed to implement or enforce those procedures. The Court granted summary judgment in favor of the SEC on six claims. Specifically, the Court found that CMA, Tortora, and Ganci breached their fiduciary duty of loyalty to their municipal entity clients, in violation of Section 15B(c)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and MSRB Rule G-42, when they failed to disclose CMA’s material conflicts of interest. The Court also ruled that CMA, Tortora, and Ganci violated MSRB Rule G-42 when they failed to provide their clients full and fair disclosures in writing of CMA’s material conflicts of interest. The Court further held that CMA, Tortora, and Ganci violated MSRB Rule G-17 by failing to deal fairly with their clients and engaging in a deceptive, dishonest, or unfair practice. In addition, the Court ruled that CMA, Tortora, and Ganci violated MSRB Rule G-44 when they failed to establish, implement, and maintain a system to supervise the municipal advisory activities of CMA and its associated persons that was reasonably designed to achieve compliance with applicable securities laws and regulations. Finally, the Court found that the violations of the MSRB rules by CMA, Tortora, and Ganci constituted violations of Section 15B(c)(1) of the Exchange Act’s prohibition against engaging in municipal advisory activity in contravention of any MSRB rule. In the same order, the Court denied the defendants’ motion for summary judgment on the same claims. The Court’s order granting summary judgment resolves the SEC’s claims against Tortora in this matter. Additional claims for which the SEC did not seek summary judgment remain pending against CMA, Ganci, the City of Rochester, New York, and Rosiland Brooks-Harris. The SEC’s litigation is led Eugene Hansen and Daniel Maher under the supervision of James Carlson, and the investigation was conducted by Cori Whitten, Warren Greth, Laura Cunningham, Jonathan Wilcox, and Creighton Papier of the Enforcement Division’s Public Finance Abuse Unit under the supervision of Ivonia Slade and Rebecca Olsen.
OCR text (4,008c · html-text · 99% conf)
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Litigation Release No. 25981 / April 22, 2024 Securities and Exchange Commission v. City of Rochester, New York, Rosiland Brooks-Harris, Capital Markets Advisors, LLC, Richard Ganci, and Richard Tortora, No. 22-cv-6273 (W.D.N.Y. filed June 14, 2022) Federal Court Grants SEC Summary Judgment Over Claims That Municipal Advisor Breached Fiduciary Duties Owed to Its Clients and Violated MSRB Rules On April 15, 2024, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York granted the Securities and Exchange Commission partial summary judgment against a New York-based municipal advisor, Capital Markets Advisors, LLC (CMA), and two of its principals, Richard Tortora and Richard Ganci. The Court found that the defendants breached the fiduciary duties owed to their municipal entity clients and violated Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (MSRB) rules. As alleged in the SEC’s complaint, CMA, Tortora, and Ganci failed to disclose to CMA’s clients material conflicts of interest arising from CMA’s contingent compensation arrangements over a period of several years. The SEC alleged that a municipal advisor has a material conflict of interest when its compensation is contingent on the size or closing of a client’s transaction, and a municipal advisor must disclose its material conflicts of interest prior to, or upon engaging, in municipal advisory activities. The SEC further alleged that during this same period, CMA, Ganci, and Tortora made written representations to clients in which they falsely stated that CMA had no undisclosed material conflicts of interest. Additionally, the SEC alleged that CMA failed to establish written supervisory procedures requiring the disclosure of all of CMA’s material conflicts of interest to its clients, including those arising from CMA’s contingent compensation arrangements, and that even after the procedures were established, Ganci and Tortora failed to implement or enforce those procedures. The Court granted summary judgment in favor of the SEC on six claims. Specifically, the Court found that CMA, Tortora, and Ganci breached their fiduciary duty of loyalty to their municipal entity clients, in violation of Section 15B(c)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and MSRB Rule G-42, when they failed to disclose CMA’s material conflicts of interest. The Court also ruled that CMA, Tortora, and Ganci violated MSRB Rule G-42 when they failed to provide their clients full and fair disclosures in writing of CMA’s material conflicts of interest. The Court further held that CMA, Tortora, and Ganci violated MSRB Rule G-17 by failing to deal fairly with their clients and engaging in a deceptive, dishonest, or unfair practice. In addition, the Court ruled that CMA, Tortora, and Ganci violated MSRB Rule G-44 when they failed to establish, implement, and maintain a system to supervise the municipal advisory activities of CMA and its associated persons that was reasonably designed to achieve compliance with applicable securities laws and regulations. Finally, the Court found that the violations of the MSRB rules by CMA, Tortora, and Ganci constituted violations of Section 15B(c)(1) of the Exchange Act’s prohibition against engaging in municipal advisory activity in contravention of any MSRB rule. In the same order, the Court denied the defendants’ motion for summary judgment on the same claims. The Court’s order granting summary judgment resolves the SEC’s claims against Tortora in this matter. Additional claims for which the SEC did not seek summary judgment remain pending against CMA, Ganci, the City of Rochester, New York, and Rosiland Brooks-Harris. The SEC’s litigation is led Eugene Hansen and Daniel Maher under the supervision of James Carlson, and the investigation was conducted by Cori Whitten, Warren Greth, Laura Cunningham, Jonathan Wilcox, and Creighton Papier of the Enforcement Division’s Public Finance Abuse Unit under the supervision of Ivonia Slade and Rebecca Olsen.