2008-03-24 sec-litreleases litigation_release 214 KB 140 chars

SEC v. RBS

raw: Lr20508 Rbs Pi

Lr20508 Rbs Pi, No. 3:06-CV-06384-MHP (Mar. 24, 2008)

Caption
SEC v. RBS
summary

Robert B. Stanton consented to a permanent injunction without admitting or denying allegations of securities fraud, including falsifying books, circumventing internal controls, and misleading auditors, resulting in a $250,000 penalty ($175,000 disgorgement, $75,000 civil fine) and a five-year bar from serving as an officer or director of any SEC-registered issuer.

paragraph

Robert B. Stanton was permanently enjoined from violating Sections 10(b), 13(b)(5), and related rules of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for engaging in fraud, falsifying financial records, circumventing internal controls, and making materially false statements to auditors. He agreed to disgorge $175,000 in ill-gotten gains and pay a $75,000 civil penalty, totaling $250,000, to be remitted to the U.S. Treasury via certified check within ten business days. Additionally, he was barred for five years from serving as an officer or director of any SEC-registered issuer, waived his right to appeal, and consented to the court’s jurisdiction without admitting or denying the allegations.

narrative

Robert B. Stanton, a former executive, consented to a permanent injunction issued by the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California without admitting or denying the allegations in the SEC’s First Amended Complaint. The SEC alleged that Stanton engaged in a scheme to defraud investors by falsifying books and records, knowingly circumventing internal accounting controls, and making materially false or misleading statements to auditors in violation of Sections 10(b), 13(b)(5), and related rules of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. As part of the settlement, Stanton was ordered to disgorge $175,000 in ill-gotten gains and pay a $75,000 civil penalty, totaling $250,000, to be paid via certified check to the SEC for remittance to the U.S. Treasury within ten business days. He was also prohibited for five years from serving as an officer or director of any SEC-registered issuer. Stanton waived his right to appeal, consented to the court’s jurisdiction over him personally and subject matter, and agreed to be permanently restrained from aiding or abetting future violations of securities laws. The court retained jurisdiction to enforce the injunction, ensuring ongoing compliance with the terms of the order.

Enriched metadata

Scheme
accounting-fraud (100%)
Court
Northern District of California
Case No.
3:06-CV-06384-MHP
Outcome
settled
Disgorgement
$175,000
Civil penalty
$75,000
Entity
RBS
Ticker
RBS
Classified accounting-fraud(confidence 100%). EDGAR detection: forms 10-K/10-Q/8-K/NT 10-K· recall 80% / precision 48%. detection rule →
Statutes
15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)15 U.S.C. § 78m(b)15 U.S.C. §78u(d)28 U.S.C. § 196115 U.S.C. § 78l15 U.S.C. § 78o(d)17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5Rule 10b-5
Parties
Securities and Exchange CommissionRBS
Keywords
rbs

Extracted insights

Entities 2
  • agency Securities and Exchange Commission
  • organization Securities and Exchange Commission
Triples 5
  • Securities and Exchange Commission filed a First Amended Complaint against Robert B. Stanton and other defendants
  • Robert B. Stanton consented to the Court's jurisdiction over him personally and over the subject matter of this action
  • Robert B. Stanton waived findings of fact and conclusions of law and waived any right to appeal from this Order of Permanent Injunction
  • Robert B. Stanton is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5
  • Robert B. Stanton is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 13(b)(5) of the Exchange Act and Rules 13b2-1 and 13b2-2
Text layers
Extracted body text (140c)
[OCR_UNRECOVERABLE method=prefilter reason=body_binary ts=2026-05-14T21:49:26.068Z]                                                         
OCR text (11,151c · tika · 95% conf)
1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

10 

11

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

__________________________________________ 

__________________________________________ 

Case 3:06-cv-06384-CRB Document 92-2 Filed 03/24/2008 Page 1 of 6 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 


NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE    Case No. C 06-6384 CRB 
COMMISSION, 

    Plaintiff,  

v. 

ROMULUS S. PEREIRA, 
ROBERT B. STANTON, 
L. JOHN KERN, 

ANDREW D. FELDMAN, 

WILLIAM F. McFARLAND, 

LORI H. CORNMESSER,  


Defendants. 

ORDER OF PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND OTHER RELIEF AGAINST ROBERT B. STANTON 

The Court finds that Plaintiff, Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”), has 

filed a First Amended Complaint; and Defendant Robert B. Stanton has entered a general 

appearance, consented to the Court’s jurisdiction over him personally and over the subject matter 

of this action, consented to the entry of this Order of Permanent Injunction and Other Relief 

against Robert B. Stanton (referred to as “Order of Permanent Injunction”) without admitting or 

denying the allegations of the First Amended Complaint (except as to jurisdiction), waived 

findings of fact and conclusions of law, and waived any right to appeal from this Order of 

Permanent Injunction. 

I. 

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, that Robert B. Stanton and his agents, 

servants, employees, attorneys, and all persons in active concert or participation with them who 

receive actual notice of this Order of Permanent Injunction by personal service or otherwise are 

permanently restrained and enjoined from violating, directly or indirectly, Section 10(b) of the 

Stanton Permanent Injunction Case No. C 06-6384 



          

 1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

10 

11

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Case 3:06-cv-06384-CRB Document 92-2 Filed 03/24/2008 Page 2 of 6 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)] and Rule 10b-5 

promulgated thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5], by using any means or instrumentality of 

interstate commerce, or of the mails, or of any facility of any national securities exchange, in 

connection with the purchase or sale of any security: 

(a) 	 to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; 

(b) 	 to make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact 

necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances  

under which they were made, not misleading; or 

(c)	 to engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would 

operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person. 

II. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Robert B. Stanton and 

his agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all persons in active concert or participation with 

them who receive actual notice of this Order of Permanent Injunction by personal service or 

otherwise are permanently restrained and enjoined from violating, directly or indirectly, Section 

13(b)(5) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78m(b)(5)] and Rules 13b2-1 and 13b2-2 

promulgated thereunder [17 C.F.R. §§ 240.13b2-1 and 240.13b2-2] by: 

(a)	 knowingly circumventing or knowingly failing to implement a system of internal 

accounting controls, or knowingly falsifying any book, record or account 

described in Section 13(b)(2) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78m(b)(2)]; or 

(b)	 directly or indirectly falsifying or causing to be falsified any book, record or 

account subject to Section 13(b)(2)(A) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 

78m(b)(2)(A)]; or 

(c)	 directly or indirectly making or causing to be made a materially false or 

misleading statement, or omitting to state or causing another person to omit to 

state any material fact, to an accountant in connection with any audit, review or 

examination of the financial statements of an issuer or company, or the 

2

Stanton Permanent Injunction 	 Case No. C 06-6384 



          

 1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

10 

11

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Case 3:06-cv-06384-CRB Document 92-2 Filed 03/24/2008 Page 3 of 6 

preparation or filing of any document or report required to be filed with the 

Commission; or 

(d)	 directly or indirectly taking any action to coerce, manipulate, mislead, or 

fraudulently influence any independent public or certified public accountant 

engaged in the performance of an audit or review of financial statements of an 

issuer that are required to be filed with the Commission where that person knew 

or should have known that such action, if successful, could result in rendering the 

issuer’s financial statements materially misleading. 

III. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Robert B. Stanton and 

his agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all persons in active concert or participation with 

them who receive actual notice of this Order of Permanent Injunction by personal service or 

otherwise are permanently restrained and enjoined from aiding and abetting any violation of 

Sections 13(a), 13(b)(2)(A) and 13(b)(2)(B)(ii) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. §§ 78m(a), 

78m(b)(2)(A), and 78m(b)(2)(B)(ii)] and Rules 12b-20, 13a-1, and 13a-13 thereunder [17 C.F.R. 

§§ 240.12b-20, 240.13a-1, and 240.13a-13], by knowingly providing substantial assistance to an 

issuer that: 

(a)	 fails to file with the Commission such information, documents, or annual, 

quarterly or periodic reports that the Commission may require or prescribe 

pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act or any of the rules, regulations or 

forms promulgated thereunder; or 

(b)	 files with the Commission any information, document, or report, that contains any 

untrue statement of a material fact, omits any material information, or otherwise 

fails to comply with the provisions of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act or any of 

the rules, regulations or forms thereunder; or 

(c)	 fails to add or include, in addition to the information expressly required to be 

included in a statement or report, such further material information as may be 

3

Stanton Permanent Injunction 	 Case No. C 06-6384 



          

 1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

10 

11

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Case 3:06-cv-06384-CRB Document 92-2 Filed 03/24/2008 Page 4 of 6 

necessary to make the required statements, in the light of the circumstances under 

which they were made, not misleading; or 

(d)	 fails to make and keep books, records, and accounts, which, in reasonable detail, 

accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the 

issuer; or 

(e)	 fails to devise and maintain a system of internal accounting controls sufficient to 

provide reasonable assurances that transactions are recorded as necessary to 

permit preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted 

accounting principles or any other criteria applicable to such statements and to 

maintain accountability of assets. 

IV. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Robert B. Stanton is 

liable for disgorgement of $175,000 (one hundred and seventy-five thousand dollars), 

representing profits gained as a result of the conduct alleged in the Complaint, and a civil penalty 

in the amount of $75,000 (seventy-five thousand dollars) pursuant to Section 21(d)(3) of the 

Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. §78u(d)(3)].  Robert B. Stanton shall satisfy this obligation by paying a 

total of $250,000 (two hundred and fifty thousand dollars) within ten (10) business days after the 

date of entry of this Order of Permanent Injunction by certified check, bank cashier’s check, 

United States postal money order or check drawn upon the trust account of Keker & Van Nest 

LLP payable to the Securities and Exchange Commission.  The payment shall be delivered or 

mailed to the Office of Financial Management, Securities and Exchange Commission, 

Operations Center, 6432 General Green Way, Mail Stop 0-3, Alexandria, Virginia 22312, 

together with a cover letter identifying Robert B. Stanton as a defendant in this action, setting 

forth the title and civil action number of this action and the name of this Court, and specifying 

that payment is made pursuant to this Order of Permanent Injunction.  Robert B. Stanton shall 

simultaneously transmit photocopies of such payment and the transmittal letter to the Securities 

and Exchange Commission’s attorney in this action.  The Securities and Exchange Commission 

shall remit the funds paid pursuant to this paragraph to the United States Treasury. 

4

Stanton Permanent Injunction 	 Case No. C 06-6384 



          

 1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

10 

11

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Case 3:06-cv-06384-CRB Document 92-2 Filed 03/24/2008 Page 5 of 6 

V. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Robert B. Stanton 

shall pay post-judgment interest on any delinquent amounts pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961. 

VI. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, pursuant to Section 

21(d)(2) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)(2)], Robert B. Stanton is prohibited for five 

years following the date of entry of this Final Judgment from acting as an officer or director of 

any issuer that has a class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act [15 

U.S.C. § 78l] or that is required to file reports pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act [15 

U.S.C. § 78o(d)]. 

VII. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Consent of Robert 

B. Stanton is incorporated herein with the same force and effect as if fully set forth herein, and 

that Robert B. Stanton shall comply with all of the undertakings and agreements set forth therein. 

VIII. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court shall retain 

jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Order for Permanent 

Injunction and Other Relief. 

// 

// 

// 

// 

// 

// 

// 

// 

// 

5

Stanton Permanent Injunction Case No. C 06-6384 



March 24

          

 1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

10 

11

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

____________________________________ 

Case 3:06-cv-06384-CRB Document 92-2 Filed 03/24/2008 Page 6 of 6 

U
N

IT
ED

ST
ATES DISTRICT COU

R
T

N
O

R
T

H

ERN DISTRICT OF CA
LI

FO
R

N
IA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

IX. 

There being no just reason for delay, pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure, the Clerk is ordered to enter a final judgment forth with and without further notice. 

Dated: ____________________, 2008 

Charles R. Breyer 
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

6

Stanton Permanent Injunction Case No. C 06-6384