2024-02-07 sec-litreleases litigation_release 66 KB 2,993 chars

SEC v. Arline E. Woodbury; and Joyce L. Holverson, No. LR-25939, Northern District of Illinois (Feb. 7, 2024) — Press Release

raw: Arline E. Woodbury and Joyce L. Holverson

Arline E. Woodbury and Joyce L. Holverson, No. 1:23-cv-14255 (Feb. 7, 2024)

Caption
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Woodbury
summary

The SEC obtained final judgments against CoinDeal promoters Arline Woodbury and Joyce Holverson for raising over $3 million through false blockchain technology claims.

paragraph

Arline Woodbury and Joyce Holverson were found liable for promoting the CoinDeal scheme, which raised over $3 million through misleading statements about imminent blockchain technology sales. The defendants misappropriated hundreds of thousands of dollars for personal use, as no actual sale ever occurred. Woodbury was ordered to pay approximately $477,614 in total penalties, while Holverson's total obligations amounted to approximately $365,086.

narrative

The SEC secured final judgments against Arline Woodbury and Joyce Holverson for their roles as downstream promoters in the multi-million dollar CoinDeal scheme. The scheme raised more than $3 million from hundreds of investors by promising astronomical returns from an imminent blockchain technology sale that never materialized. Both promoters misappropriated hundreds of thousands of dollars of investor funds for personal use. Woodbury received a default judgment and was ordered to pay $199,151 in disgorgement, $47,991 in interest, and a $230,464 civil penalty. Holverson consented to a judgment requiring her to pay $164,308 in disgorgement, $25,778 in interest, and a $175,000 civil penalty. Both women were also hit with permanent injunctions and officer-and-director bars.

Enriched metadata

Scheme
crypto-securities (97%)
Court
Northern District of Illinois
Case No.
1:23-cv-14255
Outcome
settled
Disgorgement
$230,464
Victim loss
$3,000,000
Entity
Arline E. Woodbury and Joyce L. Holverson
Classified crypto-securities(confidence 97%). EDGAR detection: forms 1-A/S-1/8-K· recall 43% / precision 2%. detection rule →
Statutes
Sections 5 and 17(a) of the Securities ActSections 5 and 17(a) of the Securities ActSection 10(b) of the Securities Exchange ActRule 10b-5
Parties
Securities and Exchange CommissionArline E. WoodburyJoyce L. Holverson
Keywords
woodburyholversonarline woodburyjoyce holversonsecurities exchangesecwoodbury joycewoodbury holversonexchange thereunderarlinejoycesecuritiesexchangefinalcoindeal

Exhibits & Attached Documents (2)

Extracted insights

Dollar amounts 7
  • $3.00M $3 million $1M–$10M
  • $230K $230,464 $100K–$1M
  • $199K $199,151 $100K–$1M
  • $175K $175,000 $100K–$1M
  • $164K $164,308 $100K–$1M
  • $48K $47,991 $10K–$100K
  • $26K $25,778 $10K–$100K
Entities 4
  • agency Securities and Exchange Commission
  • agency the sec’s complaint
  • agency the sec’s litigation
  • court united states district court for the northern district of illinois
Triples 17
  • Securities And Exchange Commission Obtains Final Judgments Against Promoters of Multi-Million Dollar CoinDeal Scheme
  • United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Entered Final Judgments On All Claims Against Two CoinDeal Promoters, Arline Woodbury Of Ridgewood, New Jersey And Joyce Holverson Of River Forest, Illinois
  • Woodbury And Holverson Acted As Downstream Promoters For The CoinDeal Scheme
  • Woodbury And Holverson Formed Their Own Investor Groups To Take Advantage Of Bonuses And Payouts Offered Through CoinDeal
  • Woodbury And Holverson Raised More Than $3 Million From Hundreds Of Investors Based On Dissemination Of Materially False And Misleading Statements About The Deal
  • Woodbury And Holverson Misappropriated Hundreds Of Thousands Of Dollars Of Investor Funds For Personal Use Collectively
  • No Sale Of CoinDeal Ever Occurred And Investors Received No Distributions
  • Woodbury Did Not Answer Or Otherwise Respond To The Sec’s Complaint
  • The Court Found That Woodbury Violated The Registration And Antifraud Provisions Of Sections 5 And 17(a) Of The Securities Act Of 1933 And Section 10(b) Of The Securities Exchange Act Of 1934 And Rule 10b-5 Thereunder
  • Woodbury Aided And Abetted Violations Of Section 10(b) Of The Exchange Act And Rule 10b-5 Thereunder By The Alleged Orchestrator Of The Scheme, Neil Chandran
  • The Court Permanently Enjoined Woodbury From Future Violations
  • The Court Entered An Officer-And-Director Bar Against Woodbury
  • The Court Ordered Woodbury To Pay Disgorgement Of $199,151 Plus Prejudgment Interest Of $47,991 And a $230,464 Civil Penalty
  • Holverson Consented To The Entry Of a Final Judgment Permanently Enjoining Her From Violating The Registration And Antifraud Provisions Of Sections 5 And 17(a) Of The Securities Act And Section 10(b) Of The Exchange Act Rule 10b-5 Thereunder
  • Holverson Consented To The Entry Of An Officer-And-Director Bar And To Pay Disgorgement Of $164,308 Plus Prejudgment Interest Of $25,778 And a $175,000 Civil Penalty
  • The Sec’s Litigation Was Handled By Michael D. Foster, Dante a. Roldan, And Caryn Trombino, With Assistance From Steven Tremaglio And Lynette Nichols-Newman, All Of The Chicago Regional Office
  • The Sec Filed a Related Action In Federal Court On January 4, 2023 Against Eight Additional Defendants, Including Chandran
Text layers
Extracted body text (2,993c)
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Litigation Release No. 25939 / February 7, 2024 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Arline E. Woodbury and Joyce L. Holverson, No. 1:23-cv-14255 (N.D. Ill. filed Sept. 28, 2023) SEC Obtains Final Judgments Against Promoters of Multi-Million Dollar CoinDeal Scheme On February 7, 2024, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois entered final judgments on all claims against two CoinDeal promoters, Arline Woodbury of Ridgewood, New Jersey and Joyce Holverson of River Forest, Illinois. The SEC’s complaint alleged that Woodbury and Holverson acted as downstream promoters for the CoinDeal scheme, through which investors would supposedly generate astronomical returns from the imminent sale of an anonymous blockchain technology. According to the complaint, Woodbury and Holverson formed their own investor groups to take advantage of bonuses and payouts offered through CoinDeal. The complaint alleged that Woodbury and Holverson raised more than $3 million from hundreds of investors based on dissemination of materially false and misleading statements about the deal and collectively misappropriated hundreds of thousands of dollars of investor funds for personal use. According to the complaint, no sale of CoinDeal ever occurred and investors received no distributions. Woodbury did not answer or otherwise respond to the SEC’s complaint. In an order entering default judgment, the Court found that Woodbury violated the registration and antifraud provisions of Sections 5 and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder and aided and abetted violations of Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder by the alleged orchestrator of the scheme, Neil Chandran. In addition, the Court: (i) permanently enjoined Woodbury from future violations; (ii) entered an officer-and-director bar against Woodbury; and (iii) ordered Woodbury to pay disgorgement of $199,151 plus prejudgment interest of $47,991 and a $230,464 civil penalty. Without admitting or denying the SEC’s allegations, Holverson consented to the entry of a final judgment permanently enjoining her from violating the registration and antifraud provisions of Sections 5 and 17(a) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act Rule 10b-5 thereunder. Holverson also consented to the entry of an officer-and-director bar and to pay disgorgement of $164,308 plus prejudgment interest of $25,778 and a $175,000 civil penalty. The SEC’s litigation was handled by Michael D. Foster, Dante A. Roldan, and Caryn Trombino, with assistance from Steven Tremaglio and Lynette Nichols-Newman, all of the Chicago Regional Office. The SEC filed a related action in federal court on January 4, 2023 against eight additional defendants, including Chandran. The SEC’s litigation in that case continues. Final Judgment - Arline E. Woodbury Final Judgment - Joyce L. Holverson
OCR text (2,993c · html-text · 99% conf)
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Litigation Release No. 25939 / February 7, 2024 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Arline E. Woodbury and Joyce L. Holverson, No. 1:23-cv-14255 (N.D. Ill. filed Sept. 28, 2023) SEC Obtains Final Judgments Against Promoters of Multi-Million Dollar CoinDeal Scheme On February 7, 2024, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois entered final judgments on all claims against two CoinDeal promoters, Arline Woodbury of Ridgewood, New Jersey and Joyce Holverson of River Forest, Illinois. The SEC’s complaint alleged that Woodbury and Holverson acted as downstream promoters for the CoinDeal scheme, through which investors would supposedly generate astronomical returns from the imminent sale of an anonymous blockchain technology. According to the complaint, Woodbury and Holverson formed their own investor groups to take advantage of bonuses and payouts offered through CoinDeal. The complaint alleged that Woodbury and Holverson raised more than $3 million from hundreds of investors based on dissemination of materially false and misleading statements about the deal and collectively misappropriated hundreds of thousands of dollars of investor funds for personal use. According to the complaint, no sale of CoinDeal ever occurred and investors received no distributions. Woodbury did not answer or otherwise respond to the SEC’s complaint. In an order entering default judgment, the Court found that Woodbury violated the registration and antifraud provisions of Sections 5 and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder and aided and abetted violations of Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder by the alleged orchestrator of the scheme, Neil Chandran. In addition, the Court: (i) permanently enjoined Woodbury from future violations; (ii) entered an officer-and-director bar against Woodbury; and (iii) ordered Woodbury to pay disgorgement of $199,151 plus prejudgment interest of $47,991 and a $230,464 civil penalty. Without admitting or denying the SEC’s allegations, Holverson consented to the entry of a final judgment permanently enjoining her from violating the registration and antifraud provisions of Sections 5 and 17(a) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act Rule 10b-5 thereunder. Holverson also consented to the entry of an officer-and-director bar and to pay disgorgement of $164,308 plus prejudgment interest of $25,778 and a $175,000 civil penalty. The SEC’s litigation was handled by Michael D. Foster, Dante A. Roldan, and Caryn Trombino, with assistance from Steven Tremaglio and Lynette Nichols-Newman, all of the Chicago Regional Office. The SEC filed a related action in federal court on January 4, 2023 against eight additional defendants, including Chandran. The SEC’s litigation in that case continues. Final Judgment - Arline E. Woodbury Final Judgment - Joyce L. Holverson