2023-11-21 sec-litreleases litigation_release 65 KB 2,707 chars

SEC v. Brite Advisors USA, Inc., No. LR-25900, Southern District of New York (Nov. 21, 2023) — Press Release

raw: Brite Advisors USA, Inc.

Brite Advisors USA, Inc., No. LR-25900 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 21, 2023)

Caption
SEC v. Brite Advisors USA, Inc
summary

The SEC charged Brite Advisors USA, Inc. with custody rule violations and disclosure failures involving $400 million in client assets, seeking injunctive relief and penalties.

paragraph

The SEC filed charges against Brite Advisors USA, Inc. for failing to comply with the custody rule and breaching fiduciary duties regarding nearly $400 million in client assets. The complaint alleges the firm failed to disclose that its Australian affiliate used client assets as collateral to borrow millions for operational funding. Brite USA faces charges for violating Sections 206(2) and 206(4) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.

narrative

The SEC has filed charges against New York-based Brite Advisors USA, Inc. for violating the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. The agency alleges the firm failed to comply with the 'custody rule' regarding the safekeeping of nearly $400 million in client assets held by its related Australian entity, Brite Australia. Furthermore, Brite USA allegedly breached its fiduciary duties by failing to disclose material risks and conflicts of interest. Specifically, the complaint asserts that Brite Australia used client assets as collateral to borrow millions of dollars to provide operational funding for Brite USA and other related companies. The SEC is seeking permanent injunctive relief and civil monetary penalties for these violations. The investigation involved cooperation from regulatory bodies in Australia, the United Kingdom, and Gibraltar.

Enriched metadata

Scheme
investment-adviser-fraud (97%)
Court
Southern District of New York
Entity
Brite Advisors USA, Inc.
Classified investment-adviser-fraud(confidence 97%). EDGAR detection: forms ADV/ADV-E/ADV-W/Form D· recall 33% / precision 13%. detection rule →
Parties
Securities and Exchange CommissionBrite Advisors USA, Inc.
Keywords
briteusasecbrite advisorscommissioninvestment adviserclient assetsbrite australiasecuritiesinvestmentclientassetssecurities exchangeexchange commissionadvisors

Exhibits & Attached Documents (1)

Extracted insights

Dollar amounts 1
  • $400.00M $400 million $100M–$1B
Entities 4
  • company brite advisors usa, inc.
  • person brite australia
  • agency sec’s custody rule for safeguarding client funds and securities
  • agency Securities and Exchange Commission
Triples 7
  • Securities And Exchange Commission filed charges against Brite Advisors USA, Inc. (f/k/a deVere USA, Inc.)
  • Brite Advisors USA, Inc. failed to comply with SEC’s custody rule for safeguarding client funds and securities
  • Brite Advisors USA, Inc. failed to disclose material risks and conflicts of interest related to using Brite Australia as a custodian
  • Brite Australia borrowed millions of dollars using client assets as collateral to fund Brite USA and related companies
  • Securities And Exchange Commission charges Brite Advisors USA, Inc. with violating Sections 206(2) and 206(4) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and Rule 206(4)-2
  • Securities And Exchange Commission seeks permanent injunctive relief and civil monetary penalties against Brite Advisors USA, Inc.
  • Securities And Exchange Commission received assistance from Australian Securities and Investments Commission, United Kingdom Financial Conduct Authority, and Gibraltar Financial Services Commission
PDF (from attached: complaint)
Text layers
Extracted body text (2,707c)
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Litigation Release No. 25900 / November 21, 2023 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Brite Advisors USA, Inc., No. 23-cv-10212 (S.D.N.Y. filed Nov. 21, 2023) SEC Charges Investment Adviser for Custody Rule Violations and Disclosure Failures The Securities and Exchange Commission today filed charges against Brite Advisors USA, Inc. (f/k/a deVere USA, Inc.) (“Brite USA”), a NY-based SEC-registered investment adviser, for failing to comply with Commission requirements for the safekeeping of client assets and for failing to disclose material risks and conflicts of interest associated with Brite USA’s recommendations to clients to use a related firm in Australia as a custodian. Brite USA has been registered with the Commission as an investment adviser since 2013. The SEC’s complaint, filed in United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, alleges that Brite USA advises nearly $400 million of client assets maintained by Brite Advisors Pty Ltd. (“Brite Australia”), an Australian financial services company under common control with Brite USA. Registered investment advisers that have custody of client assets are subject to the “custody rule,” which requires that if a related person maintains client funds or securities, the investment adviser must obtain an internal control report as to the safeguarding of client funds and securities. The SEC alleges that since 2019, when Brite USA began having a related firm, Brite Australia, maintain its clients’ assets, it failed to comply with the SEC’s custody rule. In addition, the SEC’s complaint alleges that Brite USA breached its fiduciary duties to its clients by failing to fully and fairly disclose the material risks and conflicts of interest resulting from Brite Australia’s use of clients’ assets. According to the SEC’s complaint, Brite Australia borrowed millions of dollars using client assets as collateral to provide operational funding to Brite USA and other related companies. For these alleged violations, the SEC’s complaint charges Brite USA with violating Sections 206(2) and 206(4) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and Rule 206(4)-2 thereunder and seeks permanent injunctive relief and civil monetary penalties. The SEC’s investigation was conducted by Jonathan Grant, Daphne Downes, and Wendy Tepperman, and was supervised by Sheldon L. Pollock of the New York Regional Office. The SEC’s litigation will be led by Travis Hill of the New York Regional Office. The SEC appreciates the assistance of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission, the United Kingdom Financial Conduct Authority and the Gibraltar Financial Services Commission. SEC Complaint
OCR text (2,707c · html-text · 99% conf)
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Litigation Release No. 25900 / November 21, 2023 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Brite Advisors USA, Inc., No. 23-cv-10212 (S.D.N.Y. filed Nov. 21, 2023) SEC Charges Investment Adviser for Custody Rule Violations and Disclosure Failures The Securities and Exchange Commission today filed charges against Brite Advisors USA, Inc. (f/k/a deVere USA, Inc.) (“Brite USA”), a NY-based SEC-registered investment adviser, for failing to comply with Commission requirements for the safekeeping of client assets and for failing to disclose material risks and conflicts of interest associated with Brite USA’s recommendations to clients to use a related firm in Australia as a custodian. Brite USA has been registered with the Commission as an investment adviser since 2013. The SEC’s complaint, filed in United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, alleges that Brite USA advises nearly $400 million of client assets maintained by Brite Advisors Pty Ltd. (“Brite Australia”), an Australian financial services company under common control with Brite USA. Registered investment advisers that have custody of client assets are subject to the “custody rule,” which requires that if a related person maintains client funds or securities, the investment adviser must obtain an internal control report as to the safeguarding of client funds and securities. The SEC alleges that since 2019, when Brite USA began having a related firm, Brite Australia, maintain its clients’ assets, it failed to comply with the SEC’s custody rule. In addition, the SEC’s complaint alleges that Brite USA breached its fiduciary duties to its clients by failing to fully and fairly disclose the material risks and conflicts of interest resulting from Brite Australia’s use of clients’ assets. According to the SEC’s complaint, Brite Australia borrowed millions of dollars using client assets as collateral to provide operational funding to Brite USA and other related companies. For these alleged violations, the SEC’s complaint charges Brite USA with violating Sections 206(2) and 206(4) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and Rule 206(4)-2 thereunder and seeks permanent injunctive relief and civil monetary penalties. The SEC’s investigation was conducted by Jonathan Grant, Daphne Downes, and Wendy Tepperman, and was supervised by Sheldon L. Pollock of the New York Regional Office. The SEC’s litigation will be led by Travis Hill of the New York Regional Office. The SEC appreciates the assistance of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission, the United Kingdom Financial Conduct Authority and the Gibraltar Financial Services Commission. SEC Complaint