SEC v. Matthew J. Werthe dba HSR Wealth Management, No. LR-26497, Southern District of California (Mar. 6, 2026) — Press Release
raw: Matthew J. Werthe, dba HSR Wealth Management
Matthew J. Werthe, dba HSR Wealth Management, No. 3:23-cv-815 (Mar. 6, 2026)
Matthew J. Werthe, dba HSR Wealth Management, was ordered to pay over $1.1 million in penalties and disgorgement for a cherry-picking scheme that favored his personal account over clients.
Matthew J. Werthe, a former investment adviser, was found liable for a cherry-picking scheme that misallocated profitable trades to his personal account and unprofitable trades to clients. The court ordered him to pay $507,996.42 in disgorgement, $112,340.03 in prejudgment interest, and a $507,996.42 civil penalty. His charges included violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Securities Act of 1933, and the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.
From May 2021 to March 2022, Matthew J. Werthe, dba HSR Wealth Management, operated a cherry-picking scheme by using a block trading account to disproportionately allocate profitable trades to himself and unprofitable trades to his clients. The SEC charged Werthe with violating fiduciary duties and multiple federal securities laws, including the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. Following a summary judgment in March 2025, the Court entered a final judgment in February 2026. Werthe was ordered to pay $507,996.42 in disgorgement, $112,340.03 in prejudgment interest, and a $507,996.42 civil penalty. Additionally, the Court permanently enjoined him from future violations of federal securities laws. The case was investigated and litigated by the SEC’s Los Angeles Regional Office.
Exhibits & Attached Documents (1)
Extracted insights
- $508K $507,996 $100K–$1M
- $112K $112,340 $100K–$1M
- person daniel s. lim
- organization HSR Wealth Management
- person Kelly Bowers
- person matthew j. werthe
- person robert conrrad
- agency Securities and Exchange Commission
- person stephen kam
- organization United States Securities And Exchange Commission
- Securities And Exchange Commission charged Matthew J. Werthe dba HSR Wealth Management with engaging in a cherry-picking scheme, making misrepresentations to his clients, and violating his fiduciary duties
- Matthew J. Werthe dba HSR Wealth Management used his firm’s block trading account to disproportionately allocate profitable trades to his personal account and unprofitable trades to his clients’ accounts
- Court found Matthew J. Werthe violated Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, and Sections 206(1) and 206(2) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940
- Court ordered Matthew J. Werthe to pay disgorgement in the amount of $507,996.42, prejudgment interest in the amount of $112,340.03, and a civil penalty in the amount of $507,996.42
- Court permanently enjoined Matthew J. Werthe from violating the charged provisions of the federal securities laws
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONLitigation Release No. 26497 / March 6, 2026Securities and Exchange Commission v. Matthew J. Werthe dba HSR Wealth Management, No. 3:23-cv-815-L-DDL (S.D. Cal. filed May 4, 2023)SEC Obtains Final Judgment as to Investment Adviser in Cherry-Picking Scheme On February 2, 2026, the United States District Court for the Southern District of California entered a final judgment as to Defendant Matthew J. Werthe, dba HSR Wealth Management, a formerly state-registered investment adviser, whom the SEC previously charged with engaging in a cherry-picking scheme, making misrepresentations to his clients, and violating his fiduciary duties.The SEC’s complaint, filed on May 4, 2023 alleged that, from May 2021 to March 2022, Werthe used his firm’s block trading account, which allowed him to place a single stock trade and later allocate portions of that stock trade among the various accounts over which he had discretionary trading authority, to disproportionately allocate profitable trades to his personal account and unprofitable trades to his clients’ accounts.On March 12, 2025, the Court granted the SEC’s motion for summary judgment, finding that Werthe violated Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, and Sections 206(1) and 206(2) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. On February 2, 2026, the Court granted the SEC’s motion for monetary and injunctive relief and entered a final judgment permanently enjoining Werthe from violating the charged provisions of the federal securities laws and ordering Werthe to pay disgorgement in the amount of $507,996.42, prejudgment interest in the amount of $112,340.03, and a civil penalty in the amount of $507,996.42.The investigation was conducted by Kelly Bowers and supervised by Robert Conrrad of the SEC’s Los Angeles Regional Office. The litigation was handled by Daniel S. Lim and supervised by Stephen Kam of the Los Angeles Regional Office.
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONLitigation Release No. 26497 / March 6, 2026Securities and Exchange Commission v. Matthew J. Werthe dba HSR Wealth Management, No. 3:23-cv-815-L-DDL (S.D. Cal. filed May 4, 2023)SEC Obtains Final Judgment as to Investment Adviser in Cherry-Picking Scheme On February 2, 2026, the United States District Court for the Southern District of California entered a final judgment as to Defendant Matthew J. Werthe, dba HSR Wealth Management, a formerly state-registered investment adviser, whom the SEC previously charged with engaging in a cherry-picking scheme, making misrepresentations to his clients, and violating his fiduciary duties.The SEC’s complaint, filed on May 4, 2023 alleged that, from May 2021 to March 2022, Werthe used his firm’s block trading account, which allowed him to place a single stock trade and later allocate portions of that stock trade among the various accounts over which he had discretionary trading authority, to disproportionately allocate profitable trades to his personal account and unprofitable trades to his clients’ accounts.On March 12, 2025, the Court granted the SEC’s motion for summary judgment, finding that Werthe violated Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, and Sections 206(1) and 206(2) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. On February 2, 2026, the Court granted the SEC’s motion for monetary and injunctive relief and entered a final judgment permanently enjoining Werthe from violating the charged provisions of the federal securities laws and ordering Werthe to pay disgorgement in the amount of $507,996.42, prejudgment interest in the amount of $112,340.03, and a civil penalty in the amount of $507,996.42.The investigation was conducted by Kelly Bowers and supervised by Robert Conrrad of the SEC’s Los Angeles Regional Office. The litigation was handled by Daniel S. Lim and supervised by Stephen Kam of the Los Angeles Regional Office.