2023-10-25 sec-litreleases litigation_release 66 KB 3,251 chars

SEC v. Julie Anne Darrah; and Vivid Financial Management, Inc., No. LR-25885, Central District of California (Oct. 25, 2023) — Press Release

raw: Julie Anne Darrah, et al.,

Julie Anne Darrah, et al.,, No. 2:23-cv-008843-CAS (Oct. 25, 2023)

Caption
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Julie Anne Darrah, et al.
summary

Investment adviser Julie Anne Darrah and her firm, Vivid Financial Management, Inc., were charged by the SEC for defrauding elderly clients of $2.25 million, resulting in a consented-to asset freeze.

paragraph

Julie Anne Darrah and her firm, Vivid Financial Management, Inc., allegedly misappropriated approximately $2.25 million from at least nine clients, primarily elderly women. The defendants face charges for violating the Securities Exchange Act, the Securities Act, and the Investment Advisers Act. The SEC has successfully obtained a consented-to preliminary injunction and an emergency asset freeze against Darrah.

narrative

The SEC charged Julie Anne Darrah and her firm, Vivid Financial Management, Inc., with defrauding at least nine clients of approximately $2.25 million. Darrah allegedly leveraged her roles as trustee and power of attorney to transfer client funds into personal accounts to fund real estate, luxury vehicles, and restaurant businesses. To conceal the scheme, she changed client mailing addresses and backdated promissory notes. The defendants face multiple charges under the Securities Exchange Act, the Securities Act, and the Investment Advisers Act. Darrah has already consented to a preliminary injunction and an emergency asset freeze. The SEC is now seeking disgorgement, prejudgment interest, and monetary penalties through the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.

Enriched metadata

Scheme
broker-dealer-fraud (95%)
Court
Central District of California
Case No.
2:23-cv-008843-CAS
Outcome
charged
Victim loss
$2,250,000
Entity
Julie Anne Darrah
Classified broker-dealer-fraud(confidence 95%). EDGAR detection: forms Form D· recall 29% / precision 9%. detection rule →
Parties
Securities and Exchange CommissionJulie Anne DarrahVivid Financial Management, Inc.
Keywords
darrahsecjulie anneanne darrahsecurities exchangeexchange commissioninvestment adviserbank accountssecuritiesclientsvfmaccountsjulieanneexchange

Exhibits & Attached Documents (1)

Extracted insights

Dollar amounts 2
  • $2.25M $2.25 million $1M–$10M
  • $2.00M $2 million $1M–$10M
Entities 7
  • person asset freeze
  • person client assets
  • person Julie Anne Darrah
  • person preliminary injunction
  • agency Securities and Exchange Commission
  • organization Securities and Exchange Commission
  • organization Vivid Financial Management, Inc.
Triples 10
  • Securities And Exchange Commission filed charges Julie Anne Darrah
  • Julie Anne Darrah defrauded elderly clients
  • Julie Anne Darrah misappropriated $2.25 million
  • Vivid Financial Management, Inc. misappropriated client assets
  • Julie Anne Darrah transferred victim's money
  • Securities And Exchange Commission obtained asset freeze
  • Julie Anne Darrah violated Securities Exchange Act
  • Vivid Financial Management, Inc. violated Investment Advisers Act
  • Securities And Exchange Commission seeks disgorgement
  • Julie Anne Darrah agreed to preliminary injunction
PDF (from attached: complaint)
Text layers
Extracted body text (3,251c)
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Litigation Release No. 25885 / October 25, 2023 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Julie Anne Darrah, et al., No. 2:23-cv-008843-CAS-AGR (C.D. Cal., filed Oct. 20, 2023) SEC Obtains Emergency Relief Freezing Assets of Investment Adviser Charged with Defrauding Elderly Clients The Securities and Exchange Commission announced today that it has filed charges and obtained a consented-to asset freeze against a Santa Maria, California-based investment adviser, who allegedly defrauded her victim clients of over $2 million. According to the SEC’s complaint, Julie Anne Darrah and her firm, Vivid Financial Management, Inc. (“VFM”), misappropriated approximately $2.25 million from at least nine clients who had hired Darrah and VFM to be their investment adviser. The complaint alleges that Darrah primarily targeted elderly female advisory clients, many of whom had come to rely on Darrah for their financial well-being, including one client who lives in a memory care facility. The complaint states that Darrah gained control of her victim’s assets by becoming the trustee of their trusts, using standing letters of authorization to transfer funds from their brokerage accounts to their bank accounts, becoming the signatory on their bank accounts, and/or obtaining power of attorney over their property and accounts. According to the complaint, Darrah transferred her victims’ money to her personal bank accounts, where she commingled the funds with her own money that she used to buy and improve real properties, pay her personal expenses, buy luxury vehicles, and buy and operate restaurant businesses at a loss. The complaint further alleges that Darrah concealed her scheme by, among other things, changing client account mailing addresses to her own address, falsely disclosing that she was not acting as the trustee for any clients, and having a client initial two backdated promissory notes that Darrah provided to the SEC in response to its subpoenas. The SEC’s complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California on October 20, 2023, charges Darrah and VFM with violating Section 10(b) and Rules 10b-5(a) and (c) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; Section 17(a)(1) of the Securities Act of 1933; and Sections 206(1), 206(2) and 207 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the “Advisers Act”). It also charges VFM with violating Section 206(4) and Rules 206(4)-2 and 206(4)-7 of the Advisers Act, and it charges Darrah with aiding and abetting VFM’s primary violations of those provisions. The complaint seeks disgorgement of allegedly ill-gotten gains, prejudgment interest, monetary penalties, and permanent and conduct-based injunctions. Darrah agreed to the entry of a preliminary injunction against her as well as an order freezing assets, requiring an accounting, prohibiting the destruction of documents, and granting expedited discovery, which the district court entered on October 20, 2023. The SEC’s ongoing investigation is being conducted by staff in the SEC’s Los Angeles Regional Office and Jonathon Grobelski of the SEC’s Chicago Regional Office and is supervised by Robert Conrrad. The SEC’s litigation will be led by Douglas Miller. SEC complaint
OCR text (3,251c · html-text · 99% conf)
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Litigation Release No. 25885 / October 25, 2023 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Julie Anne Darrah, et al., No. 2:23-cv-008843-CAS-AGR (C.D. Cal., filed Oct. 20, 2023) SEC Obtains Emergency Relief Freezing Assets of Investment Adviser Charged with Defrauding Elderly Clients The Securities and Exchange Commission announced today that it has filed charges and obtained a consented-to asset freeze against a Santa Maria, California-based investment adviser, who allegedly defrauded her victim clients of over $2 million. According to the SEC’s complaint, Julie Anne Darrah and her firm, Vivid Financial Management, Inc. (“VFM”), misappropriated approximately $2.25 million from at least nine clients who had hired Darrah and VFM to be their investment adviser. The complaint alleges that Darrah primarily targeted elderly female advisory clients, many of whom had come to rely on Darrah for their financial well-being, including one client who lives in a memory care facility. The complaint states that Darrah gained control of her victim’s assets by becoming the trustee of their trusts, using standing letters of authorization to transfer funds from their brokerage accounts to their bank accounts, becoming the signatory on their bank accounts, and/or obtaining power of attorney over their property and accounts. According to the complaint, Darrah transferred her victims’ money to her personal bank accounts, where she commingled the funds with her own money that she used to buy and improve real properties, pay her personal expenses, buy luxury vehicles, and buy and operate restaurant businesses at a loss. The complaint further alleges that Darrah concealed her scheme by, among other things, changing client account mailing addresses to her own address, falsely disclosing that she was not acting as the trustee for any clients, and having a client initial two backdated promissory notes that Darrah provided to the SEC in response to its subpoenas. The SEC’s complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California on October 20, 2023, charges Darrah and VFM with violating Section 10(b) and Rules 10b-5(a) and (c) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; Section 17(a)(1) of the Securities Act of 1933; and Sections 206(1), 206(2) and 207 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the “Advisers Act”). It also charges VFM with violating Section 206(4) and Rules 206(4)-2 and 206(4)-7 of the Advisers Act, and it charges Darrah with aiding and abetting VFM’s primary violations of those provisions. The complaint seeks disgorgement of allegedly ill-gotten gains, prejudgment interest, monetary penalties, and permanent and conduct-based injunctions. Darrah agreed to the entry of a preliminary injunction against her as well as an order freezing assets, requiring an accounting, prohibiting the destruction of documents, and granting expedited discovery, which the district court entered on October 20, 2023. The SEC’s ongoing investigation is being conducted by staff in the SEC’s Los Angeles Regional Office and Jonathon Grobelski of the SEC’s Chicago Regional Office and is supervised by Robert Conrrad. The SEC’s litigation will be led by Douglas Miller. SEC complaint