SEC v. Brandon Charnas, No. LR-25788, Southern District of Florida (July 25, 2023) — Press Release
raw: Brandon Charnas
Brandon Charnas, No. 1:23-mc-22764 (July 25, 2023)
The SEC filed a subpoena enforcement action against real estate broker Brandon Charnas to compel document production regarding an investigation into potential insider trading.
The SEC is investigating potential insider trading involving The ODP Corporation (Office Depot) securities, alleging Charnas realized at least $385,000 in profits. Charnas allegedly purchased common stock and out-of-the-money call options prior to the announcement of Staples' acquisition offer. The agency is now seeking a court order to compel production of documents after Charnas improperly asserted his Fifth Amendment privilege.
The Securities and Exchange Commission has filed a subpoena enforcement action against New York and South Florida real estate broker Brandon Charnas. The SEC is investigating possible insider trading violations involving The ODP Corporation (Office Depot) ahead of a January 2021 announcement regarding a Staples acquisition offer. Charnas allegedly purchased ODP common stock and out-of-the-money call options, generating at least $385,000 in profits. Notably, his December 23, 2020, option purchases represented approximately 90% of the company's total call option trading volume for that day. Charnas has failed to comply with investigative subpoenas, having improperly asserted his Fifth Amendment privilege. The SEC is now seeking a court order in the Southern District of Florida to compel the production of required documents. The agency's fact-finding investigation is ongoing and has not yet concluded that any laws were violated.
Exhibits & Attached Documents (2)
Extracted insights
- $385K $385,000 $100K–$1M
- person against real estate broker
- person brandon charnas
- agency Securities and Exchange Commission
- Securities And Exchange Commission Files Subpoena Enforcement Action Against Real Estate Broker
- Securities And Exchange Commission Announced It Filed An Action Against Brandon Charnas
- Brandon Charnas Purchased Odp Common Stock And Out-Of-The-Money Call Options
- Brandon Charnas Generated Combined Profits Of At Least 385000 Dollars
- Brandon Charnas Purchased Out-Of-The-Money Call Options Approximately 90 Percent Of Odp's Overall Call Option Trading Volume That Day
- Brandon Charnas Improperly Asserted Fifth Amendment Privilege And Failed To Comply With Document Production Obligations Of The Subpoena
- Securities And Exchange Commission Seeks An Order From The Court Directing Brandon Charnas To Show Cause Why The Court Should Not Compel Him To Produce Documents
- Securities And Exchange Commission Continuing Fact-Finding Investigation And Has Not Concluded That Any Individual Or Entity Has Violated Federal Securities Laws
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Litigation Release No. 25788 / July 25, 2023 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Brandon Charnas, No. 1:23-mc-22764 (S.D. Fla. filed July 25, 2023) SEC Files Subpoena Enforcement Action Against Real Estate Broker The Securities and Exchange Commission announced it filed an action against Brandon Charnas, a real estate broker based in New York and South Florida, seeking an order directing him to comply with an investigative subpoena for documents. According to the SEC's application, filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, the SEC is investigating possible insider trading violations in the securities of The ODP Corporation ("ODP") d/b/a Office Depot in advance of an announcement on Monday, January 11, 2021, by USR Parent, Inc. d/b/a Staples of its offer to acquire ODP. According to the application, Charnas purchased ODP common stock and out-of-the-money call options a few weeks prior to the announcement, resulting in combined profits of at least $385,000. The application states that on December 23, 2020, surrounding communications with other traders in ODP, Charnas purchased out-of-the-money call options constituting approximately 90% of ODP's overall call option trading volume that day. As stated in the application, Charnas has improperly asserted his Fifth Amendment privilege and failed to comply with the document production obligations of the subpoena. The SEC's application seeks an order from the court directing Charnas to show cause why the court should not compel him to produce documents as required by the subpoena. The SEC is continuing its fact-finding investigation and, to date, has not concluded that any individual or entity has violated the federal securities laws. ApplicationU.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Litigation Release No. 25788 / July 25, 2023 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Brandon Charnas, No. 1:23-mc-22764 (S.D. Fla. filed July 25, 2023) SEC Files Subpoena Enforcement Action Against Real Estate Broker The Securities and Exchange Commission announced it filed an action against Brandon Charnas, a real estate broker based in New York and South Florida, seeking an order directing him to comply with an investigative subpoena for documents. According to the SEC's application, filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, the SEC is investigating possible insider trading violations in the securities of The ODP Corporation ("ODP") d/b/a Office Depot in advance of an announcement on Monday, January 11, 2021, by USR Parent, Inc. d/b/a Staples of its offer to acquire ODP. According to the application, Charnas purchased ODP common stock and out-of-the-money call options a few weeks prior to the announcement, resulting in combined profits of at least $385,000. The application states that on December 23, 2020, surrounding communications with other traders in ODP, Charnas purchased out-of-the-money call options constituting approximately 90% of ODP's overall call option trading volume that day. As stated in the application, Charnas has improperly asserted his Fifth Amendment privilege and failed to comply with the document production obligations of the subpoena. The SEC's application seeks an order from the court directing Charnas to show cause why the court should not compel him to produce documents as required by the subpoena. The SEC is continuing its fact-finding investigation and, to date, has not concluded that any individual or entity has violated the federal securities laws. Application