SEC v. Jack Benjamin Grubman, Southern District of New York (Apr. 28, 2003) — Judgment
raw: SEC v. : 03 Civ. 2938 (WHP)
SEC v. : 03 Civ. 2938 (WHP) (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 28, 2003)
Jack Benjamin Grubman, a former Wall Street analyst, agreed to a final judgment settling SEC charges for aiding and abetting securities fraud by issuing biased research reports that concealed conflicts of interest with Citigroup’s investment banking clients, resulting in a $15 million penalty and disgorgement—$7.5 million to the SEC and $7.5 million to the New York Attorney General—along with a permanent injunction from future violations.
Jack Benjamin Grubman was charged by the SEC with aiding and abetting violations of Section 15(c) of the Exchange Act and industry rules by issuing research reports that were contrary to his beliefs, failed to disclose conflicts of interest, and contained unwarranted claims to benefit Citigroup’s investment banking clients. As part of the settlement, he paid a total of $15 million—$7.5 million as a penalty and $7.5 million as disgorgement—with half going to the SEC (Federal Payment) and half to the New York Attorney General (N.Y. State Settlement), all deposited into a Fair Funds distribution account for harmed investors. He was permanently enjoined from violating securities anti-fraud provisions and industry standards, and ordered to preserve all relevant records for five years, while the Court retained jurisdiction to enforce compliance.
Jack Benjamin Grubman, a former Wall Street analyst, settled SEC charges for aiding and abetting securities fraud by issuing biased and misleading research reports that concealed conflicts of interest tied to Citigroup’s investment banking clients. The SEC alleged that Grubman promoted stocks of companies seeking Citigroup’s banking services, violating Section 15(c) of the Exchange Act and industry rules from NASD and NYSE requiring balanced, truthful, and properly disclosed research. As part of the final judgment, he agreed to pay $15 million in total—$7.5 million as a penalty and $7.5 million as disgorgement of bonuses and other monies—with $7.5 million paid to the SEC (Federal Payment) and $7.5 million to the New York Attorney General (N.Y. State Settlement). These funds were deposited into a Fair Funds distribution account, established in coordination with the related Citigroup case, to be distributed to harmed investors under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Grubman was permanently enjoined from aiding in securities fraud, issuing deceptive research, or violating NASD and NYSE communication rules, and was required to preserve all relevant records—including customer data, research communications, and investment banking documents—for five years. The judgment incorporated his consent without admission of guilt, waived his right to appeal, and preserved the Court’s jurisdiction for enforcement. The settlement marked a landmark enforcement action against analyst bias in the early 2000s Wall Street scandal.
Extracted insights
- $15.00M $15,000,000 $10M–$100M
- $7.50M $7,500,000 $1M–$10M
- $7.50M $7,500,000 $1M–$10M
- $5.00M $5,000,000 $1M–$10M
- $2.50M $2,500,000 $1M–$10M
- agency Securities and Exchange Commission
- organization Securities and Exchange Commission
- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION filed a Complaint in this action against JACK BENJAMIN GRUBMAN
- JACK BENJAMIN GRUBMAN consented to the Court's jurisdiction over himself and the subject matter of this action
- JACK BENJAMIN GRUBMAN is permanently restrained and enjoined from aiding and abetting violations of Section 15(c) of the Exchange Act and Rule 15c1-2
- JACK BENJAMIN GRUBMAN is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Rule 2110 of NASD and Rules 401 and 476 of NYSE by publishing biased research reports
- JACK BENJAMIN GRUBMAN is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating NASD Rule 2210 and NYSE Rule 472 by issuing misleading public communications
- JACK BENJAMIN GRUBMAN shall pay $15,000,000 including $7,500,000 penalty and $7,500,000 disgorgement
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
________________________________________________
:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, :
:
Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.
:
-against- : 03 Civ. 2938 (WHP)
:
JACK BENJAMIN GRUBMAN, :
:
Defendant. :
________________________________________________:
FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT
JACK BENJAMIN GRUBMAN
Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) having filed a Complaint
in this action (“Complaint”) and Defendant Jack Benjamin Grubman (“Defendant”), having
(a) entered a general appearance, (b) consented to the Court’s jurisdiction over Defendant and
the subject matter of this action, (c) consented to entry of this Final Judgment without admitting
or denying the allegations of the Complaint (except as to jurisdiction), (d) waived findings of fact
and conclusions of law, and (e) waived any right to appeal from this Final Judgment:
I.
Injunctive Relief
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that:
A. Defendant, his agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all persons in active
concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal
service or otherwise, are permanently restrained and enjoined from aiding and abetting violations
of Section 15(c) of the Exchange Act and Rule 15c1-2 promulgated thereunder [15 U.S.C.
§ 78o(c) and 17 C.F.R. § 240.15c1-2] by making use of the mails or any means or
instrumentality of interstate commerce to effect any transaction in, or to induce or attempt to
induce the purchase or sale of, any security by means of any act, practice, or course of business
which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person.
B. Defendant, his agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all persons in active
concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal
service or otherwise, are permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Rule 2110 of the
Conduct Rules of NASD Inc. (“NASD”) and Rules 401 and 476 of the New York Stock
Exchange, Inc. (“NYSE”), by publishing research reports that are contrary to his beliefs and fail
to disclose that fact, do not provide a sound basis for evaluating facts, are not properly balanced,
and/or contain exaggerated or unwarranted claims and/or opinions for which there is no
reasonable basis.
C. Defendant, his agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all persons in active
concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal
service or otherwise, are permanently restrained and enjoined from violating NASD Rule 2210
and NYSE Rule 472 by issuing communications to the public that are contrary to his beliefs and
fail to disclose that fact, do not provide a sound basis for evaluating facts, are not properly
balanced, and/or contain exaggerated or unwarranted claims and/or opinions for which there is
no reasonable basis.
II.
Monetary Sanctions
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that:
A. As a result of the violations alleged in the Complaint, Defendant shall pay a total
amount of $15,000,000, which amount includes:
- 2 -
1. $7,500,000, as a penalty; and
2. $7,500,000, as disgorgement of bonuses and other monies.
B. The amount of $15,000,000, which is the sum of the penalty of $7,500,000 and
disgorgement of $7,500,000, consists of (1) $7,500,000 in connection with the resolution of this
action and related proceedings instituted by NASD and NYSE (the “Federal Payment”); and (2)
$7,500,000 that Defendant has agreed to pay in connection with the resolution of a related
proceeding by the Office of the New York Attorney General (the Defendant’s settlement with the
Office of the New York Attorney General hereinafter shall be called the “N.Y. State
Settlement”). Defendant shall pay $5,000,000 of the Federal Payment by wire transfer within 90
business days of the entry of this Final Judgment and the remaining $2,500,000 of the Federal
Payment by wire transfer by December 31, 2003 into an interest bearing account with the Federal
Reserve Bank of New York (“FRB-NY”) in accordance with instructions to be provided to
Defendant by the FRB-NY and authorized or ordered by the Court. Defendant shall
simultaneously transmit proof of his payments to the Court, the Clerk of the Court, and the
Commission’s counsel in this action. These payments shall be deposited into the same interest
bearing Distribution Fund Account that shall be established for payments from Citigroup Global
Markets Inc., formerly known as Salomon Smith Barney Inc. (“CGM”), in connection with the
civil action styled SEC v. Citigroup Global Markets Inc., f/k/a Salomon Smith Barney Inc., No.
03 Civ. 2945 (WHP) (S.D.N.Y.) (“CGM Action”). By making these payments, Defendant
relinquishes all legal and equitable right, title, and interest in such funds, and no part of the funds
shall be returned to Defendant. These funds, together with any interest and income earned
thereon (collectively, the “Distribution Fund”), shall be held by the FRB-NY until further order
of the Court. In the event that any portion of the penalty described in Section II.A.1 above is
- 3 -
remitted for deposit into the Distribution Fund, such penalty amount shall be added to the
Distribution Fund and distributed pursuant to the Fair Funds provisions in Section 308 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and any further order of the Court; provided, however, that the full
penalty amount and such portion shall still be considered a penalty for tax and any other
purposes. Pending further order of the Court, in accordance with the letter dated August 26,
2003 from the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts to the
Commission’s counsel in connection with this action, the court registry fund fee pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1914 for the Distribution Fund shall be four (4) percent of the income earned on the
Distribution Fund. The Distribution Fund shall be managed in accordance with the terms of the
Final Judgment entered in the CGM Action, and shall be distributed pursuant to the Final
Judgment in the CGM Action.
C. Defendant’s obligation to make the Federal Payment is not contingent on or
dependent in any way or part on the N.Y. State Settlement or on Defendant’s payment(s) to the
Office of the New York Attorney General pursuant to the N.Y. State Settlement, and the total
amount of the Federal Payment shall not be affected by the N.Y. State Settlement and shall
remain at $7,500,000. The total amount of penalties paid (1) in the Federal Payment (“P
Fed
”) and
(2) pursuant to the N.Y. State Settlement (“P
State
”) shall at all times equal the total amount of
disgorgement paid (3) in the Federal Payment (“D
Fed
”) and (4) pursuant to the N.Y. State
Settlement (“D
State
”). Insofar as any amount paid to the Office of the New York Attorney
General pursuant to the N.Y. State Settlement is deemed a penalty, the amount of the Federal
Payment that is deemed a penalty shall be adjusted so that P
Fed
+ P
State
= D
Fed
+ D
State
.
- 4 -
III.
Standing
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that, notwithstanding any
rule or provision of law, nothing herein shall be deemed to confer standing or right of
intervention upon any persons other than the Commission, Defendant, CGM, and the
Distribution Fund Administrator.
IV.
Record Retention and Non-Destruction Requirement
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that, for a period of five
years from the effective date of this Final Judgment or such shorter or longer period as the Court
may order, Defendant, and his agents, affiliates, servants, employees, attorneys, and those
persons in active concert or participation with them, and each of them, are hereby enjoined from
destroying, mutilating, concealing, altering, or disposing of (a) any research distributed by
Defendant or CGM during the relevant period identified in the Complaint; (b) documents
sufficient to identify all customers who bought or sold equity securities of the issuers as to which
Defendant issued research during the relevant period identified in the Complaint (the
“Transactions”), including but not limited to documents sufficient to identify the dates, amounts,
and prices of the Transactions; (c) documents sufficient to identify which customers received
which research distributed by Defendant during the relevant period identified in the Complaint;
(d) order entry information sufficient to identify whether the Transactions were solicited by
Defendant or CGM; (e) documents sufficient to identify the publicly-traded companies for which
CGM sought to provide, was engaged to provide, or did provide investment banking services
during the relevant period identified in the Complaint; and (f) any and all written (including
- 5 -
electronic) communication, including communications to and from customers and intra-firm
communications, relating to CGM’s investment banking and equity research operations during
the relevant period identified in the Complaint; provided, however, that Defendant need not
retain duplicate identical copies of public documents filed with the Commission or any other
regulatory authority.
V.
Defendant’s Consent Incorporated by Reference
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Defendant’s Consent
previously filed in this action is incorporated herein with the same force and effect as if fully set
forth herein, and Defendant shall comply with all of the undertakings and agreements set forth
therein.
VI.
Court to Retain Jurisdiction
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that this Court shall retain
jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Final Judgment.
VII.
Entry of Judgment Forthwith
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that, there being no just
cause for delay, the Clerk of the Court shall enter this Judgment forthwith and without further
notice.
Dated: New York, New York
______________, 2003
____________________________________
WILLIAM H. PAULEY III
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
- 6 - UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
________________________________________________
:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, :
:
Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.
:
-against- : 03 Civ. 2938 (WHP)
:
JACK BENJAMIN GRUBMAN, :
:
Defendant. :
________________________________________________:
FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT
JACK BENJAMIN GRUBMAN
Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) having filed a Complaint
in this action (“Complaint”) and Defendant Jack Benjamin Grubman (“Defendant”), having
(a) entered a general appearance, (b) consented to the Court’s jurisdiction over Defendant and
the subject matter of this action, (c) consented to entry of this Final Judgment without admitting
or denying the allegations of the Complaint (except as to jurisdiction), (d) waived findings of fact
and conclusions of law, and (e) waived any right to appeal from this Final Judgment:
I.
Injunctive Relief
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that:
A. Defendant, his agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all persons in active
concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal
service or otherwise, are permanently restrained and enjoined from aiding and abetting violations
of Section 15(c) of the Exchange Act and Rule 15c1-2 promulgated thereunder [15 U.S.C.
§ 78o(c) and 17 C.F.R. § 240.15c1-2] by making use of the mails or any means or
instrumentality of interstate commerce to effect any transaction in, or to induce or attempt to
induce the purchase or sale of, any security by means of any act, practice, or course of business
which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person.
B. Defendant, his agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all persons in active
concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal
service or otherwise, are permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Rule 2110 of the
Conduct Rules of NASD Inc. (“NASD”) and Rules 401 and 476 of the New York Stock
Exchange, Inc. (“NYSE”), by publishing research reports that are contrary to his beliefs and fail
to disclose that fact, do not provide a sound basis for evaluating facts, are not properly balanced,
and/or contain exaggerated or unwarranted claims and/or opinions for which there is no
reasonable basis.
C. Defendant, his agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all persons in active
concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal
service or otherwise, are permanently restrained and enjoined from violating NASD Rule 2210
and NYSE Rule 472 by issuing communications to the public that are contrary to his beliefs and
fail to disclose that fact, do not provide a sound basis for evaluating facts, are not properly
balanced, and/or contain exaggerated or unwarranted claims and/or opinions for which there is
no reasonable basis.
II.
Monetary Sanctions
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that:
A. As a result of the violations alleged in the Complaint, Defendant shall pay a total
amount of $15,000,000, which amount includes:
- 2 -
1. $7,500,000, as a penalty; and
2. $7,500,000, as disgorgement of bonuses and other monies.
B. The amount of $15,000,000, which is the sum of the penalty of $7,500,000 and
disgorgement of $7,500,000, consists of (1) $7,500,000 in connection with the resolution of this
action and related proceedings instituted by NASD and NYSE (the “Federal Payment”); and (2)
$7,500,000 that Defendant has agreed to pay in connection with the resolution of a related
proceeding by the Office of the New York Attorney General (the Defendant’s settlement with the
Office of the New York Attorney General hereinafter shall be called the “N.Y. State
Settlement”). Defendant shall pay $5,000,000 of the Federal Payment by wire transfer within 90
business days of the entry of this Final Judgment and the remaining $2,500,000 of the Federal
Payment by wire transfer by December 31, 2003 into an interest bearing account with the Federal
Reserve Bank of New York (“FRB-NY”) in accordance with instructions to be provided to
Defendant by the FRB-NY and authorized or ordered by the Court. Defendant shall
simultaneously transmit proof of his payments to the Court, the Clerk of the Court, and the
Commission’s counsel in this action. These payments shall be deposited into the same interest
bearing Distribution Fund Account that shall be established for payments from Citigroup Global
Markets Inc., formerly known as Salomon Smith Barney Inc. (“CGM”), in connection with the
civil action styled SEC v. Citigroup Global Markets Inc., f/k/a Salomon Smith Barney Inc., No.
03 Civ. 2945 (WHP) (S.D.N.Y.) (“CGM Action”). By making these payments, Defendant
relinquishes all legal and equitable right, title, and interest in such funds, and no part of the funds
shall be returned to Defendant. These funds, together with any interest and income earned
thereon (collectively, the “Distribution Fund”), shall be held by the FRB-NY until further order
of the Court. In the event that any portion of the penalty described in Section II.A.1 above is
- 3 -
remitted for deposit into the Distribution Fund, such penalty amount shall be added to the
Distribution Fund and distributed pursuant to the Fair Funds provisions in Section 308 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and any further order of the Court; provided, however, that the full
penalty amount and such portion shall still be considered a penalty for tax and any other
purposes. Pending further order of the Court, in accordance with the letter dated August 26,
2003 from the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts to the
Commission’s counsel in connection with this action, the court registry fund fee pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1914 for the Distribution Fund shall be four (4) percent of the income earned on the
Distribution Fund. The Distribution Fund shall be managed in accordance with the terms of the
Final Judgment entered in the CGM Action, and shall be distributed pursuant to the Final
Judgment in the CGM Action.
C. Defendant’s obligation to make the Federal Payment is not contingent on or
dependent in any way or part on the N.Y. State Settlement or on Defendant’s payment(s) to the
Office of the New York Attorney General pursuant to the N.Y. State Settlement, and the total
amount of the Federal Payment shall not be affected by the N.Y. State Settlement and shall
remain at $7,500,000. The total amount of penalties paid (1) in the Federal Payment (“PFed”) and
(2) pursuant to the N.Y. State Settlement (“PState”) shall at all times equal the total amount of
disgorgement paid (3) in the Federal Payment (“DFed”) and (4) pursuant to the N.Y. State
Settlement (“DState”). Insofar as any amount paid to the Office of the New York Attorney
General pursuant to the N.Y. State Settlement is deemed a penalty, the amount of the Federal
Payment that is deemed a penalty shall be adjusted so that PFed + PState = DFed + DState.
- 4 -
III.
Standing
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that, notwithstanding any
rule or provision of law, nothing herein shall be deemed to confer standing or right of
intervention upon any persons other than the Commission, Defendant, CGM, and the
Distribution Fund Administrator.
IV.
Record Retention and Non-Destruction Requirement
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that, for a period of five
years from the effective date of this Final Judgment or such shorter or longer period as the Court
may order, Defendant, and his agents, affiliates, servants, employees, attorneys, and those
persons in active concert or participation with them, and each of them, are hereby enjoined from
destroying, mutilating, concealing, altering, or disposing of (a) any research distributed by
Defendant or CGM during the relevant period identified in the Complaint; (b) documents
sufficient to identify all customers who bought or sold equity securities of the issuers as to which
Defendant issued research during the relevant period identified in the Complaint (the
“Transactions”), including but not limited to documents sufficient to identify the dates, amounts,
and prices of the Transactions; (c) documents sufficient to identify which customers received
which research distributed by Defendant during the relevant period identified in the Complaint;
(d) order entry information sufficient to identify whether the Transactions were solicited by
Defendant or CGM; (e) documents sufficient to identify the publicly-traded companies for which
CGM sought to provide, was engaged to provide, or did provide investment banking services
during the relevant period identified in the Complaint; and (f) any and all written (including
- 5 -
electronic) communication, including communications to and from customers and intra-firm
communications, relating to CGM’s investment banking and equity research operations during
the relevant period identified in the Complaint; provided, however, that Defendant need not
retain duplicate identical copies of public documents filed with the Commission or any other
regulatory authority.
V.
Defendant’s Consent Incorporated by Reference
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Defendant’s Consent
previously filed in this action is incorporated herein with the same force and effect as if fully set
forth herein, and Defendant shall comply with all of the undertakings and agreements set forth
therein.
VI.
Court to Retain Jurisdiction
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that this Court shall retain
jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Final Judgment.
VII.
Entry of Judgment Forthwith
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that, there being no just
cause for delay, the Clerk of the Court shall enter this Judgment forthwith and without further
notice.
Dated: New York, New York
______________, 2003
____________________________________
WILLIAM H. PAULEY III
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
- 6 -