SEC v. Henry McKelvey Blodget, Southern District of New York (Apr. 28, 2003) — Judgment
raw: SEC v. : 03 Civ. 2947 (WHP)
SEC v. : 03 Civ. 2947 (WHP) (Apr. 28, 2003)
Henry McKelvey Blodget, a former Wall Street analyst, agreed to a final judgment without admitting or denying allegations that he issued biased, undisclosed research reports violating securities laws, resulting in a $4 million penalty and disgorgement paid into a court-supervised fund and permanent injunctions against fraudulent research practices.
Henry McKelvey Blodget was ordered to pay $4 million to the SEC—$2 million as a penalty and $2 million as disgorgement—for violating Section 15(c) of the Exchange Act and NASD and NYSE research integrity rules by publishing misleading, unbalanced research reports that concealed conflicts of interest. He was permanently enjoined from aiding and abetting securities fraud, issuing deceptive public communications, or publishing research contrary to his beliefs without disclosure. The funds were deposited into a court-supervised Distribution Fund at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York for potential investor restitution under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and Blodget forfeited all rights to the money.
Henry McKelvey Blodget, a former Wall Street analyst, entered into a final judgment with the SEC without admitting or denying allegations that he issued misleading research reports while at Merrill Lynch, violating Section 15(c) of the Exchange Act and NASD and NYSE rules governing research integrity and public communications. The SEC charged that Blodget published biased, unbalanced, and unwarranted research opinions that concealed conflicts of interest tied to investment banking clients, thereby defrauding investors. As part of the resolution, he was ordered to pay $4 million total—$2 million in penalties and $2 million in disgorgement—into a court-supervised Distribution Fund at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, which would be used for investor restitution under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Blodget permanently forfeited all legal rights to the funds and was enjoined from aiding in securities fraud or publishing research that was contrary to his beliefs without disclosure. He was also required to retain records related to his research, client transactions, and Merrill Lynch’s investment banking activities for five years, though he was exempt from preserving duplicates of publicly filed documents. The judgment, issued by Judge William H. Pauley III in 2003, retained court jurisdiction for enforcement, and Blodget waived his right to appeal, findings of fact, and any claim to the disgorged funds.
Extracted insights
- $4.00M $4,000,000 $1M–$10M
- $4.00M $4,000,000 $1M–$10M
- $2.00M $2,000,000 $1M–$10M
- person defendant henry mckelvey blodget
- person general appearance
- person injunctive relief
- person monetary sanctions
- agency Securities and Exchange Commission
- Securities and Exchange Commission File Complaint
- Defendant Henry McKelvey Blodget Enter General Appearance
- Defendant Henry McKelvey Blodget Consent Court’s Jurisdiction
- Defendant Henry McKelvey Blodget Waive Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
- Defendant Henry McKelvey Blodget Waive Right to Appeal
- Court Order Injunctive Relief
- Defendant Be Restrained and Enjoined Aiding and Abetting Violations
- Defendant Be Restrained and Enjoined Violating Rule 2110 of NASD
- Defendant Be Restrained and Enjoined Violating Rules 401 and 476 of NYSE
- Defendant Be Restrained and Enjoined Violating NASD Rule 2210 and NYSE Rule 472
- Court Order Monetary Sanctions
- Defendant Pay $4,000,000
- Defendant Pay $2,000,000 as Penalty
- Defendant Pay $2,000,000 as Disgorgement
- Defendant Pay $4,000,000 by Wire Transfer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
________________________________________________
:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, :
:
Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.
:
-against- : 03 Civ. 2947 (WHP)
:
HENRY McKELVEY BLODGET, :
:
Defendant. :
________________________________________________:
FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT
HENRY McKELVEY BLODGET
Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) having filed a Complaint
in this action (“Complaint”) and Defendant Henry McKelvey Blodget (“Defendant”), having
(a) entered a general appearance, (b) consented to the Court’s jurisdiction over Defendant and
the subject matter of this action, (c) consented to entry of this Final Judgment without admitting
or denying the allegations of the Complaint (except as to jurisdiction), (d) waived findings of fact
and conclusions of law, and (e) waived any right to appeal from this Final Judgment:
I.
Injunctive Relief
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that:
A. Defendant, his agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all persons in active
concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal
service or otherwise, are permanently restrained and enjoined from aiding and abetting violations
of Section 15(c) of the Exchange Act and Rule 15c1-2 promulgated thereunder [15 U.S.C.
§ 78o(c) and 17 C.F.R. § 240.15c1-2] by making use of the mails or any means or
instrumentality of interstate commerce to effect any transaction in, or to induce or attempt to
induce the purchase or sale of, any security by means of any act, practice, or course of business
which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person.
B. Defendant, his agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all persons in active
concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal
service or otherwise, are permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Rule 2110 of the
Conduct Rules of NASD Inc. (“NASD”) and Rules 401 and 476 of the New York Stock
Exchange, Inc. (“NYSE”), by publishing research reports that are contrary to his beliefs and fail
to disclose that fact, do not provide a sound basis for evaluating facts, are not properly balanced,
and/or contain exaggerated or unwarranted claims and/or opinions for which there is no
reasonable basis.
C. Defendant, his agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all persons in active
concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal
service or otherwise, are permanently restrained and enjoined from violating NASD Rule 2210
and NYSE Rule 472 by issuing communications to the public that are contrary to his beliefs and
fail to disclose that fact, do not provide a sound basis for evaluating facts, are not properly
balanced, and/or contain exaggerated or unwarranted claims and/or opinions for which there is
no reasonable basis.
II.
Monetary Sanctions
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that:
A. As a result of the violations alleged in the Complaint, Defendant shall pay a total
amount of $4,000,000. This amount includes:
- 2 -
1. $2,000,000, as a penalty; and
2. $2,000,000, as disgorgement.
B. Defendant shall pay $4,000,000 by wire transfer within 30 business days of the
entry of this Final Judgment into an interest bearing account with the Federal Reserve Bank of
New York (“FRB-NY”), to be designated the “Henry McKelvey Blodget Distribution Fund
Account,” in accordance with instructions to be provided to Defendant by the FRB-NY and
authorized or ordered by the Court. Defendant shall simultaneously transmit proof of its
payment to the Court, the Clerk of the Court, and the Commission’s counsel in this action. By
making this payment, Defendant relinquishes all legal and equitable right, title, and interest in
such funds, and no part of the funds shall be returned to Defendant. These funds, together with
any interest and income earned thereon (collectively, the “Distribution Fund”), shall be held by
the FRB-NY until further order of the Court. In the event that any portion of the penalty
described in Section II.A.1 above is remitted for deposit into the Distribution Fund, such penalty
amount shall be added to the Distribution Fund and distributed pursuant to the Fair Funds
provisions in Section 308 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and any further order of the Court;
provided, however, that the full penalty amount and such portion shall still be considered a
penalty for tax and any other purposes. Pending further order of the Court, in accordance with
the letter dated August 26, 2003 from the Director of the Administrative Office of the United
States Courts to the Commission’s counsel in connection with this action, the court registry fund
fee pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1914 for the Distribution Fund shall be four (4) percent of the
income earned on the Distribution Fund. The Distribution Fund shall be managed in accordance
with the terms of, and shall be distributed pursuant to, this Final Judgment and any further
- 3 -
applicable orders of the Court. The plaintiff shall propose to the Court for its approval a plan for
the disposition of the monies in the Distribution Fund.
III.
Standing
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that, notwithstanding any
rule or provision of law, nothing herein shall be deemed to confer standing or right of
intervention upon any persons other than the Commission or the Defendant.
IV.
Record Retention and Non-Destruction Requirement
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that, for a period of five
years from the effective date of this Final Judgment or such shorter or longer period as the Court
may order, Defendant, and his agents, affiliates, servants, employees, attorneys, and those
persons in active concert or participation with them, and each of them, are hereby enjoined from
destroying, mutilating, concealing, altering, or disposing of: (a) any research distributed by
Defendant or Merrill Lynch Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (“Merrill Lynch”) during the
relevant period identified in the Complaint; (b) documents sufficient to identify all customers
who bought or sold equity securities of the issuers as to which Defendant issued research during
the relevant period identified in the Complaint (the “Transactions”), including but not limited to
documents sufficient to identify the dates, amounts, and prices of the Transactions; (c)
documents sufficient to identify which customers received which research distributed by
Defendant during the relevant period identified in the Complaint; (d) order entry information
sufficient to identify whether the Transactions were solicited by Defendant or Merrill Lynch; (e)
documents sufficient to identify the publicly-traded companies for which Merrill Lynch sought
- 4 -
to provide, was engaged to provide, or did provide investment banking services during the
relevant period identified in the Complaint; and (f) any and all written (including electronic)
communication, including communications to and from customers and intra-firm
communications, relating to Merrill Lynch’s investment banking and equity research operations
during the relevant period identified in the Complaint; provided, however, that Defendant need
not retain duplicate identical copies of public documents filed with the Commission or any other
regulatory authority.
V.
Defendant’s Consent Incorporated by Reference
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Defendant’s Consent
previously filed in this action is incorporated herein with the same force and effect as if fully set
forth herein, and Defendant shall comply with all of the undertakings and agreements set forth
therein.
VI.
Court to Retain Jurisdiction
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that this Court shall retain
jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Final Judgment.
- 5 -
VII.
Entry of Judgment Forthwith
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that, there being no just
cause for delay, the Clerk of the Court shall enter this Judgment forthwith and without further
notice.
Dated: New York, New York
______________, 2003
____________________________________
WILLIAM H. PAULEY III
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
- 6 - UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
________________________________________________
:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, :
:
Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.
:
-against- : 03 Civ. 2947 (WHP)
:
HENRY McKELVEY BLODGET, :
:
Defendant. :
________________________________________________:
FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT
HENRY McKELVEY BLODGET
Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) having filed a Complaint
in this action (“Complaint”) and Defendant Henry McKelvey Blodget (“Defendant”), having
(a) entered a general appearance, (b) consented to the Court’s jurisdiction over Defendant and
the subject matter of this action, (c) consented to entry of this Final Judgment without admitting
or denying the allegations of the Complaint (except as to jurisdiction), (d) waived findings of fact
and conclusions of law, and (e) waived any right to appeal from this Final Judgment:
I.
Injunctive Relief
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that:
A. Defendant, his agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all persons in active
concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal
service or otherwise, are permanently restrained and enjoined from aiding and abetting violations
of Section 15(c) of the Exchange Act and Rule 15c1-2 promulgated thereunder [15 U.S.C.
§ 78o(c) and 17 C.F.R. § 240.15c1-2] by making use of the mails or any means or
instrumentality of interstate commerce to effect any transaction in, or to induce or attempt to
induce the purchase or sale of, any security by means of any act, practice, or course of business
which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person.
B. Defendant, his agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all persons in active
concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal
service or otherwise, are permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Rule 2110 of the
Conduct Rules of NASD Inc. (“NASD”) and Rules 401 and 476 of the New York Stock
Exchange, Inc. (“NYSE”), by publishing research reports that are contrary to his beliefs and fail
to disclose that fact, do not provide a sound basis for evaluating facts, are not properly balanced,
and/or contain exaggerated or unwarranted claims and/or opinions for which there is no
reasonable basis.
C. Defendant, his agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all persons in active
concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal
service or otherwise, are permanently restrained and enjoined from violating NASD Rule 2210
and NYSE Rule 472 by issuing communications to the public that are contrary to his beliefs and
fail to disclose that fact, do not provide a sound basis for evaluating facts, are not properly
balanced, and/or contain exaggerated or unwarranted claims and/or opinions for which there is
no reasonable basis.
II.
Monetary Sanctions
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that:
A. As a result of the violations alleged in the Complaint, Defendant shall pay a total
amount of $4,000,000. This amount includes:
- 2 -
1. $2,000,000, as a penalty; and
2. $2,000,000, as disgorgement.
B. Defendant shall pay $4,000,000 by wire transfer within 30 business days of the
entry of this Final Judgment into an interest bearing account with the Federal Reserve Bank of
New York (“FRB-NY”), to be designated the “Henry McKelvey Blodget Distribution Fund
Account,” in accordance with instructions to be provided to Defendant by the FRB-NY and
authorized or ordered by the Court. Defendant shall simultaneously transmit proof of its
payment to the Court, the Clerk of the Court, and the Commission’s counsel in this action. By
making this payment, Defendant relinquishes all legal and equitable right, title, and interest in
such funds, and no part of the funds shall be returned to Defendant. These funds, together with
any interest and income earned thereon (collectively, the “Distribution Fund”), shall be held by
the FRB-NY until further order of the Court. In the event that any portion of the penalty
described in Section II.A.1 above is remitted for deposit into the Distribution Fund, such penalty
amount shall be added to the Distribution Fund and distributed pursuant to the Fair Funds
provisions in Section 308 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and any further order of the Court;
provided, however, that the full penalty amount and such portion shall still be considered a
penalty for tax and any other purposes. Pending further order of the Court, in accordance with
the letter dated August 26, 2003 from the Director of the Administrative Office of the United
States Courts to the Commission’s counsel in connection with this action, the court registry fund
fee pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1914 for the Distribution Fund shall be four (4) percent of the
income earned on the Distribution Fund. The Distribution Fund shall be managed in accordance
with the terms of, and shall be distributed pursuant to, this Final Judgment and any further
- 3 -
applicable orders of the Court. The plaintiff shall propose to the Court for its approval a plan for
the disposition of the monies in the Distribution Fund.
III.
Standing
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that, notwithstanding any
rule or provision of law, nothing herein shall be deemed to confer standing or right of
intervention upon any persons other than the Commission or the Defendant.
IV.
Record Retention and Non-Destruction Requirement
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that, for a period of five
years from the effective date of this Final Judgment or such shorter or longer period as the Court
may order, Defendant, and his agents, affiliates, servants, employees, attorneys, and those
persons in active concert or participation with them, and each of them, are hereby enjoined from
destroying, mutilating, concealing, altering, or disposing of: (a) any research distributed by
Defendant or Merrill Lynch Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (“Merrill Lynch”) during the
relevant period identified in the Complaint; (b) documents sufficient to identify all customers
who bought or sold equity securities of the issuers as to which Defendant issued research during
the relevant period identified in the Complaint (the “Transactions”), including but not limited to
documents sufficient to identify the dates, amounts, and prices of the Transactions; (c)
documents sufficient to identify which customers received which research distributed by
Defendant during the relevant period identified in the Complaint; (d) order entry information
sufficient to identify whether the Transactions were solicited by Defendant or Merrill Lynch; (e)
documents sufficient to identify the publicly-traded companies for which Merrill Lynch sought
- 4 -
to provide, was engaged to provide, or did provide investment banking services during the
relevant period identified in the Complaint; and (f) any and all written (including electronic)
communication, including communications to and from customers and intra-firm
communications, relating to Merrill Lynch’s investment banking and equity research operations
during the relevant period identified in the Complaint; provided, however, that Defendant need
not retain duplicate identical copies of public documents filed with the Commission or any other
regulatory authority.
V.
Defendant’s Consent Incorporated by Reference
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Defendant’s Consent
previously filed in this action is incorporated herein with the same force and effect as if fully set
forth herein, and Defendant shall comply with all of the undertakings and agreements set forth
therein.
VI.
Court to Retain Jurisdiction
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that this Court shall retain
jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Final Judgment.
- 5 -
VII.
Entry of Judgment Forthwith
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that, there being no just
cause for delay, the Clerk of the Court shall enter this Judgment forthwith and without further
notice.
Dated: New York, New York
______________, 2003
____________________________________
WILLIAM H. PAULEY III
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
- 6 -