sec-litreleases litigation_release 64 KB 2,480 chars

SEC v. Jason R. Rosenthal, No. LR-16133, District of Massachusetts — Press Release

raw: Jason R. Rosenthal

Jason R. Rosenthal, No. LR-16133

Caption
SEC v. Jason R. Rosenthal
summary

Jason R. Rosenthal, an unregistered individual, defrauded three investors of $50,000 by falsely promising 500%–2000% returns and fake venture capital backing for unregistered internet-based franchise securities, leading the SEC to charge him with antifraud and registration violations and seek disgorgement, penalties, and an injunction.

paragraph

Jason R. Rosenthal violated federal securities laws by soliciting investments via the Internet for unregistered securities through VentureLink Capital Corporation, falsely claiming 500% to 2000% returns within two years and backing by venture capitalists who funded Microsoft and Intel. He raised $50,000 from three investors and received $5,000 in commissions while being unregistered as a broker-dealer, breaching Sections 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Sections 10(b) and 15(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The SEC is seeking a permanent injunction, disgorgement of ill-gotten gains plus prejudgment interest, and a civil monetary penalty, with its investigation still ongoing.

narrative

Jason R. Rosenthal, a former resident of Gloucester, Massachusetts, and resident of Dunedin, Florida, orchestrated a fraudulent online securities offering through VentureLink Capital Corporation and its affiliates, targeting investors via the Internet. He falsely promised returns of 500% to 2000% within two years, misrepresented the ventures as having received start-up capital from the same venture capitalists who funded Microsoft and Intel, and claimed an imminent IPO would generate substantial profits. Rosenthal raised $50,000 from three investors and received $5,000 in commissions, despite being neither registered with the SEC nor associated with any registered broker-dealer. The SEC charged him with violating Sections 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Sections 10(b) and 15(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, along with Rule 10b-5. The Commission is seeking a permanent injunction to prevent future violations, disgorgement of his ill-gotten gains plus prejudgment interest, and a civil monetary penalty to be determined by the court. The complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts, and the investigation into the matter remains ongoing as of the filing date.

Enriched metadata

Scheme
unregistered-securities (100%)
Court
District of Massachusetts
Entity
Jason R. Rosenthal
Classified unregistered-securities(confidence 100%). EDGAR detection: forms Form D/S-1· recall 41% / precision 30%. detection rule →
Statutes
Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities ActSections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities ActSections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities ActSections 10(b) and 15(a) of the Securities Exchange ActSections 10(b) and 15(a) of the Securities Exchange ActRule 10b-5
Parties
Securities and Exchange CommissionJason R. Rosenthal
Keywords
rosenthalsecuritiescommissionjason rosenthalsecurities exchangejasoninvestorsexchange commissionantifraud registrationregistration provisionsprovisions federalfederal securitiessecurities lawsunregistered securitiesregistered commission

Extracted insights

Dollar amounts 2
  • $50K $50,000 $10K–$100K
  • $5K $5,000 <$10K
Entities 7
  • person jason r. rosenthal
  • agency sec as broker-dealer
  • agency Securities and Exchange Commission
  • court united states district court for the district of massachusetts (99cv11010gao)
  • company unregistered securities
  • company unregistered securities in venturelink capital corporation
  • company venturelink capital corporation
Triples 12
  • SEC filed complaint against Jason R. Rosenthal
  • Jason R. Rosenthal charged with violating antifraud and registration provisions of federal securities laws
  • Jason R. Rosenthal used Internet to solicit investors for unregistered securities in VentureLink Capital Corporation
  • Jason R. Rosenthal falsely projected investment returns of 500% to 2000% within two years
  • Jason R. Rosenthal misrepresented investment as opportunity to invest in company with millions in start-up capital from Microsoft and Intel venture capitalists
  • Jason R. Rosenthal received investments totaling $50,000 from three investors
  • Jason R. Rosenthal received commissions of $5,000
  • Jason R. Rosenthal violated Sections 5(a), 5(c), 17(a) of Securities Act of 1933 and Sections 10(b), 15(a) of Securities Exchange Act of 1934
  • SEC seeking permanent injunction, disgorgement of ill-gotten gains plus prejudgment interest, and civil monetary penalty
  • Case filed in United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts (99CV11010GAO)
  • Jason R. Rosenthal was not registered with SEC as broker-dealer
  • VentureLink Capital Corporation issued unregistered securities
View original SEC litigation releasesec.gov
Extracted body text (2,480c)
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jason R. Rosenthal(United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts 99CV11010GAO) The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") announced the filing of a complaint against Jason R. Rosenthal ("Rosenthal"), a resident of Dunedin, Florida and a former resident of Gloucester, Massachusetts, charging him with violating the antifraud and registration provisions of the federal securities laws in connection with a fraudulent offering of unregistered securities on the Internet. The Commission's Complaint alleges that since at least November 1998, Rosenthal used the Internet to solicit investors to purchase unregistered securities in entities formed to purchase and operate franchises which would sell and support software for operating commercial websites. The securities were issued by a company known as VentureLink Capital Corporation or one of its affiliates. According to the Complaint, Rosenthal's Internet solicitations falsely projected investment returns of 500% to 2000% within two years, and misrepresented the investment as an opportunity to invest in a company that had obtained millions of dollars of start-up capital from the same venture capitalists who had provided the initial capital for Microsoft and Intel. Further, Rosenthal misled investors to believe that the entities in which they would be investing were planning an initial public offering that would generate substantial profits for investors. The Commission alleges that Rosenthal's solicitations yielded investments from three investors, totalling $50,000, and commissions to Rosenthal in the amount of $5,000. Rosenthal was not registered with the Commission as a broker-dealer, nor was he associated with any broker-dealer registered with the Commission. The Complaint, which was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, alleges that Rosenthal violated Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, and Sections 10(b) and 15(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. In its Complaint, the Commission is seeking a permanent injunction prohibiting Rosenthal from further violations of the antifraud and registration provisions of the federal securities laws, disgorgement of Rosenthal's ill-gotten gains plus prejudgment interest thereon, and a civil monetary penalty in an amount to be determined by the Court. The investigation into this matter is continuing.
OCR text (2,480c · plain-text · 99% conf)
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jason R. Rosenthal(United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts 99CV11010GAO) The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") announced the filing of a complaint against Jason R. Rosenthal ("Rosenthal"), a resident of Dunedin, Florida and a former resident of Gloucester, Massachusetts, charging him with violating the antifraud and registration provisions of the federal securities laws in connection with a fraudulent offering of unregistered securities on the Internet. The Commission's Complaint alleges that since at least November 1998, Rosenthal used the Internet to solicit investors to purchase unregistered securities in entities formed to purchase and operate franchises which would sell and support software for operating commercial websites. The securities were issued by a company known as VentureLink Capital Corporation or one of its affiliates. According to the Complaint, Rosenthal's Internet solicitations falsely projected investment returns of 500% to 2000% within two years, and misrepresented the investment as an opportunity to invest in a company that had obtained millions of dollars of start-up capital from the same venture capitalists who had provided the initial capital for Microsoft and Intel. Further, Rosenthal misled investors to believe that the entities in which they would be investing were planning an initial public offering that would generate substantial profits for investors. The Commission alleges that Rosenthal's solicitations yielded investments from three investors, totalling $50,000, and commissions to Rosenthal in the amount of $5,000. Rosenthal was not registered with the Commission as a broker-dealer, nor was he associated with any broker-dealer registered with the Commission. The Complaint, which was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, alleges that Rosenthal violated Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, and Sections 10(b) and 15(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. In its Complaint, the Commission is seeking a permanent injunction prohibiting Rosenthal from further violations of the antifraud and registration provisions of the federal securities laws, disgorgement of Rosenthal's ill-gotten gains plus prejudgment interest thereon, and a civil monetary penalty in an amount to be determined by the Court. The investigation into this matter is continuing.