In re WELLS FARGO CLEARING
Wells Fargo Clearing Services and Wells Fargo Advisors Financial Network willfully violated the Investment Advisers Act by failing to adopt written policies for their bank-deposit cash-sweep program, resulting in $35 million in civil penalties.
Wells Fargo Clearing Services and Wells Fargo Advisors Financial Network were found to have willfully violated Section 206(4) of the Investment Advisers Act by failing to adopt written policies for their bank-deposit cash-sweep program. The firms defaulted most advisory clients' cash into the program, often offering lower yields than alternatives, while receiving advisory fees and other financial benefits. As a result, Wells Fargo Clearing Services was ordered to pay a $28 million civil penalty, and Wells Fargo Advisors Financial Network was ordered to pay a $7 million civil penalty.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) brought administrative and cease-and-desist proceedings against Wells Fargo Clearing Services, LLC and Wells Fargo Advisors Financial Network, LLC for willfully violating Section 206(4) of the Investment Advisers Act. The firms failed to adopt written policies and procedures for their bank-deposit cash-sweep program, which steered client cash into a low-yield FDIC-insured sweep that generated undisclosed financial benefits for the firm. From at least 2019 through May 2024, the firms defaulted most advisory clients' cash into the program, often offering lower yields than alternatives, while receiving advisory fees and other financial benefits. The SEC found that the conduct constituted a breach of the Advisers Act and censured both entities. As part of the resolution, Wells Fargo Clearing Services was ordered to pay a $28 million civil penalty, and Wells Fargo Advisors Financial Network was ordered to pay a $7 million civil penalty. Both entities were also required to cease and desist from future violations and improve their policies and procedures. The settlement was entered without admission of wrongdoing, but the firms agreed to cooperate with the SEC and pay the penalties to the U.S. Treasury.
Extracted insights
- $558.00B $558 billion ≥$1B
- $154.00B $154 billion ≥$1B
- $28.00M $28 million $10M–$100M
- $7.00M $7 million $1M–$10M
- agency the securities and exchange commission
- company wells fargo advisors
- The Securities and Exchange Commission Deems It appropriate and in the public interest that public administrative and cease-and-desist proceedings be, and hereby are, instituted
- Respondents Have submitted Offers of Settlement
- Respondents Consent to The entry of this Order Instituting Administrative and Cease-and-Desist Proceedings
- Wells Fargo Advisors Failed to adopt and implement Written policies and procedures reasonably designed to prevent violations of the Advisers Act and the rules thereunder relating to its cash sweep program
- Wells Fargo Advisors Received A significant financial benefit from advisory client cash in the BDSP
- Wells Fargo Advisors Failed to adopt and implement Reasonably designed policies and procedures to consider the best interests of clients when evaluating and selecting which cash sweep program options to make available to clients
- Wells Fargo Advisors Failed to adopt and implement Policies and procedures concerning the duties of Wells Fargo Advisors financial advisors in managing client cash in advisory accounts
- Wells Fargo Advisors Violated Section 206(4) of the Advisers Act and Rule 206(4)-7 thereunder
- Wells Fargo Advisors Made improvements to Its policies and procedures regarding the selection of cash sweep options for advisory clients and allocation of client cash
1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Release No. 102229 / January 17, 2025
INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF 1940
Release No. 6827 / January 17, 2025
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
File No. 3-22430
In the Matter of
WELLS FARGO CLEARING
SERVICES, LLC, and
WELLS FARGO ADVISORS
FINANCIAL NETWORK,
LLC
Respondents.
ORDER INSTITUTING ADMINISTRATIVE
AND CEASE-AND-DESIST PROCEEDINGS
PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 203(e) AND
203(k) OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISERS
ACT OF 1940 AND SECTION 15(b) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,
MAKING FINDINGS, AND IMPOSING
REMEDIAL SANCTIONS AND A CEASE-
AND-DESIST ORDER
I.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) deems it appropriate and in the
public interest that public administrative and cease-and-desist proceedings be, and hereby are,
instituted pursuant to Sections 203(e) and 203(k) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940
(“Advisers Act”) and Section 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”),
against Wells Fargo Clearing Services, LLC and Wells Fargo Advisors Financial Network, LLC
(collectively, the “Respondents” or “Wells Fargo Advisors”).
II.
In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, Respondents have submitted Offers
of Settlement (the “Offers”) which the Commission has determined to accept. Solely for the
purpose of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the
Commission, or to which the Commission is a party, and without admitting or denying the findings
herein, except as to the Commission’s jurisdiction over them and the subject matter of these
proceedings, which are admitted, Respondents consent to the entry of this Order Instituting
Administrative and Cease-and-Desist Proceedings Pursuant to Sections 203(e) and 203(k) of the
2
Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and Section 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
Making Findings, and Imposing Remedial Sanctions and a Cease-and-Desist Order (“Order”), as
set forth below.
III.
On the basis of this Order and Respondents’ Offers, the Commission finds:
Summary
1. These proceedings arise out of registered investment advisers Wells Fargo Advisors’
failure to adopt and implement written policies and procedures reasonably designed to prevent
violations of the Advisers Act and the rules thereunder relating to its cash sweep program,
specifically, its use of a bank deposit sweep program (“BDSP”). From at least 2019 through May
2024 (the “Relevant Period”), Wells Fargo Advisors offered the BDSP as the only cash sweep
option for most advisory clients and received a significant financial benefit from advisory client
cash in the BDSP. Wells Fargo Advisors disclosed to clients that it had a financial incentive to
offer particular vehicles in its cash sweep program, including that Wells Fargo Advisors received
financial benefits from advisory clients’ cash held in the BDSP. During the Relevant Period, Wells
Fargo Advisors failed to adopt and implement reasonably designed policies and procedures (1) to
consider the best interests of clients when evaluating and selecting which cash sweep program
options to make available to clients, including during periods of rising interest rates, and (2)
concerning the duties of Wells Fargo Advisors financial advisors in managing client cash in
advisory accounts. As a result of this conduct, Wells Fargo Advisors willfully violated Section
206(4) of the Advisers Act and Rule 206(4)-7 thereunder. Nevertheless, as described below, Wells
Fargo Advisors later made improvements to its policies and procedures regarding the selection of
cash sweep options for advisory clients and allocation of client cash.
Respondents
2. Wells Fargo Clearing Services, LLC (“Wells Fargo Clearing Services”), formerly
known as Wells Fargo Advisors, LLC, is a Delaware limited liability company with its principal
place of business in St. Louis, Missouri. It is a subsidiary and non-bank affiliate of Wells Fargo &
Company and is a dual registrant that has been registered with the Commission as a broker-dealer
since April 3, 1987, and an investment adviser since October 5, 1990. It is an affiliate of Wells
Fargo Advisors Financial Network, LLC. In its Form ADV filed March 28, 2024, Wells Fargo
Clearing Services reported that it had approximately $558 billion in regulatory assets under
management.
3. Wells Fargo Advisors Financial Network, LLC (“Wells Fargo Advisors Financial
Network”) is a Delaware limited liability company with its principal place of business in St. Louis,
Missouri. It is a subsidiary and non-bank affiliate of Wells Fargo & Company and is a dual
registrant that has been registered with the Commission as a broker-dealer since January 28, 1983,
and an investment adviser since April 3, 2000. It is an affiliate of Wells Fargo Clearing Services. In
its Form ADV, filed March 28, 2024, Wells Fargo Advisors Financial Network reported that it had
3
approximately $154 billion in regulatory assets under management. Wells Fargo Clearing Services
and Wells Fargo Advisors Financial Network collectively provide advisory services under the
brand name “Wells Fargo Advisors.”
Background
Wells Fargo Advisors’ FDIC- Insured Bank Deposit Sweep Program was the Only Cash Sweep
Program Option for Most Advisory Clients During the Relevant Period
4. Wells Fargo Advisors offers advisory services through many advisory programs to
its advisory clients, including discretionary accounts managed by Wells Fargo Advisors financial
advisors, accounts managed by the client based upon advice from Wells Fargo Advisors, portfolios
managed by Wells Fargo Advisors portfolio managers, and portfolios managed by third-party
investment advisers.
5. For all advisory programs, Wells Fargo Advisors offers advisory clients a cash
sweep program that allows clients to earn a return on uninvested cash balances in their accounts by
automatically transferring the cash balances into a cash sweep product until the cash is invested or
otherwise used to satisfy obligations. During the Relevant Period, the BDSP was the only cash
sweep product option in most Wells Fargo Advisors advisory programs. Outside the cash sweep
program, Wells Fargo Advisors also offers money market funds, treasuries and CDs, and other
cash products for clients to invest their cash. Wells Fargo Advisors charges an advisory fee on
cash held in the cash sweep program, as well as cash invested in these other options.
6. In the BDSP, Wells Fargo Advisors automatically sweeps advisory clients’
uninvested cash holdings into interest-bearing accounts subject to Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation (“FDIC”) insurance at one or more banks, including its affiliate Wells Fargo Bank,
N.A. (“Wells Fargo Bank”). Specifically, Wells Fargo Advisors offers a Standard Bank Deposit
Sweep Program, which provided for deposits with two or more affiliated banks, and the Expanded
Bank Deposit Sweep, which provided for deposits at affiliated banks and unaffiliated banks.
7. Wells Fargo Advisors sets the interest rate offered in the BDSP. Wells Fargo
Advisors’ BDSP typically offered lower yields than other cash alternatives, including cash sweep
money market mutual fund options. The yield differential between Wells Fargo Advisors’ BDSP
and other cash sweep alternatives varied; during the Relevant Period at times the differences were
minimal and at times the differences exceeded 500 basis points.
8. Wells Fargo Advisors swept billions of dollars of client cash into its BDSP on a
yearly basis between 2019 and 2023. In addition to earning advisory fees on BDSP assets, Wells
Fargo Advisors benefits financially from its advisory clients’ cash balances held in the BDSP in
other ways. Wells Fargo Clearing Services received direct payments from Wells Fargo Bank as
well as payments from external banks. In addition, the business segment in which Wells Fargo
Advisors operates reported to shareholders income credits related to BDSP balances, offset by
yield paid to customers. Wells Fargo Advisors described the BDSP to clients in its Forms ADV
4
Part 2A and other documents, including that Wells Fargo Advisors received financial benefits from
advisory clients’ cash held in the BDSP.
Wells Fargo Advisors Failed to Adopt and Implement Reasonably Designed Written Policies and
Procedures Concerning Its Cash Sweep Program
9. Section 206(4) of the Advisers Act and Rule 206(4)-7 thereunder require a
registered investment adviser to adopt and implement written policies and procedures reasonably
designed to prevent violations by the adviser and its supervised persons of the Advisers Act and the
rules adopted thereunder. During the Relevant Period, Wells Fargo Advisors failed to adopt and
implement written compliance policies and procedures reasonably designed to prevent violations
by the adviser and its supervised persons of the Advisers Act and the rules adopted thereunder
concerning its cash sweep program.
10. First, Wells Fargo Advisors failed to adopt and implement reasonably designed
written policies and procedures to consider the best interests of clients when evaluating and
selecting which cash sweep program options to make available to clients. Wells Fargo Advisors
evaluated and selected the cash sweep program options and determined to place cash sweep assets
for the majority of advisory clients in the FDIC-insured BDSP as a default option or only option.
Wells Fargo Advisors lacked reasonably designed written policies and procedures designed to
evaluate whether the cash sweep program option(s) selected were in the best interests of clients.
While documents exist showing that individuals and a committee at Wells Fargo Advisors
regularly considered what options should be provided to advisory clients in the cash sweep
program, these documents generally do not reflect discussion of which options were in the clients’
best interest, for example considering whether selecting a sweep option with higher yields similar
to government money market funds would be in the best interests of clients.
11. Second, Wells Fargo Advisors failed to adopt and implement reasonably designed
written policies and procedures concerning cash allocation, including the duties of the Wells Fargo
Advisors’ financial advisors in managing client cash in the client’s best interest and reasonably
designed policies relating to the amount of advisory client cash in the BDSP. While Wells Fargo
Advisors generally required its financial advisors to manage all client assets according to a client’s
goals and objectives, it did not have a reasonably designed process to monitor whether financial
advisors moved client cash held in the BDSP to other cash investment options if that was necessary
to meet the client’s goals, given that most advisory clients’ uninvested cash defaulted into the
BDSP. Moreover, during times of rising interest rates, for most of the Relevant Period, Wells Fargo
Advisors had no policies or procedures that specifically required that its financial advisors evaluate
whether an advisory client’s cash should remain in the BDSP option or be deployed elsewhere,
including to, where consistent with a client’s investment profile, other cash management options.
12. Wells Fargo Advisors had policies concerning limits on the amount of cash that
could be held in the BDSP. However, the limits were set at 25% for most of the Relevant Period,
and only applied to certain advisory programs. These policies were not reasonably designed to
monitor or regularly evaluate whether client cash was appropriately allocated on a timely basis
according to a client’s goals and objectives. In October 2023, Wells Fargo Advisors adopted a new
5
written policy that limited BDSP balances to 5% of a client’s total assets for clients in client-
directed and financial adviser-directed programs. The limit was raised back to 25% in June 2024
when Wells Fargo Advisors began offering a higher yield on the BDSP.
13. While Wells Fargo Advisors maintained a duty to provide advice on cash and
charged an advisory fee on the cash in advisory accounts, Wells Fargo Advisors’ disclosures were
inconsistent and stated in certain materials that “it does not have any duty to monitor the Cash
Sweep Vehicle for your account, or make recommendations about, or make changes to, the Cash
Sweep Program that may be beneficial to you.” This inconsistency made it even more important to
have policies specifically addressing the allocation of cash within the BDSP.
Violations
14. As a result of the conduct described above, Wells Fargo Advisors willfully
1
violated Section 206(4) of the Advisers Act and Rule 206(4)-7 promulgated thereunder, which
requires, among other things, that a registered investment adviser adopt and implement written
policies and procedures reasonably designed to prevent violations of the Advisers Act and the rules
promulgated thereunder.
Wells Fargo Advisors’ Remedial Efforts and Cooperation
15. In determining to accept the Offers, the Commission considered remedial acts
promptly undertaken by Wells Fargo Advisors and cooperation afforded the Commission staff.
For example, Wells Fargo Advisors made improvements to its policies and procedures regarding
the selection of cash sweep options for advisory clients and the allocation of client cash in
advisory accounts consistent with their stated goals; and reevaluated the limits on the BDSP
holdings. During the investigation, Wells Fargo Advisors also provided detailed narrative
responses on numerous topics, which expedited the investigation.
IV.
In view of the foregoing, the Commission deems it appropriate and in the public interest to
impose the sanctions agreed to in Respondents’ Offers.
1
“Willfully,” for purposes of imposing relief under Section 203(e) of the Advisers Act and
Section 15(b) of the Exchange Act, “‘means no more than that the person charged with the
duty knows what he is doing.’” Wonsover v. SEC, 205 F.3d 408, 414 (D.C. Cir. 2000)
(quoting Hughes v. SEC, 174 F.2d 969, 977 (D.C. Cir. 1949)). There is no requirement that
the actor “also be aware that he is violating one of the Rules or Acts.” Tager v. SEC, 344
F.2d 5, 8 (2d Cir. 1965). The decision in The Robare Group, Ltd. v. SEC, which construed
the term “willfully” for purposes of a differently structured statutory provision, does not
alter that standard. 922 F.3d 468, 478-79 (D.C. Cir. 2019) (setting forth the showing
required to establish that a person has “willfully omit[ted]” material information from a
required disclosure in violation of Section 207 of the Advisers Act).
6
Accordingly, pursuant to Sections 203(e) and 203(k) of the Advisers Act and Section 15(b)
of the Exchange Act, it is hereby ORDERED that:
A. Wells Fargo Clearing Services and Wells Fargo Advisors Financial Network cease
and desist from committing or causing any violations and any future violations of Section 206(4) of
the Advisers Act and Rule 206(4)-7 thereunder.
B. Wells Fargo Clearing Services and Wells Fargo Advisors Financial Network are
censured.
C. Wells Fargo Clearing Services shall, within 10 days of entry of this Order, pay a
civil money penalty of $28 million to the Securities and Exchange Commission for transfer to the
general fund of the United States Treasury, subject to Section 21F(g)(3) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934. If timely payment is not made, additional interest shall accrue pursuant to 31 U.S.C. §
3717. Payment must be made in one of the following ways:
(1) Respondent may transmit payment electronically to the Commission, which
will provide detailed ACH transfer/Fedwire instructions upon request;
(2) Respondent may make direct payment from a bank account via Pay.gov
through the SEC website at http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/ofm.htm; or
(3) Respondent may pay by certified check, bank cashier’s check, or United
States postal money order, made payable to the Securities and Exchange
Commission and hand-delivered or mailed to:
Enterprise Services Center
Accounts Receivable Branch
HQ Bldg., Room 181, AMZ-341
6500 South MacArthur Boulevard
Oklahoma City, OK 73169
Payments by check or money order must be accompanied by a cover letter identifying
Wells Fargo Clearing Services as a Respondent in these proceedings, and the file number of these
proceedings; a copy of the cover letter and check or money order must be sent to Kimberly
Frederick, Assistant Director, Asset Management Unit, Securities and Exchange Commission,
Byron G. Rogers Federal Building, 1961 Stout Street, Suite 1700, Denver, CO 80294-1961.
D. Wells Fargo Advisors Financial Network shall, within 10 days of entry of this
Order, pay a civil money penalty of $7 million to the Securities and Exchange Commission for
transfer to the general fund of the United States Treasury, subject to Section 21F(g)(3) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934. If timely payment is not made, additional interest shall accrue
pursuant to 31 U.S.C. § 3717. Payment must be made in one of the following ways:
7
(1) Respondent may transmit payment electronically to the Commission, which
will provide detailed ACH transfer/Fedwire instructions upon request;
(2) Respondent may make direct payment from a bank account via Pay.gov
through the SEC website at http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/ofm.htm; or
(3) Respondent may pay by certified check, bank cashier’s check, or United
States postal money order, made payable to the Securities and Exchange
Commission and hand-delivered or mailed to:
Enterprise Services Center
Accounts Receivable Branch
HQ Bldg., Room 181, AMZ-341
6500 South MacArthur Boulevard
Oklahoma City, OK 73169
Payments by check or money order must be accompanied by a cover letter identifying
Wells Fargo Advisors Financial Network as a Respondent in these proceedings, and the file
number of these proceedings; a copy of the cover letter and check or money order must be sent to
Kimberly Frederick, Assistant Director, Asset Management Unit, Securities and Exchange
Commission, Byron G. Rogers Federal Building, 1961 Stout Street, Suite 1700, Denver, CO
80294-1961.
E. Amounts ordered to be paid as civil money penalties pursuant to this Order shall be
treated as penalties paid to the government for all purposes, including all tax purposes. To preserve
the deterrent effect of the civil penalty, Respondents agree that in any Related Investor Action, they
shall not argue that they are entitled to, nor shall they benefit by, offset or reduction of any award of
compensatory damages by the amount of any part of Respondents’ payment of a civil penalty in this
action (“Penalty Offset”). If the court in any Related Investor Action grants such a Penalty Offset,
Respondents agree that they shall, within 30 days after entry of a final order granting the Penalty
Offset, notify the Commission’s counsel in this action and pay the amount of the Penalty Offset to
the Securities and Exchange Commission. Such a payment shall not be deemed an additional civil
penalty and shall not be deemed to change the amount of the civil penalty imposed in this
proceeding. For purposes of this paragraph, a “Related Investor Action” means a private damages
action brought against Respondents by or on behalf of one or more investors based on substantially
the same facts as alleged in the Order instituted by the Commission in this proceeding.
By the Commission.
Vanessa A. Countryman
Secretary
1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Release No. 102229 / January 17, 2025
INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF 1940
Release No. 6827 / January 17, 2025
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
File No. 3-22430
In the Matter of
WELLS FARGO CLEARING
SERVICES, LLC, and
WELLS FARGO ADVISORS
FINANCIAL NETWORK,
LLC
Respondents.
ORDER INSTITUTING ADMINISTRATIVE
AND CEASE-AND-DESIST PROCEEDINGS
PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 203(e) AND
203(k) OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISERS
ACT OF 1940 AND SECTION 15(b) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,
MAKING FINDINGS, AND IMPOSING
REMEDIAL SANCTIONS AND A CEASE-
AND-DESIST ORDER
I.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) deems it appropriate and in the
public interest that public administrative and cease-and-desist proceedings be, and hereby are,
instituted pursuant to Sections 203(e) and 203(k) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940
(“Advisers Act”) and Section 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”),
against Wells Fargo Clearing Services, LLC and Wells Fargo Advisors Financial Network, LLC
(collectively, the “Respondents” or “Wells Fargo Advisors”).
II.
In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, Respondents have submitted Offers
of Settlement (the “Offers”) which the Commission has determined to accept. Solely for the
purpose of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the
Commission, or to which the Commission is a party, and without admitting or denying the findings
herein, except as to the Commission’s jurisdiction over them and the subject matter of these
proceedings, which are admitted, Respondents consent to the entry of this Order Instituting
Administrative and Cease-and-Desist Proceedings Pursuant to Sections 203(e) and 203(k) of the
2
Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and Section 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
Making Findings, and Imposing Remedial Sanctions and a Cease-and-Desist Order (“Order”), as
set forth below.
III.
On the basis of this Order and Respondents’ Offers, the Commission finds:
Summary
1. These proceedings arise out of registered investment advisers Wells Fargo Advisors’
failure to adopt and implement written policies and procedures reasonably designed to prevent
violations of the Advisers Act and the rules thereunder relating to its cash sweep program,
specifically, its use of a bank deposit sweep program (“BDSP”). From at least 2019 through May
2024 (the “Relevant Period”), Wells Fargo Advisors offered the BDSP as the only cash sweep
option for most advisory clients and received a significant financial benefit from advisory client
cash in the BDSP. Wells Fargo Advisors disclosed to clients that it had a financial incentive to
offer particular vehicles in its cash sweep program, including that Wells Fargo Advisors received
financial benefits from advisory clients’ cash held in the BDSP. During the Relevant Period, Wells
Fargo Advisors failed to adopt and implement reasonably designed policies and procedures (1) to
consider the best interests of clients when evaluating and selecting which cash sweep program
options to make available to clients, including during periods of rising interest rates, and (2)
concerning the duties of Wells Fargo Advisors financial advisors in managing client cash in
advisory accounts. As a result of this conduct, Wells Fargo Advisors willfully violated Section
206(4) of the Advisers Act and Rule 206(4)-7 thereunder. Nevertheless, as described below, Wells
Fargo Advisors later made improvements to its policies and procedures regarding the selection of
cash sweep options for advisory clients and allocation of client cash.
Respondents
2. Wells Fargo Clearing Services, LLC (“Wells Fargo Clearing Services”), formerly
known as Wells Fargo Advisors, LLC, is a Delaware limited liability company with its principal
place of business in St. Louis, Missouri. It is a subsidiary and non-bank affiliate of Wells Fargo &
Company and is a dual registrant that has been registered with the Commission as a broker-dealer
since April 3, 1987, and an investment adviser since October 5, 1990. It is an affiliate of Wells
Fargo Advisors Financial Network, LLC. In its Form ADV filed March 28, 2024, Wells Fargo
Clearing Services reported that it had approximately $558 billion in regulatory assets under
management.
3. Wells Fargo Advisors Financial Network, LLC (“Wells Fargo Advisors Financial
Network”) is a Delaware limited liability company with its principal place of business in St. Louis,
Missouri. It is a subsidiary and non-bank affiliate of Wells Fargo & Company and is a dual
registrant that has been registered with the Commission as a broker-dealer since January 28, 1983,
and an investment adviser since April 3, 2000. It is an affiliate of Wells Fargo Clearing Services. In
its Form ADV, filed March 28, 2024, Wells Fargo Advisors Financial Network reported that it had
3
approximately $154 billion in regulatory assets under management. Wells Fargo Clearing Services
and Wells Fargo Advisors Financial Network collectively provide advisory services under the
brand name “Wells Fargo Advisors.”
Background
Wells Fargo Advisors’ FDIC- Insured Bank Deposit Sweep Program was the Only Cash Sweep
Program Option for Most Advisory Clients During the Relevant Period
4. Wells Fargo Advisors offers advisory services through many advisory programs to
its advisory clients, including discretionary accounts managed by Wells Fargo Advisors financial
advisors, accounts managed by the client based upon advice from Wells Fargo Advisors, portfolios
managed by Wells Fargo Advisors portfolio managers, and portfolios managed by third-party
investment advisers.
5. For all advisory programs, Wells Fargo Advisors offers advisory clients a cash
sweep program that allows clients to earn a return on uninvested cash balances in their accounts by
automatically transferring the cash balances into a cash sweep product until the cash is invested or
otherwise used to satisfy obligations. During the Relevant Period, the BDSP was the only cash
sweep product option in most Wells Fargo Advisors advisory programs. Outside the cash sweep
program, Wells Fargo Advisors also offers money market funds, treasuries and CDs, and other
cash products for clients to invest their cash. Wells Fargo Advisors charges an advisory fee on
cash held in the cash sweep program, as well as cash invested in these other options.
6. In the BDSP, Wells Fargo Advisors automatically sweeps advisory clients’
uninvested cash holdings into interest-bearing accounts subject to Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation (“FDIC”) insurance at one or more banks, including its affiliate Wells Fargo Bank,
N.A. (“Wells Fargo Bank”). Specifically, Wells Fargo Advisors offers a Standard Bank Deposit
Sweep Program, which provided for deposits with two or more affiliated banks, and the Expanded
Bank Deposit Sweep, which provided for deposits at affiliated banks and unaffiliated banks.
7. Wells Fargo Advisors sets the interest rate offered in the BDSP. Wells Fargo
Advisors’ BDSP typically offered lower yields than other cash alternatives, including cash sweep
money market mutual fund options. The yield differential between Wells Fargo Advisors’ BDSP
and other cash sweep alternatives varied; during the Relevant Period at times the differences were
minimal and at times the differences exceeded 500 basis points.
8. Wells Fargo Advisors swept billions of dollars of client cash into its BDSP on a
yearly basis between 2019 and 2023. In addition to earning advisory fees on BDSP assets, Wells
Fargo Advisors benefits financially from its advisory clients’ cash balances held in the BDSP in
other ways. Wells Fargo Clearing Services received direct payments from Wells Fargo Bank as
well as payments from external banks. In addition, the business segment in which Wells Fargo
Advisors operates reported to shareholders income credits related to BDSP balances, offset by
yield paid to customers. Wells Fargo Advisors described the BDSP to clients in its Forms ADV
4
Part 2A and other documents, including that Wells Fargo Advisors received financial benefits from
advisory clients’ cash held in the BDSP.
Wells Fargo Advisors Failed to Adopt and Implement Reasonably Designed Written Policies and
Procedures Concerning Its Cash Sweep Program
9. Section 206(4) of the Advisers Act and Rule 206(4)-7 thereunder require a
registered investment adviser to adopt and implement written policies and procedures reasonably
designed to prevent violations by the adviser and its supervised persons of the Advisers Act and the
rules adopted thereunder. During the Relevant Period, Wells Fargo Advisors failed to adopt and
implement written compliance policies and procedures reasonably designed to prevent violations
by the adviser and its supervised persons of the Advisers Act and the rules adopted thereunder
concerning its cash sweep program.
10. First, Wells Fargo Advisors failed to adopt and implement reasonably designed
written policies and procedures to consider the best interests of clients when evaluating and
selecting which cash sweep program options to make available to clients. Wells Fargo Advisors
evaluated and selected the cash sweep program options and determined to place cash sweep assets
for the majority of advisory clients in the FDIC-insured BDSP as a default option or only option.
Wells Fargo Advisors lacked reasonably designed written policies and procedures designed to
evaluate whether the cash sweep program option(s) selected were in the best interests of clients.
While documents exist showing that individuals and a committee at Wells Fargo Advisors
regularly considered what options should be provided to advisory clients in the cash sweep
program, these documents generally do not reflect discussion of which options were in the clients’
best interest, for example considering whether selecting a sweep option with higher yields similar
to government money market funds would be in the best interests of clients.
11. Second, Wells Fargo Advisors failed to adopt and implement reasonably designed
written policies and procedures concerning cash allocation, including the duties of the Wells Fargo
Advisors’ financial advisors in managing client cash in the client’s best interest and reasonably
designed policies relating to the amount of advisory client cash in the BDSP. While Wells Fargo
Advisors generally required its financial advisors to manage all client assets according to a client’s
goals and objectives, it did not have a reasonably designed process to monitor whether financial
advisors moved client cash held in the BDSP to other cash investment options if that was necessary
to meet the client’s goals, given that most advisory clients’ uninvested cash defaulted into the
BDSP. Moreover, during times of rising interest rates, for most of the Relevant Period, Wells Fargo
Advisors had no policies or procedures that specifically required that its financial advisors evaluate
whether an advisory client’s cash should remain in the BDSP option or be deployed elsewhere,
including to, where consistent with a client’s investment profile, other cash management options.
12. Wells Fargo Advisors had policies concerning limits on the amount of cash that
could be held in the BDSP. However, the limits were set at 25% for most of the Relevant Period,
and only applied to certain advisory programs. These policies were not reasonably designed to
monitor or regularly evaluate whether client cash was appropriately allocated on a timely basis
according to a client’s goals and objectives. In October 2023, Wells Fargo Advisors adopted a new
5
written policy that limited BDSP balances to 5% of a client’s total assets for clients in client-
directed and financial adviser-directed programs. The limit was raised back to 25% in June 2024
when Wells Fargo Advisors began offering a higher yield on the BDSP.
13. While Wells Fargo Advisors maintained a duty to provide advice on cash and
charged an advisory fee on the cash in advisory accounts, Wells Fargo Advisors’ disclosures were
inconsistent and stated in certain materials that “it does not have any duty to monitor the Cash
Sweep Vehicle for your account, or make recommendations about, or make changes to, the Cash
Sweep Program that may be beneficial to you.” This inconsistency made it even more important to
have policies specifically addressing the allocation of cash within the BDSP.
Violations
14. As a result of the conduct described above, Wells Fargo Advisors willfully1
violated Section 206(4) of the Advisers Act and Rule 206(4)-7 promulgated thereunder, which
requires, among other things, that a registered investment adviser adopt and implement written
policies and procedures reasonably designed to prevent violations of the Advisers Act and the rules
promulgated thereunder.
Wells Fargo Advisors’ Remedial Efforts and Cooperation
15. In determining to accept the Offers, the Commission considered remedial acts
promptly undertaken by Wells Fargo Advisors and cooperation afforded the Commission staff.
For example, Wells Fargo Advisors made improvements to its policies and procedures regarding
the selection of cash sweep options for advisory clients and the allocation of client cash in
advisory accounts consistent with their stated goals; and reevaluated the limits on the BDSP
holdings. During the investigation, Wells Fargo Advisors also provided detailed narrative
responses on numerous topics, which expedited the investigation.
IV.
In view of the foregoing, the Commission deems it appropriate and in the public interest to
impose the sanctions agreed to in Respondents’ Offers.
1 “Willfully,” for purposes of imposing relief under Section 203(e) of the Advisers Act and
Section 15(b) of the Exchange Act, “‘means no more than that the person charged with the
duty knows what he is doing.’” Wonsover v. SEC, 205 F.3d 408, 414 (D.C. Cir. 2000)
(quoting Hughes v. SEC, 174 F.2d 969, 977 (D.C. Cir. 1949)). There is no requirement that
the actor “also be aware that he is violating one of the Rules or Acts.” Tager v. SEC, 344
F.2d 5, 8 (2d Cir. 1965). The decision in The Robare Group, Ltd. v. SEC, which construed
the term “willfully” for purposes of a differently structured statutory provision, does not
alter that standard. 922 F.3d 468, 478-79 (D.C. Cir. 2019) (setting forth the showing
required to establish that a person has “willfully omit[ted]” material information from a
required disclosure in violation of Section 207 of the Advisers Act).
6
Accordingly, pursuant to Sections 203(e) and 203(k) of the Advisers Act and Section 15(b)
of the Exchange Act, it is hereby ORDERED that:
A. Wells Fargo Clearing Services and Wells Fargo Advisors Financial Network cease
and desist from committing or causing any violations and any future violations of Section 206(4) of
the Advisers Act and Rule 206(4)-7 thereunder.
B. Wells Fargo Clearing Services and Wells Fargo Advisors Financial Network are
censured.
C. Wells Fargo Clearing Services shall, within 10 days of entry of this Order, pay a
civil money penalty of $28 million to the Securities and Exchange Commission for transfer to the
general fund of the United States Treasury, subject to Section 21F(g)(3) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934. If timely payment is not made, additional interest shall accrue pursuant to 31 U.S.C. §
3717. Payment must be made in one of the following ways:
(1) Respondent may transmit payment electronically to the Commission, which
will provide detailed ACH transfer/Fedwire instructions upon request;
(2) Respondent may make direct payment from a bank account via Pay.gov
through the SEC website at http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/ofm.htm; or
(3) Respondent may pay by certified check, bank cashier’s check, or United
States postal money order, made payable to the Securities and Exchange
Commission and hand-delivered or mailed to:
Enterprise Services Center
Accounts Receivable Branch
HQ Bldg., Room 181, AMZ-341
6500 South MacArthur Boulevard
Oklahoma City, OK 73169
Payments by check or money order must be accompanied by a cover letter identifying
Wells Fargo Clearing Services as a Respondent in these proceedings, and the file number of these
proceedings; a copy of the cover letter and check or money order must be sent to Kimberly
Frederick, Assistant Director, Asset Management Unit, Securities and Exchange Commission,
Byron G. Rogers Federal Building, 1961 Stout Street, Suite 1700, Denver, CO 80294-1961.
D. Wells Fargo Advisors Financial Network shall, within 10 days of entry of this
Order, pay a civil money penalty of $7 million to the Securities and Exchange Commission for
transfer to the general fund of the United States Treasury, subject to Section 21F(g)(3) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934. If timely payment is not made, additional interest shall accrue
pursuant to 31 U.S.C. § 3717. Payment must be made in one of the following ways:
http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/ofm.htm
7
(1) Respondent may transmit payment electronically to the Commission, which
will provide detailed ACH transfer/Fedwire instructions upon request;
(2) Respondent may make direct payment from a bank account via Pay.gov
through the SEC website at http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/ofm.htm; or
(3) Respondent may pay by certified check, bank cashier’s check, or United
States postal money order, made payable to the Securities and Exchange
Commission and hand-delivered or mailed to:
Enterprise Services Center
Accounts Receivable Branch
HQ Bldg., Room 181, AMZ-341
6500 South MacArthur Boulevard
Oklahoma City, OK 73169
Payments by check or money order must be accompanied by a cover letter identifying
Wells Fargo Advisors Financial Network as a Respondent in these proceedings, and the file
number of these proceedings; a copy of the cover letter and check or money order must be sent to
Kimberly Frederick, Assistant Director, Asset Management Unit, Securities and Exchange
Commission, Byron G. Rogers Federal Building, 1961 Stout Street, Suite 1700, Denver, CO
80294-1961.
E. Amounts ordered to be paid as civil money penalties pursuant to this Order shall be
treated as penalties paid to the government for all purposes, including all tax purposes. To preserve
the deterrent effect of the civil penalty, Respondents agree that in any Related Investor Action, they
shall not argue that they are entitled to, nor shall they benefit by, offset or reduction of any award of
compensatory damages by the amount of any part of Respondents’ payment of a civil penalty in this
action (“Penalty Offset”). If the court in any Related Investor Action grants such a Penalty Offset,
Respondents agree that they shall, within 30 days after entry of a final order granting the Penalty
Offset, notify the Commission’s counsel in this action and pay the amount of the Penalty Offset to
the Securities and Exchange Commission. Such a payment shall not be deemed an additional civil
penalty and shall not be deemed to change the amount of the civil penalty imposed in this
proceeding. For purposes of this paragraph, a “Related Investor Action” means a private damages
action brought against Respondents by or on behalf of one or more investors based on substantially
the same facts as alleged in the Order instituted by the Commission in this proceeding.
By the Commission.
Vanessa A. Countryman
Secretary
http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/ofm.htm
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Background