2024-09-25 SEC Press pdf 172 KB 19,261 chars

In re The Bank of Nova Scotia

summary

The Bank of Nova Scotia (Scotiabank) agreed to a cease-and-desist order with the SEC for failing to timely file beneficial ownership disclosures under Section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, resulting in a $375,000 civil penalty.

paragraph

Scotiabank, a Canadian bank with U.S.-listed shares, failed to timely file required beneficial ownership disclosures for at least 22 issuers between 2018 and 2023. The bank's failures were due to inadequate systems for aggregating ownership across its global subsidiaries and excluding rehypothecable securities from its calculations. Scotiabank agreed to pay a $375,000 civil penalty and implement compliance improvements as part of the resolution.

narrative

The Bank of Nova Scotia (Scotiabank) agreed to a cease-and-desist order with the SEC for failing to timely file beneficial ownership disclosures under Section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The bank's failures, which occurred between 2018 and 2023, involved at least 22 issuers and were due to inadequate systems for aggregating ownership across its global subsidiaries and excluding rehypothecable securities from its calculations. As a result, Scotiabank did not file Schedule 13D or timely Schedule 13G forms, violating mandatory reporting rules that apply regardless of intent. The SEC found the violations were inadvertent but still actionable, noting Scotiabank's voluntary self-reporting and remedial efforts. Scotiabank agreed to pay a $375,000 civil penalty and implement compliance improvements as part of the resolution, without admitting or denying the findings except as to jurisdiction. The bank's failures highlight the importance of accurate and timely reporting of beneficial ownership, particularly for global financial institutions with complex structures.

Enriched metadata

Scheme
unregistered-securities (95%)
Outcome
settled
Civil penalty
$375,000
Ticker
BRDG
Classified unregistered-securities(confidence 95%). EDGAR detection: forms Form D/S-1· recall 41% / precision 30%. detection rule →
Statutes
31 U.S.C. § 3717SECTION 21C OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACTRule 13d-1(a)Rule 13d-1(b)Rule 13d-2(b)Rule 13d-2(c)Rule 13d-3Rule 13d-1
Parties
Securities and Exchange CommissionThe Bank of Nova Scotia
Keywords
beneficial ownershipbeneficialownershipscotiabankregistered classcommissionrespondentexchangefilesecuritiesclasssecurities exchangewithin daysregisteredscotiabank acquisition

Extracted insights

Dollar amounts 1
  • $375K $375,000 $100K–$1M
Entities 1
  • agency the securities and exchange commission
Triples 10
  • The Securities and Exchange Commission Deems Appropriate Cease-and-desist proceedings be instituted
  • Respondent Submitted An Offer of Settlement
  • Respondent Consents to Entry of the Order Instituting Cease-and-Desist Proceedings
  • The Commission Finds Proceedings arise out of violations of the beneficial ownership reporting requirements of the federal securities laws
  • Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act Requires Any person who acquires beneficial ownership of more than 5% of a registered class of equity security to file a statement with the Commission
  • Respondent Violated Section 13(d) by failing to timely file as required on Schedule 13D
  • Scotiabank Is A Canadian chartered bank with its principal executive office in Ontario, Canada
  • Scotiabank Is A foreign private issuer whose common shares are registered with the Commission under Section 12 of the Exchange Act
  • Scotiabank Acquired Greater than 5% beneficial ownership of a registered class of equity securities of at least 22 issuers
  • Section 13(d)(1) of the Exchange Act Requires Any person, including a group, who has acquired beneficial ownership of more than 5% of a class of equity security registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act to publicly file a Schedule 13D disclosure statement
Text layers
Extracted body text (19,261c)

 
 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 
 Before the 
   SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 
 
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 
Release No. 101160 / September 25, 2024 
                                                               
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING 
File No. 3-22176 
 
 
 
In the Matter of 
 
The Bank of Nova Scotia, 
 
Respondent. 
 
 
 
ORDER INSTITUTING CEASE-AND-
DESIST PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 21C OF THE SECURITIES 
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, MAKING 
FINDINGS, AND IMPOSING A CEASE-
AND-DESIST ORDER 
  
 
 I. 
 The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) deems it appropriate that 
cease-and-desist proceedings be, and hereby are, instituted pursuant to Section 21C of the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), against The Bank of Nova Scotia 
(“Scotiabank” or “Respondent”).   
II. 
 In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, Respondent has submitted an Offer 
of Settlement (the “Offer”) which the Commission has determined to accept.  Solely for the 
purpose of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the 
Commission, or to which the Commission is a party, and without admitting or denying the 
findings herein, except as to the Commission’s jurisdiction over Respondent and the subject 
matter of these proceedings, which are admitted, Respondent consents to the entry of this Order 
Instituting Cease-and-Desist Proceedings Pursuant to Section 21C of the Securities Exchange 
Act of 1934, Making Findings, and Imposing a Cease-and-Desist Order (“Order”), as set forth 
below.   

 
 
 2 
 
III. 
 On the basis of this Order and Respondent’s Offer, the Commission finds
1
 that: 
Summary 
1. These proceedings arise out of violations of the beneficial ownership reporting 
requirements of the federal securities laws.  Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act and the rules 
promulgated thereunder require any person who directly or indirectly acquires beneficial ownership 
of more than 5% of a registered class of equity security to file a statement with the Commission 
disclosing certain information and to file certain updating amendments.  Section 13(d) is a key 
provision that allows shareholders and potential investors to evaluate changes in substantial 
shareholdings.  See 113 Cong. Rec. 855 (1967).  The duty to file is not dependent on any 
intention by the stockholder to gain control of the company, but on a mechanical 5% ownership 
test.  
2. While subject to these reporting requirements due to its beneficial ownership of 
more than 5% of a registered class of equity securities of several issuers, Respondent violated 
Section 13(d) by failing to timely file as required on Schedule 13D, or in lieu thereof, on Schedule 
13G. 
Respondent 
3. Scotiabank is a Canadian chartered bank with its principal executive office in 
Ontario, Canada.  Scotiabank is a foreign private issuer whose common shares are registered with 
the Commission under Section 12 of the Exchange Act and trade on the NYSE (ticker: BNS).  At 
the relevant times discussed herein, Scotiabank acquired greater than 5% beneficial ownership of 
a registered class of equity securities of at least 22 issuers.  Scotiabank’s beneficial ownership 
derived in part from certain of its subsidiaries that include broker-dealers and investment advisers 
operating worldwide, including certain subsidiaries that are registered with the Commission.     
 
Applicable Legal Framework 
4. Section 13(d)(1) of the Exchange Act and Rule 13d-1(a) together require any person, 
including a group, who has acquired beneficial ownership of more than 5% of a class of equity 
security registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act to publicly file a Schedule 13D disclosure 
statement with the Commission, which includes, among other things, the identity of the beneficial 
owner, the amount of beneficial ownership, and plans or proposals regarding the issuer.  During the 
                                                 
1
  The findings herein are made pursuant to Respondent’s Offer of Settlement and are not binding on 
any other person or entity in this or any other proceeding. 
 

 
 
 3 
 
time period herein, Rule 13d-1(a) required the Schedule 13D to be filed within 10 days
2
 after the 
triggering acquisition.  
5. As an alternative to filing on Schedule 13D, certain statutory provisions and rules 
allow the use of short-form disclosure statements on Schedule 13G with differing timing 
requirements under certain conditions.  One of those provisions, Rule 13d-1(b), provides certain 
specified types of institutional investors, such as registered investment advisers, broker-dealers, and 
banks, with an alternative to file on Schedule 13G, so long as the institutional investor acquired the 
securities “in the ordinary course of his business and not with the purpose nor with the effect of 
changing or influencing the control of the issuer, nor in connection with or as a participant in any 
transaction having such purpose or effect” (a “Qualified Institution”).  During the time period 
herein, a Qualified Institution was permitted to file a Schedule 13G, in lieu of filing a Schedule 13D, 
within 45 days after the end of the calendar year
3
 in which they made the triggering acquisition (a 
“Qualified Institution 13G Filer”).
4
  A parent holding company or control person of a Qualified 
Institution also was permitted to file on this same time table if the aggregate amount held directly 
by the parent or control person, and directly and indirectly by their subsidiaries and affiliates that 
are not Qualified Institutions, did not exceed 1% of the class of securities (a “Qualified Control 
Person”). 
6. During the time period herein, Exchange Act Rule 13d-2(b) required that a Qualified 
Institution or Qualified Control Person 13G Filer file an annual amendment within 45 days after the 
end of each calendar year
5
 if there were any changes in the information previously reported, unless 
certain limited exceptions applied.  In addition, during the time period herein, if a Qualified 
Institution or Qualified Control Person 13G Filer acquired beneficial ownership of greater than 10% 
of a registered class of equity securities, Exchange Act Rule 13d-2(c) required that they file an 
                                                 
2
  On October 10, 2023, the Commission adopted amendments to the rules governing beneficial ownership 
reporting under Sections 13(d) and 13(g) to update and shorten certain filing deadlines (the “2023 Amendments”).  
Modernization of Beneficial Ownership Reporting, SEC Release No. 34-98704 (Oct. 10, 2023), 88 Fed. Reg. 76896 
(Nov. 7, 2023).  Among other provisions, the 2023 Amendments shortened the deadline for filing the initial 
statement on Schedule 13D from 10 days to 5 business days.  Id. at 76897, 76906.  Compliance with this new 
deadline is required as of February 5, 2024.  See id. at 76942.  
  
3
  The 2023 Amendments shortened this filing deadline to within 45 days after the end of the calendar quarter 
in which beneficial ownership first exceeds 5%.  See id. at 76897, 76916.  Compliance with this new requirement is 
required beginning September 30, 2024.  See id. at 76942. 
 
4
  During the time period herein, under Rule 13d-1(b), Qualified Institutions did not need file a statement with 
the Commission unless they beneficially owned more than 5% of a class as of the end of the calendar year in which 
they acquired the securities.  
5
  The 2023 Amendments replaced this requirement with a requirement to file an amendment within 45 days 
after the end of a calendar quarter in which a material change occurred to the information previously set forth.  See 
id. at 76898, 76921.  Compliance with this new requirement is required beginning September 30, 2024.  See id. at 
76942. 
 
 

 
 
 4 
 
amendment within 10 days after the end of the first month in which the 10% threshold was crossed 
if beneficial ownership continued to exceed 10% at month-end; thereafter, amendments were 
required to be filed within 10 days after any month-end at which beneficial ownership had increased 
or decreased by more than 5% from that previously reported.
6
  
7. Under Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act and the application of Rule 13d-3, a 
beneficial owner of a security includes “any person who, directly or indirectly, through any 
contract, arrangement, understanding, relationship or otherwise” has or shares voting or 
investment power with respect to such security.  More than one person may be a beneficial 
owner of the same securities.  Because a beneficial owner, under this standard, includes persons 
who have both direct and indirect, as well as shared, voting and investment power, beneficial 
ownership held by an entity is ordinarily also attributable to a control person of an entity and any 
parent company in a control relationship with such entity.
7
 
8. There is no state of mind requirement for violations of Section 13(d) and the rules 
thereunder.
8
  The failure to timely file a required report, even if inadvertent, constitutes a 
violation.
9
     
Respondent Failed to Comply with Filing Obligations Under Section 13(d) 
9. Between 2018 and 2023, Scotiabank failed to timely file initial statements 
pursuant to Exchange Act Section 13(d) and Rule 13d-1 thereunder as required after acquiring 
beneficial ownership of more than 5% of a registered class of equity securities with respect to at 
                                                 
6
  The 2023 Amendments replaced this requirement with a requirement to file an amendment within five 
business days after the end of the month in which beneficial ownership first exceeds 10%, and thereafter upon any 
deviation by more than 5% of the class, with these requirements applying if the thresholds were crossed at any time 
during a month.  See id. at 76898, 76924.  Compliance with this new requirement is required beginning September 
30, 2024.  See id. at 76942. 
 
7
  See Amendments to Beneficial Ownership Reporting Requirements, SEC Release No. 34-39538 (Jan. 12, 
1998), 63 Fed. Reg. 2854, 2857 (Jan. 16, 1998).  If the organizational structure of the parent and related entities are 
such that the voting and investment powers over the subject securities are exercised independently, attribution may 
not be required for the purposes of determining the aggregate amount owned by the controlling persons if certain 
conditions concerning independence are met.  Id. 
8
  See, e.g., SEC v. Savoy Indus., Inc., 587 F.2d 1149, 1167 (D.C. Cir. 1978) (“Indeed, the plain language of 
section 13(d)(1) gives no hint that intentional conduct need be found, but rather, appears to place a simple and 
affirmative duty of reporting on certain persons.  The legislative history confirms that Congress was concerned with 
providing disclosure to investors, and not merely with protecting them from fraudulent conduct”).        
9
  Cf. Oppenheimer & Co., Inc., 47 SEC 286, 1980 WL 26901, at *2 (May 19, 1980) (Commission opinion) 
(“We have previously held that the failure to make a required report, even though inadvertent, constitutes a willful 
violation”); see generally Herbert Moskowitz, 77 SEC Docket 446, 2002 WL 434524, at *7 (Mar. 21, 2002) 
(Commission opinion) (“evidence of both motive for non-disclosure and actual market impact ... is irrelevant” to 
whether violations of Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act and Rules 13d-1 and 13d-2 thereunder occurred). 
 

 
 
 5 
 
least 22 issuers.  During the time period herein, Scotiabank was required to file a Schedule 13D 
within 10 days after acquiring greater than 5% beneficial ownership with respect to each of these 
issuers under Rule 13d-1(a), or in lieu thereof, file a Schedule 13G, which would be due at the latest 
within 45 days after the end of the relevant calendar year if eligible to file as a Qualified Institution 
13G Filer under Rule 13d-1(b).   
10. From at least 2018 until 2023, Scotiabank failed to monitor and aggregate its 
beneficial ownership across its subsidiaries.
10
  This resulted in Scotiabank failing to timely file as 
required under Section 13(d) and the rules thereunder with respect to at least 11 issuers.  On 
December 26, 2023, Scotiabank filed Schedule 13G statements intended as Qualified Institution 
13G Filer filings under Rule 13d-1(b) with respect to each of the 11 issuers that reported 
beneficial ownership of more than 5% as of December 30, 2022.   
11. For example, Scotiabank’s failures to file included: 
• Scotiabank’s acquisition of beneficial ownership of more than 5% of Bridge 
Investment Group Holdings Inc.’s registered class of Class A common stock 
(NYSE: BRDG) as of at least December 30, 2021 through December 30, 2022; 
• Scotiabank’s acquisition of beneficial ownership of more than 5% of CAE Inc.’s 
registered class of common shares (NYSE: CAE) as of at least December 31, 
2018 through December 30, 2022; 
• Scotiabank’s acquisition of beneficial ownership of more than 5% of Descartes 
Systems Group Inc.’s registered class of common shares (Nasdaq: DSGX) as of at 
least December 31, 2018 through December 30, 2022; 
• Scotiabank’s acquisition of beneficial ownership of more than 5% of Gildan 
Activewear Inc.’s registered class of common shares (NYSE: GIL) as of at least 
December 31, 2018 through December 30, 2022; and  
• Scotiabank’s acquisition of beneficial ownership of more than 5% of Open Text 
Corporation’s registered class of common stock (Nasdaq: OTEX) as of at least 
December 31, 2018 through December 30, 2022.  
12. In addition, from at least 2018 until 2023, Scotiabank also failed to have systems 
that monitored its beneficial ownership resulting from rehypothecable securities for which it had or 
shared investment and/or voting discretion, and to the extent Scotiabank’s subsidiaries individually 
monitored for greater than 5% beneficial ownership during this time period, such subsidiaries 
similarly failed to monitor for or include rehypothecable securities for which they had beneficial 
                                                 
10
  During this period, Scotiabank did not rely upon and did not meet the conditions concerning independence in 
organizational structure of the parent and related entities, as a result of which Scotiabank was required to aggregate 
beneficial ownership across subsidiaries when reporting beneficial ownership. 

 
 
 6 
 
ownership in performing such calculations.  As a result, Scotiabank failed to timely file as required 
under Section 13(d) and the rules thereunder with respect to at least 11 issuers.   
13. For example, Scotiabank’s failures to file include: 
• Scotiabank’s acquisition of beneficial ownership of more than 5% of Bio-Rad 
Laboratories, Inc.’s registered class of Class A common stock (NYSE: BIO) as of 
at least December 30, 2022; 
 
• Scotiabank’s acquisition of beneficial ownership of more than 5% of Fortis, Inc.’s 
registered class of common shares (NYSE: FTS) as of at least December 30, 
2022; 
 
• Scotiabank’s acquisition of beneficial ownership of more than 5% of GoodRx 
Holdings Inc.’s registered class of Class A common stock (Nasdaq: GDRX) as of 
at least December 30, 2022; 
 
• Scotiabank’s acquisition of beneficial ownership of more than 5% of Manulife 
Financial Corp.’s registered class of common shares (NYSE: MFC) as of at least 
December 30, 2022; and 
 
• Scotiabank’s acquisition of beneficial ownership of more than 5% of Vermilion 
Energy Inc.’s registered class of common shares (NYSE: VET) as of at least 
December 30, 2022. 
 
14. As a result of the conduct described above, Respondent violated Section 13(d) of 
the Exchange Act and Rule 13d-1 thereunder. 
Respondent’s Remedial Efforts 
15. In determining to accept Respondent’s Offer, the Commission considered certain 
remedial acts undertaken by Respondent and cooperation afforded to Commission staff, 
including Respondent’s voluntary self-reporting of its violations. 
IV. 
In view of the foregoing, the Commission deems it appropriate to impose the sanctions 
agreed to in Respondent’s Offer. 
 Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that: 
 A. Pursuant to Section 21C of the Exchange Act, Respondent cease and desist from 
committing or causing any violations and any future violations of Section 13(d) of the Exchange 
Act and Rule 13d-1 promulgated thereunder.   

 
 
 7 
 
B. Respondent shall, within 14 days of the entry of this Order, pay a civil money 
penalty in the amount of $375,000 to the Securities and Exchange Commission, for transfer to 
the general fund of the United States Treasury, subject to Exchange Act Section 21F(g)(3).  If 
timely payment is not made, additional interest shall accrue pursuant to 31 U.S.C. § 3717.  
Payment must be made in one of the following ways:   
(1)  Respondent may transmit payment electronically to the Commission, which will 
provide detailed ACH transfer/Fedwire instructions upon request;  
 
(2)  Respondent may make direct payment from a bank account via Pay.gov through 
the SEC website at http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/ofm.htm; or  
 
(3)  Respondent may pay by certified check, bank cashier’s check, or United States 
postal money order, made payable to the Securities and Exchange Commission and hand-
delivered or mailed to:  
 
Enterprise Services Center 
Accounts Receivable Branch 
HQ Bldg., Room 181, AMZ-341 
6500 South MacArthur Boulevard 
Oklahoma City, OK 73169 
 
Payments by check or money order must be accompanied by a cover letter identifying 
The Bank of Nova Scotia as a Respondent in these proceedings, and the file number of these 
proceedings; a copy of the cover letter and check or money order must be sent to Thomas Smith, 
Associate Regional Director, Division of Enforcement, Securities and Exchange Commission, 
100 Pearl Street, Suite 20-100, New York, NY 10004.   
Amounts ordered to be paid as civil money penalties pursuant to this Order shall be 
treated as penalties paid to the government for all purposes, including all tax purposes.  To 
preserve the deterrent effect of the civil penalty, Respondent agrees that in any Related Investor 
Action, it shall not argue that it is entitled to, nor shall it benefit by, offset or reduction of any 
award of compensatory damages by the amount of any part of Respondent’s payment of a civil 
penalty in this action (“Penalty Offset”).  If the court in any Related Investor Action grants such 
a Penalty Offset, Respondent agrees that it shall, within 30 days after entry of a final order 
granting the Penalty Offset, notify the Commission's counsel in this action and pay the amount of 
the Penalty Offset to the Securities and Exchange Commission.  Such a payment shall not be 
deemed an additional civil penalty and shall not be deemed to change the amount of the civil  
  

 
 
 8 
 
penalty imposed in this proceeding.  For purposes of this paragraph, a “Related Investor Action” 
means a private damages action brought against Respondent by or on behalf of one or more 
investors based on substantially the same facts as alleged in the Order instituted by the 
Commission in this proceeding. 
 
 By the Commission. 
 
 
       Vanessa A. Countryman 
       Secretary 
OCR text (19,540c · tika · 95% conf)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

 Before the 

   SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 

 

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 101160 / September 25, 2024 

                                                               

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING 

File No. 3-22176 

 

 

 

In the Matter of 

 

The Bank of Nova Scotia, 

 

Respondent. 

 

 

 

ORDER INSTITUTING CEASE-AND-

DESIST PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 21C OF THE SECURITIES 

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, MAKING 

FINDINGS, AND IMPOSING A CEASE-

AND-DESIST ORDER 

  

 

 I. 

 The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) deems it appropriate that 

cease-and-desist proceedings be, and hereby are, instituted pursuant to Section 21C of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), against The Bank of Nova Scotia 

(“Scotiabank” or “Respondent”).   

II. 

 In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, Respondent has submitted an Offer 

of Settlement (the “Offer”) which the Commission has determined to accept.  Solely for the 

purpose of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the 

Commission, or to which the Commission is a party, and without admitting or denying the 

findings herein, except as to the Commission’s jurisdiction over Respondent and the subject 

matter of these proceedings, which are admitted, Respondent consents to the entry of this Order 

Instituting Cease-and-Desist Proceedings Pursuant to Section 21C of the Securities Exchange 

Act of 1934, Making Findings, and Imposing a Cease-and-Desist Order (“Order”), as set forth 

below.   



 
 

 2 

 

III. 

 On the basis of this Order and Respondent’s Offer, the Commission finds1 that: 

Summary 

1. These proceedings arise out of violations of the beneficial ownership reporting 

requirements of the federal securities laws.  Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act and the rules 

promulgated thereunder require any person who directly or indirectly acquires beneficial ownership 

of more than 5% of a registered class of equity security to file a statement with the Commission 

disclosing certain information and to file certain updating amendments.  Section 13(d) is a key 

provision that allows shareholders and potential investors to evaluate changes in substantial 

shareholdings.  See 113 Cong. Rec. 855 (1967).  The duty to file is not dependent on any 

intention by the stockholder to gain control of the company, but on a mechanical 5% ownership 

test.  

2. While subject to these reporting requirements due to its beneficial ownership of 

more than 5% of a registered class of equity securities of several issuers, Respondent violated 

Section 13(d) by failing to timely file as required on Schedule 13D, or in lieu thereof, on Schedule 

13G. 

Respondent 

3. Scotiabank is a Canadian chartered bank with its principal executive office in 

Ontario, Canada.  Scotiabank is a foreign private issuer whose common shares are registered with 

the Commission under Section 12 of the Exchange Act and trade on the NYSE (ticker: BNS).  At 

the relevant times discussed herein, Scotiabank acquired greater than 5% beneficial ownership of 

a registered class of equity securities of at least 22 issuers.  Scotiabank’s beneficial ownership 

derived in part from certain of its subsidiaries that include broker-dealers and investment advisers 

operating worldwide, including certain subsidiaries that are registered with the Commission.     

 

Applicable Legal Framework 

4. Section 13(d)(1) of the Exchange Act and Rule 13d-1(a) together require any person, 

including a group, who has acquired beneficial ownership of more than 5% of a class of equity 

security registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act to publicly file a Schedule 13D disclosure 

statement with the Commission, which includes, among other things, the identity of the beneficial 

owner, the amount of beneficial ownership, and plans or proposals regarding the issuer.  During the 

                                                 
1  The findings herein are made pursuant to Respondent’s Offer of Settlement and are not binding on 

any other person or entity in this or any other proceeding. 

 



 
 

 3 

 

time period herein, Rule 13d-1(a) required the Schedule 13D to be filed within 10 days2 after the 

triggering acquisition.  

5. As an alternative to filing on Schedule 13D, certain statutory provisions and rules 

allow the use of short-form disclosure statements on Schedule 13G with differing timing 

requirements under certain conditions.  One of those provisions, Rule 13d-1(b), provides certain 

specified types of institutional investors, such as registered investment advisers, broker-dealers, and 

banks, with an alternative to file on Schedule 13G, so long as the institutional investor acquired the 

securities “in the ordinary course of his business and not with the purpose nor with the effect of 

changing or influencing the control of the issuer, nor in connection with or as a participant in any 

transaction having such purpose or effect” (a “Qualified Institution”).  During the time period 

herein, a Qualified Institution was permitted to file a Schedule 13G, in lieu of filing a Schedule 13D, 

within 45 days after the end of the calendar year3 in which they made the triggering acquisition (a 

“Qualified Institution 13G Filer”).4  A parent holding company or control person of a Qualified 

Institution also was permitted to file on this same time table if the aggregate amount held directly 

by the parent or control person, and directly and indirectly by their subsidiaries and affiliates that 

are not Qualified Institutions, did not exceed 1% of the class of securities (a “Qualified Control 

Person”). 

6. During the time period herein, Exchange Act Rule 13d-2(b) required that a Qualified 

Institution or Qualified Control Person 13G Filer file an annual amendment within 45 days after the 

end of each calendar year5 if there were any changes in the information previously reported, unless 

certain limited exceptions applied.  In addition, during the time period herein, if a Qualified 

Institution or Qualified Control Person 13G Filer acquired beneficial ownership of greater than 10% 

of a registered class of equity securities, Exchange Act Rule 13d-2(c) required that they file an 

                                                 
2  On October 10, 2023, the Commission adopted amendments to the rules governing beneficial ownership 

reporting under Sections 13(d) and 13(g) to update and shorten certain filing deadlines (the “2023 Amendments”).  

Modernization of Beneficial Ownership Reporting, SEC Release No. 34-98704 (Oct. 10, 2023), 88 Fed. Reg. 76896 

(Nov. 7, 2023).  Among other provisions, the 2023 Amendments shortened the deadline for filing the initial 

statement on Schedule 13D from 10 days to 5 business days.  Id. at 76897, 76906.  Compliance with this new 

deadline is required as of February 5, 2024.  See id. at 76942.  

  
3  The 2023 Amendments shortened this filing deadline to within 45 days after the end of the calendar quarter 

in which beneficial ownership first exceeds 5%.  See id. at 76897, 76916.  Compliance with this new requirement is 

required beginning September 30, 2024.  See id. at 76942. 

 
4  During the time period herein, under Rule 13d-1(b), Qualified Institutions did not need file a statement with 

the Commission unless they beneficially owned more than 5% of a class as of the end of the calendar year in which 

they acquired the securities.  

5  The 2023 Amendments replaced this requirement with a requirement to file an amendment within 45 days 

after the end of a calendar quarter in which a material change occurred to the information previously set forth.  See 

id. at 76898, 76921.  Compliance with this new requirement is required beginning September 30, 2024.  See id. at 

76942. 

 

 



 
 

 4 

 

amendment within 10 days after the end of the first month in which the 10% threshold was crossed 

if beneficial ownership continued to exceed 10% at month-end; thereafter, amendments were 

required to be filed within 10 days after any month-end at which beneficial ownership had increased 

or decreased by more than 5% from that previously reported.6  

7. Under Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act and the application of Rule 13d-3, a 

beneficial owner of a security includes “any person who, directly or indirectly, through any 

contract, arrangement, understanding, relationship or otherwise” has or shares voting or 

investment power with respect to such security.  More than one person may be a beneficial 

owner of the same securities.  Because a beneficial owner, under this standard, includes persons 

who have both direct and indirect, as well as shared, voting and investment power, beneficial 

ownership held by an entity is ordinarily also attributable to a control person of an entity and any 

parent company in a control relationship with such entity.7 

8. There is no state of mind requirement for violations of Section 13(d) and the rules 

thereunder.8  The failure to timely file a required report, even if inadvertent, constitutes a 

violation.9     

Respondent Failed to Comply with Filing Obligations Under Section 13(d) 

9. Between 2018 and 2023, Scotiabank failed to timely file initial statements 

pursuant to Exchange Act Section 13(d) and Rule 13d-1 thereunder as required after acquiring 

beneficial ownership of more than 5% of a registered class of equity securities with respect to at 

                                                 
6  The 2023 Amendments replaced this requirement with a requirement to file an amendment within five 

business days after the end of the month in which beneficial ownership first exceeds 10%, and thereafter upon any 

deviation by more than 5% of the class, with these requirements applying if the thresholds were crossed at any time 

during a month.  See id. at 76898, 76924.  Compliance with this new requirement is required beginning September 

30, 2024.  See id. at 76942. 

 
7  See Amendments to Beneficial Ownership Reporting Requirements, SEC Release No. 34-39538 (Jan. 12, 

1998), 63 Fed. Reg. 2854, 2857 (Jan. 16, 1998).  If the organizational structure of the parent and related entities are 

such that the voting and investment powers over the subject securities are exercised independently, attribution may 

not be required for the purposes of determining the aggregate amount owned by the controlling persons if certain 

conditions concerning independence are met.  Id. 

8  See, e.g., SEC v. Savoy Indus., Inc., 587 F.2d 1149, 1167 (D.C. Cir. 1978) (“Indeed, the plain language of 

section 13(d)(1) gives no hint that intentional conduct need be found, but rather, appears to place a simple and 

affirmative duty of reporting on certain persons.  The legislative history confirms that Congress was concerned with 

providing disclosure to investors, and not merely with protecting them from fraudulent conduct”).        

9  Cf. Oppenheimer & Co., Inc., 47 SEC 286, 1980 WL 26901, at *2 (May 19, 1980) (Commission opinion) 

(“We have previously held that the failure to make a required report, even though inadvertent, constitutes a willful 

violation”); see generally Herbert Moskowitz, 77 SEC Docket 446, 2002 WL 434524, at *7 (Mar. 21, 2002) 

(Commission opinion) (“evidence of both motive for non-disclosure and actual market impact … is irrelevant” to 

whether violations of Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act and Rules 13d-1 and 13d-2 thereunder occurred). 

 



 
 

 5 

 

least 22 issuers.  During the time period herein, Scotiabank was required to file a Schedule 13D 

within 10 days after acquiring greater than 5% beneficial ownership with respect to each of these 

issuers under Rule 13d-1(a), or in lieu thereof, file a Schedule 13G, which would be due at the latest 

within 45 days after the end of the relevant calendar year if eligible to file as a Qualified Institution 

13G Filer under Rule 13d-1(b).   

10. From at least 2018 until 2023, Scotiabank failed to monitor and aggregate its 

beneficial ownership across its subsidiaries.10  This resulted in Scotiabank failing to timely file as 

required under Section 13(d) and the rules thereunder with respect to at least 11 issuers.  On 

December 26, 2023, Scotiabank filed Schedule 13G statements intended as Qualified Institution 

13G Filer filings under Rule 13d-1(b) with respect to each of the 11 issuers that reported 

beneficial ownership of more than 5% as of December 30, 2022.   

11. For example, Scotiabank’s failures to file included: 

• Scotiabank’s acquisition of beneficial ownership of more than 5% of Bridge 

Investment Group Holdings Inc.’s registered class of Class A common stock 

(NYSE: BRDG) as of at least December 30, 2021 through December 30, 2022; 

• Scotiabank’s acquisition of beneficial ownership of more than 5% of CAE Inc.’s 

registered class of common shares (NYSE: CAE) as of at least December 31, 

2018 through December 30, 2022; 

• Scotiabank’s acquisition of beneficial ownership of more than 5% of Descartes 

Systems Group Inc.’s registered class of common shares (Nasdaq: DSGX) as of at 

least December 31, 2018 through December 30, 2022; 

• Scotiabank’s acquisition of beneficial ownership of more than 5% of Gildan 

Activewear Inc.’s registered class of common shares (NYSE: GIL) as of at least 

December 31, 2018 through December 30, 2022; and  

• Scotiabank’s acquisition of beneficial ownership of more than 5% of Open Text 

Corporation’s registered class of common stock (Nasdaq: OTEX) as of at least 

December 31, 2018 through December 30, 2022.  

12. In addition, from at least 2018 until 2023, Scotiabank also failed to have systems 

that monitored its beneficial ownership resulting from rehypothecable securities for which it had or 

shared investment and/or voting discretion, and to the extent Scotiabank’s subsidiaries individually 

monitored for greater than 5% beneficial ownership during this time period, such subsidiaries 

similarly failed to monitor for or include rehypothecable securities for which they had beneficial 

                                                 
10  During this period, Scotiabank did not rely upon and did not meet the conditions concerning independence in 

organizational structure of the parent and related entities, as a result of which Scotiabank was required to aggregate 

beneficial ownership across subsidiaries when reporting beneficial ownership. 



 
 

 6 

 

ownership in performing such calculations.  As a result, Scotiabank failed to timely file as required 

under Section 13(d) and the rules thereunder with respect to at least 11 issuers.   

13. For example, Scotiabank’s failures to file include: 

• Scotiabank’s acquisition of beneficial ownership of more than 5% of Bio-Rad 

Laboratories, Inc.’s registered class of Class A common stock (NYSE: BIO) as of 

at least December 30, 2022; 

 

• Scotiabank’s acquisition of beneficial ownership of more than 5% of Fortis, Inc.’s 

registered class of common shares (NYSE: FTS) as of at least December 30, 

2022; 

 

• Scotiabank’s acquisition of beneficial ownership of more than 5% of GoodRx 

Holdings Inc.’s registered class of Class A common stock (Nasdaq: GDRX) as of 

at least December 30, 2022; 

 

• Scotiabank’s acquisition of beneficial ownership of more than 5% of Manulife 

Financial Corp.’s registered class of common shares (NYSE: MFC) as of at least 

December 30, 2022; and 

 

• Scotiabank’s acquisition of beneficial ownership of more than 5% of Vermilion 

Energy Inc.’s registered class of common shares (NYSE: VET) as of at least 

December 30, 2022. 

 

14. As a result of the conduct described above, Respondent violated Section 13(d) of 

the Exchange Act and Rule 13d-1 thereunder. 

Respondent’s Remedial Efforts 

15. In determining to accept Respondent’s Offer, the Commission considered certain 

remedial acts undertaken by Respondent and cooperation afforded to Commission staff, 

including Respondent’s voluntary self-reporting of its violations. 

IV. 

In view of the foregoing, the Commission deems it appropriate to impose the sanctions 

agreed to in Respondent’s Offer. 

 Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that: 

 A. Pursuant to Section 21C of the Exchange Act, Respondent cease and desist from 

committing or causing any violations and any future violations of Section 13(d) of the Exchange 

Act and Rule 13d-1 promulgated thereunder.   



 
 

 7 

 

B. Respondent shall, within 14 days of the entry of this Order, pay a civil money 

penalty in the amount of $375,000 to the Securities and Exchange Commission, for transfer to 

the general fund of the United States Treasury, subject to Exchange Act Section 21F(g)(3).  If 

timely payment is not made, additional interest shall accrue pursuant to 31 U.S.C. § 3717.  

Payment must be made in one of the following ways:   

(1)  Respondent may transmit payment electronically to the Commission, which will 

provide detailed ACH transfer/Fedwire instructions upon request;  

 

(2)  Respondent may make direct payment from a bank account via Pay.gov through 

the SEC website at http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/ofm.htm; or  

 

(3)  Respondent may pay by certified check, bank cashier’s check, or United States 

postal money order, made payable to the Securities and Exchange Commission and hand-

delivered or mailed to:  

 

Enterprise Services Center 

Accounts Receivable Branch 

HQ Bldg., Room 181, AMZ-341 

6500 South MacArthur Boulevard 

Oklahoma City, OK 73169 

 

Payments by check or money order must be accompanied by a cover letter identifying 

The Bank of Nova Scotia as a Respondent in these proceedings, and the file number of these 

proceedings; a copy of the cover letter and check or money order must be sent to Thomas Smith, 

Associate Regional Director, Division of Enforcement, Securities and Exchange Commission, 

100 Pearl Street, Suite 20-100, New York, NY 10004.   

Amounts ordered to be paid as civil money penalties pursuant to this Order shall be 

treated as penalties paid to the government for all purposes, including all tax purposes.  To 

preserve the deterrent effect of the civil penalty, Respondent agrees that in any Related Investor 

Action, it shall not argue that it is entitled to, nor shall it benefit by, offset or reduction of any 

award of compensatory damages by the amount of any part of Respondent’s payment of a civil 

penalty in this action (“Penalty Offset”).  If the court in any Related Investor Action grants such 

a Penalty Offset, Respondent agrees that it shall, within 30 days after entry of a final order 

granting the Penalty Offset, notify the Commission's counsel in this action and pay the amount of 

the Penalty Offset to the Securities and Exchange Commission.  Such a payment shall not be 

deemed an additional civil penalty and shall not be deemed to change the amount of the civil  

  



 
 

 8 

 

penalty imposed in this proceeding.  For purposes of this paragraph, a “Related Investor Action” 

means a private damages action brought against Respondent by or on behalf of one or more 

investors based on substantially the same facts as alleged in the Order instituted by the 

Commission in this proceeding. 

 

 By the Commission. 

 

 

       Vanessa A. Countryman 

       Secretary 


	Respondent