In re TransUnion
TransUnion violated SEC Rule 21F-17(a) by requiring 29 severance and transaction incentive agreements and three consulting contracts between 2019 and 2023 to waive employees' and contractors' rights to whistleblower awards, impeding SEC communications, and agreed to a $312,000 penalty and revised agreements without admitting guilt.
TransUnion, a Chicago-based credit reporting company, violated SEC Rule 21F-17(a) by including award-waiver provisions in 29 severance and transaction incentive agreements and three consulting contracts between May 2019 and September 2023, which prohibited employees and contractors from claiming monetary rewards for reporting securities violations to the SEC. Although the agreements permitted participation in government investigations, the waiver clauses created an unlawful deterrent to whistleblowing by conditioning severance and incentives on relinquishing potential awards. TransUnion agreed to a $312,000 civil penalty, revised its agreement templates to affirmatively permit SEC communications and award claims, and notified affected individuals of their rights, all under a cease-and-desist order accepted by the SEC without admission of guilt.
TransUnion, a Delaware-based consumer credit reporting company listed on the NYSE under ticker TRU, violated SEC Rule 21F-17(a) by embedding provisions in 29 severance and transaction incentive agreements and three consulting contracts between May 8, 2019, and September 22, 2023, that required senior employees and contractors to waive their right to receive monetary awards from government whistleblower programs. While these agreements technically permitted individuals to report potential securities violations to the SEC, they explicitly barred them from claiming any financial reward, thereby impeding communication with the Commission and undermining the congressional intent behind the Dodd-Frank Act’s whistleblower incentives. The SEC found no evidence that TransUnion enforced these clauses against individuals, but determined the mere presence of the provisions created a chilling effect and constituted independent violations. TransUnion consented to a cease-and-desist order without admitting or denying the findings, agreed to pay a $312,000 civil penalty, and committed to revising all affected agreement templates to affirmatively permit whistleblowers to communicate with the SEC and seek awards. The company also undertook to notify all individuals who signed the problematic agreements of their unchanged rights under the law. The SEC accepted the settlement, citing TransUnion’s cooperation, prompt remedial actions, and proactive revisions as mitigating factors in determining the penalty amount.
Extracted insights
- $312K $312,000 $100K–$1M
- Commission deems appropriate cease-and-desist proceedings be instituted
- TransUnion submitted Offer of Settlement
- Commission determined to accept Offer of Settlement
- TransUnion consents to entry of this Order
- TransUnion is provider of consumer credit reporting services
- TransUnion operates through various subsidiaries
- Common stock of TransUnion is registered with Commission
- Rule 21F-17 became effective on August 12, 2011
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Release No. 100975 / September 9, 2024
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
File No. 3-22084
In the Matter of
TransUnion,
Respondent.
ORDER INSTITUTING CEASE-AND-
DESIST PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO
SECTION 21C OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, MAKING
FINDINGS, AND IMPOSING A CEASE-
AND-DESIST ORDER
I.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) deems it appropriate that cease-
and-desist proceedings be, and hereby are, instituted pursuant to Section 21C of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), against TransUnion.
II.
In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, TransUnion has submitted an Offer
of Settlement (the “Offer”) which the Commission has determined to accept. Solely for the purpose
of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the Commission, or to
which the Commission is a party, and without admitting or denying the findings herein, except as
to the Commission’s jurisdiction over it and the subject matter of these proceedings, which are
admitted, TransUnion consents to the entry of this Order Instituting Cease-and-Desist Proceedings
Pursuant to Section 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Making Findings, and Imposing a
Cease-and-Desist Order (“Order”), as set forth below.
III.
On the basis of this Order and TransUnion’s Offer, the Commission finds that:
Respondent
1. TransUnion, a Delaware corporation based in Chicago, Illinois, is a provider of
consumer credit reporting services that also develops and markets various credit services and
2
fraud-protection products. TransUnion operates through various subsidiaries, including Trans
Union LLC (collectively, “TransUnion” or “Respondent”). The common stock of TransUnion is
registered with the Commission pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act and is listed on the
New York Stock Exchange under the ticker “TRU.”
Facts
A. Statutory and Regulatory Framework Protecting Whistleblowers
2. The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank
Act”), enacted on July 21, 2010, amended the Exchange Act by adding Section 21F,
“Whistleblower Incentives and Protection.” The congressional purpose underlying these provisions
was “to encourage whistleblowers to report possible violations of the securities laws by providing
financial incentives, prohibiting employment-related retaliation, and providing various
confidentiality guarantees.” See Implementation of the Whistleblower Provisions of Section 21F of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Release No. 34-64545, at p. 197 (Aug. 12, 2011).
3. Congress explicitly noted the importance of providing financial incentives to
promote whistleblowing to the Commission as it determined that “a critical component of the
Whistleblower Program is the minimum payout that any individual could look towards in
determining whether to take the enormous risk of blowing the whistle in calling attention to fraud.”
See The Restoring American Financial Stability Act of 2010, Committee on Banking, Housing, and
Urban Affairs (Apr. 30, 2010).
4. To fulfill this congressional purpose, the Commission adopted Rule 21F-17, which
provides in relevant part:
(a) No person may take any action to impede an individual from communicating
directly with the Commission staff about a possible securities law violation,
including enforcing, or threatening to enforce, a confidentiality agreement . . .
with respect to such communications.
Rule 21F-17 became effective on August 12, 2011.
B. TransUnion’s Severance, General Release, Transaction Incentive, and Consulting
Agreements
5. As a regular part of its business, TransUnion enters into severance agreements and
general release agreements with certain senior employees. These agreements document the rights
and responsibilities of TransUnion and the employee following the end of the employment
relationship.
6. From time to time, TransUnion enters into transaction incentive agreements with
certain senior employees. These agreements provide financial incentives to employees following a
business transaction affecting their employment.
3
7. As a regular part of its business, TransUnion enters into consulting agreements with
individual independent contractors. These agreements define the rights and responsibilities of the
individual contractor during their working relationship with TransUnion and after their departure.
8. Between May 8, 2019, and September 22, 2023, TransUnion entered into twenty-
nine agreements that required senior employees to waive their right to recover a monetary award
for participating in an investigation by a government agency. Although these agreements expressly
permitted participation in government whistleblower programs, they also required senior
employees to waive their right to a potential award. These included general release agreements that
contained award-waiver provisions, as well as severance agreements and transaction incentive
agreements that required senior employees to execute a separate agreement containing an award-
waiver provision following the end of their employment with TransUnion. These agreements
stated:
I agree that I am waiving all rights to sue or obtain equitable, remedial or punitive
relief from any or all Released Parties of any kind whatsoever (including, without
limitation, reinstatement, back pay, front pay, attorneys’ fees and any form of
injunctive relief). Notwithstanding the above, I further acknowledge that I am not
waiving and am not being required to waive any right that cannot be waived under
law (including, without limitation, the right to file an administrative charge or
participate in an administrative investigation or proceeding); provided that I
disclaim and waive any right to share or participate in any monetary award
resulting from the prosecution of such charge or investigation or proceeding.
(Emphasis added.)
9. Between August 24, 2022, and September 6, 2023, TransUnion entered into three
consulting agreements that prohibited individual contractors from voluntarily providing
information about TransUnion’s business operations to government agencies and required that
these contractors notify TransUnion of any legally compelled disclosure of such information.
These agreements stated:
Consultant shall hold in confidence and shall not copy, publish, disseminate or
otherwise use any confidential information it receives from [TransUnion]
and/or any [TransUnion] Affiliate (as defined below in Section 13.3) by virtue of
this Contract including but not limited to any such information Consultant received
prior to the commencement of this Contract; provided however, that Consultant
may use (but not copy, publish, disseminate nor use for any other purpose) any such
confidential information solely to the extent necessary for Consultant’s
performance under this Contract. Such obligations of confidentiality shall not
apply to information (a) which Consultant can demonstrate, by its written records,
was already in the possession of Consultant prior to the first date of disclosure by
[TransUnion] and/or a [TransUnion] Affiliate; (b) which is now or becomes
publicly known through no fault of Consultant; (c) which Consultant rightfully
4
receives from third parties; (d) which by [TransUnion’s written authorization is
approved for use or release by Consultant; or (e) which is required by law (i.e., an
order of a court or data request from an administrative or governmental
agency with competent jurisdiction) to be disclosed; provided however, that
Consultant shall provide [TransUnion] at least ten (10) days prior written
notice before the disclosure of such information pursuant to this
Subparagraph (e).
(Emphasis added.)
10. Although the Commission is unaware of any instances in which TransUnion took
action to enforce these provisions or in which the affected individuals declined to speak with the
Commission staff about potential violations of securities laws, these provisions created
impediments to participation in the Commission’s whistleblower program by requiring individuals
to forego either their right to file a complaint with the Commission staff or the financial award they
might receive for doing so.
11. Through the conduct described above, TransUnion violated Exchange Act Rule
21F-17(a), which prohibits any person from taking any action to impede an individual from
communicating directly with the Commission staff about a possible securities law violation.
Remedial Actions and Cooperation
12. After being contacted by the Commission staff in connection with this matter,
TransUnion revised its internal agreement templates, adding language affirmatively advising
employees and contractors that they are not prohibited from disclosing information to any
governmental or regulatory authority, or collecting any related incentive awards. TransUnion also
used reasonable efforts to notify the affected employees and contractors that their agreements do
not in any way limit their ability to contact the Commission staff or to obtain an award in
connection with information they provide.
13. In determining to accept the Offer, the Commission considered remedial acts
promptly undertaken by TransUnion and cooperation afforded to the Commission staff.
IV.
In view of the foregoing, the Commission deems it appropriate to impose the sanctions
agreed to in TransUnion’s Offer.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:
A. Pursuant to Section 21C of the Exchange Act, TransUnion cease and desist from
committing or causing any violations and any future violations of Exchange Act Rule 21F-17(a).
B. TransUnion shall, within ten days of the entry of this order, pay a civil money
penalty in the amount of $312,000 to the Securities and Exchange Commission for transfer to the
5
general fund of the United States Treasury, subject to Exchange Act Section 21F(g)(3). If timely
payment is not made, additional interest shall accrue pursuant to 31 U.S.C. § 3717.
Payment must be made in one of the following ways:
(1) Respondent may transmit payment electronically to the Commission, which
will provide detailed ACH transfer/Fedwire instructions upon request;
(2) Respondent may make direct payment from a bank account via Pay.gov
through the SEC website at http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/ofm.htm; or
(3) Respondent may pay by certified check, bank cashier’s check, or United
States postal money order, made payable to the Securities and Exchange
Commission and hand-delivered or mailed to:
Enterprise Services Center
Accounts Receivable Branch
HQ Bldg., Room 181, AMZ-341
6500 South MacArthur Boulevard
Oklahoma City, OK 73169
Payments by check or money order must be accompanied by a cover letter identifying
TransUnion as a respondent in these proceedings, and the file number of these proceedings; a copy
of the cover letter and check or money order must be sent to Nicholas P. Heinke, Associate
Regional Director, Division of Enforcement, United States Securities and Exchange Commission,
1961 Stout Street, Suite 1700, Denver, CO 80294.
C. Amounts ordered to be paid as civil money penalties pursuant to this Order shall be
treated as penalties paid to the government for all purposes, including all tax purposes. To preserve
the deterrent effect of the civil penalty, Respondent agrees that in any Related Investor Action, it
shall not argue that it is entitled to, nor shall it benefit by, offset or reduction of any award of
compensatory damages by the amount of any part of Respondent’s payment of a civil penalty in
this action (“Penalty Offset”). If the court in any Related Investor Action grants such a Penalty
Offset, Respondent agrees that it shall, within thirty days after entry of a final order granting the
Penalty Offset, notify the Commission’s counsel in this action and pay the amount of the Penalty
Offset to the Securities and Exchange Commission. Such a payment shall not be deemed an
additional civil penalty and shall not be deemed to change the amount of the civil penalty imposed
6
in this proceeding. For purposes of this paragraph, a “Related Investor Action” means a private
damages action brought against Respondent by or on behalf of one or more investors based on
substantially the same facts as alleged in the Order instituted by the Commission in this
proceeding.
By the Commission.
Vanessa A. Countryman
Secretary UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Release No. 100975 / September 9, 2024
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
File No. 3-22084
In the Matter of
TransUnion,
Respondent.
ORDER INSTITUTING CEASE-AND-
DESIST PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO
SECTION 21C OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, MAKING
FINDINGS, AND IMPOSING A CEASE-
AND-DESIST ORDER
I.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) deems it appropriate that cease-
and-desist proceedings be, and hereby are, instituted pursuant to Section 21C of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), against TransUnion.
II.
In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, TransUnion has submitted an Offer
of Settlement (the “Offer”) which the Commission has determined to accept. Solely for the purpose
of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the Commission, or to
which the Commission is a party, and without admitting or denying the findings herein, except as
to the Commission’s jurisdiction over it and the subject matter of these proceedings, which are
admitted, TransUnion consents to the entry of this Order Instituting Cease-and-Desist Proceedings
Pursuant to Section 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Making Findings, and Imposing a
Cease-and-Desist Order (“Order”), as set forth below.
III.
On the basis of this Order and TransUnion’s Offer, the Commission finds that:
Respondent
1. TransUnion, a Delaware corporation based in Chicago, Illinois, is a provider of
consumer credit reporting services that also develops and markets various credit services and
2
fraud-protection products. TransUnion operates through various subsidiaries, including Trans
Union LLC (collectively, “TransUnion” or “Respondent”). The common stock of TransUnion is
registered with the Commission pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act and is listed on the
New York Stock Exchange under the ticker “TRU.”
Facts
A. Statutory and Regulatory Framework Protecting Whistleblowers
2. The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank
Act”), enacted on July 21, 2010, amended the Exchange Act by adding Section 21F,
“Whistleblower Incentives and Protection.” The congressional purpose underlying these provisions
was “to encourage whistleblowers to report possible violations of the securities laws by providing
financial incentives, prohibiting employment-related retaliation, and providing various
confidentiality guarantees.” See Implementation of the Whistleblower Provisions of Section 21F of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Release No. 34-64545, at p. 197 (Aug. 12, 2011).
3. Congress explicitly noted the importance of providing financial incentives to
promote whistleblowing to the Commission as it determined that “a critical component of the
Whistleblower Program is the minimum payout that any individual could look towards in
determining whether to take the enormous risk of blowing the whistle in calling attention to fraud.”
See The Restoring American Financial Stability Act of 2010, Committee on Banking, Housing, and
Urban Affairs (Apr. 30, 2010).
4. To fulfill this congressional purpose, the Commission adopted Rule 21F-17, which
provides in relevant part:
(a) No person may take any action to impede an individual from communicating
directly with the Commission staff about a possible securities law violation,
including enforcing, or threatening to enforce, a confidentiality agreement . . .
with respect to such communications.
Rule 21F-17 became effective on August 12, 2011.
B. TransUnion’s Severance, General Release, Transaction Incentive, and Consulting
Agreements
5. As a regular part of its business, TransUnion enters into severance agreements and
general release agreements with certain senior employees. These agreements document the rights
and responsibilities of TransUnion and the employee following the end of the employment
relationship.
6. From time to time, TransUnion enters into transaction incentive agreements with
certain senior employees. These agreements provide financial incentives to employees following a
business transaction affecting their employment.
3
7. As a regular part of its business, TransUnion enters into consulting agreements with
individual independent contractors. These agreements define the rights and responsibilities of the
individual contractor during their working relationship with TransUnion and after their departure.
8. Between May 8, 2019, and September 22, 2023, TransUnion entered into twenty-
nine agreements that required senior employees to waive their right to recover a monetary award
for participating in an investigation by a government agency. Although these agreements expressly
permitted participation in government whistleblower programs, they also required senior
employees to waive their right to a potential award. These included general release agreements that
contained award-waiver provisions, as well as severance agreements and transaction incentive
agreements that required senior employees to execute a separate agreement containing an award-
waiver provision following the end of their employment with TransUnion. These agreements
stated:
I agree that I am waiving all rights to sue or obtain equitable, remedial or punitive
relief from any or all Released Parties of any kind whatsoever (including, without
limitation, reinstatement, back pay, front pay, attorneys’ fees and any form of
injunctive relief). Notwithstanding the above, I further acknowledge that I am not
waiving and am not being required to waive any right that cannot be waived under
law (including, without limitation, the right to file an administrative charge or
participate in an administrative investigation or proceeding); provided that I
disclaim and waive any right to share or participate in any monetary award
resulting from the prosecution of such charge or investigation or proceeding.
(Emphasis added.)
9. Between August 24, 2022, and September 6, 2023, TransUnion entered into three
consulting agreements that prohibited individual contractors from voluntarily providing
information about TransUnion’s business operations to government agencies and required that
these contractors notify TransUnion of any legally compelled disclosure of such information.
These agreements stated:
Consultant shall hold in confidence and shall not copy, publish, disseminate or
otherwise use any confidential information it receives from [TransUnion]
and/or any [TransUnion] Affiliate (as defined below in Section 13.3) by virtue of
this Contract including but not limited to any such information Consultant received
prior to the commencement of this Contract; provided however, that Consultant
may use (but not copy, publish, disseminate nor use for any other purpose) any such
confidential information solely to the extent necessary for Consultant’s
performance under this Contract. Such obligations of confidentiality shall not
apply to information (a) which Consultant can demonstrate, by its written records,
was already in the possession of Consultant prior to the first date of disclosure by
[TransUnion] and/or a [TransUnion] Affiliate; (b) which is now or becomes
publicly known through no fault of Consultant; (c) which Consultant rightfully
4
receives from third parties; (d) which by [TransUnion’s written authorization is
approved for use or release by Consultant; or (e) which is required by law (i.e., an
order of a court or data request from an administrative or governmental
agency with competent jurisdiction) to be disclosed; provided however, that
Consultant shall provide [TransUnion] at least ten (10) days prior written
notice before the disclosure of such information pursuant to this
Subparagraph (e).
(Emphasis added.)
10. Although the Commission is unaware of any instances in which TransUnion took
action to enforce these provisions or in which the affected individuals declined to speak with the
Commission staff about potential violations of securities laws, these provisions created
impediments to participation in the Commission’s whistleblower program by requiring individuals
to forego either their right to file a complaint with the Commission staff or the financial award they
might receive for doing so.
11. Through the conduct described above, TransUnion violated Exchange Act Rule
21F-17(a), which prohibits any person from taking any action to impede an individual from
communicating directly with the Commission staff about a possible securities law violation.
Remedial Actions and Cooperation
12. After being contacted by the Commission staff in connection with this matter,
TransUnion revised its internal agreement templates, adding language affirmatively advising
employees and contractors that they are not prohibited from disclosing information to any
governmental or regulatory authority, or collecting any related incentive awards. TransUnion also
used reasonable efforts to notify the affected employees and contractors that their agreements do
not in any way limit their ability to contact the Commission staff or to obtain an award in
connection with information they provide.
13. In determining to accept the Offer, the Commission considered remedial acts
promptly undertaken by TransUnion and cooperation afforded to the Commission staff.
IV.
In view of the foregoing, the Commission deems it appropriate to impose the sanctions
agreed to in TransUnion’s Offer.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:
A. Pursuant to Section 21C of the Exchange Act, TransUnion cease and desist from
committing or causing any violations and any future violations of Exchange Act Rule 21F-17(a).
B. TransUnion shall, within ten days of the entry of this order, pay a civil money
penalty in the amount of $312,000 to the Securities and Exchange Commission for transfer to the
5
general fund of the United States Treasury, subject to Exchange Act Section 21F(g)(3). If timely
payment is not made, additional interest shall accrue pursuant to 31 U.S.C. § 3717.
Payment must be made in one of the following ways:
(1) Respondent may transmit payment electronically to the Commission, which
will provide detailed ACH transfer/Fedwire instructions upon request;
(2) Respondent may make direct payment from a bank account via Pay.gov
through the SEC website at http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/ofm.htm; or
(3) Respondent may pay by certified check, bank cashier’s check, or United
States postal money order, made payable to the Securities and Exchange
Commission and hand-delivered or mailed to:
Enterprise Services Center
Accounts Receivable Branch
HQ Bldg., Room 181, AMZ-341
6500 South MacArthur Boulevard
Oklahoma City, OK 73169
Payments by check or money order must be accompanied by a cover letter identifying
TransUnion as a respondent in these proceedings, and the file number of these proceedings; a copy
of the cover letter and check or money order must be sent to Nicholas P. Heinke, Associate
Regional Director, Division of Enforcement, United States Securities and Exchange Commission,
1961 Stout Street, Suite 1700, Denver, CO 80294.
C. Amounts ordered to be paid as civil money penalties pursuant to this Order shall be
treated as penalties paid to the government for all purposes, including all tax purposes. To preserve
the deterrent effect of the civil penalty, Respondent agrees that in any Related Investor Action, it
shall not argue that it is entitled to, nor shall it benefit by, offset or reduction of any award of
compensatory damages by the amount of any part of Respondent’s payment of a civil penalty in
this action (“Penalty Offset”). If the court in any Related Investor Action grants such a Penalty
Offset, Respondent agrees that it shall, within thirty days after entry of a final order granting the
Penalty Offset, notify the Commission’s counsel in this action and pay the amount of the Penalty
Offset to the Securities and Exchange Commission. Such a payment shall not be deemed an
additional civil penalty and shall not be deemed to change the amount of the civil penalty imposed
http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/ofm.htm
6
in this proceeding. For purposes of this paragraph, a “Related Investor Action” means a private
damages action brought against Respondent by or on behalf of one or more investors based on
substantially the same facts as alleged in the Order instituted by the Commission in this
proceeding.
By the Commission.
Vanessa A. Countryman
Secretary
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
IV.