2022-06-21 SEC Press press_release 62 KB 2,869 chars

SEC Charges Egan-Jones Ratings Co. and CEO with Conflict of Interest Violations

Release
2022-111
Caption
Securities and Exchange Commission v. $300,000 Penalty to Settle Sec Charges, et al.
summary

Egan-Jones Ratings Company and its CEO, Sean Egan, were charged by the SEC with violating conflict of interest provisions, resulting in a $1.7 million penalty and $146,000 in disgorgement and interest for the company, and a $300,000 penalty for Egan.

paragraph

The SEC charged Egan-Jones Ratings Company and its CEO, Sean Egan, with violating conflict-of-interest rules by allowing business and marketing considerations to influence credit ratings in 2018 and 2019. Egan-Jones agreed to pay $1.7 million in penalties and $146,000 in disgorgement and interest, while Egan separately paid a $300,000 penalty. The company also failed to maintain adequate policies to manage these conflicts, and must implement enhanced compliance measures.

narrative

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) charged Egan-Jones Ratings Company, a nationally recognized statistical rating organization (NRSRO), and its founder and CEO, Sean Egan, with violating conflict of interest provisions. The alleged fraud involved Egan's involvement in business and marketing activities with clients while determining credit ratings, creating a prohibited conflict of interest, and failing to manage such conflicts. In 2018, Egan-Jones continued to issue and maintain ratings for a client that contributed over 10% of the firm's net revenue, violating another conflict of interest provision. In 2019, Egan's involvement in business and marketing activities with a client influenced the credit rating, further violating conflict of interest rules. Egan-Jones agreed to pay a $1.7 million penalty and $146,000 in disgorgement and interest, while Egan separately paid a $300,000 penalty. The company must also implement enhanced compliance measures, including training and an independent consultant review, and Egan is barred from participating in credit rating decisions.

Enriched metadata

Scheme
corporate-fraud (95%)
Outcome
settled
Settlement
$300,000
Disgorgement
$146,000
Victim loss
$146,000
Classified corporate-fraud(confidence 95%). EDGAR detection: forms 10-K/10-Q/8-K· recall 56% / precision 8%. detection rule →
Parties
$300,000 penalty to settle sec chargesegan-jones ratings companysean egansec's nrsro conflict of interest rulesSecurities and Exchange Commission
Keywords
secegan-jonesinterestconflict interestratingsorder findscreditegan-jones ratingsconflicts interestcredit ratingsconflictegancredit ratingfinds egan-jonesrating

Exhibits & Attached Documents (1)

Extracted insights

Dollar amounts 3
  • $1.70M $1.7 million $1M–$10M
  • $300K $300,000 $100K–$1M
  • $146K $146,000 $100K–$1M
Entities 5
  • agency $300,000 penalty to settle sec charges
  • company egan-jones ratings company
  • person sean egan
  • agency sec's nrsro conflict of interest rules
  • agency Securities and Exchange Commission
Triples 11
  • SEC charged Egan-Jones Ratings Company with violating conflict of interest provisions
  • SEC charged Sean Egan with causing violations
  • Sean Egan became involved in business and marketing activities concerning a client in 2019
  • Egan-Jones Ratings Company violated SEC's NRSRO conflict of interest rules
  • Sean Egan caused Egan-Jones's violations
  • Egan-Jones Ratings Company violated conflict of interest provision in 2018 by continuing to issue ratings for client with 10%+ net revenues
  • Egan-Jones Ratings Company failed to establish policies and procedures to manage conflicts of interest
  • Egan-Jones Ratings Company agreed to pay $1.7 million penalty and $146,000 in disgorgement and interest
  • Egan-Jones Ratings Company committed to conduct training and retain independent consultant for conflict of interest assessment
  • Sean Egan agreed to pay $300,000 penalty to settle SEC charges
  • Sean Egan prohibited from participating in determining or monitoring credit ratings at Egan-Jones
PDF (from attached: pdf)
Text layers
Extracted body text (2,869c)
The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged Haverford, PA-based Egan-Jones Ratings Company, a nationally recognized statistical rating organization (NRSRO) registered with the Commission in certain ratings classes, with violating conflict of interest provisions. The SEC also charged the company’s founder and chief executive officer, Sean Egan, with causing certain of those violations. The SEC’s order finds that, in 2019, Egan, who at the time headed Egan-Jones’s ratings group, became involved in business and marketing activities concerning a client and was influenced by sales and marketing considerations while participating in determining a credit rating for that client, which created a prohibited conflict of interest. The order finds that by issuing and maintaining a rating for the client under those circumstances, Egan-Jones violated the SEC’s NRSRO conflict of interest rules and, further, that Egan caused the company’s violations. The SEC’s order also finds that, in 2018, Egan-Jones violated another conflict of interest provision by continuing to issue and maintain ratings for another client even though that client had contributed ten percent or more of the company’s net revenues during the prior fiscal year. Finally, the order finds that Egan-Jones failed to establish, maintain, and enforce policies and procedures reasonably designed to manage such conflicts of interest. "Credit rating agencies play a vital role in assessing the credit risk of an issuer and must be vigilant in avoiding potential conflicts of interest to promote the integrity, impartiality, and quality of credit ratings," said Gurbir S. Grewal, Director of the SEC’s Division of Enforcement. "As the SEC’s order finds, both Egan-Jones and Sean Egan violated the securities laws related to credit rating agency conflicts of interest and now are being held accountable for their actions." Without admitting or denying the SEC’s findings, Egan-Jones agreed to settle the matter by paying a $1.7 million penalty and more than $146,000 in disgorgement and interest. It also committed to conduct training, retain an independent consultant to assess its policies and procedures concerning conflicts of interest, and prohibit Egan from, among other things, participating in determining or monitoring credit ratings issued or maintained by Egan-Jones or developing or approving procedures used for determining credit ratings issued or maintained by Egan-Jones. Separately, and also without admitting or denying the SEC’s findings, Egan agreed to pay a $300,000 penalty to settle the SEC’s charges against him. The SEC’s investigation was conducted by Greg Hillson and Avron Elbaum, and supervised by Peter Rosario and Yuri B. Zelinsky. Dean M. Conway of the Enforcement Division’s Trial Unit and staff of the SEC’s Office of Credit Ratings assisted with the investigation.
OCR text (2,869c · html-text · 99% conf)
The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged Haverford, PA-based Egan-Jones Ratings Company, a nationally recognized statistical rating organization (NRSRO) registered with the Commission in certain ratings classes, with violating conflict of interest provisions. The SEC also charged the company’s founder and chief executive officer, Sean Egan, with causing certain of those violations. The SEC’s order finds that, in 2019, Egan, who at the time headed Egan-Jones’s ratings group, became involved in business and marketing activities concerning a client and was influenced by sales and marketing considerations while participating in determining a credit rating for that client, which created a prohibited conflict of interest. The order finds that by issuing and maintaining a rating for the client under those circumstances, Egan-Jones violated the SEC’s NRSRO conflict of interest rules and, further, that Egan caused the company’s violations. The SEC’s order also finds that, in 2018, Egan-Jones violated another conflict of interest provision by continuing to issue and maintain ratings for another client even though that client had contributed ten percent or more of the company’s net revenues during the prior fiscal year. Finally, the order finds that Egan-Jones failed to establish, maintain, and enforce policies and procedures reasonably designed to manage such conflicts of interest. "Credit rating agencies play a vital role in assessing the credit risk of an issuer and must be vigilant in avoiding potential conflicts of interest to promote the integrity, impartiality, and quality of credit ratings," said Gurbir S. Grewal, Director of the SEC’s Division of Enforcement. "As the SEC’s order finds, both Egan-Jones and Sean Egan violated the securities laws related to credit rating agency conflicts of interest and now are being held accountable for their actions." Without admitting or denying the SEC’s findings, Egan-Jones agreed to settle the matter by paying a $1.7 million penalty and more than $146,000 in disgorgement and interest. It also committed to conduct training, retain an independent consultant to assess its policies and procedures concerning conflicts of interest, and prohibit Egan from, among other things, participating in determining or monitoring credit ratings issued or maintained by Egan-Jones or developing or approving procedures used for determining credit ratings issued or maintained by Egan-Jones. Separately, and also without admitting or denying the SEC’s findings, Egan agreed to pay a $300,000 penalty to settle the SEC’s charges against him. The SEC’s investigation was conducted by Greg Hillson and Avron Elbaum, and supervised by Peter Rosario and Yuri B. Zelinsky. Dean M. Conway of the Enforcement Division’s Trial Unit and staff of the SEC’s Office of Credit Ratings assisted with the investigation.