In re TRANSAMERICA
Transamerica Financial Advisors, Inc. violated fiduciary duties by recommending higher-cost mutual fund share classes with 12b-1 fees over lower-cost alternatives eligible to clients, while failing to disclose the conflict of interest, leading to a $6.02 million disgorgement and cease-and-desist order after self-reporting under the SEC’s SCSD Initiative.
Between January 1, 2014, and May 12, 2016, Transamerica Financial Advisors, Inc. recommended mutual fund share classes charging 12b-1 fees when lower-cost Class I shares were available to clients, generating $5,364,292.04 in improper fees and $658,780.64 in prejudgment interest. The firm failed to disclose these conflicts of interest in its Form ADV or elsewhere, breaching Sections 206(2) and 207 of the Investment Advisers Act. As part of a settlement under the SEC’s Share Class Selection Disclosure Initiative, Transamerica agreed to a cease-and-desist order, pay $6,023,072.68 in disgorgement and interest, and undertake corrective actions without admitting or denying the findings.
Between January 1, 2014, and May 12, 2016, Transamerica Financial Advisors, Inc. breached its fiduciary duty by recommending and retaining mutual fund share classes that charged 12b-1 fees—typically 25 to 100 basis points—when lower-cost Class I shares of the same funds were available to its advisory clients. The firm received $5,364,292.04 in 12b-1 fees it would not have earned had clients been placed in the more cost-effective share classes, directly harming investor returns. Transamerica failed to disclose this conflict of interest in its Form ADV or through other means, violating Sections 206(2) and 207 of the Investment Advisers Act. The firm self-reported the misconduct to the SEC under the Share Class Selection Disclosure Initiative, which led to a settlement without civil penalty but with a formal cease-and-desist order and censure. As part of the resolution, Transamerica agreed to disgorge $6,023,072.68, including $658,780.64 in prejudgment interest, to be distributed via a Qualified Settlement Fund by February 12, 2018, with full responsibility for tax compliance and distribution costs. The firm also committed to revising its disclosures, transitioning affected clients to lower-cost share classes, notifying investors, and submitting a final accounting to the SEC’s Chicago Regional Office. The SEC reserved the right to seek penalties if Transamerica later provided false or misleading information.
Extracted insights
- $972.55M $972,548,629 $100M–$1B
- $6.02M $6,023,072 $1M–$10M
- $5.36M $5,364,292 $1M–$10M
- $659K $658,780 $100K–$1M
- person fiduciary duty
- agency Securities and Exchange Commission
- company transamerica financial advisors, inc.
- Securities And Exchange Commission instituted Administrative And Cease-And-Desist Proceedings
- Transamerica Financial Advisors, Inc. breached Fiduciary Duty
- Transamerica Financial Advisors, Inc. failed to disclose Conflicts Of Interest
- Transamerica Financial Advisors, Inc. received 12b-1 Fees
- Transamerica Financial Advisors, Inc. self-reported Violations
- Securities And Exchange Commission accepted Offer Of Settlement
- Transamerica Financial Advisors, Inc. consented to Order Instituting Administrative And Cease-And-Desist Proceedings
- Transamerica Financial Advisors, Inc. reported Regulatory Assets Under Management Of Approximately $972,548,629
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF 1940
Release No. 5150 / March 11, 2019
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
File No. 3-19053
In the Matter of
TRANSAMERICA
FINANCIAL ADVISORS,
INC.
Respondent.
ORDER INSTITUTING ADMINISTRATIVE
AND CEASE-AND-DESIST PROCEEDINGS,
PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 203(e) AND
203(k) OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISERS
ACT OF 1940, MAKING FINDINGS, AND
IMPOSING REMEDIAL SANCTIONS AND A
CEASE-AND-DESIST ORDER
I.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) deems it appropriate and in the
public interest that public administrative and cease-and-desist proceedings be, and hereby are,
instituted pursuant to Sections 203(e) and 203(k) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940
(“Advisers Act”) against Transamerica Financial Advisors, Inc. (“Respondent”).
II.
In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, Respondent has submitted an Offer
of Settlement (the “Offer”), which the Commission has determined to accept. Solely for the
purpose of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the
Commission, or to which the Commission is a party, and without admitting or denying the findings
herein, except as to the Commission’s jurisdiction over it and the subject matter of these
proceedings, which are admitted, Respondent consents to the entry of this Order Instituting
Administrative and Cease-and-Desist Proceedings, Pursuant to Sections 203(e) and 203(k) of the
Investment Advisers Act of 1940, Making Findings, and Imposing Remedial Sanctions and a
Cease-and-Desist Order (“Order”), as set forth below.
2
III.
On the basis of this Order and Respondent’s Offer, the Commission finds
1
that
Summary
1. These proceedings arise out of breaches of fiduciary duty and inadequate disclosures
by registered investment adviser Transamerica Financial Advisors, Inc. in connection with its
mutual fund share class selection practices and the fees it and its associated persons received
pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (“12b-1 fees”). At times during
the period January 1, 2014 to May 12, 2016 (the “Relevant Period”), Respondent and its associated
persons purchased, recommended, or held for advisory clients mutual fund share classes that
charged 12b-1 fees instead of lower-cost share classes of the same funds for which the clients were
eligible. Respondent received 12b-1 fees in connection with these investments. Respondent failed
to disclose in its Form ADV or otherwise the conflicts of interest related to (a) its receipt of 12b-1
fees, and/or (b) its selection of mutual fund share classes that pay such fees. During the Relevant
Period, Respondent and its associated persons received 12b-1 fees for advising clients to invest in
or hold such mutual fund share classes.
2. Respondent self-reported to the Commission the violations discussed in this Order
pursuant to the Division of Enforcement’s (the “Division”) Share Class Selection Disclosure
Initiative (“SCSD Initiative”).
2
Accordingly, this Order and Respondent’s Offer are based on the
information self-reported by Respondent.
Respondent
3. Respondent Transamerica Financial Advisors, Inc., incorporated in Delaware and
headquartered in St. Petersburg, Florida, has been dually registered with the Commission as an
investment adviser and broker-dealer since 1985. In its Form ADV filed September 27, 2018,
Respondent reported regulatory assets under management of approximately $972,548,629.
Mutual Fund Share Class Selection
4. Mutual funds typically offer investors different types of shares or “share classes.”
Each share class represents an interest in the same portfolio of securities with the same investment
objective. The primary difference among the share classes is the fee structure.
5. For example, some mutual fund share classes charge 12b-1 fees to cover fund
distribution and sometimes shareholder service expenses. These recurring fees, which are included
1
The findings herein are made pursuant to Respondent’s Offer of Settlement and are not binding on any
other person or entity in this or any other proceeding.
2
See Div. of Enforcement, U.S. Sec. & Exch. Comm’n, Share Class Selection Disclosure Initiative,
https://www.sec.gov/enforce/announcement/scsd-initiative (last modified Feb. 12, 2018).
3
in a mutual fund’s total annual fund operating expenses, vary by share class, but typically range
from 25 to 100 basis points. They are deducted from the mutual fund’s assets on an ongoing basis
and paid to the fund’s distributor or principal underwriter, which generally remits the 12b-1 fees to
the broker-dealer that distributed or sold the shares.
6. Many mutual funds also offer share classes that do not charge 12b-1 fees (e.g.,
“Institutional Class” or “Class I” shares (collectively, “Class I shares”)).
3
An investor who holds
Class I shares of a mutual fund will usually pay lower total annual fund operating expenses over
time – and thus will almost always earn higher returns – than one who holds a share class of the
same fund that charges 12b-1 fees. Therefore, if a mutual fund offers a Class I share, and an
investor is eligible to own it, it is often, though not always, better for the investor to purchase or
hold the Class I share.
7. During the Relevant Period, Respondent advised clients to purchase or hold
4
mutual
fund share classes that charged 12b-1 fees when lower-cost share classes of those same funds were
available to those clients. Respondent and its associated persons received 12b-1 fees that it would
not have collected had those clients been invested in the available lower-cost share classes.
Inadequate Disclosures Concerning Mutual Fund Investments
8. As an investment adviser, Respondent was obligated to disclose all material facts to
its clients, including any conflicts of interest between itself and/or its associated persons and its
clients that could affect the advisory relationship and how those conflicts could impact advice the
Respondent provided its clients. Relevant to the issue herein, Respondent was required to give its
clients sufficient information so that they could understand the conflicts of interest of the
Respondent and/or its associated persons concerning their advice about investing in the different
classes of mutual funds and have a basis on which they could consent to or reject such conflicted
transactions.
9. At times during the Relevant Period, Respondent did not disclose adequately to its
clients either in its Forms ADV or otherwise its and/or its associated persons’ conflicts of interest
related to (a) its receipt of 12b-1 fees, and/or (b) its selection of mutual fund share classes that pay
such fees.
Violations
10. As a result of the conduct described above, Respondent willfully
5
violated Section
206(2) of the Advisers Act, which makes it unlawful for any investment adviser, directly or
3
Share classes that do not charge 12b-1 fees also go by a variety of other names in the mutual fund industry,
such as “Class F2,” “Class Y” and “Class Z” shares. As used in this Order, the term “Class I shares” refers
generically to share classes that do not charge 12b-1 fees.
4
In many cases, mutual funds permit certain advisory clients who hold shares in classes charging 12b-1 fees
to convert those shares to Class I shares without cost or tax consequences to the client.
5
A willful violation of the securities laws means merely “‘that the person charged with the duty knows what
he is doing.’” Wonsover v. SEC, 205 F.3d 408, 414 (D.C. Cir. 2000) (quoting Hughes v. SEC, 174 F.2d 969, 977
4
indirectly, to “engage in any transaction, practice or course of business which operates as a fraud or
deceit upon any client or prospective client.” Scienter is not required to establish a violation of
Section 206(2), but rather may rest on a finding of negligence. SEC v. Steadman, 967 F.2d 636,
643 n.5 (D.C. Cir. 1992) (citing SEC v. Capital Gains Research Bureau, Inc., 375 U.S. 180,194-95
(1963)).
11. As a result of the conduct described above, Respondent willfully violated Section
207 of the Advisers Act, which makes it “unlawful for any person willfully to make any untrue
statement of a material fact in any registration application or report filed with the Commission . . .
or willfully to omit to state in any such application or report any material fact which is required to
be stated therein.”
Self-Reporting
12. In determining to accept Respondent’s offer, the Commission considered that
Respondent self-reported its conduct to the Commission pursuant to the SCSD Initiative.
Undertakings
13. Respondent has undertaken to:
a. Within 30 days of the entry of this Order, review and correct as necessary
all relevant disclosure documents concerning mutual fund share class selection and
12b-1 fees.
b. Within 30 days of the entry of this Order, evaluate whether existing clients
should be moved to a lower-cost share class and move clients as necessary.
c. Within 30 days of the entry of this Order, evaluate, update (if necessary),
and review for the effectiveness of their implementation, Respondent’s policies and
procedures so that they are reasonably designed to prevent violations of the
Advisers Act in connection with disclosures regarding mutual fund share class
selection.
d. Within 30 days of the entry of this Order, notify affected investors (i.e.,
those former and current clients who, during the Relevant Period of inadequate
disclosure, purchased or held 12b-1 fee paying share class mutual funds when a
lower-cost share class of the same fund was available to the client) (hereinafter,
“affected investors”) of the settlement terms of this Order in a clear and
conspicuous fashion.
e. Within 40 days of the entry of this Order, certify, in writing, compliance
with the undertaking(s) set forth above. The certification shall identify the
(D.C. Cir. 1949)). There is no requirement that the actor “‘also be aware that he is violating one of the Rules or
Acts.’” Id. (quoting Gearhart & Otis, Inc. v. SEC, 348 F.2d 798, 803 (D.C. Cir. 1965)).
5
undertaking(s), provide written evidence of compliance in the form of a narrative,
and be supported by exhibits sufficient to demonstrate compliance. The
certification and supporting material shall be submitted to Paul Montoya, Chicago
Regional Office, Securities and Exchange Commission, 175 West Jackson
Boulevard, Suite 1450, Chicago, IL 60604, or such other address as the
Commission staff may provide, with a copy to the Office of Chief Counsel of the
Division of Enforcement, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F. Street,
NE, Washington, DC 20549.
f. For good cause shown, the Commission staff may extend any of the
procedural dates relating to these undertakings. Deadlines for procedural dates
shall be counted in calendar days, except that if the last day falls on a weekend or
federal holiday, the next business day shall be considered the last day.
IV.
In view of the foregoing, the Commission deems it appropriate, and in the public interest to
impose the sanctions agreed to in Respondent’s Offer.
Accordingly, pursuant to Sections 203(e) and 203(k) of the Advisers Act, it is hereby
ORDERED that:
A. Respondent shall cease and desist from committing or causing any violations and
any future violations of Sections 206(2) and 207 of the Advisers Act.
B. Respondent is censured.
C. Respondent shall pay disgorgement and prejudgment interest to affected investors,
totaling $6,023,072.68 as follows:
(i.) Respondent shall pay disgorgement of $5,364,292.04 and prejudgment
interest of $658,780.64, consistent with the provisions of this Subsection C and
subject to the offset provisions of Subsection C.(vii) below.
(ii.) Within ten (10) days of the entry of this Order, Respondent shall deposit the
full amount of the disgorgement and prejudgment interest (the “Distribution Fund”)
into an escrow account at a financial institution not unacceptable to the
Commission staff and Respondent shall provide evidence of such deposit in a form
acceptable to the Commission staff. If timely deposit is not made, additional
interest shall accrue pursuant to SEC Rule of Practice 600 [17 C.F.R. § 201.600].
(iii.) Respondent shall be responsible for administering the Distribution Fund and
may hire a professional acceptable to the Commission, at its own cost, to assist it in
the administration of the distribution. The costs and expenses of administering the
Distribution Fund, including any such professional services, shall be borne by
Respondent and shall not be paid out of the Distribution Fund.
6
(iv.) Respondent shall distribute the amount of the Distribution Fund to each
affected investor an amount representing: (a) the 12b-1 fees attributable to the
affected investor during the Relevant Period; and (b) reasonable interest paid on
such fees,
6
pursuant to a disbursement calculation (the “Calculation”) that will be
submitted to, reviewed, and approved by the Commission staff in accordance with
this Subsection C. The Calculation shall be subject to a de minimis threshold. No
portion of the Distribution Fund shall be paid to any affected investor account in
which Respondent or its past or present officers or directors have a financial
interest.
(v.) Respondent shall, within ninety (90) days of the entry of this Order, submit a
Calculation to the Commission staff for review and approval. Respondent shall also
provide to the Commission staff such additional information and supporting
documentation as the Commission staff may request for the purpose of its review.
In the event of one or more objections by the Commission staff to Respondent’s
proposed Calculation or any of its information or supporting documentation,
Respondent shall submit a revised Calculation for the review and approval of the
Commission staff or additional information or supporting documentation within ten
(10) days of the date that Respondent is notified of the objection. The revised
Calculation shall be subject to all of the provisions of this Subsection C.
(vi.) Respondent shall, within thirty (30) days of the written approval of the
Calculation by the Commission staff, submit a payment file (the “Payment File”) for
review and acceptance by the Commission staff demonstrating the application of the
methodology to each affected investor. The Payment File should identify, at a
minimum: (1) the name of each affected investor, (2) the exact amount of the
payment to be made from the Distribution Fund to each affected investor, and (3) the
application of a de minimis threshold.
(vii.) Respondent shall disburse all amounts payable to affected investors within
90 days of the date the Commission staff accepts the Payment File unless such time
period is extended as provided in Paragraph (x.) of this Subsection C. The amount
Respondent pays to affected investors on or after February 12, 2018, up until the
lapse of 90 days following the date of staff’s acceptance of the Payment File for
12b-1 fees the Respondent received during the Relevant Period, will dollar for
dollar offset the disgorgement payable to the Commission pursuant to this
Subsection C, subject to approval by Commission staff. If, after Respondent’s
reasonable efforts to distribute the Distribution Fund pursuant to the approved
Payment File, Respondent is unable to distribute any portion of the Distribution
Fund for good cause, including factors beyond Respondent’s control, Respondent
6
Reasonable interest will be calculated at the Short-Term Applicable Federal Rate plus three percent (3%),
compounded quarterly from the end of the year when Respondent and its associated persons received the 12b-1 fees
to the date the Respondent completed its self-report pursuant to the SCSD Initiative.
7
shall transfer any such undistributed funds to the Commission for transmittal to the
United States Treasury in accordance with Section 21F(g)(3) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 when the distribution of the funds is complete and before the
final accounting provided for in Paragraph (ix.) below is submitted to Commission
staff. Any such payment shall be made in accordance with Paragraph (xi.) below.
(viii.) A Distribution Fund is a Qualified Settlement Fund (“QSF”) under Section
468B(g) of the Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”), 26 U.S.C. §§1.468B.1-1.468B.5.
Respondent agrees to be responsible for all tax compliance responsibilities
associated with distribution of the Distribution Fund, including but not limited to
tax obligations resulting from the Distribution Fund’s status as a QSF and the
Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (“FATCA”), and may retain any
professional services necessary. The costs and expenses of any such professional
services shall be borne by Respondent and shall not be paid by the Distribution
Fund.
(ix.) Within 150 days after Respondent completes the distribution of all amounts
payable to the affected investors, Respondent shall submit to the Commission staff
a final accounting and certification of the disposition of the Distribution Fund for
Commission approval. The final accounting shall be in a format to be provided by
the Commission staff. The final accounting and certification shall include: (1) the
amount paid to each affected investor, with reasonable interest; (2) the date of each
payment; (3) the check number or other identifier of money transferred to each
affected investor; (4) the amount of any returned payment and the date received; (5)
a description of any effort to locate an affected investor whose payment was
returned or to whom payment was not made for any reason; (6) the total amount, if
any, to be forwarded to the Commission for transfer to the United States Treasury;
and (7) an affirmation that Respondent has made payments from the Distribution
Fund to affected investors in accordance with the Payment File approved by the
Commission staff. Respondent shall submit the final accounting and certification,
together with proof and supporting documentation of such payment in a form
acceptable to Commission staff, under a cover letter that identifies Transamerica
Financial Advisors, Inc. as the Respondent in these proceedings and the file number
of these proceedings to Paul Montoya, Asset Management Unit, Chicago Regional
Office, United States Securities and Exchange Commission, 175 West Jackson
Boulevard, Suite 1450, Chicago, IL 60604, or such other address as the
Commission staff may provide. Any and all supporting documentation for the
accounting and certification shall be provided to the Commission staff upon
request, and Respondent shall cooperate with any additional requests by the
Commission staff in connection with the accounting and certification.
(x.) The Commission staff may extend any of the procedural dates set forth in
Paragraphs (ii.) through (ix.) of this Subsection C for good cause shown. Deadlines
for dates relating to the Distribution Fund shall be counted in calendar days, except
8
if the last day falls on a weekend or federal holiday, the next business day shall be
considered the last day.
(xi.) Respondent’s transfer of any undistributed funds to the Commission for
transmittal to the United States Treasury must be made in one of the following
ways:
(a) Respondent may transmit payment electronically to the Commission, which
will provide detailed ACH transfer/Fedwire instructions upon request;
(b) Respondent may make direct payment from a bank account via Pay.gov
through the SEC website at http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/ofm.htm; or
(c) Respondent may pay by certified check, bank cashier’s check, or United
States postal money order, made payable to the Securities and Exchange
Commission and hand-delivered or mailed to:
Enterprise Services Center
Accounts Receivable Branch
HQ Bldg., Room 181, AMZ-341
6500 South MacArthur Boulevard
Oklahoma City, OK 73169
Payments by check or money order must be accompanied by a cover letter
identifying Respondent as a Respondent in these proceedings, and the file number
of these proceedings; a copy of the cover letter and check or money order must be
sent to Paul Montoya, Asset Management Unit, Chicago Regional Office, United
States Securities and Exchange Commission, 175 West Jackson Boulevard, Suite
1450, Chicago, IL 60604, or such other address as the Commission staff may
provide.
D. Respondent acknowledges that the Commission is not imposing a civil penalty
based upon Respondent’s self-report in the SCSD Initiative. If at any time following the entry of
this Order, the Division obtains information indicating that Respondent knowingly provided
materially false or misleading information or materials to the Commission, or in a related
proceeding, the Division may, at its sole discretion and with prior notice to the Respondent,
petition the Commission to reopen this matter and seek an order directing that the Respondent pay
a civil money penalty. Respondent may contest by way of defense in any resulting administrative
proceeding whether it knowingly provided materially false or misleading information, but may not:
(1) contest the findings in this Order; or (2) assert any defense to liability or remedy, including, but
not limited to, any statute of limitations defense.
9
E. Respondent shall comply with the undertakings enumerated in Section III,
paragraphs 13.a through 13.e above.
By the Commission.
Vanessa A. Countryman
Acting Secretary
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF 1940
Release No. 5150 / March 11, 2019
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
File No. 3-19053
In the Matter of
TRANSAMERICA
FINANCIAL ADVISORS,
INC.
Respondent.
ORDER INSTITUTING ADMINISTRATIVE
AND CEASE-AND-DESIST PROCEEDINGS,
PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 203(e) AND
203(k) OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISERS
ACT OF 1940, MAKING FINDINGS, AND
IMPOSING REMEDIAL SANCTIONS AND A
CEASE-AND-DESIST ORDER
I.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) deems it appropriate and in the
public interest that public administrative and cease-and-desist proceedings be, and hereby are,
instituted pursuant to Sections 203(e) and 203(k) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940
(“Advisers Act”) against Transamerica Financial Advisors, Inc. (“Respondent”).
II.
In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, Respondent has submitted an Offer
of Settlement (the “Offer”), which the Commission has determined to accept. Solely for the
purpose of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the
Commission, or to which the Commission is a party, and without admitting or denying the findings
herein, except as to the Commission’s jurisdiction over it and the subject matter of these
proceedings, which are admitted, Respondent consents to the entry of this Order Instituting
Administrative and Cease-and-Desist Proceedings, Pursuant to Sections 203(e) and 203(k) of the
Investment Advisers Act of 1940, Making Findings, and Imposing Remedial Sanctions and a
Cease-and-Desist Order (“Order”), as set forth below.
2
III.
On the basis of this Order and Respondent’s Offer, the Commission finds1 that
Summary
1. These proceedings arise out of breaches of fiduciary duty and inadequate disclosures
by registered investment adviser Transamerica Financial Advisors, Inc. in connection with its
mutual fund share class selection practices and the fees it and its associated persons received
pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (“12b-1 fees”). At times during
the period January 1, 2014 to May 12, 2016 (the “Relevant Period”), Respondent and its associated
persons purchased, recommended, or held for advisory clients mutual fund share classes that
charged 12b-1 fees instead of lower-cost share classes of the same funds for which the clients were
eligible. Respondent received 12b-1 fees in connection with these investments. Respondent failed
to disclose in its Form ADV or otherwise the conflicts of interest related to (a) its receipt of 12b-1
fees, and/or (b) its selection of mutual fund share classes that pay such fees. During the Relevant
Period, Respondent and its associated persons received 12b-1 fees for advising clients to invest in
or hold such mutual fund share classes.
2. Respondent self-reported to the Commission the violations discussed in this Order
pursuant to the Division of Enforcement’s (the “Division”) Share Class Selection Disclosure
Initiative (“SCSD Initiative”).2 Accordingly, this Order and Respondent’s Offer are based on the
information self-reported by Respondent.
Respondent
3. Respondent Transamerica Financial Advisors, Inc., incorporated in Delaware and
headquartered in St. Petersburg, Florida, has been dually registered with the Commission as an
investment adviser and broker-dealer since 1985. In its Form ADV filed September 27, 2018,
Respondent reported regulatory assets under management of approximately $972,548,629.
Mutual Fund Share Class Selection
4. Mutual funds typically offer investors different types of shares or “share classes.”
Each share class represents an interest in the same portfolio of securities with the same investment
objective. The primary difference among the share classes is the fee structure.
5. For example, some mutual fund share classes charge 12b-1 fees to cover fund
distribution and sometimes shareholder service expenses. These recurring fees, which are included
1
The findings herein are made pursuant to Respondent’s Offer of Settlement and are not binding on any
other person or entity in this or any other proceeding.
2
See Div. of Enforcement, U.S. Sec. & Exch. Comm’n, Share Class Selection Disclosure Initiative,
https://www.sec.gov/enforce/announcement/scsd-initiative (last modified Feb. 12, 2018).
3
in a mutual fund’s total annual fund operating expenses, vary by share class, but typically range
from 25 to 100 basis points. They are deducted from the mutual fund’s assets on an ongoing basis
and paid to the fund’s distributor or principal underwriter, which generally remits the 12b-1 fees to
the broker-dealer that distributed or sold the shares.
6. Many mutual funds also offer share classes that do not charge 12b-1 fees (e.g.,
“Institutional Class” or “Class I” shares (collectively, “Class I shares”)).3 An investor who holds
Class I shares of a mutual fund will usually pay lower total annual fund operating expenses over
time – and thus will almost always earn higher returns – than one who holds a share class of the
same fund that charges 12b-1 fees. Therefore, if a mutual fund offers a Class I share, and an
investor is eligible to own it, it is often, though not always, better for the investor to purchase or
hold the Class I share.
7. During the Relevant Period, Respondent advised clients to purchase or hold4 mutual
fund share classes that charged 12b-1 fees when lower-cost share classes of those same funds were
available to those clients. Respondent and its associated persons received 12b-1 fees that it would
not have collected had those clients been invested in the available lower-cost share classes.
Inadequate Disclosures Concerning Mutual Fund Investments
8. As an investment adviser, Respondent was obligated to disclose all material facts to
its clients, including any conflicts of interest between itself and/or its associated persons and its
clients that could affect the advisory relationship and how those conflicts could impact advice the
Respondent provided its clients. Relevant to the issue herein, Respondent was required to give its
clients sufficient information so that they could understand the conflicts of interest of the
Respondent and/or its associated persons concerning their advice about investing in the different
classes of mutual funds and have a basis on which they could consent to or reject such conflicted
transactions.
9. At times during the Relevant Period, Respondent did not disclose adequately to its
clients either in its Forms ADV or otherwise its and/or its associated persons’ conflicts of interest
related to (a) its receipt of 12b-1 fees, and/or (b) its selection of mutual fund share classes that pay
such fees.
Violations
10. As a result of the conduct described above, Respondent willfully5 violated Section
206(2) of the Advisers Act, which makes it unlawful for any investment adviser, directly or
3
Share classes that do not charge 12b-1 fees also go by a variety of other names in the mutual fund industry,
such as “Class F2,” “Class Y” and “Class Z” shares. As used in this Order, the term “Class I shares” refers
generically to share classes that do not charge 12b-1 fees.
4
In many cases, mutual funds permit certain advisory clients who hold shares in classes charging 12b-1 fees
to convert those shares to Class I shares without cost or tax consequences to the client.
5
A willful violation of the securities laws means merely “‘that the person charged with the duty knows what
he is doing.’” Wonsover v. SEC, 205 F.3d 408, 414 (D.C. Cir. 2000) (quoting Hughes v. SEC, 174 F.2d 969, 977
4
indirectly, to “engage in any transaction, practice or course of business which operates as a fraud or
deceit upon any client or prospective client.” Scienter is not required to establish a violation of
Section 206(2), but rather may rest on a finding of negligence. SEC v. Steadman, 967 F.2d 636,
643 n.5 (D.C. Cir. 1992) (citing SEC v. Capital Gains Research Bureau, Inc., 375 U.S. 180,194-95
(1963)).
11. As a result of the conduct described above, Respondent willfully violated Section
207 of the Advisers Act, which makes it “unlawful for any person willfully to make any untrue
statement of a material fact in any registration application or report filed with the Commission . . .
or willfully to omit to state in any such application or report any material fact which is required to
be stated therein.”
Self-Reporting
12. In determining to accept Respondent’s offer, the Commission considered that
Respondent self-reported its conduct to the Commission pursuant to the SCSD Initiative.
Undertakings
13. Respondent has undertaken to:
a. Within 30 days of the entry of this Order, review and correct as necessary
all relevant disclosure documents concerning mutual fund share class selection and
12b-1 fees.
b. Within 30 days of the entry of this Order, evaluate whether existing clients
should be moved to a lower-cost share class and move clients as necessary.
c. Within 30 days of the entry of this Order, evaluate, update (if necessary),
and review for the effectiveness of their implementation, Respondent’s policies and
procedures so that they are reasonably designed to prevent violations of the
Advisers Act in connection with disclosures regarding mutual fund share class
selection.
d. Within 30 days of the entry of this Order, notify affected investors (i.e.,
those former and current clients who, during the Relevant Period of inadequate
disclosure, purchased or held 12b-1 fee paying share class mutual funds when a
lower-cost share class of the same fund was available to the client) (hereinafter,
“affected investors”) of the settlement terms of this Order in a clear and
conspicuous fashion.
e. Within 40 days of the entry of this Order, certify, in writing, compliance
with the undertaking(s) set forth above. The certification shall identify the
(D.C. Cir. 1949)). There is no requirement that the actor “‘also be aware that he is violating one of the Rules or
Acts.’” Id. (quoting Gearhart & Otis, Inc. v. SEC, 348 F.2d 798, 803 (D.C. Cir. 1965)).
5
undertaking(s), provide written evidence of compliance in the form of a narrative,
and be supported by exhibits sufficient to demonstrate compliance. The
certification and supporting material shall be submitted to Paul Montoya, Chicago
Regional Office, Securities and Exchange Commission, 175 West Jackson
Boulevard, Suite 1450, Chicago, IL 60604, or such other address as the
Commission staff may provide, with a copy to the Office of Chief Counsel of the
Division of Enforcement, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F. Street,
NE, Washington, DC 20549.
f. For good cause shown, the Commission staff may extend any of the
procedural dates relating to these undertakings. Deadlines for procedural dates
shall be counted in calendar days, except that if the last day falls on a weekend or
federal holiday, the next business day shall be considered the last day.
IV.
In view of the foregoing, the Commission deems it appropriate, and in the public interest to
impose the sanctions agreed to in Respondent’s Offer.
Accordingly, pursuant to Sections 203(e) and 203(k) of the Advisers Act, it is hereby
ORDERED that:
A. Respondent shall cease and desist from committing or causing any violations and
any future violations of Sections 206(2) and 207 of the Advisers Act.
B. Respondent is censured.
C. Respondent shall pay disgorgement and prejudgment interest to affected investors,
totaling $6,023,072.68 as follows:
(i.) Respondent shall pay disgorgement of $5,364,292.04 and prejudgment
interest of $658,780.64, consistent with the provisions of this Subsection C and
subject to the offset provisions of Subsection C.(vii) below.
(ii.) Within ten (10) days of the entry of this Order, Respondent shall deposit the
full amount of the disgorgement and prejudgment interest (the “Distribution Fund”)
into an escrow account at a financial institution not unacceptable to the
Commission staff and Respondent shall provide evidence of such deposit in a form
acceptable to the Commission staff. If timely deposit is not made, additional
interest shall accrue pursuant to SEC Rule of Practice 600 [17 C.F.R. § 201.600].
(iii.) Respondent shall be responsible for administering the Distribution Fund and
may hire a professional acceptable to the Commission, at its own cost, to assist it in
the administration of the distribution. The costs and expenses of administering the
Distribution Fund, including any such professional services, shall be borne by
Respondent and shall not be paid out of the Distribution Fund.
6
(iv.) Respondent shall distribute the amount of the Distribution Fund to each
affected investor an amount representing: (a) the 12b-1 fees attributable to the
affected investor during the Relevant Period; and (b) reasonable interest paid on
such fees,6 pursuant to a disbursement calculation (the “Calculation”) that will be
submitted to, reviewed, and approved by the Commission staff in accordance with
this Subsection C. The Calculation shall be subject to a de minimis threshold. No
portion of the Distribution Fund shall be paid to any affected investor account in
which Respondent or its past or present officers or directors have a financial
interest.
(v.) Respondent shall, within ninety (90) days of the entry of this Order, submit a
Calculation to the Commission staff for review and approval. Respondent shall also
provide to the Commission staff such additional information and supporting
documentation as the Commission staff may request for the purpose of its review.
In the event of one or more objections by the Commission staff to Respondent’s
proposed Calculation or any of its information or supporting documentation,
Respondent shall submit a revised Calculation for the review and approval of the
Commission staff or additional information or supporting documentation within ten
(10) days of the date that Respondent is notified of the objection. The revised
Calculation shall be subject to all of the provisions of this Subsection C.
(vi.) Respondent shall, within thirty (30) days of the written approval of the
Calculation by the Commission staff, submit a payment file (the “Payment File”) for
review and acceptance by the Commission staff demonstrating the application of the
methodology to each affected investor. The Payment File should identify, at a
minimum: (1) the name of each affected investor, (2) the exact amount of the
payment to be made from the Distribution Fund to each affected investor, and (3) the
application of a de minimis threshold.
(vii.) Respondent shall disburse all amounts payable to affected investors within
90 days of the date the Commission staff accepts the Payment File unless such time
period is extended as provided in Paragraph (x.) of this Subsection C. The amount
Respondent pays to affected investors on or after February 12, 2018, up until the
lapse of 90 days following the date of staff’s acceptance of the Payment File for
12b-1 fees the Respondent received during the Relevant Period, will dollar for
dollar offset the disgorgement payable to the Commission pursuant to this
Subsection C, subject to approval by Commission staff. If, after Respondent’s
reasonable efforts to distribute the Distribution Fund pursuant to the approved
Payment File, Respondent is unable to distribute any portion of the Distribution
Fund for good cause, including factors beyond Respondent’s control, Respondent
6
Reasonable interest will be calculated at the Short-Term Applicable Federal Rate plus three percent (3%),
compounded quarterly from the end of the year when Respondent and its associated persons received the 12b-1 fees
to the date the Respondent completed its self-report pursuant to the SCSD Initiative.
7
shall transfer any such undistributed funds to the Commission for transmittal to the
United States Treasury in accordance with Section 21F(g)(3) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 when the distribution of the funds is complete and before the
final accounting provided for in Paragraph (ix.) below is submitted to Commission
staff. Any such payment shall be made in accordance with Paragraph (xi.) below.
(viii.) A Distribution Fund is a Qualified Settlement Fund (“QSF”) under Section
468B(g) of the Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”), 26 U.S.C. §§1.468B.1-1.468B.5.
Respondent agrees to be responsible for all tax compliance responsibilities
associated with distribution of the Distribution Fund, including but not limited to
tax obligations resulting from the Distribution Fund’s status as a QSF and the
Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (“FATCA”), and may retain any
professional services necessary. The costs and expenses of any such professional
services shall be borne by Respondent and shall not be paid by the Distribution
Fund.
(ix.) Within 150 days after Respondent completes the distribution of all amounts
payable to the affected investors, Respondent shall submit to the Commission staff
a final accounting and certification of the disposition of the Distribution Fund for
Commission approval. The final accounting shall be in a format to be provided by
the Commission staff. The final accounting and certification shall include: (1) the
amount paid to each affected investor, with reasonable interest; (2) the date of each
payment; (3) the check number or other identifier of money transferred to each
affected investor; (4) the amount of any returned payment and the date received; (5)
a description of any effort to locate an affected investor whose payment was
returned or to whom payment was not made for any reason; (6) the total amount, if
any, to be forwarded to the Commission for transfer to the United States Treasury;
and (7) an affirmation that Respondent has made payments from the Distribution
Fund to affected investors in accordance with the Payment File approved by the
Commission staff. Respondent shall submit the final accounting and certification,
together with proof and supporting documentation of such payment in a form
acceptable to Commission staff, under a cover letter that identifies Transamerica
Financial Advisors, Inc. as the Respondent in these proceedings and the file number
of these proceedings to Paul Montoya, Asset Management Unit, Chicago Regional
Office, United States Securities and Exchange Commission, 175 West Jackson
Boulevard, Suite 1450, Chicago, IL 60604, or such other address as the
Commission staff may provide. Any and all supporting documentation for the
accounting and certification shall be provided to the Commission staff upon
request, and Respondent shall cooperate with any additional requests by the
Commission staff in connection with the accounting and certification.
(x.) The Commission staff may extend any of the procedural dates set forth in
Paragraphs (ii.) through (ix.) of this Subsection C for good cause shown. Deadlines
for dates relating to the Distribution Fund shall be counted in calendar days, except
8
if the last day falls on a weekend or federal holiday, the next business day shall be
considered the last day.
(xi.) Respondent’s transfer of any undistributed funds to the Commission for
transmittal to the United States Treasury must be made in one of the following
ways:
(a) Respondent may transmit payment electronically to the Commission, which
will provide detailed ACH transfer/Fedwire instructions upon request;
(b) Respondent may make direct payment from a bank account via Pay.gov
through the SEC website at http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/ofm.htm; or
(c) Respondent may pay by certified check, bank cashier’s check, or United
States postal money order, made payable to the Securities and Exchange
Commission and hand-delivered or mailed to:
Enterprise Services Center
Accounts Receivable Branch
HQ Bldg., Room 181, AMZ-341
6500 South MacArthur Boulevard
Oklahoma City, OK 73169
Payments by check or money order must be accompanied by a cover letter
identifying Respondent as a Respondent in these proceedings, and the file number
of these proceedings; a copy of the cover letter and check or money order must be
sent to Paul Montoya, Asset Management Unit, Chicago Regional Office, United
States Securities and Exchange Commission, 175 West Jackson Boulevard, Suite
1450, Chicago, IL 60604, or such other address as the Commission staff may
provide.
D. Respondent acknowledges that the Commission is not imposing a civil penalty
based upon Respondent’s self-report in the SCSD Initiative. If at any time following the entry of
this Order, the Division obtains information indicating that Respondent knowingly provided
materially false or misleading information or materials to the Commission, or in a related
proceeding, the Division may, at its sole discretion and with prior notice to the Respondent,
petition the Commission to reopen this matter and seek an order directing that the Respondent pay
a civil money penalty. Respondent may contest by way of defense in any resulting administrative
proceeding whether it knowingly provided materially false or misleading information, but may not:
(1) contest the findings in this Order; or (2) assert any defense to liability or remedy, including, but
not limited to, any statute of limitations defense.
http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/ofm.htm
9
E. Respondent shall comply with the undertakings enumerated in Section III,
paragraphs 13.a through 13.e above.
By the Commission.
Vanessa A. Countryman
Acting Secretary