SEC v. Matthew M. Motil, Northern District of Ohio (Jan. 16, 2026) — Judgment
raw: SEC v. MATTHEW M. MOTIL
SEC v. MATTHEW M. MOTIL (Jan. 16, 2026)
Classified broker-dealer-fraud(confidence 90%). EDGAR detection: forms Form D· recall 29% / precision 9%. detection rule →
Statutes
15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)15 U.S.C. § 77q(a)15 U.S.C. § 77e(a)15 U.S.C. § 77h15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)15 U.S.C. § 77t(b)11 U.S.C. §52311 U.S.C. §523(a)17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5SECTION 10(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACTSECTION 17(a) OF THE SECURITIES ACTSECTIONS 5(a) AND (c) OF THE SECURITIES ACTSections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities ActSection 8 of the Securities ActSection 20(b) of the Securities ActRule 10b-5
Parties
Securities and Exchange CommissionMatthew M. Motil
Keywords
ordered adjudgedadjudged decreedfurther orderedsecuritiesorderedadjudgeddecreedfurthermatthew motilsecurities exchangedirectly indirectlyfinalsecurityinterstate commerceregistration statement
Extracted insights
Dollar amounts 2
- $2.97M $2,967,535 $1M–$10M
- $340K $340,395 $100K–$1M
Entities 4
- company in connection with purchase or sale of securities
- person matthew m. motil
- agency Securities and Exchange Commission
- company to defraud in offer or sale of securities
Triples 22
- Securities And Exchange Commission Filed a Complaint Against Matthew M. Motil And Others
- Matthew M. Motil Entered a General Appearance In The Case
- Matthew M. Motil Consented To Jurisdiction By The Court
- Matthew M. Motil Waived Findings Of Fact And Conclusions Of Law
- Matthew M. Motil Waived Right To Appeal From The Final Judgment
- Court Ordered And Adjudged Matthew M. Motil To Be Permanently Restrained And Enjoined
- Matthew M. Motil Violating Section 10(b) Of The Securities Exchange Act Of 1934
- Matthew M. Motil Using Means Of Interstate Commerce In Connection With Purchase Or Sale Of Securities
- Matthew M. Motil Employing Device, Scheme, Or Artifice To Defraud
- Matthew M. Motil Making Untrue Statement Of a Material Fact
- Matthew M. Motil Omitting To State Material Fact Necessary For Non-Misleading Statements
- Matthew M. Motil Engaging In Act Or Practice That Operates As Fraud Or Deceit
- Matthew M. Motil Creating False Appearance Or Deceiving Any Person
- Matthew M. Motil Disseminating False Or Misleading Information To Investors Or Prospective Investors
- Matthew M. Motil Making False Or Misleading Statement In Communication With Investors
- Court Ordered And Adjudged Matthew M. Motil To Be Permanently Restrained And Enjoined
- Matthew M. Motil Violating Section 17(a) Of The Securities Act Of 1933
- Matthew M. Motil Offering Or Selling Securities Using Means Of Interstate Commerce
- Matthew M. Motil Employing Device, Scheme, Or Artifice To Defraud In Offer Or Sale Of Securities
- Matthew M. Motil Obtaining Money Or Property By Untrue Statement Of Material Fact
- Matthew M. Motil Omitting Material Fact Necessary For Non-Misleading Statements
- Matthew M. Motil Engaging In Transaction Or Practice That Operates As Fraud Or Deceit On Purchaser
Text layers
Extracted body text (9,672c)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,
Plaintiff,
No. 1:23-cv-1853 (JZ)
v.
MATTHEW M. MOTIL, et al.,
Defendants.
FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT MATTHEW M. MOTIL
The Securities and Exchange Commission having filed a Complaint and Defendant
Matthew M. Motil (“Defendant”) having entered a general appearance; consented to the Court’s
jurisdiction over Defendant and the subject matter of this action; consented to entry of this Final
Judgment; waived findings of fact and conclusions of law; and waived any right to appeal from
this Final Judgment:
I.
SECTION 10(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is
permanently restrained and enjoined from violating, directly or indirectly, Section 10(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)] and Rule 10b-5
promulgated thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5], by using any means or instrumentality of
interstate commerce, or of the mails, or of any facility of any national securities exchange, in
connection with the purchase or sale of any security:
(a) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud;
Case: 1:23-cv-01853-JZ Doc #: 36 Filed: 01/13/26 1 of 6. PageID #: 222
2
(b) to make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact
necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances
under which they were made, not misleading; or
(c) to engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would
operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person
by, directly or indirectly, (i) creating a false appearance or otherwise deceiving any person, or (ii)
disseminating false or misleading documents, materials, or information or making, either orally
or in writing, any false or misleading statement in any communication with any investor or
prospective investor, about:
(A) any investment in or offering of securities;
(B) the prospects for success of any product or company;
(C) the use of investor funds;
(D) compensation to any person; or
(E) the misappropriation of investor funds or investment proceeds.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who
receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s
officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or
participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a).
II.
SECTION 17(a) OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that
Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities
Case: 1:23-cv-01853-JZ Doc #: 36 Filed: 01/13/26 2 of 6. PageID #: 223
3
Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 77q(a)] in the offer or sale of any security by the
use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or
by use of the mails, directly or indirectly:
(a) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud;
(b) to obtain money or property by means of any untrue statement of a material fact
or any omission of a material fact necessary in order to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading;
or
(c) to engage in any transaction, practice, or course of business which operates or
would operate as a fraud or deceit upon the purchaser
by, directly or indirectly, (i) creating a false appearance or otherwise deceiving any person, or (ii)
disseminating false or misleading documents, materials, or information or making, either orally
or in writing, any false or misleading statement in any communication with any investor or
prospective investor, about:
(A) any investment in or offering of securities;
(B) the prospects for success of any product or company;
(C) the use of investor funds;
(D) compensation to any person; or
(E) the misappropriation of investor funds or investment proceeds.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who
receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s
officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or
Case: 1:23-cv-01853-JZ Doc #: 36 Filed: 01/13/26 3 of 6. PageID #: 224
4
participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a).
III.
SECTIONS 5(a) AND (c) OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that
Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the
Securities Act [15 U.S.C. § 77e(a) and (c)] by, directly or indirectly, in the absence of any
applicable exemption:
(a) Unless a registration statement is in effect as to a security, making use of any
means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce
or of the mails to sell such security through the use or medium of any prospectus
or otherwise;
(b) Unless a registration statement is in effect as to a security, carrying or causing to
be carried through the mails or in interstate commerce, by any means or
instruments of transportation, any such security for the purpose of sale or for
delivery after sale; or
(c) Making use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in
interstate commerce or of the mails to offer to sell or offer to buy through the use
or medium of any prospectus or otherwise any security, unless a registration
statement has been filed with the Commission as to such security, or while the
registration statement is the subject of a refusal order or stop order or (prior to the
effective date of the registration statement) any public proceeding or examination
under Section 8 of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. § 77h].
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in
Case: 1:23-cv-01853-JZ Doc #: 36 Filed: 01/13/26 4 of 6. PageID #: 225
5
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who
receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s
officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or
participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a).
IV.
ISSUANCE, PURCHASE, OFFERING, AND SALE BAR
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that pursuant to
Section 21(d)(1) and 21(d)(5) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)(1) and (5)] and Section
20(b) of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. § 77t(b)], Defendant is permanently restrained and
enjoined from participating directly or indirectly in the issuance, purchase, offer or sale of any
security; provided, however, that such injunction shall not prevent him from purchasing or
selling securities listed on a national securities exchange for his own personal account.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who
receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s
officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or
participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a).
V.
DISGORGEMENT
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is
liable for and shall pay disgorgement of ill-gotten gains in the amount of $2,967,535, along with
prejudgment interest in the amount of $340,395.77.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant’s
Case: 1:23-cv-01853-JZ Doc #: 36 Filed: 01/13/26 5 of 6. PageID #: 226
6
obligation to make this payment shall be deemed satisfied by the entry of the restitution order in
the related criminal case United States v. Matthew Motil, Crim. No. 24-cr-289 (N.D. Ohio).
VI.
INCORPORATION OF CONSENT
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Consent is
incorporated herein with the same force and effect as if fully set forth herein, and that Defendant
shall comply with all the undertakings and agreements set forth therein.
VII
BANKRUPTCY NONDISCHARGEABILITY
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, for purposes of
exceptions to discharge set forth in Section 523 of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. §523, the
allegations in the complaint are true and admitted by Defendant, and further, any debt for
disgorgement, prejudgment interest, civil penalty or other amounts due by Defendant under this
Final Judgment or any other judgment, order, consent order, decree or settlement agreement
entered in connection with this proceeding, is a debt for the violation by Defendant of the federal
securities laws or any regulation or order issued under such laws, as set forth in Section
523(a)(19) of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. §523(a)(19).
VIII.
RETENTION OF JURISDICTION
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court shall
retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Final Judgment.
Dated: January 13, 2026
_s/ Jack Zouhary_____
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case: 1:23-cv-01853-JZ Doc #: 36 Filed: 01/13/26 6 of 6. PageID #: 227
Blank PageOCR text (9,672c · textlayer · 95% conf)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,
Plaintiff,
No. 1:23-cv-1853 (JZ)
v.
MATTHEW M. MOTIL, et al.,
Defendants.
FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT MATTHEW M. MOTIL
The Securities and Exchange Commission having filed a Complaint and Defendant
Matthew M. Motil (“Defendant”) having entered a general appearance; consented to the Court’s
jurisdiction over Defendant and the subject matter of this action; consented to entry of this Final
Judgment; waived findings of fact and conclusions of law; and waived any right to appeal from
this Final Judgment:
I.
SECTION 10(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is
permanently restrained and enjoined from violating, directly or indirectly, Section 10(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)] and Rule 10b-5
promulgated thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5], by using any means or instrumentality of
interstate commerce, or of the mails, or of any facility of any national securities exchange, in
connection with the purchase or sale of any security:
(a) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud;
Case: 1:23-cv-01853-JZ Doc #: 36 Filed: 01/13/26 1 of 6. PageID #: 222
2
(b) to make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact
necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances
under which they were made, not misleading; or
(c) to engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would
operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person
by, directly or indirectly, (i) creating a false appearance or otherwise deceiving any person, or (ii)
disseminating false or misleading documents, materials, or information or making, either orally
or in writing, any false or misleading statement in any communication with any investor or
prospective investor, about:
(A) any investment in or offering of securities;
(B) the prospects for success of any product or company;
(C) the use of investor funds;
(D) compensation to any person; or
(E) the misappropriation of investor funds or investment proceeds.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who
receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s
officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or
participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a).
II.
SECTION 17(a) OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that
Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities
Case: 1:23-cv-01853-JZ Doc #: 36 Filed: 01/13/26 2 of 6. PageID #: 223
3
Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 77q(a)] in the offer or sale of any security by the
use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or
by use of the mails, directly or indirectly:
(a) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud;
(b) to obtain money or property by means of any untrue statement of a material fact
or any omission of a material fact necessary in order to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading;
or
(c) to engage in any transaction, practice, or course of business which operates or
would operate as a fraud or deceit upon the purchaser
by, directly or indirectly, (i) creating a false appearance or otherwise deceiving any person, or (ii)
disseminating false or misleading documents, materials, or information or making, either orally
or in writing, any false or misleading statement in any communication with any investor or
prospective investor, about:
(A) any investment in or offering of securities;
(B) the prospects for success of any product or company;
(C) the use of investor funds;
(D) compensation to any person; or
(E) the misappropriation of investor funds or investment proceeds.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who
receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s
officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or
Case: 1:23-cv-01853-JZ Doc #: 36 Filed: 01/13/26 3 of 6. PageID #: 224
4
participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a).
III.
SECTIONS 5(a) AND (c) OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that
Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the
Securities Act [15 U.S.C. § 77e(a) and (c)] by, directly or indirectly, in the absence of any
applicable exemption:
(a) Unless a registration statement is in effect as to a security, making use of any
means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce
or of the mails to sell such security through the use or medium of any prospectus
or otherwise;
(b) Unless a registration statement is in effect as to a security, carrying or causing to
be carried through the mails or in interstate commerce, by any means or
instruments of transportation, any such security for the purpose of sale or for
delivery after sale; or
(c) Making use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in
interstate commerce or of the mails to offer to sell or offer to buy through the use
or medium of any prospectus or otherwise any security, unless a registration
statement has been filed with the Commission as to such security, or while the
registration statement is the subject of a refusal order or stop order or (prior to the
effective date of the registration statement) any public proceeding or examination
under Section 8 of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. § 77h].
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in
Case: 1:23-cv-01853-JZ Doc #: 36 Filed: 01/13/26 4 of 6. PageID #: 225
5
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who
receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s
officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or
participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a).
IV.
ISSUANCE, PURCHASE, OFFERING, AND SALE BAR
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that pursuant to
Section 21(d)(1) and 21(d)(5) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)(1) and (5)] and Section
20(b) of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. § 77t(b)], Defendant is permanently restrained and
enjoined from participating directly or indirectly in the issuance, purchase, offer or sale of any
security; provided, however, that such injunction shall not prevent him from purchasing or
selling securities listed on a national securities exchange for his own personal account.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who
receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s
officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or
participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a).
V.
DISGORGEMENT
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is
liable for and shall pay disgorgement of ill-gotten gains in the amount of $2,967,535, along with
prejudgment interest in the amount of $340,395.77.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant’s
Case: 1:23-cv-01853-JZ Doc #: 36 Filed: 01/13/26 5 of 6. PageID #: 226
6
obligation to make this payment shall be deemed satisfied by the entry of the restitution order in
the related criminal case United States v. Matthew Motil, Crim. No. 24-cr-289 (N.D. Ohio).
VI.
INCORPORATION OF CONSENT
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Consent is
incorporated herein with the same force and effect as if fully set forth herein, and that Defendant
shall comply with all the undertakings and agreements set forth therein.
VII
BANKRUPTCY NONDISCHARGEABILITY
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, for purposes of
exceptions to discharge set forth in Section 523 of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. §523, the
allegations in the complaint are true and admitted by Defendant, and further, any debt for
disgorgement, prejudgment interest, civil penalty or other amounts due by Defendant under this
Final Judgment or any other judgment, order, consent order, decree or settlement agreement
entered in connection with this proceeding, is a debt for the violation by Defendant of the federal
securities laws or any regulation or order issued under such laws, as set forth in Section
523(a)(19) of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. §523(a)(19).
VIII.
RETENTION OF JURISDICTION
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court shall
retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Final Judgment.
Dated: January 13, 2026
_s/ Jack Zouhary_____
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case: 1:23-cv-01853-JZ Doc #: 36 Filed: 01/13/26 6 of 6. PageID #: 227
Blank Page