2026-01-06 sec-litreleases litigation_release 67 KB 4,102 chars

SEC v. Muhammad Saad Shoukat; Gyunho Kim; Muhammad Arham Shoukat; Muhammad Shahwaiz Shoukat; Izunna Okonkwo; and Daniyal Khan, No. LR-26458, District of New Jersey (Jan. 6, 2026) — Press Release

raw: Muhammad Saad Shoukat; Gyunho Kim; Muhammad Arham Shoukat; Muhammad Shahwaiz Shoukat; Izunna Okonkwo; Daniyal Khan

Muhammad Saad Shoukat; Gyunho Kim; Muhammad Arham Shoukat; Muhammad Shahwaiz Shoukat; Izunna Okonkwo; Daniyal Khan, No. 2:25-cv-18864 (D.N.J. Jan. 6, 2026)

Caption
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. SHOUKAT
summary

The SEC charged the Shoukat brothers and three associates with orchestrating $41 million in insider trading and manipulating Olema and Opiant Pharmaceuticals stocks through identity theft and false press releases.

paragraph

The SEC charged Muhammad Saad Shoukat, Muhammad Arham Shoukat, and Muhammad Shahwaiz Shoukat with market manipulation and a $41 million insider trading scheme. The defendants face charges for violating the Securities Act of 1933 and the Exchange Act of 1934. The SEC is seeking permanent injunctive relief, civil penalties, and the disgorgement of ill-gotten gains.

narrative

The SEC charged three brothers—Muhammad Saad Shoukat, Muhammad Arham Shoukat, and Muhammad Shahwaiz Shoukat—and three associates with a $41 million insider trading scheme and two market manipulation schemes. To inflate Olema Pharmaceuticals' stock, the brothers allegedly impersonated physicians and stole patient identities to falsify clinical trial results. For Opiant Pharmaceuticals, they used threats and a fictitious partnership press release to boost stock prices. The insider trading scheme involved investment banker Justin Kim providing nonpublic acquisition tips to Saad Shoukat, who then tipped his brothers and two other friends. The combined illicit profits from these schemes totaled approximately $41 million. In addition to SEC civil charges, a parallel criminal action has been launched by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of New Jersey.

Enriched metadata

Scheme
insider-trading (100%)
Court
District of New Jersey
Case No.
2:25-cv-18864
Victim loss
$41,000,000
Entity
Muhammad Saad Shoukat
Classified insider-trading(confidence 100%). EDGAR detection: forms 4/3/5/144· recall 81% / precision 19%. detection rule →
Parties
Securities and Exchange CommissionMuhammad Shahwaiz ShoukatIzunna OkonkwoMishaal AnwarMuhammad Saad ShoukatMuhammad Arham ShoukatGozie Anthony OkonkwoGyunho KimDaniyal Khan
Keywords
shoukatsaad shoukatshoukat brothersmuhammadkimsecbrothersopiantsaadmuhammad saadarham shoukatshoukat muhammadsecurities exchangeokonkwokhan

Exhibits & Attached Documents (1)

Extracted insights

Dollar amounts 2
  • $41.00M $41 Million $10M–$100M
  • $41.00M $41 million $10M–$100M
Entities 8
  • person Assunta Vivolo
  • person ben kuruvilla
  • organization Defendants
  • person Defendants
  • person Justin Kim
  • agency Securities and Exchange Commission
  • organization Securities and Exchange Commission
  • person Tracy Sivitz
Triples 14
  • Securities And Exchange Commission charged Muhammad Saad Shoukat, Muhammad Arham Shoukat, And Muhammad Shahwaiz Shoukat
  • Muhammad Saad Shoukat And Muhammad Arham Shoukat impersonated Physicians
  • Shoukat Brothers purchased Opiant Stock
  • Shoukat Brothers threatened Opiant Leadership
  • Justin Kim tipped Saad Shoukat
  • Saad Shoukat tipped Brothers, Okonkwo, And Khan
  • Defendants violated Section 17(a) Of The Securities Act Of 1933
  • Defendants violated Section 10(b) Of The Securities Exchange Act Of 1934
  • Securities And Exchange Commission seeks Permanent Injunctive Relief, Disgorgement Of Ill-Gotten Gains
  • Us Attorney's Office announced Criminal Charges Against Shoukat Brothers, Kim, Okonkwo, And Khan
  • Securities And Exchange Commission investigated Market Abuse Scheme
  • Tracy Sivitz conducted Investigation
  • Assunta Vivolo supervised Investigation
  • Ben Kuruvilla leads Litigation
PDF (from attached: complaint)
Text layers
Extracted body text (4,102c)
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONLitigation Release No. 26458 / January 6, 2026Securities and Exchange Commission v. Muhammad Saad Shoukat, et al., No. 2:25-cv-18864 (D.N.J. filed Dec. 22, 2025)SEC Charges Three Brothers with Allegedly Manipulating Two Pharma Company Stocks and Carrying Out a $41 Million Insider Trading Scheme with Three FriendsThe Securities and Exchange Commission charged three Pakistani and U.S. nationals Muhammad Saad Shoukat, Muhammad Arham Shoukat, and Muhammad Shahwaiz Shoukat, with allegedly perpetrating two market manipulation schemes, and along with three friends, carrying out a $41 million insider trading scheme.The complaint alleges that the Shoukat brothers manipulated the securities of Olema Pharmaceuticals, Inc and Opiant Pharmaceuticals, Inc. According to the complaint, in the scheme involving Olema, Saad and Arham Shoukat impersonated physicians to steal confidential information about Olema’s clinical trials and then stole the identities of metastatic breast cancer patients on online patient forums to publish falsified clinical trial results that increased Olema’s stock price. In the alleged scheme involving Opiant, the three Shoukat brothers purchased Opiant stock based on a tip that another company would soon acquire Opiant. When the acquisition stalled, they allegedly threatened Opiant leadership and issued a false press release that announced a fictitious partnership deal for Opiant’s lead drug candidate, increased Opiant’s stock price, and allowed the Shoukat brothers to sell their Opiant stock more profitably than they would have otherwise.The alleged insider trading scheme took place from at least June 2020 through February 2024, and involved the Shoukat brothers and three friends, Izunna Okonkwo, a U.S. and Nigerian national, Daniyal Khan, a U.K. national, and Justin Kim, a U.S. national. According to the complaint, Kim, an investment banker, tipped Saad Shoukat with material nonpublic information obtained from Kim’s firm about nine potential corporate acquisitions. As alleged, Saad Shoukat then tipped his brothers, Okonkwo, and Khan. The SEC alleges that the defendants’ and relief defendants’ combined profits from the scheme totaled approximately $41 million.The SEC’s complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, charges the Shoukat brothers with violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, all defendants with violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rules 10b-5 thereunder, and all defendants except Khan for violating Section 14(e) of the Exchange Act and Rule 14e-3 thereunder. The complaint seeks permanent injunctive relief, disgorgement of ill-gotten gains with prejudgment interest, civil penalties, and an injunction against Kim permanently prohibiting Kim from acting as or being associated with any broker, dealer, or investment adviser. The complaint also seeks disgorgement and prejudgment interest from Mishal Anwar and Gozie Okonkwo, relief defendants whose accounts were used to generate illicit profits.In a parallel action, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of New Jersey announced criminal charges against the Shoukat brothers, Kim, Okonkwo, and Khan.The SEC’s investigation was conducted by Tracy Sivitz and supervised by Assunta Vivolo and Joseph Sansone, all of the Enforcement Division’s Market Abuse Unit. Assisting with the investigation were John Rymas and Darren Boerner of the Market Abuse Unit’s Analysis and Detection Center, Maxwell Clark, Ryan Erhard, Jason Lee, and William Young of the SEC’s Division of Economic and Research Analysis, Izabela Reis and Marianne Olson of the SEC’s Office of International Affairs, and James D’Avino of the SEC’s New York Regional Office. The litigation will be led by Senior Trial Counsel Ben Kuruvilla and Ms. Sivitz and will be supervised by Jack Kaufman of the New York Regional Office and Ms. Vivolo. The SEC appreciates the assistance of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, the UK Financial Conduct Authority, and the Jersey Financial Services Commission.
OCR text (4,102c · html-text · 99% conf)
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONLitigation Release No. 26458 / January 6, 2026Securities and Exchange Commission v. Muhammad Saad Shoukat, et al., No. 2:25-cv-18864 (D.N.J. filed Dec. 22, 2025)SEC Charges Three Brothers with Allegedly Manipulating Two Pharma Company Stocks and Carrying Out a $41 Million Insider Trading Scheme with Three FriendsThe Securities and Exchange Commission charged three Pakistani and U.S. nationals Muhammad Saad Shoukat, Muhammad Arham Shoukat, and Muhammad Shahwaiz Shoukat, with allegedly perpetrating two market manipulation schemes, and along with three friends, carrying out a $41 million insider trading scheme.The complaint alleges that the Shoukat brothers manipulated the securities of Olema Pharmaceuticals, Inc and Opiant Pharmaceuticals, Inc. According to the complaint, in the scheme involving Olema, Saad and Arham Shoukat impersonated physicians to steal confidential information about Olema’s clinical trials and then stole the identities of metastatic breast cancer patients on online patient forums to publish falsified clinical trial results that increased Olema’s stock price. In the alleged scheme involving Opiant, the three Shoukat brothers purchased Opiant stock based on a tip that another company would soon acquire Opiant. When the acquisition stalled, they allegedly threatened Opiant leadership and issued a false press release that announced a fictitious partnership deal for Opiant’s lead drug candidate, increased Opiant’s stock price, and allowed the Shoukat brothers to sell their Opiant stock more profitably than they would have otherwise.The alleged insider trading scheme took place from at least June 2020 through February 2024, and involved the Shoukat brothers and three friends, Izunna Okonkwo, a U.S. and Nigerian national, Daniyal Khan, a U.K. national, and Justin Kim, a U.S. national. According to the complaint, Kim, an investment banker, tipped Saad Shoukat with material nonpublic information obtained from Kim’s firm about nine potential corporate acquisitions. As alleged, Saad Shoukat then tipped his brothers, Okonkwo, and Khan. The SEC alleges that the defendants’ and relief defendants’ combined profits from the scheme totaled approximately $41 million.The SEC’s complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, charges the Shoukat brothers with violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, all defendants with violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rules 10b-5 thereunder, and all defendants except Khan for violating Section 14(e) of the Exchange Act and Rule 14e-3 thereunder. The complaint seeks permanent injunctive relief, disgorgement of ill-gotten gains with prejudgment interest, civil penalties, and an injunction against Kim permanently prohibiting Kim from acting as or being associated with any broker, dealer, or investment adviser. The complaint also seeks disgorgement and prejudgment interest from Mishal Anwar and Gozie Okonkwo, relief defendants whose accounts were used to generate illicit profits.In a parallel action, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of New Jersey announced criminal charges against the Shoukat brothers, Kim, Okonkwo, and Khan.The SEC’s investigation was conducted by Tracy Sivitz and supervised by Assunta Vivolo and Joseph Sansone, all of the Enforcement Division’s Market Abuse Unit. Assisting with the investigation were John Rymas and Darren Boerner of the Market Abuse Unit’s Analysis and Detection Center, Maxwell Clark, Ryan Erhard, Jason Lee, and William Young of the SEC’s Division of Economic and Research Analysis, Izabela Reis and Marianne Olson of the SEC’s Office of International Affairs, and James D’Avino of the SEC’s New York Regional Office. The litigation will be led by Senior Trial Counsel Ben Kuruvilla and Ms. Sivitz and will be supervised by Jack Kaufman of the New York Regional Office and Ms. Vivolo. The SEC appreciates the assistance of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, the UK Financial Conduct Authority, and the Jersey Financial Services Commission.