In re Health Net
Health Net, Inc. violated SEC Rule 21F-17 by including severance agreement clauses from August 2011 to October 2015 that prohibited former employees from seeking or accepting whistleblower awards and waived their rights to monetary recovery from SEC proceedings, impeding protected communications with the Commission, and agreed to a $340,000 civil penalty and corrective notice requirements without admitting or denying the findings.
Health Net, Inc. violated SEC Rule 21F-17(a) by embedding provisions in its severance agreements that barred former employees from filing applications for or accepting whistleblower awards under the Dodd-Frank Act, even after the rule took effect in August 2011. Between August 2011 and October 2015, approximately 600 employees signed agreements containing language that waived their right to any monetary recovery from government investigations, undermining the financial incentives Congress intended to encourage whistleblowing. Without admitting or denying the allegations, Health Net consented to a cease-and-desist order, paid a $340,000 civil penalty, and agreed to notify all affected former employees of their whistleblower rights and submit compliance certifications.
Health Net, Inc. violated SEC Rule 21F-17(a) by including provisions in its voluntary severance agreements from August 2011 to October 2015 that prohibited former employees from filing applications for or accepting whistleblower awards under Section 21F of the Securities Exchange Act, despite the rule’s explicit prohibition against impeding such communications. Although Health Net revised its agreements in June 2013 to remove explicit language banning award applications, it retained clauses that waived any right to monetary recovery from government proceedings, effectively nullifying the financial incentives Congress designed to encourage whistleblowing. Approximately 600 employees signed these agreements during the violation period, and the company continued the practice until October 22, 2015, when it finally amended the language to comply. The SEC found that these provisions directly conflicted with the purpose of the Dodd-Frank whistleblower program, which relies on financial rewards to motivate individuals to report securities fraud. Without admitting or denying the findings, Health Net consented to a cease-and-desist order, agreed to pay a $340,000 civil penalty, and committed to undertaking reasonable efforts to notify all affected former employees of their whistleblower rights. The company was also required to submit certifications of compliance to the SEC and revise its standard severance agreements to ensure future adherence to Rule 21F-17. This case underscores the SEC’s enforcement priority in protecting the integrity of the whistleblower program and deterring corporate efforts to silence potential informants through contractual restrictions.
Extracted insights
- $340K $340,000 $100K–$1M
- company health net, inc.
- agency impeding individual from communicating with sec about securities law violations
- agency sec pursuant to section 12(b) of exchange act until april 4, 2016
- agency Securities and Exchange Commission
- Health Net, Inc. is Delaware Corporation Headquartered In Woodland Hills, California
- Health Net, Inc. registered with SEC Pursuant To Section 12(b) Of Exchange Act Until April 4, 2016
- Health Net, Inc. traded on New York Stock Exchange Until March 24, 2016
- Health Net, Inc. had Approximately 8,541 Employees As Of December 31, 2015
- SEC instituted Cease-And-Desist Proceedings Against Health Net, Inc. Pursuant To Section 21C
- Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform And Consumer Protection Act enacted July 21, 2010
- Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform And Consumer Protection Act added Section 21F Whistleblower Incentives And Protection To Exchange Act
- SEC adopted Rule 21F-17 Effective August 12, 2011
- Rule 21F-17 prohibits Impeding Individual From Communicating With SEC About Securities Law Violations
- Health Net, Inc. entered into Voluntary Severance Agreements With Employees From Prior To August 12, 2011 Through October 22, 2015
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Release No. 78590 / August 16, 2016
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
File No. 3-17396
In the Matter of
Health Net, Inc.,
Respondent.
ORDER INSTITUTING CEASE-AND-
DESIST PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO
SECTION 21C OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, MAKING
FINDINGS, AND IMPOSING A CEASE-
AND-DESIST ORDER
I.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) deems it appropriate that cease-
and-desist proceedings be, and hereby are, instituted pursuant to Section 21C of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) against Health Net, Inc. (“Health Net” or “Respondent”).
II.
In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, Respondent has submitted an Offer
of Settlement (the “Offer”) which the Commission has determined to accept. Solely for the
purpose of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the
Commission, or to which the Commission is a party, and without admitting or denying the findings
herein, except as to the Commission’s jurisdiction over it and the subject matter of these
proceedings, which are admitted, Respondent consents to the entry of this Order Instituting Cease-
and-Desist Proceedings Pursuant to Section 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Making
Findings, and Imposing a Cease-and-Desist Order (“Order”), as set forth below.
III.
On the basis of this Order and Respondent’s Offer, the Commission finds
1
that:
Respondent
1. Health Net, Inc. is a Delaware corporation headquartered in Woodland Hills,
California. Until April 4, 2016, Health Net’s common stock was registered with the Commission
pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act and, until March 24, 2016, traded on the New York
1
The findings herein are made pursuant to Respondent’s Offer of Settlement and are not binding on any
other person or entity in this or any other proceeding.
2
Stock Exchange. While registered with the Commission, Health Net filed periodic reports,
including reports on Forms 10-K and 10-Q, with the Commission pursuant to Section 13(a) of the
Exchange Act and related rules thereunder. As of December 31, 2015, Health Net and its
subsidiaries had approximately 8,541 employees.
Facts
A. Statutory and Regulatory Framework Protecting Whistleblowers
2. The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, enacted on July
21, 2010, amended the Exchange Act by adding Section 21F, “Whistleblower Incentives and
Protection.” The purpose of these provisions was to encourage whistleblowers to report possible
securities law violations by providing, among other things, financial incentives and various
confidentiality guarantees.
3. Congress explicitly noted the critical importance of providing financial incentives
to promote whistleblowing to the SEC as it determined that “a critical component of the
Whistleblower Program is the minimum payout that any individual could look towards in
determining whether to take the enormous risk of blowing the whistle in calling attention to fraud.”
See “The Restoring American Financial Stability Act of 2010” report from the Committee on
Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs (April 30, 2010).
4. To fulfill this Congressional purpose, the Commission adopted Rule 21F-17, which
provides in relevant part:
(a) No person may take any action to impede an individual from communicating
directly with the Commission staff about a possible securities law violation,
including enforcing, or threatening to enforce, a confidentiality agreement . . . with
respect to such communications.
Rule 21F-17 became effective on August 12, 2011.
B. Health Net’s Severance Agreements
5. Beginning prior to August 12, 2011, and continuing through October 22, 2015,
Respondent entered into voluntary severance agreements with employees who were leaving the
company. A severance agreement is a contract between an employer and a former employee
documenting the rights and responsibilities of both parties incidental to the employee’s departure.
Respondent continues to enter into voluntary severance agreements with departing employees, but
on October 22, 2015, it amended those agreements to strike the language at issue below.
6. Respondent’s severance agreements included a Waiver and Release of Claims that
listed various potential claims against Respondent that a departing employee waived as a condition
of being paid monetary severance payments and receiving other voluntarily provided consideration
from Respondent.
7. In August 2011 – after the Commission adopted Rule 21F-17 – and as part of a
regular periodic review and update of its agreements, Respondent amended the Waiver and
3
Release of Claims. Among other things, Respondent amended the Waiver and Release of Claims
to specify that, while not prohibited by the severance agreement from participating in a
government investigation, the former employee who executed the Waiver and Release of Claims
was prohibited from filing an application for, or accepting, a whistleblower award from the
Commission.
8. In particular, Paragraph 4 of Respondent’s Waiver and Release of Claims expressly
required an employee to waive:
the right to file an application for award for original information submitted pursuant to
Section 21F of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
9. While Paragraph 8 of the Waiver and Release of Claims stated that nothing in the
Release precludes an employee from participating in any investigation before any federal agency,
that same Paragraph required the employee to waive his or her right to any monetary recovery
related to any such investigation.
10. In particular, Paragraph 8 provided that “nothing in this Release precludes
Employee from participating in any investigation or proceeding before any federal or state agency,
or governmental body . . . however, while Employee may file a charge and participate in any such
proceeding, by signing this Release, Employee waives any right to bring a lawsuit against the
Company, and waives any right to any individual monetary recovery in any such proceeding or
lawsuit or in any proceeding brought based on any communication by Employee to any federal,
state, or local government agency or department.”
11. Approximately 600 employees signed agreements that contained the above
language, which was used by Respondent from approximately August 2011 to June 2013.
12. In June 2013, again as part of a regular periodic review and update of its
agreements, Respondent further amended the Waiver and Release of Claims. Respondent removed
the language expressly prohibiting employees from applying for whistleblower awards pursuant to
Exchange Act Section 21F. Respondent also added Paragraph 4.a. which provided that “[n]othing
herein shall be construed to impede the employee from communicating directly with, cooperating
with or providing information to any government regulator.” However, Respondent retained
restrictions in the Waiver and Release of Claims that removed the financial incentive for its former
employees who executed that agreement to communicate with Commission staff concerning
possible securities law violations at Health Net. Paragraph 5 of the revised Waiver and Release of
Claims stated that: “nothing in this Release precludes Employee from participating in any
investigation or proceeding before any federal or state agency or governmental body . . .however,
while Employee may file a charge, provide information, or participate in any investigation or
proceeding, by signing this Release, Employee, to the maximum extent permitted by law . . .
waives any right to any individual monetary recovery . . . in any proceeding brought based on any
communication by Employee to any federal, state or local government agency or department.”
13. Though the Commission is unaware of any instances in which (i) a former
employee of Respondent who executed the above noted agreements did not communicate directly
with Commission staff about potential securities law violations or (ii) Respondent took action to
enforce those provisions or otherwise prevent such communications, Respondent – by use of both
4
the 2011 and 2013 agreements – directly targeted the SEC’s whistleblower program by removing
the critically important financial incentives that are intended to encourage persons to communicate
directly with the Commission staff about possible securities law violations. Such restrictions on
accepting financial awards for providing information regarding possible securities law violations to
the Commission undermine the purpose of Section 21F and Rule 21F-17(a), which is to
“encourag[e] individuals to report to the Commission,” [Adopting Release at p. 201], and violate
Rule 21F-17(a) by impeding individuals from communicating directly with the Commission staff
about possible securities law violations.
Violation
14. Through its conduct described above, Health Net violated Rule 21F-17 under the
Exchange Act.
Undertaking
15. Health Net has agreed that, within 60 days from the date the Commission enters this
Order, it will make reasonable efforts to contact Health Net former employees who signed the
Waiver and Release of Claims from August 12, 2011 to October 22, 2015, and provide them with
an Internet link to the order
2
and a statement that Health Net does not prohibit former employees
from seeking and obtaining a whistleblower award from the Securities and Exchange Commission
pursuant to Section 21F of the Exchange Act. In determining whether to accept the Offer, the
Commission has considered this undertaking.
16. Health Net has agreed to certify, in writing, compliance with the undertaking set
forth above. The certification shall identify the undertaking, provide written evidence of
compliance in the form of a narrative, and be supported by exhibits sufficient to demonstrate
compliance. The Commission staff may make reasonable requests for further evidence of
compliance, and Respondent agrees to provide such evidence. The certification and supporting
material shall be submitted to Antonia Chion, Associate Director, with a copy to the Office of the
Chief Counsel of the Enforcement Division, no later than sixty (60) days from the date of
completion of the undertakings.
IV.
In view of the foregoing, the Commission deems it appropriate to impose the sanctions
agreed to in Respondent Health Net’s Offer.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:
A. Pursuant to Section 21C of the Exchange Act, Respondent Health Net cease and
desist from committing or causing any violations and any future violations of Rule 21F-17 of the
Exchange Act;
B. Respondent shall, within thirty (30) days of the entry of this Order, pay a civil
money penalty in the amount of $340,000 to the Securities and Exchange Commission for
2
Health Net further agrees to provide a paper copy of the Order to any former employee who requests it.
5
transfer to the general fund of the United States Treasury in accordance with Exchange Act
Section 21F(g)(3). If timely payment is not made, additional interest shall accrue pursuant to 31
U.S.C. 3717. Payment must be made in one of the following ways:
(1) Respondent may transmit payment electronically to the Commission, which will
provide detailed ACH transfer/Fedwire instructions upon request;
(2) Respondent may make direct payment from a bank account via Pay.gov through
the SEC website at http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/ofm.htm; or
(3) Respondent may pay by certified check, bank cashier’s check, or United States
postal money order, made payable to the Securities and Exchange Commission
and hand-delivered or mailed to:
Enterprise Services Center
Accounts Receivable Branch
HQ Bldg., Room 181, AMZ-341
6500 South MacArthur Boulevard
Oklahoma City, OK 73169
Payments by check or money order must be accompanied by a cover letter identifying
Health Net as a Respondent in these proceedings, and the file number of these proceedings; a copy
of the cover letter and check or money order must be sent to Antonia Chion, Associate Director,
Division of Enforcement, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, N.E., Washington,
D.C. 20549.
By the Commission.
Brent J. Fields
Secretary UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Release No. 78590 / August 16, 2016
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
File No. 3-17396
In the Matter of
Health Net, Inc.,
Respondent.
ORDER INSTITUTING CEASE-AND-
DESIST PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO
SECTION 21C OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, MAKING
FINDINGS, AND IMPOSING A CEASE-
AND-DESIST ORDER
I.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) deems it appropriate that cease-
and-desist proceedings be, and hereby are, instituted pursuant to Section 21C of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) against Health Net, Inc. (“Health Net” or “Respondent”).
II.
In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, Respondent has submitted an Offer
of Settlement (the “Offer”) which the Commission has determined to accept. Solely for the
purpose of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the
Commission, or to which the Commission is a party, and without admitting or denying the findings
herein, except as to the Commission’s jurisdiction over it and the subject matter of these
proceedings, which are admitted, Respondent consents to the entry of this Order Instituting Cease-
and-Desist Proceedings Pursuant to Section 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Making
Findings, and Imposing a Cease-and-Desist Order (“Order”), as set forth below.
III.
On the basis of this Order and Respondent’s Offer, the Commission finds1 that:
Respondent
1. Health Net, Inc. is a Delaware corporation headquartered in Woodland Hills,
California. Until April 4, 2016, Health Net’s common stock was registered with the Commission
pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act and, until March 24, 2016, traded on the New York
1 The findings herein are made pursuant to Respondent’s Offer of Settlement and are not binding on any
other person or entity in this or any other proceeding.
2
Stock Exchange. While registered with the Commission, Health Net filed periodic reports,
including reports on Forms 10-K and 10-Q, with the Commission pursuant to Section 13(a) of the
Exchange Act and related rules thereunder. As of December 31, 2015, Health Net and its
subsidiaries had approximately 8,541 employees.
Facts
A. Statutory and Regulatory Framework Protecting Whistleblowers
2. The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, enacted on July
21, 2010, amended the Exchange Act by adding Section 21F, “Whistleblower Incentives and
Protection.” The purpose of these provisions was to encourage whistleblowers to report possible
securities law violations by providing, among other things, financial incentives and various
confidentiality guarantees.
3. Congress explicitly noted the critical importance of providing financial incentives
to promote whistleblowing to the SEC as it determined that “a critical component of the
Whistleblower Program is the minimum payout that any individual could look towards in
determining whether to take the enormous risk of blowing the whistle in calling attention to fraud.”
See “The Restoring American Financial Stability Act of 2010” report from the Committee on
Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs (April 30, 2010).
4. To fulfill this Congressional purpose, the Commission adopted Rule 21F-17, which
provides in relevant part:
(a) No person may take any action to impede an individual from communicating
directly with the Commission staff about a possible securities law violation,
including enforcing, or threatening to enforce, a confidentiality agreement . . . with
respect to such communications.
Rule 21F-17 became effective on August 12, 2011.
B. Health Net’s Severance Agreements
5. Beginning prior to August 12, 2011, and continuing through October 22, 2015,
Respondent entered into voluntary severance agreements with employees who were leaving the
company. A severance agreement is a contract between an employer and a former employee
documenting the rights and responsibilities of both parties incidental to the employee’s departure.
Respondent continues to enter into voluntary severance agreements with departing employees, but
on October 22, 2015, it amended those agreements to strike the language at issue below.
6. Respondent’s severance agreements included a Waiver and Release of Claims that
listed various potential claims against Respondent that a departing employee waived as a condition
of being paid monetary severance payments and receiving other voluntarily provided consideration
from Respondent.
7. In August 2011 – after the Commission adopted Rule 21F-17 – and as part of a
regular periodic review and update of its agreements, Respondent amended the Waiver and
3
Release of Claims. Among other things, Respondent amended the Waiver and Release of Claims
to specify that, while not prohibited by the severance agreement from participating in a
government investigation, the former employee who executed the Waiver and Release of Claims
was prohibited from filing an application for, or accepting, a whistleblower award from the
Commission.
8. In particular, Paragraph 4 of Respondent’s Waiver and Release of Claims expressly
required an employee to waive:
the right to file an application for award for original information submitted pursuant to
Section 21F of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
9. While Paragraph 8 of the Waiver and Release of Claims stated that nothing in the
Release precludes an employee from participating in any investigation before any federal agency,
that same Paragraph required the employee to waive his or her right to any monetary recovery
related to any such investigation.
10. In particular, Paragraph 8 provided that “nothing in this Release precludes
Employee from participating in any investigation or proceeding before any federal or state agency,
or governmental body . . . however, while Employee may file a charge and participate in any such
proceeding, by signing this Release, Employee waives any right to bring a lawsuit against the
Company, and waives any right to any individual monetary recovery in any such proceeding or
lawsuit or in any proceeding brought based on any communication by Employee to any federal,
state, or local government agency or department.”
11. Approximately 600 employees signed agreements that contained the above
language, which was used by Respondent from approximately August 2011 to June 2013.
12. In June 2013, again as part of a regular periodic review and update of its
agreements, Respondent further amended the Waiver and Release of Claims. Respondent removed
the language expressly prohibiting employees from applying for whistleblower awards pursuant to
Exchange Act Section 21F. Respondent also added Paragraph 4.a. which provided that “[n]othing
herein shall be construed to impede the employee from communicating directly with, cooperating
with or providing information to any government regulator.” However, Respondent retained
restrictions in the Waiver and Release of Claims that removed the financial incentive for its former
employees who executed that agreement to communicate with Commission staff concerning
possible securities law violations at Health Net. Paragraph 5 of the revised Waiver and Release of
Claims stated that: “nothing in this Release precludes Employee from participating in any
investigation or proceeding before any federal or state agency or governmental body . . .however,
while Employee may file a charge, provide information, or participate in any investigation or
proceeding, by signing this Release, Employee, to the maximum extent permitted by law . . .
waives any right to any individual monetary recovery . . . in any proceeding brought based on any
communication by Employee to any federal, state or local government agency or department.”
13. Though the Commission is unaware of any instances in which (i) a former
employee of Respondent who executed the above noted agreements did not communicate directly
with Commission staff about potential securities law violations or (ii) Respondent took action to
enforce those provisions or otherwise prevent such communications, Respondent – by use of both
4
the 2011 and 2013 agreements – directly targeted the SEC’s whistleblower program by removing
the critically important financial incentives that are intended to encourage persons to communicate
directly with the Commission staff about possible securities law violations. Such restrictions on
accepting financial awards for providing information regarding possible securities law violations to
the Commission undermine the purpose of Section 21F and Rule 21F-17(a), which is to
“encourag[e] individuals to report to the Commission,” [Adopting Release at p. 201], and violate
Rule 21F-17(a) by impeding individuals from communicating directly with the Commission staff
about possible securities law violations.
Violation
14. Through its conduct described above, Health Net violated Rule 21F-17 under the
Exchange Act.
Undertaking
15. Health Net has agreed that, within 60 days from the date the Commission enters this
Order, it will make reasonable efforts to contact Health Net former employees who signed the
Waiver and Release of Claims from August 12, 2011 to October 22, 2015, and provide them with
an Internet link to the order2 and a statement that Health Net does not prohibit former employees
from seeking and obtaining a whistleblower award from the Securities and Exchange Commission
pursuant to Section 21F of the Exchange Act. In determining whether to accept the Offer, the
Commission has considered this undertaking.
16. Health Net has agreed to certify, in writing, compliance with the undertaking set
forth above. The certification shall identify the undertaking, provide written evidence of
compliance in the form of a narrative, and be supported by exhibits sufficient to demonstrate
compliance. The Commission staff may make reasonable requests for further evidence of
compliance, and Respondent agrees to provide such evidence. The certification and supporting
material shall be submitted to Antonia Chion, Associate Director, with a copy to the Office of the
Chief Counsel of the Enforcement Division, no later than sixty (60) days from the date of
completion of the undertakings.
IV.
In view of the foregoing, the Commission deems it appropriate to impose the sanctions
agreed to in Respondent Health Net’s Offer.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:
A. Pursuant to Section 21C of the Exchange Act, Respondent Health Net cease and
desist from committing or causing any violations and any future violations of Rule 21F-17 of the
Exchange Act;
B. Respondent shall, within thirty (30) days of the entry of this Order, pay a civil
money penalty in the amount of $340,000 to the Securities and Exchange Commission for
2 Health Net further agrees to provide a paper copy of the Order to any former employee who requests it.
5
transfer to the general fund of the United States Treasury in accordance with Exchange Act
Section 21F(g)(3). If timely payment is not made, additional interest shall accrue pursuant to 31
U.S.C. 3717. Payment must be made in one of the following ways:
(1) Respondent may transmit payment electronically to the Commission, which will
provide detailed ACH transfer/Fedwire instructions upon request;
(2) Respondent may make direct payment from a bank account via Pay.gov through
the SEC website at http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/ofm.htm; or
(3) Respondent may pay by certified check, bank cashier’s check, or United States
postal money order, made payable to the Securities and Exchange Commission
and hand-delivered or mailed to:
Enterprise Services Center
Accounts Receivable Branch
HQ Bldg., Room 181, AMZ-341
6500 South MacArthur Boulevard
Oklahoma City, OK 73169
Payments by check or money order must be accompanied by a cover letter identifying
Health Net as a Respondent in these proceedings, and the file number of these proceedings; a copy
of the cover letter and check or money order must be sent to Antonia Chion, Associate Director,
Division of Enforcement, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, N.E., Washington,
D.C. 20549.
By the Commission.
Brent J. Fields
Secretary