I. In connection with an investigation by the Division of Enforcement ("Division")
Nortek, Inc. entered into a non-prosecution agreement with the SEC after its China subsidiary made over 400 improper payments totaling $290,000 to Chinese officials from 2009 to 2014 to secure preferential treatment, resulting in FCPA violations for inadequate internal controls and false books and records, leading to $291,403 in disgorgement and $30,655 in interest, full cooperation, and remedial actions.
Nortek, Inc. agreed to a non-prosecution agreement with the SEC to resolve violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act stemming from over 400 improper payments totaling approximately $290,000 made by its China subsidiary, Linear Electronics (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd., to Chinese government officials between 2009 and 2014. The SEC found that Nortek failed to maintain adequate internal accounting controls and accurately record these bribes in its books and records, enabling systemic corruption. As part of the resolution, Nortek paid $291,403 in disgorgement and $30,655 in prejudgment interest, committed to full cooperation with regulators, and implemented remedial measures including employee terminations, enhanced compliance training, and establishment of a global anti-corruption committee.
Nortek, Inc., a Delaware-based manufacturer, entered into a non-prosecution agreement with the SEC to resolve allegations of violating the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) due to improper payments made by its China subsidiary, Linear Electronics (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd., between 2009 and 2014. Over 400 payments totaling approximately $290,000 were made to Chinese government officials to secure preferential treatment and reduced duties, while Nortek failed to maintain adequate internal accounting controls and accurately record these transactions in its books and records. As part of the resolution, Nortek agreed to disgorge $291,403 in ill-gotten gains and pay $30,655 in prejudgment interest, with payment due within 15 days via Pay.gov or certified check. The company committed to full, truthful, and continuing cooperation with the SEC and any other regulatory proceedings, including producing documents, making employees available for interviews and testimony, and entering into tolling agreements. Nortek also undertook remedial actions such as terminating involved employees, enhancing global compliance training, and establishing a global anti-corruption committee. The SEC agreed not to pursue enforcement actions provided Nortek fully complied with all terms, explicitly reserving the right to act on future violations not time-barred and excluding protection for successors or other entities. Nortek further agreed not to make any public statements contradicting the agreement without SEC approval, and all communications must be served to the SEC’s Boston office as specified.
Extracted insights
- $291K $291,403 $100K–$1M
- $290K $290,000 $100K–$1M
- $31K $30,655 $10K–$100K
- location delaware
- company nortek, inc.
- agency sec division of enforcement
- agency sec investigation and related enforcement proceedings
- agency Securities and Exchange Commission
- SEC Division of Enforcement investigated Nortek, Inc. for Foreign Corrupt Practices Act violations from 2009 through 2014
- SEC entered into non-prosecution agreement with Nortek, Inc.
- Nortek, Inc. agreed to pay disgorgement of $291,403 plus $30,655 prejudgment interest
- Nortek, Inc. agreed to pay within 15 days
- Nortek, Inc. agreed to cooperate fully in SEC Investigation and related enforcement proceedings
- Non-prosecution agreement entered into on June 7, 2016
- Nortek, Inc. organized and operating under laws of Delaware
- Investigation related to violations of Foreign Corrupt Practices Act books and records and internal accounting controls provisions
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT
I. In connection with an investigation by the Division of Enforcement ("Division")
relating to possible violations ofthe books and records and intemal accounting controls
provisions
ofthe Foreign Corrupt Practices Act from at least 2009 through 2014
("Investigation"), the United States Securities and Exchange Commission
("Commission") and Nortek, Inc. ("Respondent") enter into this non-prosecution
agreement ("Agreement") on the following terms and conditions:
COOPERATION
2. The Respondent, a corporation organized and operating under the laws
of
Delaware agrees to cooperate fully and truthfully in the Investigation and any other
related enforcement litigation or proceeding to which the Commission is a party (the
"Proceedings"), regardless
ofthe time period in which the cooperation is required. In
addition, the Respondent agrees to cooperate fully and truthfully, when directed by the
Division's staff, in an official investigation or proceeding by any federal, state, or self
regulatory organization ("Other Proceedings"). The full, truthful, and continuing
cooperation
of the Respondent shall include, but not be limited to:
a. producing, in a responsive and prompt manner, all non-privileged
documents, information, and other materials to the Commission as requested by the
Division's staff, wherever located, in the possession, custody,
or control of the
Respondent;
b. using its best efforts to secure the full, truthful, and continuing
cooperation, as defined in Paragraph 3,
ofcurrent and former directors, officers,
employees and agents, including making these persons available, when requested to do so
by the Division's staff, at its expense, for interviews and the provision
oftestimony in the
investigation, trial and other judicial proceedings in connection with the Proceedings or
Other Proceedings; and
c. entering into tolling agreements, when requested to do so by the
Division's staff, during the period
of cooperation.
3. The full, truthful, and continuing cooperation of each person described in
Paragraph 2 above
will be subject to the procedures and protections ofthis paragraph,
and shall include, but not be limited to:
a. producing all non-privileged documents and other materials as requested
by the Division's staff;
b. appearing for interviews, at such times and pl aces, as requested b y the
Div ision's staff;
c. responding to a
ll inquiries, when requested to do so by the Division's
staff, in connection with the Proceedings or Other Proceedings; and
d. testifying at trial a nd other judicial proceedings, when requested to do so
by the Division's staff, in connection w ith the Proceedings or Other Proceedings.
UNDERTAKINGS
4.
The Respondent understands and agrees to perfonn the following undertakings:
a. to
pay disgorgement obtained or retained as a resul t of the v iolations
discovered during the Investigation, without reimbursement or ind
emnification from any
so
urce, in the amount of$291,403, together with prejudgm ent interest thereon in the
amount of$30,655 within 15 days. Payment may be made directly from a bank account
v ia Pay.gov throu
gh the SEC website at http://www.sec.gov/about/offices.ofrn.htm.
Payment
may also be made by certified check, ba nk cashi er's check, or United States
postal
money ord er payable to the Securities and Exchange Commission, which shall be
delivered
or mailed to:
Enterprise Services Center
Accounts
Receivable Branch
6500 South MacArthur Boulevard
Oklahoma City, OK 73169
along with a letter identifying the Respondent and specify ing that the payment is m ade
purs uant to a non-prosecution agreement entered into w ith th e Commissio n o n June 7,
2016, and send
an additional copy of the letter and check in accordance with the service
requirements
ofParagraph 7;
PUBLIC STATEMENTS
5. After this
Agreement is executed , the Respondent agrees not to take any action or
to make or permit any public statement through present or future attorneys, employees,
agents,
or other persons authorized to speak for it, except i n legal proceedings in w hich
the Commission is not a party, denying, directly or indirectl y, the factual basis ofany
aspect
ofth is Agreement. T his paragraph is not intended to apply to any statement made
b y an individua l in the course ofa ny criminal, civil, or regulatory proceeding initiated by
the government
or self-regulatory organization against such individual, unless such
individual is speaking
on behalfofthe Responde nt. Ifit is determined by the
Commission th
at a public statement by the Respondent or any related person contradicts
in whole
or in part th is Agreement, a t its sole discretion, the Commission may bring an
enforcement action in accordance with Paragraphs 8 through 10.
2
6. Prior to issuing a press release concerning this Agreement, the Respondent agrees
to have the text
of the release approved by the staff of the Division.
SERVICE
7. The Respondent agrees to serve by hand delivery or by next-day mail all written
notices and correspondence required by or related to this Agreement to Paul
G. Block,
Assistant Regional Director, Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Unit, United States Securities
and Exchange Commission,
33 Arch Street, 24th Floor, Boston, MA 02110, (617) 573
8912, unless otherwise directed in writing by the staff
of the Division.
VIOLATION OF AGREEMENT
8. The Respondent understands and agrees that it shall be a violation ofthis
Agreement
if it knowingly provides false or misleading information or materials in
connection with the Proceedings or Other Proceedings. In the event
ofsuch misconduct,
the Division will advise the Commission
ofthe Respondent's misconduct and may make
a criminal referral for providing false information (18 U.S.C.
§ 1001), contempt (18
U.S.C.
§§ 401-402) and/or obstructing justice (18 U.S.C. § 1503 et seq.).
9. The Respondent understands and agrees that it shall be a violation of this
agreement
if it violates the federal securities laws after entering into this agreement. It is
further understood and agreed that should the Division determine that it has failed to
comply with any term or condition ofthis Agreement, the Division will notify the
Respondent or its counsel
of the fact and provide an opportunity for the Respondent to
make a submission consistent with the procedures set forth in the Securities Act
of 1933
Release No. 5310. Under these circumstances, the Division may, in its sole discretion
and not subject to judicial review, recommend to the Commission an enforcement action
against the Respondent for any securities law violations, including, but not limited to, the
substantive offenses relating to the Investigation. Nothing in this agreement limits the
Division's discretion to recommend to the
Commission an enforcement action against the
Respondent for future violations
ofthe federal securities laws, without notice, to protect
the public interest.
10. The Respondent understands that
if it fails to make any payment by the date
agreed and/or in the amount agreed according to the schedule set forth above, all
outstanding payments under this Agreement, minus any payments made, shall become
due and payable immediately at the discretion
of the staff of the Commission.
11. The Respondent understands and agrees that in any future enforcement action
resulting from its violation
ofthe Agreement, any documents, statements, information,
testimony,
or evidence provided by it during the Proceedings or Other Proceedings, and
any leads derived there from, may be used against it in future legal proceedings.
3
12. The Respondent understands and agrees that any enforcement action brought by
the Commission following the Respondent's violation
of the Agreement that would not
have been time-barred by the applicable statute
of limitations if brought on the date of the
execution of this Agreement, may be commenced against the Respondent,
notwithstanding the expiration
of the statute of limitations between the signing ofthis
Agreement and the commencement of such action.
13. In the event it breaches this Agreement, the Respondent agrees not to dispute,
contest,
or contradict the factual statements contained in Exhibit A, or their admissibility,
in any future Commission enforcement action against it.
COMPLIANCE WITH AGREEMENT
14. Subject to the full, truthful, and continuing cooperation
ofthe Respondent, as
described in Paragraphs 2 and 3, and compliance with all obligations and undertakings in
the Agreement, the Commission agrees not to bring any enforcement action
or
proceeding against the Respondent arising from the Investigation. This agreement should
not, however, be deemed exoneration
ofthe Respondent or to be construed as a finding
by the Commission that no violations
ofthe federal securities laws have occurred.
15. The Respondent understands and agrees that this Agreement does not bind other
federal, state
or self-regulatory organizations, but the Commission may, at its discretion,
issue a letter to these organizations detailing the fact, manner, and extent
ofits
cooperation during the Proceedings or Other Proceedings, upon the written request
ofthe
Respondent.
16. The Respondent understands and agrees that
if it sells, merges, or transfers all or
substantially all of its business operations as they exist as of the date ofthis Agreement,
whether such a sale is structured as a stock or asset sale, merger,
or transfer during the
Deferred Period, it shall include in any contract for sale, merger, or transfer a provision
binding the purchaser
or successor in interest to the obligations set forth in this
Agreement. Furthermore, the protections arising from this Agreement will not apply to
purchasers
or successors in interest unless such purchaser or successor enters into a
written agreement, on terms acceptable to the Division, agreeing to assume all the
obligations set forth in this Agreement.
17. The Respondent understands and agrees that the Agreement only provides
protection against enforcement actions arising from the Investigation and does not relate
to any other violations
or any individual or entity other than the Respondent.
VOLUNTARY AGREEMENT
18. The Respondent's decision to enter into this Agreement is freely and voluntarily
made and is not the result
offorce, threats, assurances, promises, or representations other
than those contained in this Agreement.
4
19. The Respondent read and understands this Agreement. Furthermore, the
Respondent has reviewed all legal and factual aspects
of this matter with its attorney and
is fully satisfied with its attorney's legal representation. The Respondent has thoroughly
reviewed this Agreement with its attorney and has received satisfactory explanations
concerning each paragraph
of the Agreement. After conferring with its attorney and
considering all available alternatives, the Respondent has made a knowing decision to
enter into the Agreement.
20. The Respondent represents that its Board
of Directors has duly authorized, in the
resolution attached as Exhibit B, the execution and delivery
ofthis Agreement, and that
the person signing this Agreement has authority to bind the Respondent.
ENTIRETY OF AGREEMENT
21. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the Commission and the
Respondent, and supersedes all prior understandings,
if any, whether oral or written,
relating to the subject matter herein.
22. This Agreement cannot be modified except in writing, signed by the Respondent
and a representative
ofthe Commission.
23. In the event an ambiguity or a question
of intent or interpretation arises, this
Agreement shall be construed as
if drafted jointly by the parties hereto, and no
presumption or burden
of proof shall arise favoring or disfavoring the Commission or the
Respondent
by virtue ofthe authorship ofany of the provisions of the Agreement.
[Remainder
ofpage intentionally left blank]
5
The signatories below acknowledge acceptance of the foregoing terms and conditions.
RESPONDENT
I
Date:
Kev?ef~
Senior Vice President,
General Counsel
& Secretary
Nortek, Inc.
500 Exchange Street, I 0th Floor
Providence, RI 02903
On
~ , 3 , 2016, Kevin W. Donnelly, a person known to me, personally
appearedefore me and acknowledged executing the foregoing agreement with full
authority to do so
on behalf ofNortek, Inc., as its Senior Vice President, General Counsel
& Secretary and pursuant to the attached Resolution ofthe Board of Directors.
NCirary Public
Stat~: ~h;d~ k la...('\C,
Commission number: l/31;:i9
Commission expiration: J.JI (. a
I(.;)7 .,;:)(}I ~
RESPONDENT'S COUNSEL
Approved as to form:
'IS~r :;L
~lf~ .
Luke T. Cadigan
K&L GATES LLP
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
DIVISION
OF ENFORCEMENT
Date Kara Brockmeyer
Chief, FCP A Unit
6
EXHIBIT A
STATEMENT OF FACTS
Ifthis case had gone to trial, the Commission would have presented evidence
sufficient to prove the following facts:
Nortek, Inc.
1. Nortek, Inc. ("Nortek") is incorporated in Delaware with its principal
place
of business in Providence, Rhode Island. Nortek manufactures and sells a wide
variety
of products for residential and commercial constructions and remodeling and the
personal and enterprise computer markets, including heaters, range hoods, heating,
ventilation and air conditioning systems, and garage door and security systems. Nortek's
stock is registered pursuant to Section l 2(b)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
("Exchange Act"), and it is listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market.
2. Linear Electronics (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd. ("Linear China") was an indirect
wholly-owned subsidiary
ofNortek located in Shenzhen, China. Linear China
manufactures products for Nortek, including during the period 2009 through 2014.
Improper Payments and Gifts to Chinese Government Officials
3. From at least 2009 to 2014, Linear China's managing director,
accounting manager, customs liaison officer, and other employees made or approved
improper payments and gifts to local Chinese officials in order to receive preferential
treatment, relaxed regulatory oversight, and/or reduced customs duties, taxes, and fees.
4. The improper payments and gifts to local Chinese officials included cash
payments, gift cards, meals, travel, accommodations, and entertainment. Linear China
made the illicit payments to local officials from multiple different governmental
departments, including customs, tax, fire, police, labor, health inspection, environmental
protection, and telecommunications.
5. Linear China's improper payments were systemic and went undetected for
several years. From 2009 through 2014, Linear China made more than 400 payments to
local Chinese officials. At least one improper payment was made every month during
those 5 years. These payments totaled approximately
$290,000.
6. In some instances, Linear China's accounting department entered the illicit
payments as entries in various accounts and supported the expenditures with false or
misleading information and supporting documentation.
1
Nortek's Inadequate Internal Accounting Controls
and Inaccurate Books and Records
7. As evidenced by Linear China's illicit payments made directly to Chinese
officials in the ordinary course
of business over many years, Nortek failed to devise and
maintain a system
of internal accounting controls at Linear China sufficient to provide
reasonable assurances that, among other things, transactions were executed
in accordance
with management's general or specific authorization, and transactions were recorded as
necessary to maintain accountability for assets. Linear China made improper payments
from multiple accounts, which Nortek failed to review or test. Nortek failed to notice
obvious red flags in Linear China's financial records, including the number and size
of
Linear China's meals and entertainment expenses. Further, Nortek failed to establish
procedures to ensure its Linear China employees were trained in anti-corruption
compliance.
8. From 2009 through 2014, certain Linear China employees paid bribes
that were inaccurately recorded in Linear China's books, records and accounts, which
were consolidated into the books and records
of Nortek.
Nortek's Self-Report
9. Nortek timely self-reported this matter to the Division of Enforcement and
conducted a prompt and thorough investigation. In 2014, Nortek conducted an internal
audit
of Linear China's books and records. The internal audit team identified
questionable payments made to local Chinese officials. As a result, Nortek conducted an
internal investigation
of Linear China's conduct and forensically analyzed Linear China's
financial records. The internal investigation confirmed Linear China had made improper
payments to Chinese officials local to Shenzhen, China. Before completing its internal
investigation, Nortek promptly self-reported its preliminary findings to both the SEC and
the Department
ofJustice.
Remedial Measures and Cooperation
10. Upon learning of the bribes, Nortek took immediate action to end the
illicit payments and implemented significant remedial measures. Once the employees at
Linear China were interviewed by the internal investigation, those involved were
terminated, including Linear China's managing director and chief financial officer.
Nortek also comprehensively reviewed its then existing compliance program and
undertook significant corrective action to enhance its compliance program and ensure
that its employees around the globe were receiving adequate training. As part
of its
remedial efforts, Nortek: (i) revised its internal audit testing and protocols to focus on
quickly discovering any FCPA-related improprieties;
(ii) strengthened its anti-corruption
policies;
(iii) developed a Compliance Committee consisting ofrepresentatives from
management and subsidiaries to supervise compliance implementation
ofNortek's
policies and training; (iv) provided extensive mandatory in-person and on-line trainings
on the FCPA and anti-corruption policies to its employees around the globe in
2
appropriate languages; and (v) adjusted its internal audit schedules to prioritize facilities
located
in geographic areas known for higher incidences of corruption.
11. Nortek provided comprehensive, organized, and real-time cooperation
with the staff
ofthe Enforcement Division during the course of its internal investigation,
including: (i) sharing the detailed findings
of its internal investigation, including
identifying all improper payments and potential improper payments made to foreign
officials and providing its summaries
of witness interviews; (ii) timely updating the staff
with additional findings when its investigation uncovered new information; (iii)
effectively segregating, organizing, and presenting the most salient documents to the
staff; (iv) voluntarily translating documents from Chinese into English; (v) voluntarily
making witnesses available for interviews, including those in China; and (vi) conducting
a risk assessment to determine whether the improper conduct at Linear China occurred at
Nortek's other manufacturing locations in China.
3
Kevin W. Donnelly
NORTEK INC. CERTIFICATE OF CORPORATE RESOLUTION
I, Kevin W. Donnelly,
do hereby certify that I am the duly elected, qualified and acting Senior
Vice President, General Counsel
& Secretary of Nortek, Inc. ("Nortek" or the " Corporation"), a
Delaware corporation, a
nd that the following is a complete and accurate copy ofa resolution
adopted by the Board
of Directors ofNorte k at a meeting held on May 3, 2016 at which a
quorum was present and re
solved as follows:
RESOLVED: That Kevin W. Donnelly, an Officer of this Corporation, be and here by is
authorized to act on behalf ofthe Corporation, and in his sole di scretion, to negotiate,
approve,
and execute the Non-Prosecution Agreement, attached hereto, with the United
Stat
es Securities and Exchange Commission (" Commission") in connection with the
inv
estigation conducted by the Commission; in this connection, the aforementioned
Officer be and hereby is authorized to und
ertake suc h actions as he may deem necessary
and advisable, including the execution
of such documentation as may be required by the
Commission, in ord
er to carry out the fo regoing.
I further certify that the aforesaid resolution
has not been amended or revoked in any respect and
remains in full force and effect.
IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this Certificate as a
sealed instrument this 3 r d day
ofMay, 2016.
By:
Senior Vice President,
General Counsel
& Secretary
Nortek, Inc.
l'J....otary~
Stat er·6f Rhode Island
County of Providence
~lA4A A . If~
Dawn Valois
Notary Public
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT
I. In connection with an investigation by the Division of Enforcement ("Division")
relating to possible violations of the books and records and intemal accounting controls
provisions of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act from at least 2009 through 2014
("Investigation"), the United States Securities and Exchange Commission
("Commission") and Nortek, Inc. ("Respondent") enter into this non-prosecution
agreement ("Agreement") on the following terms and conditions:
COOPERATION
2. The Respondent, a corporation organized and operating under the laws of
Delaware agrees to cooperate fully and truthfully in the Investigation and any other
related enforcement litigation or proceeding to which the Commission is a party (the
"Proceedings"), regardless of the time period in which the cooperation is required. In
addition, the Respondent agrees to cooperate fully and truthfully, when directed by the
Division's staff, in an official investigation or proceeding by any federal, state, or self
regulatory organization ("Other Proceedings"). The full, truthful, and continuing
cooperation of the Respondent shall include, but not be limited to:
a. producing, in a responsive and prompt manner, all non-privileged
documents, information, and other materials to the Commission as requested by the
Division's staff, wherever located, in the possession, custody, or control of the
Respondent;
b. using its best efforts to secure the full, truthful, and continuing
cooperation, as defined in Paragraph 3, of current and former directors, officers,
employees and agents, including making these persons available, when requested to do so
by the Division's staff, at its expense, for interviews and the provision of testimony in the
investigation, trial and other judicial proceedings in connection with the Proceedings or
Other Proceedings; and
c. entering into tolling agreements, when requested to do so by the
Division's staff, during the period of cooperation.
3. The full, truthful, and continuing cooperation of each person described in
Paragraph 2 above will be subject to the procedures and protections of this paragraph,
and shall include, but not be limited to:
a. producing all non-privileged documents and other materials as requested
by the Division's staff;
b. appearing for interviews, at such times and places, as requested by the
Division's staff;
c. responding to all inquiries, when requested to do so by the Division's
staff, in connection with the Proceedings or Other Proceedings; and
d. testifying at trial and other judicial proceedings, when requested to do so
by the Division's staff, in connection with the Proceedings or Other Proceedings.
UNDERTAKINGS
4. The Respondent understands and agrees to perfonn the following undertakings:
a. to pay disgorgement obtained or retained as a result of the violations
discovered during the Investigation, without reimbursement or indemnification from any
source, in the amount of$29 1,403, together with prejudgment interest thereon in the
amount of$30,655 within 15 days. Payment may be made directly from a bank account
via Pay.gov through the SEC website at http://www.sec.gov/about/offices.ofrn.htm.
Payment may also be made by certified check, bank cashier's check, or United States
postal money order payable to the Securities and Exchange Commission, which shall be
delivered or mailed to:
Enterprise Services Center
Accounts Receivable Branch
6500 South MacArthur Boulevard
Oklahoma City, OK 73169
along with a letter identifying the Respondent and speci fying that the payment is made
pursuant to a non-prosecution agreement entered into with the Commission on June 7,
2016, and send an additional copy of the letter and check in accordance with the service
requirements of Paragraph 7;
PUBLIC STATEMENTS
5. After this Agreement is executed, the Respondent agrees not to take any action or
to make or permit any public statement through present or future attorneys, employees,
agents, or other persons authorized to speak for it, except in legal proceedings in which
the Commission is not a party, denying, directly or indirectl y, the factual basis of any
aspect of this Agreement. This paragraph is not intended to apply to any statement made
by an individual in the course of any criminal, civil, or regulatory proceeding initiated by
the government or self-regulatory organization against such individual, unless such
individual is speaking on behalfof the Respondent. If it is determined by the
Commission that a public statement by the Respondent or any related person contradicts
in whole or in part th is Agreement, at its sole discretion, the Commission may bring an
enforcement action in accordance with Paragraphs 8 through 10.
2
http://www.sec.gov/about/offices.ofrn.htm
6. Prior to issuing a press release concerning this Agreement, the Respondent agrees
to have the text of the release approved by the staff of the Division.
SERVICE
7. The Respondent agrees to serve by hand delivery or by next-day mail all written
notices and correspondence required by or related to this Agreement to Paul G. Block,
Assistant Regional Director, Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Unit, United States Securities
and Exchange Commission, 33 Arch Street, 24th Floor, Boston, MA 02110, (617) 573
8912, unless otherwise directed in writing by the staff of the Division.
VIOLATION OF AGREEMENT
8. The Respondent understands and agrees that it shall be a violation of this
Agreement if it knowingly provides false or misleading information or materials in
connection with the Proceedings or Other Proceedings. In the event of such misconduct,
the Division will advise the Commission of the Respondent's misconduct and may make
a criminal referral for providing false information (18 U.S.C. § 1001), contempt (18
U.S.C. §§ 401-402) and/or obstructing justice (18 U.S.C. § 1503 et seq.).
9. The Respondent understands and agrees that it shall be a violation of this
agreement if it violates the federal securities laws after entering into this agreement. It is
further understood and agreed that should the Division determine that it has failed to
comply with any term or condition of this Agreement, the Division will notify the
Respondent or its counsel of the fact and provide an opportunity for the Respondent to
make a submission consistent with the procedures set forth in the Securities Act of 1933
Release No. 5310. Under these circumstances, the Division may, in its sole discretion
and not subject to judicial review, recommend to the Commission an enforcement action
against the Respondent for any securities law violations, including, but not limited to, the
substantive offenses relating to the Investigation. Nothing in this agreement limits the
Division's discretion to recommend to the Commission an enforcement action against the
Respondent for future violations of the federal securities laws, without notice, to protect
the public interest.
10. The Respondent understands that if it fails to make any payment by the date
agreed and/or in the amount agreed according to the schedule set forth above, all
outstanding payments under this Agreement, minus any payments made, shall become
due and payable immediately at the discretion of the staff of the Commission.
11. The Respondent understands and agrees that in any future enforcement action
resulting from its violation of the Agreement, any documents, statements, information,
testimony, or evidence provided by it during the Proceedings or Other Proceedings, and
any leads derived there from, may be used against it in future legal proceedings.
3
12. The Respondent understands and agrees that any enforcement action brought by
the Commission following the Respondent's violation of the Agreement that would not
have been time-barred by the applicable statute of limitations if brought on the date of the
execution of this Agreement, may be commenced against the Respondent,
notwithstanding the expiration of the statute of limitations between the signing of this
Agreement and the commencement of such action.
13. In the event it breaches this Agreement, the Respondent agrees not to dispute,
contest, or contradict the factual statements contained in Exhibit A, or their admissibility,
in any future Commission enforcement action against it.
COMPLIANCE WITH AGREEMENT
14. Subject to the full, truthful, and continuing cooperation of the Respondent, as
described in Paragraphs 2 and 3, and compliance with all obligations and undertakings in
the Agreement, the Commission agrees not to bring any enforcement action or
proceeding against the Respondent arising from the Investigation. This agreement should
not, however, be deemed exoneration of the Respondent or to be construed as a finding
by the Commission that no violations of the federal securities laws have occurred.
15. The Respondent understands and agrees that this Agreement does not bind other
federal, state or self-regulatory organizations, but the Commission may, at its discretion,
issue a letter to these organizations detailing the fact, manner, and extent of its
cooperation during the Proceedings or Other Proceedings, upon the written request of the
Respondent.
16. The Respondent understands and agrees that if it sells, merges, or transfers all or
substantially all of its business operations as they exist as of the date of this Agreement,
whether such a sale is structured as a stock or asset sale, merger, or transfer during the
Deferred Period, it shall include in any contract for sale, merger, or transfer a provision
binding the purchaser or successor in interest to the obligations set forth in this
Agreement. Furthermore, the protections arising from this Agreement will not apply to
purchasers or successors in interest unless such purchaser or successor enters into a
written agreement, on terms acceptable to the Division, agreeing to assume all the
obligations set forth in this Agreement.
17. The Respondent understands and agrees that the Agreement only provides
protection against enforcement actions arising from the Investigation and does not relate
to any other violations or any individual or entity other than the Respondent.
VOLUNTARY AGREEMENT
18. The Respondent's decision to enter into this Agreement is freely and voluntarily
made and is not the result of force, threats, assurances, promises, or representations other
than those contained in this Agreement.
4
19. The Respondent read and understands this Agreement. Furthermore, the
Respondent has reviewed all legal and factual aspects of this matter with its attorney and
is fully satisfied with its attorney's legal representation. The Respondent has thoroughly
reviewed this Agreement with its attorney and has received satisfactory explanations
concerning each paragraph of the Agreement. After conferring with its attorney and
considering all available alternatives, the Respondent has made a knowing decision to
enter into the Agreement.
20. The Respondent represents that its Board of Directors has duly authorized, in the
resolution attached as Exhibit B, the execution and delivery of this Agreement, and that
the person signing this Agreement has authority to bind the Respondent.
ENTIRETY OF AGREEMENT
21. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the Commission and the
Respondent, and supersedes all prior understandings, if any, whether oral or written,
relating to the subject matter herein.
22. This Agreement cannot be modified except in writing, signed by the Respondent
and a representative of the Commission.
23. In the event an ambiguity or a question of intent or interpretation arises, this
Agreement shall be construed as if drafted jointly by the parties hereto, and no
presumption or burden of proof shall arise favoring or disfavoring the Commission or the
Respondent by virtue of the authorship of any of the provisions of the Agreement.
[Remainder ofpage intentionally left blank]
5
The signatories below acknowledge acceptance of the foregoing terms and conditions.
RESPONDENT
I
Date: Kev?ef~
Senior Vice President,
General Counsel & Secretary
Nortek, Inc.
500 Exchange Street, I 0th Floor
Providence, RI 02903
On ~ , 3 , 2016, Kevin W. Donnelly, a person known to me, personally
appearedefore me and acknowledged executing the foregoing agreement with full
authority to do so on behalf ofNortek, Inc., as its Senior Vice President, General Counsel
& Secretary and pursuant to the attached Resolution of the Board of Directors.
NCirary Public
Stat~ : ~h;d~ k la...('\C,
Commission number: l/31;:i9
Commission expiration: J.JI (. a
I(.;)7 .,;:)(}I ~
RESPONDENT'S COUNSEL
Approved as to form: 'IS~r :;L
~lf~ .
Luke T. Cadigan
K&L GATES LLP
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
DIVISION OF ENFORCEMENT
Date Kara Brockmeyer
Chief, FCP A Unit
6
EXHIBIT A
STATEMENT OF FACTS
If this case had gone to trial, the Commission would have presented evidence
sufficient to prove the following facts:
Nortek, Inc.
1. Nortek, Inc. ("Nortek") is incorporated in Delaware with its principal
place of business in Providence, Rhode Island. Nortek manufactures and sells a wide
variety of products for residential and commercial constructions and remodeling and the
personal and enterprise computer markets, including heaters, range hoods, heating,
ventilation and air conditioning systems, and garage door and security systems. Nortek's
stock is registered pursuant to Section l 2(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
("Exchange Act"), and it is listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market.
2. Linear Electronics (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd. ("Linear China") was an indirect
wholly-owned subsidiary ofNortek located in Shenzhen, China. Linear China
manufactures products for Nortek, including during the period 2009 through 2014.
Improper Payments and Gifts to Chinese Government Officials
3. From at least 2009 to 2014, Linear China's managing director,
accounting manager, customs liaison officer, and other employees made or approved
improper payments and gifts to local Chinese officials in order to receive preferential
treatment, relaxed regulatory oversight, and/or reduced customs duties, taxes, and fees.
4. The improper payments and gifts to local Chinese officials included cash
payments, gift cards, meals, travel, accommodations, and entertainment. Linear China
made the illicit payments to local officials from multiple different governmental
departments, including customs, tax, fire, police, labor, health inspection, environmental
protection, and telecommunications.
5. Linear China's improper payments were systemic and went undetected for
several years. From 2009 through 2014, Linear China made more than 400 payments to
local Chinese officials. At least one improper payment was made every month during
those 5 years. These payments totaled approximately $290,000.
6. In some instances, Linear China's accounting department entered the illicit
payments as entries in various accounts and supported the expenditures with false or
misleading information and supporting documentation.
1
Nortek's Inadequate Internal Accounting Controls
and Inaccurate Books and Records
7. As evidenced by Linear China's illicit payments made directly to Chinese
officials in the ordinary course of business over many years, Nortek failed to devise and
maintain a system of internal accounting controls at Linear China sufficient to provide
reasonable assurances that, among other things, transactions were executed in accordance
with management's general or specific authorization, and transactions were recorded as
necessary to maintain accountability for assets. Linear China made improper payments
from multiple accounts, which Nortek failed to review or test. Nortek failed to notice
obvious red flags in Linear China's financial records, including the number and size of
Linear China's meals and entertainment expenses. Further, Nortek failed to establish
procedures to ensure its Linear China employees were trained in anti-corruption
compliance.
8. From 2009 through 2014, certain Linear China employees paid bribes
that were inaccurately recorded in Linear China's books, records and accounts, which
were consolidated into the books and records of Nortek.
Nortek's Self-Report
9. Nortek timely self-reported this matter to the Division of Enforcement and
conducted a prompt and thorough investigation. In 2014, Nortek conducted an internal
audit of Linear China's books and records. The internal audit team identified
questionable payments made to local Chinese officials. As a result, Nortek conducted an
internal investigation of Linear China's conduct and forensically analyzed Linear China's
financial records. The internal investigation confirmed Linear China had made improper
payments to Chinese officials local to Shenzhen, China. Before completing its internal
investigation, Nortek promptly self-reported its preliminary findings to both the SEC and
the Department of Justice.
Remedial Measures and Cooperation
10. Upon learning of the bribes, Nortek took immediate action to end the
illicit payments and implemented significant remedial measures. Once the employees at
Linear China were interviewed by the internal investigation, those involved were
terminated, including Linear China's managing director and chief financial officer.
Nortek also comprehensively reviewed its then existing compliance program and
undertook significant corrective action to enhance its compliance program and ensure
that its employees around the globe were receiving adequate training. As part of its
remedial efforts, Nortek: (i) revised its internal audit testing and protocols to focus on
quickly discovering any FCPA-related improprieties; (ii) strengthened its anti-corruption
policies; (iii) developed a Compliance Committee consisting of representatives from
management and subsidiaries to supervise compliance implementation ofNortek's
policies and training; (iv) provided extensive mandatory in-person and on-line trainings
on the FCPA and anti-corruption policies to its employees around the globe in
2
appropriate languages; and (v) adjusted its internal audit schedules to prioritize facilities
located in geographic areas known for higher incidences of corruption.
11. Nortek provided comprehensive, organized, and real-time cooperation
with the staff of the Enforcement Division during the course of its internal investigation,
including: (i) sharing the detailed findings of its internal investigation, including
identifying all improper payments and potential improper payments made to foreign
officials and providing its summaries of witness interviews; (ii) timely updating the staff
with additional findings when its investigation uncovered new information; (iii)
effectively segregating, organizing, and presenting the most salient documents to the
staff; (iv) voluntarily translating documents from Chinese into English; (v) voluntarily
making witnesses available for interviews, including those in China; and (vi) conducting
a risk assessment to determine whether the improper conduct at Linear China occurred at
Nortek's other manufacturing locations in China.
3
Kevin W. Donnelly
NORTEK INC. CERTIFICATE OF CORPORATE RESOLUTION
I, Kevin W. Donnelly, do hereby certify that I am the duly elected, qualified and acting Senior
Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary of Nortek, Inc. ("Nortek" or the "Corporation"), a
Delaware corporation, and that the following is a complete and accurate copy of a resolution
adopted by the Board of Directors ofNortek at a meeting held on May 3, 2016 at which a
quorum was present and resolved as follows:
RESOLVED: That Kevin W. Donnelly, an Officer of this Corporation, be and hereby is
authorized to act on behalf of the Corporation, and in his sole di scretion, to negotiate,
approve, and execute the Non-Prosecution Agreement, attached hereto, with the United
States Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") in connection with the
investigation conducted by the Commission; in this connection, the aforementioned
Officer be and hereby is authorized to undertake such actions as he may deem necessary
and advisable, including the execution of such documentation as may be required by the
Commission, in order to carry out the foregoing.
I further certify that the aforesaid resolution has not been amended or revoked in any respect and
remains in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this Certificate as a sealed instrument this 3 r d day
ofMay, 2016.
By:
Senior Vice President,
General Counsel & Secretary
Nortek, Inc.
l'J....otary~
Stat er·6f Rhode Island
County of Providence
~lA4A A . If~
Dawn Valois
Notary Public