In re CLARITAS INVESTMENTS
Claritas Investments Ltd., a Cayman Islands-based asset manager, violated Rule 105 of Regulation M by short-selling 42,513 shares of Tenium S.A. before a follow-on offering and then purchasing 175,000 shares in that offering, netting $73,883 in illicit profits, and agreed to a cease-and-desist order and $144,819.67 in total penalties without admitting or denying wrongdoing.
Claritas Investments Ltd. violated Rule 105 of Regulation M by selling short 42,513 shares of Tenium S.A. during the restricted period preceding a follow-on public offering and subsequently purchasing 175,000 shares in the offering, generating $73,883 in illicit profits. The SEC found this conduct artificially influenced the offering price, breaching the rule’s prophylactic prohibition designed to preserve market integrity. Without admitting or denying the allegations, Claritas consented to a cease-and-desist order and agreed to pay $73,883 in disgorgement, $5,936.67 in prejudgment interest, and a $65,000 civil penalty, totaling $144,819.67.
Claritas Investments Ltd., a Cayman Islands-based asset management firm, violated Rule 105 of Regulation M by selling short 42,513 shares of Tenium S.A. between February 3 and February 9, 2011, during the restricted period prior to a follow-on public offering. On February 9, 2011, Tenium priced its offering at $36.00 per share, and Claritas received an allocation of 175,000 shares, realizing a profit of $73,883 from the price differential between its short sales and the offering purchase. Rule 105 prohibits such conduct regardless of intent, as it undermines the integrity of offering prices by allowing traders to artificially depress the market before buying into the offering. The SEC determined that Claritas’ actions breached the rule’s prophylactic framework designed to ensure offering prices reflect true market supply and demand. Without admitting or denying the findings, Claritas consented to a cease-and-desist order and agreed to pay $73,883 in disgorgement, $5,936.67 in prejudgment interest, and a $65,000 civil penalty, totaling $144,819.67. The SEC accepted the settlement in part due to Claritas’ prompt remedial actions and cooperation during the investigation. Claritas, registered with the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority, had advised the fund involved until February 2012 and currently operates as a selling agent.
Extracted insights
- $1.00M $1,000,000 $1M–$10M
- $145K $144,819 $100K–$1M
- $74K $73,883 $10K–$100K
- $74K $73,882 $10K–$100K
- $65K $65,000 $10K–$100K
- $6K $5,936 <$10K
- company against claritas investments ltd.
- person cayman islands
- person cayman islands monetary authority
- company claritas investments ltd.
- agency Securities and Exchange Commission
- company violation by claritas investments ltd.
- Claritas Investments Ltd. violated Rule 105 of Regulation M of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
- Claritas Investments Ltd. bought offered shares from underwriter or broker or dealer participating in follow-on public offering
- Claritas Investments Ltd. sold short same security during restricted period
- Claritas Investments Ltd. generated profits $73,883
- Violation by Claritas Investments Ltd. occurred in February 2011
- Claritas Investments Ltd. is domiciled in Cayman Islands
- Claritas Investments Ltd. is registered with Cayman Islands Monetary Authority
- Claritas Investments Ltd. advised fund until February 2012
- SEC instituted cease-and-desist proceedings against Claritas Investments Ltd.
- SEC issued order on September 16, 2013
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Release No. 70393 / September 16, 2013
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
File No. 3-15474
In the Matter of
CLARITAS INVESTMENTS
LTD.,
Respondent.
ORDER INSTITUTING CEASE-AND-
DESIST PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO
SECTION 21C OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, MAKING
FINDINGS, AND IMPOSING A CEASE-
AND-DESIST ORDER AND CIVIL
PENALTY
I.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) deems it appropriate that cease-
and-desist proceedings be, and hereby are, instituted pursuant to Section 21C of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), against Claritas Investment, Ltd. (“Claritas” or
“Respondent”).
II.
In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, Respondent has submitted an Offer
of Settlement (the “Offer”) which the Commission has determined to accept. Solely for the
purpose of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the
Commission, or to which the Commission is a party, and without admitting or denying the findings
herein, except as to the Commission’s jurisdiction over it and the subject matter of these
proceedings, which are admitted, Respondent consents to the entry of this Order Instituting Cease-
and-Desist Proceedings Pursuant to Section 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Making
Findings, and Imposing a Cease-and-Desist Order and Civil Penalty (“Order”), as set forth below.
2
III.
On the basis of this Order and Respondent’s Offer, the Commission finds
1
that:
Summary
1. These proceedings arise out of a violation of Rule 105 of Regulation M of the
Exchange Act by Claritas, which, at the time of the violation, operated as a Cayman Islands-based
asset management firm. Rule 105 prohibits buying an equity security made available through a
public offering, conducted on a firm commitment basis, from an underwriter or broker or dealer
participating in the offering after having sold short the same security during the restricted period as
defined therein.
2. In February 2011, Claritas bought offered shares from an underwriter or broker or
dealer participating in a follow-on public offering after having sold short the same security during
the restricted period. This violation resulted in profits of $73,883.
Respondent
3. Claritas Investments Ltd. is a limited liability company domiciled in the Cayman
Islands and is registered with the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority. Until February 2012,
Claritas advised the fund that engaged in the violation. Claritas currently conducts business as a
selling agent in connection with the investment of assets.
Legal Framework
4. Rule 105 makes it unlawful for a person to purchase equity securities from an
underwriter, broker, or dealer participating in a public offering if that person sold short the
security that is the subject of the offering during the restricted period defined in the rule, absent
an exception. 17 C.F.R. § 242.105; see Short Selling in Connection with a Public Offering, Rel.
No. 34-56206, 72 Fed. Reg. 45094 (Aug. 10, 2007) (effective Oct. 9, 2007). The Rule 105
restricted period is the shorter of the period: (1) beginning five business days before the pricing
of the offered securities and ending with such pricing; or (2) beginning with the initial filing of a
registration statement or notification on Exchange Act Form 1-A or Form 1-E and ending with
pricing.
5. “The goal of Rule 105 is to promote offering prices that are based upon open
market prices determined by supply and demand rather than artificial forces.” Final Rule: Short
Sales, Exchange Act Release No. 50103. Rule 105 is prophylactic and prohibits the conduct
irrespective of the short seller’s intent in effecting the short sale.
1
The findings herein are made pursuant to Respondent’s Offer of Settlement and are not binding
on any other person or entity in this or any other proceeding.
3
Claritas’ Violation of Rule 105 of Regulation M
6. From February 3, 2011 through February 9, 2011, Claritas sold short 42,513 shares
of Tenium S.A. (“TX”) during the restricted period at an average price of $37.7379 per share. On
February 9, 2011, TX announced the pricing of a follow-on offering of its common stock at $36.00
per share. Claritas received an allocation of 175,000 shares in that offering. The difference
between Claritas’ proceeds from the restricted period short sales of TX shares and the price paid
for the 42,513 shares received in the offering was $73,882.86.
7. In total, Claritas’ violation of Rule 105 resulted in profits of $73,883.
Violations
8. As a result of the conduct described above, Claritas violated Rule 105 of Regulation
M under the Exchange Act.
Claritas’ Remedial Efforts
9. In determining to accept the Offer, the Commission considered remedial
acts promptly undertaken by Respondent and cooperation afforded to Commission staff.
IV.
In view of the foregoing, the Commission deems it appropriate to impose the sanctions
agreed to in Respondent Claritas’ Offer.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:
A. Pursuant to Section 21C of the Exchange Act, Respondent Claritas cease and desist
from committing or causing any violations and any future violations of Rule 105 of Regulation M of
the Exchange Act;
B. Claritas shall within fourteen (14) days of the entry of this Order, pay disgorgement
of $73,883, prejudgment interest of $5,936.67, and a civil money penalty in the amount of $65,000
(for a total of $144,819.67) to the United States Treasury. If timely payment is not made,
additional interest shall accrue pursuant to SEC Rule of Practice 600. Payments must be made in
one of the following ways:
(1) Respondent may transmit payment electronically to the Commission, which will
provide detailed ACH transfer/Fedwire instructions upon request;
2
(2) Respondent may make direct payment from a bank account via Pay.gov through the
SEC website at http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/ofm.htm; or
2
The minimum threshold for transmission of payment electronically is $1,000,000. For amounts below the
threshold, respondents must make payments pursuant to options (2) or (3) above.
4
(3) Respondent may pay by certified check, bank cashier’s check, or United States postal
money order, made payable to the Securities and Exchange Commission and hand-
delivered or mailed to:
Enterprise Services Center
Accounts Receivable Branch
HQ Bldg., Room 181, AMZ-341
6500 South MaClaritasthur Boulevard
Oklahoma City, OK 73169
Payments by check or money order must be accompanied by a cover letter identifying
Claritas as a Respondent in these proceedings, and the file number of these proceedings; a copy of
the cover letter and check or money order must be sent to Gerald W. Hodgkins, Associate Director,
Division of Enforcement, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, N.E., Washington,
DC 20549.
By the Commission.
Elizabeth M. Murphy
Secretary
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Release No. 70393 / September 16, 2013
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
File No. 3-15474
In the Matter of
CLARITAS INVESTMENTS
LTD.,
Respondent.
ORDER INSTITUTING CEASE-AND-
DESIST PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO
SECTION 21C OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, MAKING
FINDINGS, AND IMPOSING A CEASE-
AND-DESIST ORDER AND CIVIL
PENALTY
I.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) deems it appropriate that cease-
and-desist proceedings be, and hereby are, instituted pursuant to Section 21C of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), against Claritas Investment, Ltd. (“Claritas” or
“Respondent”).
II.
In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, Respondent has submitted an Offer
of Settlement (the “Offer”) which the Commission has determined to accept. Solely for the
purpose of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the
Commission, or to which the Commission is a party, and without admitting or denying the findings
herein, except as to the Commission’s jurisdiction over it and the subject matter of these
proceedings, which are admitted, Respondent consents to the entry of this Order Instituting Cease-
and-Desist Proceedings Pursuant to Section 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Making
Findings, and Imposing a Cease-and-Desist Order and Civil Penalty (“Order”), as set forth below.
2
III.
On the basis of this Order and Respondent’s Offer, the Commission finds1 that:
Summary
1. These proceedings arise out of a violation of Rule 105 of Regulation M of the
Exchange Act by Claritas, which, at the time of the violation, operated as a Cayman Islands-based
asset management firm. Rule 105 prohibits buying an equity security made available through a
public offering, conducted on a firm commitment basis, from an underwriter or broker or dealer
participating in the offering after having sold short the same security during the restricted period as
defined therein.
2. In February 2011, Claritas bought offered shares from an underwriter or broker or
dealer participating in a follow-on public offering after having sold short the same security during
the restricted period. This violation resulted in profits of $73,883.
Respondent
3. Claritas Investments Ltd. is a limited liability company domiciled in the Cayman
Islands and is registered with the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority. Until February 2012,
Claritas advised the fund that engaged in the violation. Claritas currently conducts business as a
selling agent in connection with the investment of assets.
Legal Framework
4. Rule 105 makes it unlawful for a person to purchase equity securities from an
underwriter, broker, or dealer participating in a public offering if that person sold short the
security that is the subject of the offering during the restricted period defined in the rule, absent
an exception. 17 C.F.R. § 242.105; see Short Selling in Connection with a Public Offering, Rel.
No. 34-56206, 72 Fed. Reg. 45094 (Aug. 10, 2007) (effective Oct. 9, 2007). The Rule 105
restricted period is the shorter of the period: (1) beginning five business days before the pricing
of the offered securities and ending with such pricing; or (2) beginning with the initial filing of a
registration statement or notification on Exchange Act Form 1-A or Form 1-E and ending with
pricing.
5. “The goal of Rule 105 is to promote offering prices that are based upon open
market prices determined by supply and demand rather than artificial forces.” Final Rule: Short
Sales, Exchange Act Release No. 50103. Rule 105 is prophylactic and prohibits the conduct
irrespective of the short seller’s intent in effecting the short sale.
1 The findings herein are made pursuant to Respondent’s Offer of Settlement and are not binding
on any other person or entity in this or any other proceeding.
3
Claritas’ Violation of Rule 105 of Regulation M
6. From February 3, 2011 through February 9, 2011, Claritas sold short 42,513 shares
of Tenium S.A. (“TX”) during the restricted period at an average price of $37.7379 per share. On
February 9, 2011, TX announced the pricing of a follow-on offering of its common stock at $36.00
per share. Claritas received an allocation of 175,000 shares in that offering. The difference
between Claritas’ proceeds from the restricted period short sales of TX shares and the price paid
for the 42,513 shares received in the offering was $73,882.86.
7. In total, Claritas’ violation of Rule 105 resulted in profits of $73,883.
Violations
8. As a result of the conduct described above, Claritas violated Rule 105 of Regulation
M under the Exchange Act.
Claritas’ Remedial Efforts
9. In determining to accept the Offer, the Commission considered remedial
acts promptly undertaken by Respondent and cooperation afforded to Commission staff.
IV.
In view of the foregoing, the Commission deems it appropriate to impose the sanctions
agreed to in Respondent Claritas’ Offer.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:
A. Pursuant to Section 21C of the Exchange Act, Respondent Claritas cease and desist
from committing or causing any violations and any future violations of Rule 105 of Regulation M of
the Exchange Act;
B. Claritas shall within fourteen (14) days of the entry of this Order, pay disgorgement
of $73,883, prejudgment interest of $5,936.67, and a civil money penalty in the amount of $65,000
(for a total of $144,819.67) to the United States Treasury. If timely payment is not made,
additional interest shall accrue pursuant to SEC Rule of Practice 600. Payments must be made in
one of the following ways:
(1) Respondent may transmit payment electronically to the Commission, which will
provide detailed ACH transfer/Fedwire instructions upon request;2
(2) Respondent may make direct payment from a bank account via Pay.gov through the
SEC website at http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/ofm.htm; or
2 The minimum threshold for transmission of payment electronically is $1,000,000. For amounts below the
threshold, respondents must make payments pursuant to options (2) or (3) above.
4
(3) Respondent may pay by certified check, bank cashier’s check, or United States postal
money order, made payable to the Securities and Exchange Commission and hand-
delivered or mailed to:
Enterprise Services Center
Accounts Receivable Branch
HQ Bldg., Room 181, AMZ-341
6500 South MaClaritasthur Boulevard
Oklahoma City, OK 73169
Payments by check or money order must be accompanied by a cover letter identifying
Claritas as a Respondent in these proceedings, and the file number of these proceedings; a copy of
the cover letter and check or money order must be sent to Gerald W. Hodgkins, Associate Director,
Division of Enforcement, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, N.E., Washington,
DC 20549.
By the Commission.
Elizabeth M. Murphy
Secretary