In re POLO CAPITAL
Polo Capital International Gestão de Recursos Ltda., a Brazilian investment adviser, was ordered to cease and desist from violating Rule 105 of Regulation M and pay $282,720.51 in disgorgement, prejudgment interest, and civil penalties for generating $191,833 in illicit profits from selling short YPF S.A. shares during a restricted period.
Polo Capital International Gestão de Recursos Ltda. violated Rule 105 of Regulation M by selling short 91,628 shares of YPF S.A. during a restricted period prior to purchasing 110,000 shares in a follow-on public offering, generating $191,833 in illicit profits. The firm consented to a cease-and-desist order without admitting or denying the allegations. As part of the settlement, Polo Capital agreed to pay $282,720.51, consisting of $191,833 in disgorgement, $14,887.51 in prejudgment interest, and a $76,000 civil penalty.
Polo Capital International Gestão de Recursos Ltda., a Brazilian investment adviser, was found to have violated Rule 105 of Regulation M by selling short 91,628 shares of YPF S.A. during a restricted period prior to purchasing 110,000 shares in a follow-on public offering. This conduct resulted in $191,833 in illicit profits, which the SEC found artificially suppressed offering prices and undermined market integrity. Polo Capital, which was not registered with the SEC at the time, consented to a cease-and-desist order without admitting or denying the allegations. As part of the settlement, the firm agreed to pay $282,720.51, consisting of $191,833 in disgorgement, $14,887.51 in prejudgment interest, and a $76,000 civil penalty. The SEC accepted the settlement in part due to Polo Capital's prompt remedial actions and cooperation during the investigation. Polo Capital's cooperation and remedial efforts were taken into consideration by the SEC when determining the sanctions. The firm's actions were deemed to be in violation of Rule 105, which prohibits buying an equity security made available through a public offering after having sold short the same security during the restricted period.
Extracted insights
- $259.00M $259 million $100M–$1B
- $1.00M $1,000,000 $1M–$10M
- $283K $282,720 $100K–$1M
- $192K $191,833 $100K–$1M
- $185K $185,463 $100K–$1M
- $76K $76,000 $10K–$100K
- $15K $ 14,887 $10K–$100K
- $6K $6,369 <$10K
- company polo capital
- agency sec since march 2012
- agency Securities and Exchange Commission
- SEC instituted cease-and-desist proceedings against Polo Capital International Gestão de Recursos Ltda.
- Polo Capital International Gestão de Recursos Ltda. violated Rule 105 of Regulation M of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
- Polo Capital bought offered shares from underwriter or broker or dealer participating in follow-on public offering in March 2011
- Polo Capital sold short same security during restricted period
- Polo Capital violation resulted in $191,833 in profits
- Polo Capital is organized under laws of Brazil as a Brazilian Sociedade Limitada
- Polo Capital has principal place of business in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Polo Capital has assets under management of $259 million
- Polo Capital obtained exempt adviser reporting status with SEC since March 2012
- Polo Capital is investment adviser to two offshore funds
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Release No. 70397 / September 16, 2013
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
File No. 3-15481
In the Matter of
POLO CAPITAL
INTERNATIONAL
GESTAO DE
RECURSOS LTDA.
Respondent.
ORDER INSTITUTING CEASE-AND-
DESIST PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO
SECTION 21C OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, MAKING
FINDINGS, AND IMPOSING A CEASE-
AND-DESIST ORDER AND CIVIL
PENALTY
I.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) deems it appropriate that cease-
and-desist proceedings be, and hereby are, instituted pursuant to Section 21C of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), against Polo Capital International Gestão de Recursos
Ltda. (“Polo Capital” or “Respondent”).
II.
In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, Respondent has submitted an Offer
of Settlement (the “Offer”) which the Commission has determined to accept. Solely for the
purpose of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the
Commission, or to which the Commission is a party, and without admitting or denying the findings
herein, except as to the Commission’s jurisdiction over it and the subject matter of these
proceedings, which are admitted, Respondent consents to the entry of this Order Instituting Cease-
and-Desist Proceedings Pursuant to Section 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Making
Findings, and Imposing a Cease-and-Desist Order and Civil Penalty (“Order”), as set forth below.
2
III.
On the basis of this Order and Respondent’s Offer, the Commission finds
1
that:
Summary
1. These proceedings arise out of violations of Rule 105 of Regulation M of the
Exchange Act by Polo Capital, a Brazilian-based investment adviser. Rule 105 prohibits buying an
equity security made available through a public offering, conducted on a firm commitment basis,
from an underwriter or broker or dealer participating in the offering after having sold short the
same security during the restricted period as defined therein.
2. In March 2011, Polo Capital bought offered shares from an underwriter or broker or
dealer participating in a follow-on public offering after having sold short the same security during
the restricted period. This violation resulted in profits of $191,833.
Respondent
3. Polo Capital International Gestão de Recursos Ltda. a/k/a Polo Capital
Management is a Brazilian company organized under the laws of Brazil as a Brazilian Sociedade
Limitada with its principal place of business in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Since March 2012, Polo
Capital has had exempt adviser reporting status with the Commission; it was not registered with
the Commission at the time of the violations. Polo Capital is the investment adviser to two
offshore funds and has over $259 million in assets under management.
Legal Framework
4. Rule 105 makes it unlawful for a person to purchase equity securities from an
underwriter, broker, or dealer participating in a public offering if that person sold short the
security that is the subject of the offering during the restricted period defined in the rule, absent
an exception. 17 C.F.R. § 242.105; see Short Selling in Connection with a Public Offering, Rel.
No. 34-56206, 72 Fed. Reg. 45094 (Aug. 10, 2007) (effective Oct. 9, 2007). The Rule 105
restricted period is the shorter of the period: (1) beginning five business days before the pricing
of the offered securities and ending with such pricing; or (2) beginning with the initial filing of a
registration statement or notification on Exchange Act Form 1-A or Form 1-E and ending with
pricing.
5. “The goal of Rule 105 is to promote offering prices that are based upon open
market prices determined by supply and demand rather than artificial forces.” Final Rule: Short
Sales, Exchange Act Release No. 50103. Rule 105 is prophylactic and prohibits the conduct
irrespective of the short seller’s intent in effecting the short sale.
1
The findings herein are made pursuant to Respondent’s Offer of Settlement and are not binding on any other person
or entity in this or any other proceeding.
3
Polo Capital’s Violations of Rule 105 of Regulation M
6. From March 21, 2011 through March 22, 2011, Polo Capital sold short 91,628
shares of YPF S.A., Inc. (“YPF”) during the restricted period at an average price of $43.0241per
share. On March 23, 2011, YPF announced the pricing of a follow-on offering of its common
stock at $41.00 per share. Polo Capital received an allocation of 110,000 shares in that offering.
The difference between Polo Capital’s proceeds from the restricted period short sales of YPF
shares and the price paid for the 91,628 shares received in the offering was $185,463.90.
Respondent also improperly obtained a benefit of $6,369.57 by purchasing the remaining 18,372
shares at a discount from YPF’s market price. Thus, Polo Capital’s participation in the YPF
offering netted total profits of $191,833.47.
7. In total, Polo Capital’s violation of Rule 105 resulted in profits of $191,833.47.
Violations
8. As a result of the conduct described above, Polo Capital violated Rule 105 of
Regulation M under the Exchange Act.
Polo Capital’s Remedial Efforts
9. In determining to accept the Offer, the Commission considered remedial
acts promptly undertaken by Respondent and cooperation afforded to the Commission
staff.
IV.
In view of the foregoing, the Commission deems it appropriate to impose the sanctions
agreed to in Respondent Polo Capital’s Offer.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:
A. Pursuant to Section 21C of the Exchange Act, Respondent Polo Capital cease and
desist from committing or causing any violations and any future violations of Rule 105 of
Regulation M of the Exchange Act;
B. Polo Capital shall within fourteen (14) days of the entry of this Order, cause to pay
disgorgement of $191,833, prejudgment interest of $ 14,887.51, and a civil money penalty in the
amount of $76,000 (for a total of $282,720.51) to the United States Treasury. If timely payment is
not made, additional interest shall accrue pursuant to SEC Rule of Practice 600. Payments must be
made in one of the following ways:
4
(1) Respondent may transmit payment electronically to the Commission, which will
provide detailed ACH transfer/Fedwire instructions upon request;
2
(2) Respondent may make direct payment from a bank account via Pay.gov through the
SEC website at http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/ofm.htm; or
(3) Respondent may pay by certified check, bank cashier’s check, or United States postal
money order, made payable to the Securities and Exchange Commission and hand-
delivered or mailed to:
Enterprise Services Center
Accounts Receivable Branch
HQ Bldg., Room 181, AMZ-341
6500 South MacArthur Boulevard
Oklahoma City, OK 73169
Payments by check or money order must be accompanied by a cover letter identifying Polo
Capital as a Respondent in these proceedings, and the file number of these proceedings; a copy of
the cover letter and check or money order must be sent to Gerald W. Hodgkins, Associate Director,
Division of Enforcement, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, N.E., Washington,
DC 20549.
By the Commission.
Elizabeth M. Murphy
Secretary
2
The minimum threshold for transmission of payment electronically is $1,000,000. For amounts below the
threshold, respondents must make payments pursuant to options (2) or (3) above. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Release No. 70397 / September 16, 2013
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
File No. 3-15481
In the Matter of
POLO CAPITAL
INTERNATIONAL
GESTAO DE
RECURSOS LTDA.
Respondent.
ORDER INSTITUTING CEASE-AND-
DESIST PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO
SECTION 21C OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, MAKING
FINDINGS, AND IMPOSING A CEASE-
AND-DESIST ORDER AND CIVIL
PENALTY
I.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) deems it appropriate that cease-
and-desist proceedings be, and hereby are, instituted pursuant to Section 21C of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), against Polo Capital International Gestão de Recursos
Ltda. (“Polo Capital” or “Respondent”).
II.
In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, Respondent has submitted an Offer
of Settlement (the “Offer”) which the Commission has determined to accept. Solely for the
purpose of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the
Commission, or to which the Commission is a party, and without admitting or denying the findings
herein, except as to the Commission’s jurisdiction over it and the subject matter of these
proceedings, which are admitted, Respondent consents to the entry of this Order Instituting Cease-
and-Desist Proceedings Pursuant to Section 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Making
Findings, and Imposing a Cease-and-Desist Order and Civil Penalty (“Order”), as set forth below.
2
III.
On the basis of this Order and Respondent’s Offer, the Commission finds1 that:
Summary
1. These proceedings arise out of violations of Rule 105 of Regulation M of the
Exchange Act by Polo Capital, a Brazilian-based investment adviser. Rule 105 prohibits buying an
equity security made available through a public offering, conducted on a firm commitment basis,
from an underwriter or broker or dealer participating in the offering after having sold short the
same security during the restricted period as defined therein.
2. In March 2011, Polo Capital bought offered shares from an underwriter or broker or
dealer participating in a follow-on public offering after having sold short the same security during
the restricted period. This violation resulted in profits of $191,833.
Respondent
3. Polo Capital International Gestão de Recursos Ltda. a/k/a Polo Capital
Management is a Brazilian company organized under the laws of Brazil as a Brazilian Sociedade
Limitada with its principal place of business in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Since March 2012, Polo
Capital has had exempt adviser reporting status with the Commission; it was not registered with
the Commission at the time of the violations. Polo Capital is the investment adviser to two
offshore funds and has over $259 million in assets under management.
Legal Framework
4. Rule 105 makes it unlawful for a person to purchase equity securities from an
underwriter, broker, or dealer participating in a public offering if that person sold short the
security that is the subject of the offering during the restricted period defined in the rule, absent
an exception. 17 C.F.R. § 242.105; see Short Selling in Connection with a Public Offering, Rel.
No. 34-56206, 72 Fed. Reg. 45094 (Aug. 10, 2007) (effective Oct. 9, 2007). The Rule 105
restricted period is the shorter of the period: (1) beginning five business days before the pricing
of the offered securities and ending with such pricing; or (2) beginning with the initial filing of a
registration statement or notification on Exchange Act Form 1-A or Form 1-E and ending with
pricing.
5. “The goal of Rule 105 is to promote offering prices that are based upon open
market prices determined by supply and demand rather than artificial forces.” Final Rule: Short
Sales, Exchange Act Release No. 50103. Rule 105 is prophylactic and prohibits the conduct
irrespective of the short seller’s intent in effecting the short sale.
1 The findings herein are made pursuant to Respondent’s Offer of Settlement and are not binding on any other person
or entity in this or any other proceeding.
3
Polo Capital’s Violations of Rule 105 of Regulation M
6. From March 21, 2011 through March 22, 2011, Polo Capital sold short 91,628
shares of YPF S.A., Inc. (“YPF”) during the restricted period at an average price of $43.0241per
share. On March 23, 2011, YPF announced the pricing of a follow-on offering of its common
stock at $41.00 per share. Polo Capital received an allocation of 110,000 shares in that offering.
The difference between Polo Capital’s proceeds from the restricted period short sales of YPF
shares and the price paid for the 91,628 shares received in the offering was $185,463.90.
Respondent also improperly obtained a benefit of $6,369.57 by purchasing the remaining 18,372
shares at a discount from YPF’s market price. Thus, Polo Capital’s participation in the YPF
offering netted total profits of $191,833.47.
7. In total, Polo Capital’s violation of Rule 105 resulted in profits of $191,833.47.
Violations
8. As a result of the conduct described above, Polo Capital violated Rule 105 of
Regulation M under the Exchange Act.
Polo Capital’s Remedial Efforts
9. In determining to accept the Offer, the Commission considered remedial
acts promptly undertaken by Respondent and cooperation afforded to the Commission
staff.
IV.
In view of the foregoing, the Commission deems it appropriate to impose the sanctions
agreed to in Respondent Polo Capital’s Offer.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:
A. Pursuant to Section 21C of the Exchange Act, Respondent Polo Capital cease and
desist from committing or causing any violations and any future violations of Rule 105 of
Regulation M of the Exchange Act;
B. Polo Capital shall within fourteen (14) days of the entry of this Order, cause to pay
disgorgement of $191,833, prejudgment interest of $ 14,887.51, and a civil money penalty in the
amount of $76,000 (for a total of $282,720.51) to the United States Treasury. If timely payment is
not made, additional interest shall accrue pursuant to SEC Rule of Practice 600. Payments must be
made in one of the following ways:
4
(1) Respondent may transmit payment electronically to the Commission, which will
provide detailed ACH transfer/Fedwire instructions upon request;2
(2) Respondent may make direct payment from a bank account via Pay.gov through the
SEC website at http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/ofm.htm; or
(3) Respondent may pay by certified check, bank cashier’s check, or United States postal
money order, made payable to the Securities and Exchange Commission and hand-
delivered or mailed to:
Enterprise Services Center
Accounts Receivable Branch
HQ Bldg., Room 181, AMZ-341
6500 South MacArthur Boulevard
Oklahoma City, OK 73169
Payments by check or money order must be accompanied by a cover letter identifying Polo
Capital as a Respondent in these proceedings, and the file number of these proceedings; a copy of
the cover letter and check or money order must be sent to Gerald W. Hodgkins, Associate Director,
Division of Enforcement, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, N.E., Washington,
DC 20549.
By the Commission.
Elizabeth M. Murphy
Secretary
2 The minimum threshold for transmission of payment electronically is $1,000,000. For amounts below the
threshold, respondents must make payments pursuant to options (2) or (3) above.