2012-07-18 SEC Press pdf 132 KB 22,991 chars

Deferred Prosecution Agreement With Amish Helping Fund

summary

The Amish Helping Fund, an Ohio non-profit, committed securities fraud from 1995 to 2010 by making material misrepresentations in its offering materials—falsely claiming a 15% liquid reserve, short-term investments, and 30-day redemptions—while using funds for illiquid long-term mortgages, leading to a deferred prosecution agreement with the SEC requiring cooperation, audits, disclosures, and rescission offers, with no enforcement action taken after compliance.

paragraph

The Amish Helping Fund, an Ohio non-profit, violated Sections 17(a) and 10(b) of federal securities laws between 1995 and 2010 by misrepresenting its financial practices, falsely asserting it maintained a 15% liquid reserve, invested only in short-term land contracts, and could redeem investments within 30 days, when it instead used investor funds for illiquid long-term mortgages and lacked adequate liquidity. The Fund raised over $125 million through these deceptive offering memoranda, though no investors suffered realized losses. In July 2012, it entered a deferred prosecution agreement with the SEC, agreeing to a two-year compliance period through July 2014, during which it undertook independent audits, issued corrected disclosures, offered rescission rights to investors (nearly all of whom declined), and fully cooperated with investigations in exchange for no enforcement action after successful compliance.

narrative

The Amish Helping Fund, an Ohio non-profit corporation, engaged in a prolonged securities fraud scheme from November 1995 through June 2010 by distributing offering memoranda that contained material misrepresentations, falsely claiming it maintained a 15% liquid reserve, invested exclusively in short-term land contracts, and could redeem investor funds within 30 days. In reality, the Fund diverted investor capital into long-term, illiquid mortgages and lacked sufficient liquidity to meet redemption requests, misleading thousands of investors and raising over $125 million. Although no investor losses were realized, the SEC determined these omissions and falsehoods violated Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, along with Rule 10b-5. In July 2012, the Fund entered into a deferred prosecution agreement with the SEC, agreeing to a two-year compliance period through July 2014, during which it was required to retain independent auditors, issue corrected disclosures, and make rescission offers to investors—nearly all of whom declined. The Fund also committed to full cooperation with the SEC and any related investigations, including producing documents, making personnel available for interviews and testimony, and entering into tolling agreements. The agreement tolled the statute of limitations for any potential enforcement actions during the deferred period, and the Fund agreed not to contest the factual statements in the agreement. Upon successful completion of the deferred period and full compliance, the SEC agreed not to pursue any enforcement actions against the Fund, preserving its non-profit status while imposing lasting governance and disclosure obligations.

Enriched metadata

Scheme
unregistered-securities (100%)
Outcome
convicted
Victim loss
$125,000,000
Classified unregistered-securities(confidence 100%). EDGAR detection: forms Form D/S-1· recall 41% / precision 30%. detection rule →
Keywords
respondentagreementdeferred perioddivisionfundproceedingcommissionperiodsecuritiesdeferredaction proceedingactioninvestorsagreesrespondent understands

Extracted insights

Dollar amounts 1
  • $125.00M $125 million $100M–$1B
Triples 15
  • The Division Alleges The Amish Helping Fund violated Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder
  • The Respondent Offers to Accept Responsibility For its conduct and to not contest or contradict the factual statements contained in Paragraph 6 in any future Commission action or proceeding in the event it breaches this Agreement
  • The Commission and the Respondent Enter into This deferred prosecution agreement on the following terms and conditions
  • The Respondent Understands and Agrees That the provisions of this Agreement are in full force and effect from July 17, 2012 through July 17, 2014 (the Deferred Period)
  • The Respondent Agrees to Cooperate Fully and Truthfully In the Investigation and any related action or proceeding against other persons to which the Commission is a party (a Proceeding)
  • The Respondent Agrees to Cooperate Fully and Truthfully In any investigation, action or proceeding by any federal, state, or self-regulatory organization related to the Investigation and the factual statements contained in this Agreement (an Other Proceeding)
  • The Respondent Agrees to Produce All non-privileged documents, information, and other materials to the Commission as requested by the Division’s staff, wherever located, in the possession, custody, or control of the Respondent
  • The Respondent Agrees to Use Its Best Efforts To secure the full, truthful, and continuing cooperation of its current and former directors, officers, trustees, employees, and agents
  • The Respondent Agrees to Enter into Tolling Agreements During the Deferred Period with any federal, state, or self-regulatory organization in connection with any Other Proceeding, when requested to do so by the Division’s staff
  • The Full, Truthful, and Continuing Cooperation of Each Person Described in Paragraph 3(b) Is Subject to The procedures and protections of this paragraph
  • The Full, Truthful, and Continuing Cooperation of Each Person Described in Paragraph 3(b) Includes Producing All non-privileged documents and other materials as requested by the Division’s staff
  • The Full, Truthful, and Continuing Cooperation of Each Person Described in Paragraph 3(b) Includes Appearing for Interviews At such times and places, as requested by the Division’s staff
  • The Full, Truthful, and Continuing Cooperation of Each Person Described in Paragraph 3(b) Includes Responding to All Inquiries When requested to do so by the Division’s staff, in connection with any Proceeding or Other Proceeding
  • The Full, Truthful, and Continuing Cooperation of Each Person Described in Paragraph 3(b) Includes Testifying at Trial And other judicial proceedings, when requested to do so by the Division’s staff, in connection with any Proceeding or Other Proceeding
  • The Respondent Agrees that the Running of Any Statute of Limitations Applicable to any action or proceeding against it authorized, instituted, or brought by or on behalf of the Commission
Text layers
Extracted body text (22,991c)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 

DEFERRED PROSECUTION AGREEMENT 
1. In connection with an investigation, the Division of Enforcement (the “Division”) 
of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) alleges 
that the Amish Helping Fund, an Ohio non-profit corporation (the “Respondent” or the 
“Fund”), from in or about November 1995 through in or about June 2010, violated 
Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange 
Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, by knowingly or recklessly making material 
misrepresentations in the sale of securities (the “Investigation”).  Prior to any action or 
proceeding being brought by the Commission against it, the Respondent has offered to 
accept responsibility for its conduct and to not contest or contradict the factual statements 
contained in Paragraph 6 in any future Commission action or proceeding in the event it 
breaches this Agreement.  Accordingly, the Commission and the Respondent enter into 
this deferred prosecution agreement (the “Agreement”) on the following terms and 
conditions: 
TERM 
2. The Respondent understands and agrees that the provisions of this Agreement are 
in full force and effect from July 17, 2012 through July 17, 2014 (the “Deferred Period”), 
unless expressly stated otherwise. 
COOPERATION 
3. The Respondent, a non-profit corporation organized and operating under the laws 
of Ohio, agrees to cooperate fully and truthfully in the Investigation and any related 
action or proceeding against other persons to which the Commission is a party (a 
“Proceeding”), regardless of the time period in which the cooperation is required.  In 
addition, the Respondent agrees to cooperate fully and truthfully, when directed by the 
Division’s staff, in any investigation, action or proceeding by any federal, state, or self-
regulatory organization related to the Investigation and the factual statements contained 
in this Agreement (an “Other Proceeding”).  The full, truthful, and continuing 
cooperation of the Respondent shall include, but not be limited to: 
a. producing, in a responsive and prompt manner, all non-privileged 
documents, information, and other materials to the Commission as requested by the 
Division’s staff, wherever located, in the possession, custody, or control of the 
Respondent; 
b. using its best efforts to secure the full, truthful, and continuing 
cooperation, as defined in Paragraph 4, of its current and former directors, officers, 
trustees, employees, and agents, including making these persons available, when 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
requested to do so by the Division’s staff, at the Respondent’s expense, for interviews 
and the provision of testimony in any Proceeding or Other Proceeding; and 
c. entering into tolling agreements during the Deferred Period with any 
federal, state, or self-regulatory organization in connection with any Other Proceeding, 
when requested to do so by the Division’s staff. 
4. The full, truthful, and continuing cooperation of each person described in 
Paragraph 3(b) above will be subject to the procedures and protections of this paragraph, 
and shall include, but not be limited to: 
a. producing all non-privileged documents and other materials as requested 
by the Division’s staff; 
b. appearing for interviews, at such times and places, as requested by the 
Division’s staff; 
c. responding to all inquiries, when requested to do so by the Division’s 
staff, in connection with any Proceeding or Other Proceeding; and  
d. testifying at trial and other judicial proceedings, when requested to do so 
by the Division’s staff, in connection with any Proceeding or Other Proceeding. 
STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS 
5. The Respondent agrees that the running of any statute of limitations applicable to 
any action or proceeding against it authorized, instituted, or brought by or on behalf of 
the Commission arising out of the Investigation (an “Enforcement Action”), including 
any sanctions or relief that may be imposed therein, is tolled and suspended during the 
Deferred Period. 
a. The Respondent and any of its attorneys or agents shall not include the 
Deferred Period in the calculation of the running of any statute of limitations or for any 
other time-related defense applicable to any Enforcement Action, including any sanctions 
or relief that may be imposed therein, in asserting or relying upon any such time-related 
defense. 
b. This Agreement shall not affect any statute of limitations or other time-
related defense that may be available to the Respondent before the commencement of the 
Deferred Period or be construed to revive any Enforcement Action that may be barred by 
any applicable statute of limitations or other time-related defense before the 
commencement of the Deferred Period. 
c. The running of any statute of limitations or other time-related defense 
applicable to any Enforcement Action shall commence again after the end of the Deferred 
Period.  If there is an extension of the Deferred Period executed in writing by or on behalf 
2 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                                                
 
  
   
     
 
of the parties hereto, then the running of any statute of limitations or other time-related 
defense applicable to any Enforcement Action shall commence again only after the end 
of the extension of the Deferred Period. 
d. This Agreement is not intended as, and shall not be construed as, an 
admission by the Commission relating to the applicability of any statute of limitations to 
any Enforcement Action, including any sanctions or relief that may be imposed therein, 
or to the length of any limitations period that may apply, or to the applicability of, any 
other time-related defense.  
STATEMENT OF FACTS
1 
6. If this case had gone to trial, the Commission would have presented evidence 
sufficient to prove the following facts: 
a. In or about November 1995 the Amish Helping Fund, a religious-based 
organization, was established in Sugarcreek, Ohio with the stated non-profit purpose of 
preserving the Amish way of life by raising funds to loan to Amish families to enable 
them to purchase real estate or make construction improvements to existing real estate. 
b. From in or about November 1995 through in or about June 2010, the 
Amish Helping Fund offered and sold investment contracts to thousands of investors in 
the Amish community, raising more than $125 million. 
c. The Fund is run by a Board of Trustees comprised of a group of elders in 
the Amish community.  To apply for a loan, prospective Amish borrowers would 
approach the member of the Board of Trustees who lived nearest to them.  The Board of 
Trustees would consider the application and decide whether to fund a particular loan.  
The loans were documented and recorded using a local law firm, with the borrowers 
paying the associated legal expenses. 
d. Prospective investors interested in purchasing investment contracts from 
the Amish Helping Fund were given a confidential offering memorandum drafted in 1995 
(the “Memorandum”) by the Treasurer of the Fund.  The Memorandum was the primary 
disclosure document provided to an investor at the time of his or her investment. 
e. The Memorandum, which was factually correct when originally drafted in 
1995, was not revised or updated over time to reflect material changes in business 
practices.  Specifically, the Memorandum failed to reflect changes in the history of 
operations of the Fund, the cash reserves of the Fund, the use of investor monies, and the 
ability of investors to redeem their investments.  Despite making changes in its business 
1
 The facts set forth in Paragraph 6 are made pursuant to settlement negotiations in connection with the 
violations alleged by the Division in Paragraph 1 of this Agreement and are not binding on any person 
other than the Respondent.  Nothing in this Agreement shall limit or otherwise affect the Respondent’s 
testimonial obligations or right to take legal or factual positions in any action or proceeding to which the 
Commission is not a party. 
3 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
practices, the Amish Helping Fund continued to use the Memorandum after 1995, thereby 
distributing a document that contained statements that were no longer accurate. 
f. Specifically, the Memorandum contained the following statements, which 
became inaccurate after 1995: 
STATEMENT REASON IT IS FALSE OR 
MISLEADING 
“The Fund has only recently been formed.  From November 1996 through August 
The Fund does not have any historical 2010, the Fund had historical financial and 
financial or operating data upon which an operating data upon which investors could 
investor in the investment agreements can base their decision whether or not to invest 
base his or her decision to invest or not with the Fund. 
invest...” 
“All of the money invested will not be used After the first year of operations, the Fund 
for purchasing real estate.  A reserve of never maintained a 15% reserve in liquid 
approximately fifteen percent (15%) will investments. 
be kept to cover the needs of the 
Fund...Such funds will be kept in liquid 
investments such as money market 
accounts or certificates of deposit at 
lending institutions...” 
“With the money invested in the Fund, the While the Fund initially purchased real 
Fund will purchase real estate and sell it to estate and sold it to borrowers pursuant to 
buyers pursuant to land contracts.” land contracts, within the first few years of 
operations, the Fund ceased this practice. 
The Fund then used investor funds to make 
mortgage and construction loans, not to 
purchase real estate. 
“If the Trustees consent and sufficient 
funds are available, the Fund will redeem 
the Investment Agreements within thirty 
(30) days of their tender by the Investor.  It 
is the intent of the Fund to be able to honor 
all Members’ wishes to redeem Investment 
Agreements.  Based on the Founders’ 
understanding of communities in Indiana 
and Illinois, this has not been a problem, 
but there is no guarantee that the fund will 
be able to redeem all Investment 
Agreements tendered to it.” 
The Fund did not disclose that, because the 
vast majority of investor funds were 
deployed in mortgage loans, many of 
which had 15 or 20 year terms, there could 
never be enough funds available for 
redemption if the number of redemption 
requests exceeded a certain level. 
g. Each of the statements listed in Paragraph 6(f) above were false and 
misleading, and constituted information that a reasonable investor would consider 
important in making an investment decision. 
4 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
h. Despite making periodic oral representations as to the financial condition 
and purpose of the investment at meetings, the Respondent knew or was reckless in not 
knowing that it was making material written misrepresentations to investors.  The Board 
of Trustees and the Treasurer of the Respondent knew or were reckless in not knowing 
that the Memorandum had been drafted in 1995 and was never revised or updated, yet 
they continued to provide it to prospective investors. 
i. To date, the investors have suffered no realized losses.  In addition, there 
have been no foreclosures. 
j. Notwithstanding the facts recited in Paragraph 6(i) above, the material 
misrepresentations the Respondent made to investors operated as a fraud and deceit upon 
investors. 
k. After the Division’s staff raised the misrepresentations listed in Paragraph 
6(f) with the Fund, the Fund: 
(i)	 retained an independent certified public accountant to perform 
ongoing audits of the Fund’s financial statements, the first of 
which was completed in 2010; 
(ii)	 updated and corrected its offering memorandum, and provided 
existing investors with the corrected offering memorandum; 
(iii)	 registered its past securities offerings with the Ohio Division of 
Securities, and offered all existing investors the right of rescission; 
(iv)	 registered a new securities offering with the Ohio Division of 
Securities; and 
(v)	 consented to a cease-and-desist order with the Ohio Division of 
Securities, waiving its right to appeal. 
l. Almost no investors accepted the Fund’s offer of the right of rescission. 
PROHIBITIONS 
7. During the Deferred Period, the Respondent understands and agrees to comply 
with the following prohibitions: 
a.	 to refrain from violating the federal and state securities laws; and 
b.	 to refrain from violating the applicable rules promulgated by any self- 
regulatory organization. 
UNDERTAKINGS 
8. During the Deferred Period, the Respondent understands and agrees to perform 
the following undertakings: 
5 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
                                                
 
  
 
   
a. to provide written notification to the Division, within five days, if it is 
questioned, charged, or convicted of any offense by any federal, state, or local law 
enforcement organization or regulatory agency; 
b. to provide written notification to the Division, within five days, if it is 
questioned, a formal or informal complaint has been made against it, or disciplinary 
action is taken against it by any self-regulatory organization; 
c. to retain, at its own expense, and cooperate fully with an independent 
certified public accountant not unacceptable to the Division that is authorized: 
(i) 	to perform an annual audit in accordance with generally accepted 
auditing standards; and 
(ii) 	to issue an opinion as to whether the Respondent’s financial 
statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial 
position of the Respondent in conformity with generally accepted 
accounting principles, 
with the first such audit to be completed before the beginning of the Deferred Period
2
; 
d. to provide all existing and prospective investors with accurate financial 
information about the Respondent, including allowing each existing and prospective 
investor the opportunity to review the Respondent’s most recent audited financial 
statements; 
e. to provide all existing and prospective investors with a new offering 
memorandum that includes complete and accurate information about the Respondent, 
including, but not limited to, descriptions of:  the Respondent’s operations, the securities 
offered, the risks associated with the investment, and the management of the 
Respondent
3
; 
f. to offer the right of rescission to all existing investors, in compliance with 
all applicable federal and/or state securities registration provisions
4
; 
g. to register any new securities offerings with the Ohio Division of 
Securities and/or the Commission, as appropriate;  
h. to adopt on or before the beginning of the Deferred Period and implement 
thereafter comprehensive procedures designed to prevent future violations of the federal 
securities laws, including, but not limited to, procedures regarding disclosure of the 
nature of any investments offered to existing and prospective investors; and 
2
 Apple Growth Partners (“AGP”) has completed audits of the Fund’s financial statements for the period 
ended June 30, 2010.  The Fund has since retained Rea & Associates (“Rea”) to audit its financial 
statements, and Rea will continue to audit the Fund’s financial statements on an ongoing basis.  Neither 
AGP nor Rea is unacceptable to the Division. 
3
 A new offering document was provided to existing investors beginning on December 30, 2010 and will be 
provided to prospective investors in the future. 
4
 A rescission offer was made to all existing investors beginning on December 30, 2010. 
6 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
i. to provide the Division with a written certification of compliance with the 
prohibitions and undertakings in this Agreement between forty-five and sixty days before 
the end of the Deferred Period. 
PUBLIC STATEMENTS 
9. After the Deferred Period begins, the Respondent agrees not to take any action or 
to make or permit any public statement through present or future attorneys, employees, 
directors, officers, trustees, agents, or other persons authorized to speak for it, except in 
legal proceedings in which the Commission is not a party, denying, directly or indirectly, 
any aspect of this Agreement or creating the impression that the statements in Paragraph 
6 of this Agreement are without factual basis.  This Paragraph 9 is not intended to apply 
to any statement made by an individual in the course of any criminal, civil, or regulatory 
proceeding initiated by a government or self-regulatory organization against such 
individual, unless such individual is speaking on behalf of the Respondent.  If it is 
determined by the Commission that a public statement by the Respondent, or any related 
person contradicts in whole or in part this Agreement, the Commission, at its sole 
discretion, may bring an action or proceeding against the Respondent in accordance with 
Paragraphs 12 through 15. 
10. Prior to issuing any press release concerning this Agreement, the Respondent 
agrees to have the text of the release approved by the staff of the Division. 
SERVICE 
11. The Respondent agrees to serve by hand delivery or by next-day mail all written 
notices and correspondence required by or related to this Agreement to John J. Sikora, Jr., 
Assistant Regional Director, Division of Enforcement, Chicago Regional Office, United 
States Securities and Exchange Commission, 175 West Jackson Boulevard, Suite 900, 
Chicago, Illinois, 60604, unless otherwise directed in writing by the staff of the Division. 
VIOLATION OF AGREEMENT 
12. The Respondent understands and agrees that it shall be a violation of this 
Agreement if it knowingly provides false or misleading information or materials in 
connection with any Proceeding or Other Proceeding.  In the event of such misconduct, 
the Division will advise the Commission of the Respondent’s misconduct and may make 
a criminal referral for providing false information (18 U.S.C. § 1001), contempt (18 
U.S.C. §§ 401-402) and/or obstructing justice (18 U.S.C. § 1503 et seq.). 
13. The Respondent understands and agrees that it shall be a violation of this 
Agreement if it violates the federal securities laws during the Deferred Period.  It is 
further understood and agreed that should the Division determine that the Respondent has 
failed to comply with any term or condition of this Agreement, the Division will notify 
the Respondent or its counsel of that determination and provide an opportunity for the 
7 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Respondent to make a submission consistent with the procedures set forth in Securities 
Act of 1933 Release No. 5310.  Under these circumstances, the Division may, in its sole 
discretion and not subject to judicial review, recommend to the Commission an action or 
proceeding against the Respondent for any securities law violations, including, but not 
limited to, the substantive offenses relating to the Investigation.  Nothing in this 
Agreement limits the Division’s discretion to recommend to the Commission any action 
or proceeding against the Respondent for future violations of the federal securities laws, 
without notice, to protect the public interest. 
14. The Respondent understands and agrees that any documents, statements, 
information, testimony, or evidence provided by it during any Proceeding or Other 
Proceeding, and any leads derived therefrom, may be used against it in any future action 
or proceeding resulting from its violation of this Agreement. 
15. In the event it breaches this Agreement, the Respondent agrees not to contest or 
contradict in any future Commission action or proceeding the factual statements 
contained in Paragraph 6 above as admissions pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 
801(d)(2). 
COMPLIANCE WITH AGREEMENT 
16. Subject to the full, truthful, and continuing cooperation of the Respondent, as 
described in Paragraphs 3 and 4, and compliance by the Respondent with all obligations, 
prohibitions and undertakings in the Agreement during the Deferred Period, the 
Commission agrees not to bring any action or proceeding against the Respondent arising 
from the Investigation after the conclusion of the Deferred Period. 
17. The Respondent understands and agrees that this Agreement does not bind other 
federal, state or self-regulatory organizations, but the Commission may, at its discretion, 
issue a letter to these organizations detailing the fact, manner, and extent of the 
Respondent’s cooperation during any Proceeding or Other Proceeding, upon the written 
request of the Respondent. 
18. The Respondent understands and agrees that if, during the Deferred Period, it 
sells, merges, or transfers all or substantially all of its business operations as they exist as 
of the date of this Agreement, whether such a sale is structured as a stock or asset sale, 
merger, or transfer, it shall include in any contract for sale, merger, or transfer a provision 
binding the purchaser to the obligations set forth in this Agreement. 
19. The Respondent understands and agrees that the Agreement only provides 
protection against enforcement actions arising from the Investigation and does not relate 
to any other violations or any individual or entity other than the Respondent. 
8 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
VOLUNTARY AGREEMENT 

20. The Respondent’s decision to enter into this Agreement is freely and voluntarily 
made and is not the result of force, threats, assurances, promises, or representations other 
than those contained in this Agreement. 
21. The Respondent has read and understands this Agreement.  Furthermore, the 
Respondent has thoroughly reviewed all legal and factual aspects of this Agreement with 
its attorney, has received satisfactory explanations concerning each paragraph of the 
Agreement, and is fully satisfied with its attorney’s legal representation.  After conferring 
with its attorney and considering all available alternatives, the Respondent has made a 
knowing decision to enter into the Agreement. 
22. The Respondent represents that its Board of Trustees has duly authorized, in the 
resolution attached as Exhibit A, the execution and delivery of this Agreement, and that 
the person signing this Agreement has authority to bind the Respondent. 
ENTIRETY OF AGREEMENT 
23. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the Commission and the 
Respondent, and supersedes all prior understandings, if any, whether oral or written, 
relating to the subject matter herein. 
24. This Agreement cannot be modified except in writing, signed by the Respondent 
and a representative of the Commission. 
25. In the event an ambiguity or a question of intent or interpretation arises, this 
Agreement shall be construed as if drafted jointly by the parties hereto, and no  
9 


OCR text (23,144c · tika · 95% conf)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 


DEFERRED PROSECUTION AGREEMENT 

1. In connection with an investigation, the Division of Enforcement (the “Division”) 
of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) alleges 
that the Amish Helping Fund, an Ohio non-profit corporation (the “Respondent” or the 
“Fund”), from in or about November 1995 through in or about June 2010, violated 
Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange 
Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, by knowingly or recklessly making material 
misrepresentations in the sale of securities (the “Investigation”).  Prior to any action or 
proceeding being brought by the Commission against it, the Respondent has offered to 
accept responsibility for its conduct and to not contest or contradict the factual statements 
contained in Paragraph 6 in any future Commission action or proceeding in the event it 
breaches this Agreement.  Accordingly, the Commission and the Respondent enter into 
this deferred prosecution agreement (the “Agreement”) on the following terms and 
conditions: 

TERM 

2. The Respondent understands and agrees that the provisions of this Agreement are 
in full force and effect from July 17, 2012 through July 17, 2014 (the “Deferred Period”), 
unless expressly stated otherwise. 

COOPERATION 

3. The Respondent, a non-profit corporation organized and operating under the laws 
of Ohio, agrees to cooperate fully and truthfully in the Investigation and any related 
action or proceeding against other persons to which the Commission is a party (a 
“Proceeding”), regardless of the time period in which the cooperation is required.  In 
addition, the Respondent agrees to cooperate fully and truthfully, when directed by the 
Division’s staff, in any investigation, action or proceeding by any federal, state, or self-
regulatory organization related to the Investigation and the factual statements contained 
in this Agreement (an “Other Proceeding”).  The full, truthful, and continuing 
cooperation of the Respondent shall include, but not be limited to: 

a. producing, in a responsive and prompt manner, all non-privileged 
documents, information, and other materials to the Commission as requested by the 
Division’s staff, wherever located, in the possession, custody, or control of the 
Respondent; 

b. using its best efforts to secure the full, truthful, and continuing 
cooperation, as defined in Paragraph 4, of its current and former directors, officers, 
trustees, employees, and agents, including making these persons available, when 



 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

requested to do so by the Division’s staff, at the Respondent’s expense, for interviews 
and the provision of testimony in any Proceeding or Other Proceeding; and 

c. entering into tolling agreements during the Deferred Period with any 
federal, state, or self-regulatory organization in connection with any Other Proceeding, 
when requested to do so by the Division’s staff. 

4. The full, truthful, and continuing cooperation of each person described in 
Paragraph 3(b) above will be subject to the procedures and protections of this paragraph, 
and shall include, but not be limited to: 

a. producing all non-privileged documents and other materials as requested 
by the Division’s staff; 

b. appearing for interviews, at such times and places, as requested by the 
Division’s staff; 

c. responding to all inquiries, when requested to do so by the Division’s 
staff, in connection with any Proceeding or Other Proceeding; and  

d. testifying at trial and other judicial proceedings, when requested to do so 
by the Division’s staff, in connection with any Proceeding or Other Proceeding. 

STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS 

5. The Respondent agrees that the running of any statute of limitations applicable to 
any action or proceeding against it authorized, instituted, or brought by or on behalf of 
the Commission arising out of the Investigation (an “Enforcement Action”), including 
any sanctions or relief that may be imposed therein, is tolled and suspended during the 
Deferred Period. 

a. The Respondent and any of its attorneys or agents shall not include the 
Deferred Period in the calculation of the running of any statute of limitations or for any 
other time-related defense applicable to any Enforcement Action, including any sanctions 
or relief that may be imposed therein, in asserting or relying upon any such time-related 
defense. 

b. This Agreement shall not affect any statute of limitations or other time-
related defense that may be available to the Respondent before the commencement of the 
Deferred Period or be construed to revive any Enforcement Action that may be barred by 
any applicable statute of limitations or other time-related defense before the 
commencement of the Deferred Period. 

c. The running of any statute of limitations or other time-related defense 
applicable to any Enforcement Action shall commence again after the end of the Deferred 
Period. If there is an extension of the Deferred Period executed in writing by or on behalf 

2 




 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 
 

 

 
 

 

                                                 
  
   

     
 

of the parties hereto, then the running of any statute of limitations or other time-related 
defense applicable to any Enforcement Action shall commence again only after the end 
of the extension of the Deferred Period. 

d. This Agreement is not intended as, and shall not be construed as, an 
admission by the Commission relating to the applicability of any statute of limitations to 
any Enforcement Action, including any sanctions or relief that may be imposed therein, 
or to the length of any limitations period that may apply, or to the applicability of, any 
other time-related defense.  

STATEMENT OF FACTS1 

6. If this case had gone to trial, the Commission would have presented evidence 
sufficient to prove the following facts: 

a. In or about November 1995 the Amish Helping Fund, a religious-based 
organization, was established in Sugarcreek, Ohio with the stated non-profit purpose of 
preserving the Amish way of life by raising funds to loan to Amish families to enable 
them to purchase real estate or make construction improvements to existing real estate. 

b. From in or about November 1995 through in or about June 2010, the 
Amish Helping Fund offered and sold investment contracts to thousands of investors in 
the Amish community, raising more than $125 million. 

c. The Fund is run by a Board of Trustees comprised of a group of elders in 
the Amish community.  To apply for a loan, prospective Amish borrowers would 
approach the member of the Board of Trustees who lived nearest to them.  The Board of 
Trustees would consider the application and decide whether to fund a particular loan.  
The loans were documented and recorded using a local law firm, with the borrowers 
paying the associated legal expenses. 

d. Prospective investors interested in purchasing investment contracts from 
the Amish Helping Fund were given a confidential offering memorandum drafted in 1995 
(the “Memorandum”) by the Treasurer of the Fund.  The Memorandum was the primary 
disclosure document provided to an investor at the time of his or her investment. 

e. The Memorandum, which was factually correct when originally drafted in 
1995, was not revised or updated over time to reflect material changes in business 
practices. Specifically, the Memorandum failed to reflect changes in the history of 
operations of the Fund, the cash reserves of the Fund, the use of investor monies, and the 
ability of investors to redeem their investments.  Despite making changes in its business 

1 The facts set forth in Paragraph 6 are made pursuant to settlement negotiations in connection with the 
violations alleged by the Division in Paragraph 1 of this Agreement and are not binding on any person 
other than the Respondent.  Nothing in this Agreement shall limit or otherwise affect the Respondent’s 
testimonial obligations or right to take legal or factual positions in any action or proceeding to which the 
Commission is not a party. 

3 




 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 

practices, the Amish Helping Fund continued to use the Memorandum after 1995, thereby 
distributing a document that contained statements that were no longer accurate. 

f. Specifically, the Memorandum contained the following statements, which 
became inaccurate after 1995: 

STATEMENT REASON IT IS FALSE OR 
MISLEADING 

“The Fund has only recently been formed.  From November 1996 through August 
The Fund does not have any historical 2010, the Fund had historical financial and 
financial or operating data upon which an operating data upon which investors could 
investor in the investment agreements can base their decision whether or not to invest 
base his or her decision to invest or not with the Fund. 
invest…” 
“All of the money invested will not be used After the first year of operations, the Fund 
for purchasing real estate. A reserve of never maintained a 15% reserve in liquid 
approximately fifteen percent (15%) will investments. 
be kept to cover the needs of the 
Fund…Such funds will be kept in liquid 
investments such as money market 
accounts or certificates of deposit at 
lending institutions…” 
“With the money invested in the Fund, the While the Fund initially purchased real 
Fund will purchase real estate and sell it to estate and sold it to borrowers pursuant to 
buyers pursuant to land contracts.” land contracts, within the first few years of 

operations, the Fund ceased this practice. 
The Fund then used investor funds to make 
mortgage and construction loans, not to 
purchase real estate. 

“If the Trustees consent and sufficient 
funds are available, the Fund will redeem 
the Investment Agreements within thirty 
(30) days of their tender by the Investor.  It 
is the intent of the Fund to be able to honor 
all Members’ wishes to redeem Investment 
Agreements.  Based on the Founders’ 
understanding of communities in Indiana 
and Illinois, this has not been a problem, 
but there is no guarantee that the fund will 
be able to redeem all Investment 
Agreements tendered to it.” 

The Fund did not disclose that, because the 
vast majority of investor funds were 
deployed in mortgage loans, many of 
which had 15 or 20 year terms, there could 
never be enough funds available for 
redemption if the number of redemption 
requests exceeded a certain level. 

g. Each of the statements listed in Paragraph 6(f) above were false and 
misleading, and constituted information that a reasonable investor would consider 
important in making an investment decision. 

4 



 

 

 

 
 

 

 
 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 

h. Despite making periodic oral representations as to the financial condition 
and purpose of the investment at meetings, the Respondent knew or was reckless in not 
knowing that it was making material written misrepresentations to investors.  The Board 
of Trustees and the Treasurer of the Respondent knew or were reckless in not knowing 
that the Memorandum had been drafted in 1995 and was never revised or updated, yet 
they continued to provide it to prospective investors. 

i. To date, the investors have suffered no realized losses.  In addition, there 
have been no foreclosures. 

j. Notwithstanding the facts recited in Paragraph 6(i) above, the material 
misrepresentations the Respondent made to investors operated as a fraud and deceit upon 
investors. 

k. After the Division’s staff raised the misrepresentations listed in Paragraph 
6(f) with the Fund, the Fund: 

(i)	 retained an independent certified public accountant to perform 
ongoing audits of the Fund’s financial statements, the first of 
which was completed in 2010; 

(ii)	 updated and corrected its offering memorandum, and provided 
existing investors with the corrected offering memorandum; 

(iii)	 registered its past securities offerings with the Ohio Division of 
Securities, and offered all existing investors the right of rescission; 

(iv)	 registered a new securities offering with the Ohio Division of 
Securities; and 

(v)	 consented to a cease-and-desist order with the Ohio Division of 
Securities, waiving its right to appeal. 

l. Almost no investors accepted the Fund’s offer of the right of rescission. 

PROHIBITIONS 

7. During the Deferred Period, the Respondent understands and agrees to comply 
with the following prohibitions: 

a.	 to refrain from violating the federal and state securities laws; and 

b.	 to refrain from violating the applicable rules promulgated by any self- 
regulatory organization. 

UNDERTAKINGS 

8. During the Deferred Period, the Respondent understands and agrees to perform 
the following undertakings: 

5 




 

 

 

 

 
 

 
 

 
  

 

 

                                                 
  

 

   

a. to provide written notification to the Division, within five days, if it is 
questioned, charged, or convicted of any offense by any federal, state, or local law 
enforcement organization or regulatory agency; 

b. to provide written notification to the Division, within five days, if it is 
questioned, a formal or informal complaint has been made against it, or disciplinary 
action is taken against it by any self-regulatory organization; 

c. to retain, at its own expense, and cooperate fully with an independent 
certified public accountant not unacceptable to the Division that is authorized: 

(i) 	 to perform an annual audit in accordance with generally accepted 
auditing standards; and 

(ii) 	 to issue an opinion as to whether the Respondent’s financial 
statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial 
position of the Respondent in conformity with generally accepted 
accounting principles, 

with the first such audit to be completed before the beginning of the Deferred Period2; 

d. to provide all existing and prospective investors with accurate financial 
information about the Respondent, including allowing each existing and prospective 
investor the opportunity to review the Respondent’s most recent audited financial 
statements; 

e. to provide all existing and prospective investors with a new offering 
memorandum that includes complete and accurate information about the Respondent, 
including, but not limited to, descriptions of:  the Respondent’s operations, the securities 
offered, the risks associated with the investment, and the management of the 
Respondent3; 

f. to offer the right of rescission to all existing investors, in compliance with 
all applicable federal and/or state securities registration provisions4; 

g. to register any new securities offerings with the Ohio Division of 
Securities and/or the Commission, as appropriate;  

h. to adopt on or before the beginning of the Deferred Period and implement 
thereafter comprehensive procedures designed to prevent future violations of the federal 
securities laws, including, but not limited to, procedures regarding disclosure of the 
nature of any investments offered to existing and prospective investors; and 

2 Apple Growth Partners (“AGP”) has completed audits of the Fund’s financial statements for the period 
ended June 30, 2010.  The Fund has since retained Rea & Associates (“Rea”) to audit its financial 
statements, and Rea will continue to audit the Fund’s financial statements on an ongoing basis.  Neither 
AGP nor Rea is unacceptable to the Division. 
3 A new offering document was provided to existing investors beginning on December 30, 2010 and will be 
provided to prospective investors in the future. 
4 A rescission offer was made to all existing investors beginning on December 30, 2010. 

6 




 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 
 

 

 
 

 

 
 

 

i. to provide the Division with a written certification of compliance with the 
prohibitions and undertakings in this Agreement between forty-five and sixty days before 
the end of the Deferred Period. 

PUBLIC STATEMENTS 

9. After the Deferred Period begins, the Respondent agrees not to take any action or 
to make or permit any public statement through present or future attorneys, employees, 
directors, officers, trustees, agents, or other persons authorized to speak for it, except in 
legal proceedings in which the Commission is not a party, denying, directly or indirectly, 
any aspect of this Agreement or creating the impression that the statements in Paragraph 
6 of this Agreement are without factual basis.  This Paragraph 9 is not intended to apply 
to any statement made by an individual in the course of any criminal, civil, or regulatory 
proceeding initiated by a government or self-regulatory organization against such 
individual, unless such individual is speaking on behalf of the Respondent.  If it is 
determined by the Commission that a public statement by the Respondent, or any related 
person contradicts in whole or in part this Agreement, the Commission, at its sole 
discretion, may bring an action or proceeding against the Respondent in accordance with 
Paragraphs 12 through 15. 

10. Prior to issuing any press release concerning this Agreement, the Respondent 
agrees to have the text of the release approved by the staff of the Division. 

SERVICE 

11. The Respondent agrees to serve by hand delivery or by next-day mail all written 
notices and correspondence required by or related to this Agreement to John J. Sikora, Jr., 
Assistant Regional Director, Division of Enforcement, Chicago Regional Office, United 
States Securities and Exchange Commission, 175 West Jackson Boulevard, Suite 900, 
Chicago, Illinois, 60604, unless otherwise directed in writing by the staff of the Division. 

VIOLATION OF AGREEMENT 

12. The Respondent understands and agrees that it shall be a violation of this 
Agreement if it knowingly provides false or misleading information or materials in 
connection with any Proceeding or Other Proceeding.  In the event of such misconduct, 
the Division will advise the Commission of the Respondent’s misconduct and may make 
a criminal referral for providing false information (18 U.S.C. § 1001), contempt (18 
U.S.C. §§ 401-402) and/or obstructing justice (18 U.S.C. § 1503 et seq.). 

13. The Respondent understands and agrees that it shall be a violation of this 
Agreement if it violates the federal securities laws during the Deferred Period.  It is 
further understood and agreed that should the Division determine that the Respondent has 
failed to comply with any term or condition of this Agreement, the Division will notify 
the Respondent or its counsel of that determination and provide an opportunity for the 

7 




 

 

 

 

 
 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Respondent to make a submission consistent with the procedures set forth in Securities 
Act of 1933 Release No. 5310. Under these circumstances, the Division may, in its sole 
discretion and not subject to judicial review, recommend to the Commission an action or 
proceeding against the Respondent for any securities law violations, including, but not 
limited to, the substantive offenses relating to the Investigation.  Nothing in this 
Agreement limits the Division’s discretion to recommend to the Commission any action 
or proceeding against the Respondent for future violations of the federal securities laws, 
without notice, to protect the public interest. 

14. The Respondent understands and agrees that any documents, statements, 
information, testimony, or evidence provided by it during any Proceeding or Other 
Proceeding, and any leads derived therefrom, may be used against it in any future action 
or proceeding resulting from its violation of this Agreement. 

15. In the event it breaches this Agreement, the Respondent agrees not to contest or 
contradict in any future Commission action or proceeding the factual statements 
contained in Paragraph 6 above as admissions pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 
801(d)(2). 

COMPLIANCE WITH AGREEMENT 

16. Subject to the full, truthful, and continuing cooperation of the Respondent, as 
described in Paragraphs 3 and 4, and compliance by the Respondent with all obligations, 
prohibitions and undertakings in the Agreement during the Deferred Period, the 
Commission agrees not to bring any action or proceeding against the Respondent arising 
from the Investigation after the conclusion of the Deferred Period. 

17. The Respondent understands and agrees that this Agreement does not bind other 
federal, state or self-regulatory organizations, but the Commission may, at its discretion, 
issue a letter to these organizations detailing the fact, manner, and extent of the 
Respondent’s cooperation during any Proceeding or Other Proceeding, upon the written 
request of the Respondent. 

18. The Respondent understands and agrees that if, during the Deferred Period, it 
sells, merges, or transfers all or substantially all of its business operations as they exist as 
of the date of this Agreement, whether such a sale is structured as a stock or asset sale, 
merger, or transfer, it shall include in any contract for sale, merger, or transfer a provision 
binding the purchaser to the obligations set forth in this Agreement. 

19. The Respondent understands and agrees that the Agreement only provides 
protection against enforcement actions arising from the Investigation and does not relate 
to any other violations or any individual or entity other than the Respondent. 

8 




 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 

VOLUNTARY AGREEMENT 


20. The Respondent’s decision to enter into this Agreement is freely and voluntarily 
made and is not the result of force, threats, assurances, promises, or representations other 
than those contained in this Agreement. 

21. The Respondent has read and understands this Agreement.  Furthermore, the 
Respondent has thoroughly reviewed all legal and factual aspects of this Agreement with 
its attorney, has received satisfactory explanations concerning each paragraph of the 
Agreement, and is fully satisfied with its attorney’s legal representation.  After conferring 
with its attorney and considering all available alternatives, the Respondent has made a 
knowing decision to enter into the Agreement. 

22. The Respondent represents that its Board of Trustees has duly authorized, in the 
resolution attached as Exhibit A, the execution and delivery of this Agreement, and that 
the person signing this Agreement has authority to bind the Respondent. 

ENTIRETY OF AGREEMENT 

23. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the Commission and the 
Respondent, and supersedes all prior understandings, if any, whether oral or written, 
relating to the subject matter herein. 

24. This Agreement cannot be modified except in writing, signed by the Respondent 
and a representative of the Commission. 

25. In the event an ambiguity or a question of intent or interpretation arises, this 
Agreement shall be construed as if drafted jointly by the parties hereto, and no  

9