In re Resolute Capital Partners LTD

[OCR_UNRECOVERABLE method=recover reason=missing_pdf ts=2026-09-26T14:05:04.808Z]                                                           

“SEC” or “Commission”) deems it appropriate to Section 8A of the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”) against Resolute Capital Partners LTD, LLC (“RCP”) and Homebound Resources, LLC (“Homebound”); that public administrative Sections 15(b) and 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), 9(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (“Investment Company Act”) against Stefan T. Toth (“Toth”); and that public administrative and cease

Advisers Act of 1940 (“Advisers Act”) (“Powell”) (collectively, “ ”).

Offer of Settlement (the “Offers”)

except as to the Commission’s jurisdiction over

(“Order”)

(the “Relevant Period”)

The findings herein are made pursuant to Respondents’ Offers of Settle

(“RCP”) is a Nevada company with offices that “gives smart investors access to beyond gas wells.”

(“Homebound”) is a Texas company located in Group, LP (“Homebound Financial”) for RCP’s

(“PetroRock”)

Resolute Capital Advisors, LLC (“RCA”)

listed in Figure 1 (“Equity Funds”)

listed in Figure 2 (“Debt Funds”)

,

Homebound’s operations

a “one pager” document

RCP’s

provided investors with a document drafted by Powell entitled “Tax Benefit ”

including land, royalty/mineral rights, oil and gas working interests, and 20% for “cash reserves.”

the “primary purpose” of Legacy

to “finance the business and ” and

may be used for, among other things, the “repayment of other debt, loans and promissory notes” of PetroRock af fil

Holdings, LLC (“TMH”), an entity owned by Homebound, Powell, and other RCP employees.

“any person in the offer or sale of securities ... directly or indirectly ... to obtain money or

“Willfully,” for purposes of imposing the relief contained in this Order, “means no more than that the person charged with the duty knows what he is doing. ”

D.C. Cir. 1949)). There is no requirement that the actor “also be aware that he is violating one of the Rules or Acts. ”

, which construed the term “willfully” for pu

person has “willfully omit[ted]” material information from a required discl

they were made, not misleading."

“any person in the offer or sale of any securities ... to engage in any transaction, practice, or erate as a fraud or deceit upon the purchaser."

Homebound willfully violated Section 5(a) of the Securities Act, which states that “[u]nless a

or for delivery after sale.”

Homebound willfully violated Section 5(c) of the Securities Act, which states that “[i]t shall be

statement has been filed as to such security."

makes it unlawful for any broker or dealer “to unless such broker or dealer is registered in accordance” with Section 15(b) of the Exchange Act “ ... ” generally

Respondents’ “Consultant”), not unacceptable to the Commission’s staff of the Consultant’s 0) days following the date of the Consultant’s engagement, (“Division”) Consultant’s responsibilities, which shall include the reviews and reports to be made by the

Respondent RCP’s and Homebound’s

(1) has determined that Respondents’ policies and procedures for each of Respondents’ compliance with the federal securities laws identified as

Consultant with access to such of Respondents’

this Order shall not, without prior written consent of the Commission’s Director of

the Commission’s discharge of

s’

Commission’s order and payment of any or all of the following: (a) any disgorgement or civil

Respondent may pay by certified check, bank cashier’s check, or United

respective Respondent’s name

[illegible]