SEC v. Michael Gastauer; Roger Knox; Wintercap SA; Michael T. Gastauer; WB21 US INC.; Silvertown SA Inc., et al., No. 1:18-cv-12058, District of Massachusetts (Mar. 24, 2022) — Judgment
raw: judgment on its claims that defendant Michael Gastauer (“Defendant”) aided and abetted
judgment on its claims that defendant Michael Gastauer (“Defendant”) aided and abetted, No. 1:18-cv-12058 (Mar. 24, 2022)
Michael Gastauer received a default judgment for aiding and abetting securities fraud, resulting in a permanent injunction and a total financial obligation of over $17 million.
The court found Michael Gastauer liable for aiding and abetting violations of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Exchange Act of 1934. He was ordered to pay a total of $17,351,817, which includes $11,264,415 in disgorgement, $1,736,559 in prejudgment interest, and a $4,350,843 civil penalty. The judgment also imposes permanent injunctions against him for future fraudulent securities transactions.
The U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts granted a motion for default judgment in favor of the SEC against Michael Gastauer. The court found that Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as well as Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act of 1934. As a result, Gastauer is permanently enjoined from engaging in fraudulent schemes, making untrue statements of material fact, or conducting unregistered securities sales. The total financial judgment against him amounts to $17,351,817, consisting of $11,264,415 in disgorgement, $1,736,559 in prejudgment interest, and a $4,350,843 civil penalty. This obligation is to be satisfied jointly and severally with several affiliated entities, including Wintercap SA and WB21 US Inc. The court also ordered the transfer of various frozen funds and held trusts to the SEC to satisfy these monetary obligations.
Extracted insights
- $17.35M $17,351,817 $10M–$100M
- $11.26M $11,264,415 $10M–$100M
- $4.35M $4,350,843 $1M–$10M
- $1.74M $1,736,559 $1M–$10M
- $770K $770,376 $100K–$1M
- $598K $597,679 $100K–$1M
- person default judgment
- person defendant michael gastauer
- person final judgment
- person michael gastauer
- agency of the securities and exchange commission for default judgment
- agency Securities and Exchange Commission
- agency the securities and exchange commission
- The Securities and Exchange Commission moved for default judgment on its claims that defendant Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securites Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder
- the Court GRANTS the Commission’s motion
- the Court FINDS that defendant Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securites Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder
- IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED restrains and enjoins Defendant from violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder
- IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED binds Defendant’s officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys and other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant
- IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED restrains and enjoins Defendant from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933
- IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED binds Defendant’s officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys and other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant
- Securities and Exchange Commission moved for default judgment that defendant Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5
- the Court grants the motion for default judgment against defendant Michael Gastauer
- the Court finds that defendant Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
- Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 by using any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce to defraud, make untrue statements, or engage in fraudulent acts
- Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 in the offer or sale of any security by using interstate commerce or mails to defraud, make untrue statements, or engage in fraudulent practices
- SEC moved for default judgment that Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
- Court grants motion for default judgment against Michael Gastauer
- Court finds that Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
- Court restrains and enjoins Michael Gastauer from violating Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
- Court restrains and enjoins Michael Gastauer from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act
- Securities and Exchange Commission moved for default judgment that defendant Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5
- the Court GRANTS the motion of the Securities and Exchange Commission for default judgment against Michael Gastauer
- the Court FINDS that Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
- Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 by using interstate commerce or mails to defraud, make untrue statements, or engage in fraudulent practices
- Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 in the offer or sale of securities by using interstate commerce or mails to defraud, make untrue statements, or engage in fraudulent practices
- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION moved for default judgment that defendant Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5
- the Court GRANTS the motion of the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION for default judgment
- the Court FINDS that defendant Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
- Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 by using any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce in connection with the purchase or sale of any security to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud, make untrue statements, or engage in fraud or deceit
- Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 in the offer or sale of any security by using any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or by use of the mails to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud, obtain money by untrue statements, or engage in fraud or deceit
- SEC moved for default judgment that Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
- Court grants motion for default judgment against Michael Gastauer
- Court finds that Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
- Court restrains and enjoins Michael Gastauer from violating Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
- Court restrains and enjoins Michael Gastauer from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act
- SEC moved for default judgment that Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
- Court grants motion for default judgment against Michael Gastauer
- Court finds that Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
- Court restrains and enjoins Michael Gastauer from violating Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
- Court restrains and enjoins Michael Gastauer from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act
- SEC moved for default judgment that Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
- Court grants motion for default judgment against Michael Gastauer
- Court finds that Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
- Court restrains and enjoins Michael Gastauer from violating Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
- Court restrains and enjoins Michael Gastauer from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act
- Securities and Exchange Commission moved for default judgment that defendant Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5
- the Court grants the motion for default judgment against defendant Michael Gastauer
- the Court finds that defendant Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
- Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 by using any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce to defraud, make untrue statements, or engage in fraudulent practices
- Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 in the offer or sale of any security by using interstate commerce or mails to defraud, make untrue statements, or engage in fraudulent practices
- The Securities and Exchange Commission moved for default judgment on its claims that defendant Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securites Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder
- The Court GRANTS the Commission’s motion FINDS that defendant Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securites Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder
- The Court orders Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating, directly or indirectly, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder
- The Court orders Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933
- SEC moved for default judgment that Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
- Court grants motion for default judgment against Michael Gastauer
- Court finds that Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
- Court restrains and enjoins Michael Gastauer from violating Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
- Court restrains and enjoins Michael Gastauer from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act
- SEC moved for default judgment that Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
- Court grants motion for default judgment against Michael Gastauer
- Court finds that Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
- Court restrains and enjoins Michael Gastauer from violating Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
- Court restrains and enjoins Michael Gastauer from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act
- Securities and Exchange Commission moved for default judgment claims that defendant Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations
- Court grants Commission's motion
- Court finds defendant Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act, and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
- Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5
- Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933
- Final Judgment binds Defendant's officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys
- Final Judgment binds other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant
- Securities and Exchange Commission moved for default judgment that defendant Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
- the Court grants the motion for default judgment against Michael Gastauer
- the Court finds that Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
- the Court orders Michael Gastauer to be permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
- the Court orders Michael Gastauer to be permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act
- SEC moved for default judgment that Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
- Court grants motion for default judgment against Michael Gastauer
- Court finds that Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
- Court restrains and enjoins Michael Gastauer from violating Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
- Court restrains and enjoins Michael Gastauer from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act
- Securities and Exchange Commission moved for default judgment that defendant Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act, and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
- the Court GRANTS the motion for default judgment against defendant Michael Gastauer
- the Court FINDS that defendant Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act, and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
- Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5
- Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933
- SEC moved for default judgment that Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
- Court grants motion for default judgment against Michael Gastauer
- Court finds that Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
- Court restrains and enjoins Michael Gastauer from violating Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
- Court restrains and enjoins Michael Gastauer from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act
- Securities and Exchange Commission moved for default judgment that defendant Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5
- the Court GRANTS the motion of the Securities and Exchange Commission for default judgment against Michael Gastauer
- the Court FINDS that Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
- Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 by using interstate commerce or mails to defraud, make untrue statements, or engage in fraudulent practices
- Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 in the offer or sale of securities by using interstate commerce or mails to defraud, make untrue statements, or engage in fraudulent practices
- SEC moved for default judgment that Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
- Court grants motion for default judgment against Michael Gastauer
- Court finds that Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
- Court restrains and enjoins Michael Gastauer from violating Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
- Court restrains and enjoins Michael Gastauer from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act
- Securities and Exchange Commission moved for default judgment that defendant Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5
- the Court GRANTS the motion for default judgment against defendant Michael Gastauer
- the Court FINDS that defendant Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
- Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 by using any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce to defraud, make untrue statements, or engage in fraudulent acts
- Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 in the offer or sale of any security by using interstate commerce or mails to defraud, make untrue statements, or engage in fraudulent practices
- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION moved for default judgment that defendant Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5
- the Court GRANTS the motion of the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION for default judgment
- the Court FINDS that defendant Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
- Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 by using any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce to defraud, make untrue statements, or engage in fraudulent practices
- Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 in the offer or sale of any security by using interstate commerce or mails to defraud, make untrue statements, or engage in fraudulent practices
- Securities and Exchange Commission moved for default judgment that defendant Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5
- the Court GRANTS the motion for default judgment against defendant Michael Gastauer
- the Court FINDS that defendant Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
- Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 by using any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce to defraud, make untrue statements, or engage in fraudulent acts
- Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 in the offer or sale of any security by using interstate commerce or mails to defraud, make untrue statements, or engage in fraudulent practices
- Securities and Exchange Commission moved for default judgment that defendant Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5
- the Court grants the motion for default judgment against Michael Gastauer
- the Court finds that defendant Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
- Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 by using any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce to defraud, make untrue statements, or engage in fraudulent acts
- Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 in the offer or sale of any security by using interstate commerce or mails to defraud, make untrue statements, or engage in fraudulent practices
- Securities and Exchange Commission moved for default judgment that defendant Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5
- the Court GRANTS the motion of the Securities and Exchange Commission for default judgment against Michael Gastauer
- the Court FINDS that Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
- Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 by using interstate commerce or mails to defraud, make untrue statements, or engage in fraudulent practices
- Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 in the offer or sale of securities by using interstate commerce or mails to defraud, make untrue statements, or engage in fraudulent practices
- SEC moved for default judgment that Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c), 17(a) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
- Court grants motion for default judgment against Michael Gastauer
- Court finds that Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c), 17(a) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
- Court restrains and enjoins Michael Gastauer from violating Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
- Court restrains and enjoins Michael Gastauer from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act
- Securities and Exchange Commission moved for default judgment that defendant Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5
- the Court GRANTS the motion of the Securities and Exchange Commission for default judgment against Michael Gastauer
- the Court FINDS that Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
- Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 by using any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce in connection with the purchase or sale of any security to defraud, make untrue statements, or engage in fraudulent practices
- Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 in the offer or sale of any security by using interstate commerce or mails to defraud, make untrue statements, or engage in fraudulent practices
- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION moved for default judgment that defendant Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act, and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
- the Court GRANTS the motion of the Securities and Exchange Commission for default judgment
- the Court FINDS that defendant Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act, and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
- Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 by using any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce to defraud, make untrue statements, or engage in fraudulent practices
- Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 in the offer or sale of any security by using interstate commerce or mails to defraud, make untrue statements, or engage in fraudulent practices
- SEC moved for default judgment that Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
- Court grants motion for default judgment against Michael Gastauer
- Court finds that Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
- Court restrains and enjoins Michael Gastauer from violating Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
- Court restrains and enjoins Michael Gastauer from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act
- Securities and Exchange Commission moved for default judgment that defendant Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5
- the Court GRANTS the motion of the Securities and Exchange Commission for default judgment against Michael Gastauer
- the Court FINDS that Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
- Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 by using interstate commerce or mails to defraud, make untrue statements, or engage in fraudulent practices
- Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 in the offer or sale of securities by using interstate commerce or mails to defraud, make untrue statements, or engage in fraudulent practices
- Securities and Exchange Commission moved for default judgment that defendant Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5
- the Court GRANTS the motion for default judgment against defendant Michael Gastauer
- the Court FINDS that defendant Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
- Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 by using any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce to defraud, make untrue statements, or engage in fraudulent acts
- Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 in the offer or sale of any security by using interstate commerce or mails to defraud, make untrue statements, or engage in fraudulent practices
- Securities and Exchange Commission moved for default judgment that defendant Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5
- the Court GRANTS the motion of the Securities and Exchange Commission for default judgment against Michael Gastauer
- the Court FINDS that Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
- Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 by using interstate commerce or mails to defraud, make untrue statements, or engage in fraudulent practices
- Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 in the offer or sale of securities by using interstate commerce or mails to defraud, make untrue statements, or engage in fraudulent practices
- Securities and Exchange Commission moved for default judgment that defendant Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act, and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
- the Court GRANTS the motion of the Securities and Exchange Commission for default judgment
- the Court FINDS that defendant Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act, and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
- Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5
- Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933
- SEC moved for default judgment that Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
- Court grants motion for default judgment against Michael Gastauer
- Court finds that Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
- Court restrains and enjoins Michael Gastauer from violating Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
- Court restrains and enjoins Michael Gastauer from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act
- SEC moved for default judgment that Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c), 17(a) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
- Court grants motion for default judgment against Michael Gastauer
- Court finds that Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c), 17(a) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
- Court restrains and enjoins Michael Gastauer from violating Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
- Court restrains and enjoins Michael Gastauer from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act
- Securities and Exchange Commission moved for default judgment that defendant Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
- the Court GRANTS the motion for default judgment against defendant Michael Gastauer
- the Court FINDS that defendant Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
- Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 by using means of interstate commerce to defraud, make untrue statements, or engage in fraudulent practices
- Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act by using interstate commerce or mails to defraud, make untrue statements, or engage in fraudulent practices in securities offers or sales
- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION moved for default judgment
- Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act
- Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act
- Court GRANTS Commission’s motion
- Defendant is restrained and enjoined from violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
- Defendant is restrained and enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933
- Securities and Exchange Commission moved for default judgment
- Court GRANTS Commission’s motion
- Court FINDS that defendant Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations
- Defendant Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a) of the Securities Act
- Defendant Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
- Court orders permanent restraint and injunction against violating Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act
- Court orders permanent restraint and injunction against violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act
- Defendant is restrained and enjoined from violating Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
- Defendant is restrained and enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act
- Defendant is bound by Final Judgment
- Defendant’s officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys are bound by Final Judgment
- other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant are bound by Final Judgment
- Securities and Exchange Commission filed motion for default judgment
- Case No. 1:18-cv-12058-RGS filed on 03/23/22
- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION moved for default judgment
- Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ___________________________________________ ) SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 1:18-cv-12058-RGS ) ROGER KNOX, WINTERCAP SA, ) MICHAEL T. GASTAUER, WB21 US ) INC., SILVERTON SA INC., WB21 NA ) INC., C CAPITAL CORP., WINTERCAP ) SA INC. AND B2 CAP INC. ) ) Defendants, ) and ) ) RAIMUND GASTAUER, SIMONE ) GASTAUER FOEHR, B21 LTD., SHAMAL ) INTERNATIONAL FZE, AND WB21 DMCC ) ) Relief Defendants. ) ___________________________________________ ) FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT MICHAEL GASTAUER The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) having moved for default judgment on its claims that defendant Michael Gastauer (“Defendant”) aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securites Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”), and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, the Court now GRANTS the Commission’s motion, FINDS that defendant Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securites Act, and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and further orders as follows: 2 I. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating, directly or indirectly, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) [15 U.S.C. §78j(b)] and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder [17 C.F.R. §240.10b-5], by using any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce, or of the mails, or of any facility of any national securities exchange, in connection with the purchase or sale of any security: (a)to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; (b)to make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or (c)to engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a). II. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) [15 U.S.C. §77q(a)] in the offer or sale of any security by the use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or by use of the 3 mails, directly or indirectly: (a)to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; (b)to obtain money or property by means of any untrue statement of a material fact or any omission of a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or (c)to engage in any transaction, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon the purchaser. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a). III. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 5 of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. §77e] by, directly or indirectly, in the absence of any applicable exemption: (a)Unless a registration statement is in effect as to a security, making use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or of the mails to sell such security through the use or medium of any prospectus or otherwise; (b)Unless a registration statement is in effect as to a security, carrying or causing to be carried through the mails or in interstate commerce, by any means or 4 instruments of transportation, any such security for the purpose of sale or for delivery after sale; or (c)Making use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or of the mails to offer to sell or offer to buy through the use or medium of any prospectus or otherwise any security, unless a registration statement has been filed with the Commission as to such security, or while the registration statement is the subject of a refusal order or stop order or (prior to the effective date of the registration statement) any public proceeding or examination under Section 8 of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. §77h]. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a). IV. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is liable for disgorgement of $11,264,415 representing net profits gained as a result of the conduct alleged in the Complaint, together with prejudgment interest thereon in the amount of $1,736,559, jointly and severally with: Silverton SA Inc., WB21 NA Inc., WB21 US Inc., C Capital Corp., Wintercap SA Inc., and B2 Cap Inc., and a civil penalty in the amount of $4,350,843 pursuant to 15 U.S.C. §§77t(d) & 78u(d)(3). Defendant shall satisfy this obligation by paying $17,351,817 to the Securities and Exchange Commission within 30 days after entry of this Final Judgment. 5 Defendant may transmit payment electronically to the Commission, which will provide detailed ACH transfer/Fedwire instructions upon request. Payment may also be made directly from a bank account via Pay.gov through the SEC website at http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/ofm.htm. Defendant may also pay by certified check, bank cashier’s check, or United States postal money order payable to the Securities and Exchange Commission, which shall be delivered or mailed to Enterprise Services Center Accounts Receivable Branch 6500 South MacArthur Boulevard Oklahoma City, OK 73169 and shall be accompanied by a letter identifying the case title, civil action number, and name of this Court; Michael Gastauer as a defendant in this action; and specifying that payment is made pursuant to this Final Judgment. Defendant shall simultaneously transmit photocopies of evidence of payment and case identifying information to the Commission’s counsel in this action. By making this payment, Defendant relinquishes all legal and equitable right, title, and interest in such funds and no part of the funds shall be returned to Defendant. The Commission may enforce the Court’s judgment for disgorgement and prejudgment interest by using all collection procedures authorized by law, including, but not limited to, moving for civil contempt at any time after 30 days following entry of this Final Judgment. The Commission may enforce the Court’s judgment for penalties by the use of all collection procedures authorized by law, including the Federal Debt Collection Procedures Act, 28 U.S.C. §3001 et seq., and moving for civil contempt for the violation of any Court orders issued in this action. Defendant shall pay post judgment interest on any amounts due after 30 days of the entry of this Final Judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1961. The Commission shall 6 hold the funds, together with any interest and income earned thereon (collectively, the “Fund”), pending further order of the Court. The Commission may propose a plan to distribute the Fund subject to the Court’s approval. Such a plan may provide that the Fund shall be distributed pursuant to the Fair Fund provisions of Section 308(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The Court shall retain jurisdiction over the administration of any distribution of the Fund and the Fund may only be disbursed pursuant to an Order of the Court. Regardless of whether any such Fair Fund distribution is made, amounts ordered to be paid as civil penalties pursuant to this Judgment shall be treated as penalties paid to the government for all purposes, including all tax purposes. To preserve the deterrent effect of the civil penalty, Defendant shall not, after offset or reduction of any award of compensatory damages in any Related Investor Action based on Defendant’s payment of disgorgement in this action, argue that it is entitled to, nor shall it further benefit by, offset or reduction of such compensatory damages award by the amount of any part of Defendant’s payment of a civil penalty in this action (“Penalty Offset”). If the court in any Related Investor Acti on grants such a Penalty Offset, Defendant shall, within 30 days after entry of a final order granting the Penalty Offset, notify the Commission’s counsel in this action and pay the amount of the Penalty Offset to the United States Treasury or to a Fair Fund, as the Commission directs. Such a payment shall not be deemed an additional civil penalty and shall not be deemed to change the amount of the civil penalty imposed in this Judgment. For purposes of this paragraph, a “Related Investor Action” means a private damages action brought against Defendant by or on behalf of one or more investors based on substantially the same facts as alleged in the Complaint in this action. 7 Enterprise Services Center Accounts Receivable Branch 6500 South MacArthur Boulevard Oklahoma City, OK 73169 and shall be accompanied by a letter identifying the case title, civil action number, and name of this Court; and specifying that payment is made pursuant to this Final Judgment. VI. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the sums currently held in trust for the benefit of Defendants in this action by Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP (“Quinn Emanuel”), which total $770,376.36, plus any accrued interest, shall be transferred to the Commission in partial satisfaction of this monetary judgment. Quinn Emanuel may transmit payment electronically to the Commission, which will provide detailed ACH transfer/Fedwire instructions upon request. Payment may also be made directly from a bank account via Pay.gov through the SEC website at http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/ofm.htm . V. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the sums on deposit in the Court’s Registry Account that were recovered from Netjets and Defendant’s former counsel, which total at l east $597,679.58, shall be transferred to the Commission in partial satisfaction of this monetary judgment. The Court’s Registry Account may transmit payment electronically to the Commission, which will provide detailed ACH transfer/Fedwire instructions upon request. Payment may also be made directly from a bank account via Pay.gov through the SEC website at http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/ofm.htm. The Court’s Registry Account also may transfer these funds by certified check, bank cashier’s check, or United States postal money order payable to the Securities and Exchange Commission, which shall be delivered or mailed to 8 Enterprise Services Center Accounts Receivable Branch 6500 South MacArthur Boulevard Oklahoma City, OK 73169 and shall be accompanied by a letter identifying the case title, civil action number, and name of this Court; and specifying that payment is made pursuant to this Final Judgment. VII. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that within 3 days after being served with a copy of this Final Judgment, WB21 Pte. Ltd. shall transfer the entire balance of the following WB21 Pte. Ltd. account(s), including any accrued interest, which were frozen pursuant to an Order of this Court to the Commission: Account Owner Currency Acct. Ending in: Wintercap SA USD ****1467 Wintercap SA CAD ****4730 Wintercap SA EUR ****6456 Wintercap SA CHF ****1468 Wintercap SA GBP ****5457 WB21 Pte. Ltd. may transmit payment electronically to the Commission, which will provide detailed ACH transfer/Fedwire instructions upon request. Payment may also be made directly from a bank account via Pay.gov through the SEC website at http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/ofm.htm . WB21 Pte. Ltd. also may transfer these funds by certified check, bank cashier’s check, or United States postal money order payable to the Securities and Exchange Commission, which shall be delivered or mailed to Quinn Emanuel also may transfer these funds by certified check, bank cashier’s check, or United States postal money order payable to the Securities and Exchange Commission, which shall be delivered or mailed to 9 and shall be accompanied by a letter identifying the case title, civil action number, and name of this Court; and specifying that payment is made pursuant to this Final Judgment. VIII. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, solely for purposes of exceptions to discharge set forth in Section 523 of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. §523, the allegations in the complaint are true and admitted by Defendant, and further, any debt for disgorgement, prejudgment interest, civil penalty or other amounts due by Defendant under this Final Judgment or any other judgment, order, consent order, decree or settlement agreement entered in connection with this proceeding, is a debt for the violation by Michael Gastauer of the federal securities laws or any regulation or order issued under such laws, as set forth in Section 523(a)(19) of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. §523(a)(19). I X. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Final Judgment. X. There being no just reason for delay, pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Clerk is ordered to enter this Final Judgment forthwith and without further notice. Dated: March 23, 2022 ____________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Enterprise Services Center Accounts Receivable Branch 6500 South MacArthur Boulevard Oklahoma City, OK 73169 /s/ Richard G. Stearns
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ___________________________________________ ) SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 1:18-cv-12058-RGS ) ROGER KNOX, WINTERCAP SA, ) MICHAEL T. GASTAUER, WB21 US ) INC., SILVERTON SA INC., WB21 NA ) INC., C CAPITAL CORP., WINTERCAP ) SA INC. AND B2 CAP INC. ) ) Defendants, ) and ) ) RAIMUND GASTAUER, SIMONE ) GASTAUER FOEHR, B21 LTD., SHAMAL ) INTERNATIONAL FZE, AND WB21 DMCC ) ) Relief Defendants. ) ___________________________________________ ) FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT MICHAEL GASTAUER The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) having moved for default judgment on its claims that defendant Michael Gastauer (“Defendant”) aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securites Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”), and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, the Court now GRANTS the Commission’s motion, FINDS that defendant Michael Gastauer aided and abetted violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securites Act, and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and further orders as follows: Case 1:18-cv-12058-RGS Document 241 Filed 03/23/22 Page 1 of 9 2 I. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating, directly or indirectly, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) [15 U.S.C. §78j(b)] and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder [17 C.F.R. §240.10b-5], by using any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce, or of the mails, or of any facility of any national securities exchange, in connection with the purchase or sale of any security: (a) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; (b) to make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or (c) to engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a). II. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) [15 U.S.C. §77q(a)] in the offer or sale of any security by the use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or by use of the Case 1:18-cv-12058-RGS Document 241 Filed 03/23/22 Page 2 of 9 3 mails, directly or indirectly: (a) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; (b) to obtain money or property by means of any untrue statement of a material fact or any omission of a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or (c) to engage in any transaction, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon the purchaser. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a). III. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 5 of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. §77e] by, directly or indirectly, in the absence of any applicable exemption: (a) Unless a registration statement is in effect as to a security, making use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or of the mails to sell such security through the use or medium of any prospectus or otherwise; (b) Unless a registration statement is in effect as to a security, carrying or causing to be carried through the mails or in interstate commerce, by any means or Case 1:18-cv-12058-RGS Document 241 Filed 03/23/22 Page 3 of 9 4 instruments of transportation, any such security for the purpose of sale or for delivery after sale; or (c) Making use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or of the mails to offer to sell or offer to buy through the use or medium of any prospectus or otherwise any security, unless a registration statement has been filed with the Commission as to such security, or while the registration statement is the subject of a refusal order or stop order or (prior to the effective date of the registration statement) any public proceeding or examination under Section 8 of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. §77h]. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a). IV. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is liable for disgorgement of $11,264,415 representing net profits gained as a result of the conduct alleged in the Complaint, together with prejudgment interest thereon in the amount of $1,736,559, jointly and severally with: Silverton SA Inc., WB21 NA Inc., WB21 US Inc., C Capital Corp., Wintercap SA Inc., and B2 Cap Inc., and a civil penalty in the amount of $4,350,843 pursuant to 15 U.S.C. §§77t(d) & 78u(d)(3). Defendant shall satisfy this obligation by paying $17,351,817 to the Securities and Exchange Commission within 30 days after entry of this Final Judgment. Case 1:18-cv-12058-RGS Document 241 Filed 03/23/22 Page 4 of 9 5 Defendant may transmit payment electronically to the Commission, which will provide detailed ACH transfer/Fedwire instructions upon request. Payment may also be made directly from a bank account via Pay.gov through the SEC website at http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/ofm.htm. Defendant may also pay by certified check, bank cashier’s check, or United States postal money order payable to the Securities and Exchange Commission, which shall be delivered or mailed to Enterprise Services Center Accounts Receivable Branch 6500 South MacArthur Boulevard Oklahoma City, OK 73169 and shall be accompanied by a letter identifying the case title, civil action number, and name of this Court; Michael Gastauer as a defendant in this action; and specifying that payment is made pursuant to this Final Judgment. Defendant shall simultaneously transmit photocopies of evidence of payment and case identifying information to the Commission’s counsel in this action. By making this payment, Defendant relinquishes all legal and equitable right, title, and interest in such funds and no part of the funds shall be returned to Defendant. The Commission may enforce the Court’s judgment for disgorgement and prejudgment interest by using all collection procedures authorized by law, including, but not limited to, moving for civil contempt at any time after 30 days following entry of this Final Judgment. The Commission may enforce the Court’s judgment for penalties by the use of all collection procedures authorized by law, including the Federal Debt Collection Procedures Act, 28 U.S.C. §3001 et seq., and moving for civil contempt for the violation of any Court orders issued in this action. Defendant shall pay post judgment interest on any amounts due after 30 days of the entry of this Final Judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1961. The Commission shall Case 1:18-cv-12058-RGS Document 241 Filed 03/23/22 Page 5 of 9 6 hold the funds, together with any interest and income earned thereon (collectively, the “Fund”), pending further order of the Court. The Commission may propose a plan to distribute the Fund subject to the Court’s approval. Such a plan may provide that the Fund shall be distributed pursuant to the Fair Fund provisions of Section 308(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The Court shall retain jurisdiction over the administration of any distribution of the Fund and the Fund may only be disbursed pursuant to an Order of the Court. Regardless of whether any such Fair Fund distribution is made, amounts ordered to be paid as civil penalties pursuant to this Judgment shall be treated as penalties paid to the government for all purposes, including all tax purposes. To preserve the deterrent effect of the civil penalty, Defendant shall not, after offset or reduction of any award of compensatory damages in any Related Investor Action based on Defendant’s payment of disgorgement in this action, argue that it is entitled to, nor shall it further benefit by, offset or reduction of such compensatory damages award by the amount of any part of Defendant’s payment of a civil penalty in this action (“Penalty Offset”). If the court in any Related Investor Action grants such a Penalty Offset, Defendant shall, within 30 days after entry of a final order granting the Penalty Offset, notify the Commission’s counsel in this action and pay the amount of the Penalty Offset to the United States Treasury or to a Fair Fund, as the Commission directs. Such a payment shall not be deemed an additional civil penalty and shall not be deemed to change the amount of the civil penalty imposed in this Judgment. For purposes of this paragraph, a “Related Investor Action” means a private damages action brought against Defendant by or on behalf of one or more investors based on substantially the same facts as alleged in the Complaint in this action. Case 1:18-cv-12058-RGS Document 241 Filed 03/23/22 Page 6 of 9 7 Enterprise Services Center Accounts Receivable Branch 6500 South MacArthur Boulevard Oklahoma City, OK 73169 and shall be accompanied by a letter identifying the case title, civil action number, and name of this Court; and specifying that payment is made pursuant to this Final Judgment. VI. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the sums currently held in trust for the benefit of Defendants in this action by Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP (“Quinn Emanuel”), which total $770,376.36, plus any accrued interest, shall be transferred to the Commission in partial satisfaction of this monetary judgment. Quinn Emanuel may transmit payment electronically to the Commission, which will provide detailed ACH transfer/Fedwire instructions upon request. Payment may also be made directly from a bank account via Pay.gov through the SEC website at http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/ofm.htm. V. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the sums on deposit in the Court’s Registry Account that were recovered from Netjets and Defendant’s former counsel, which total at least $597,679.58, shall be transferred to the Commission in partial satisfaction of this monetary judgment. The Court’s Registry Account may transmit payment electronically to the Commission, which will provide detailed ACH transfer/Fedwire instructions upon request. Payment may also be made directly from a bank account via Pay.gov through the SEC website at http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/ofm.htm. The Court’s Registry Account also may transfer these funds by certified check, bank cashier’s check, or United States postal money order payable to the Securities and Exchange Commission, which shall be delivered or mailed to Case 1:18-cv-12058-RGS Document 241 Filed 03/23/22 Page 7 of 9 8 Enterprise Services Center Accounts Receivable Branch 6500 South MacArthur Boulevard Oklahoma City, OK 73169 and shall be accompanied by a letter identifying the case title, civil action number, and name of this Court; and specifying that payment is made pursuant to this Final Judgment. VII. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that within 3 days after being served with a copy of this Final Judgment, WB21 Pte. Ltd. shall transfer the entire balance of the following WB21 Pte. Ltd. account(s), including any accrued interest, which were frozen pursuant to an Order of this Court to the Commission: Account Owner Currency Acct. Ending in: Wintercap SA USD ****1467 Wintercap SA CAD ****4730 Wintercap SA EUR ****6456 Wintercap SA CHF ****1468 Wintercap SA GBP ****5457 WB21 Pte. Ltd. may transmit payment electronically to the Commission, which will provide detailed ACH transfer/Fedwire instructions upon request. Payment may also be made directly from a bank account via Pay.gov through the SEC website at http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/ofm.htm. WB21 Pte. Ltd. also may transfer these funds by certified check, bank cashier’s check, or United States postal money order payable to the Securities and Exchange Commission, which shall be delivered or mailed to Quinn Emanuel also may transfer these funds by certified check, bank cashier’s check, or United States postal money order payable to the Securities and Exchange Commission, which shall be delivered or mailed to Case 1:18-cv-12058-RGS Document 241 Filed 03/23/22 Page 8 of 9 9 and shall be accompanied by a letter identifying the case title, civil action number, and name of this Court; and specifying that payment is made pursuant to this Final Judgment. VIII. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, solely for purposes of exceptions to discharge set forth in Section 523 of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. §523, the allegations in the complaint are true and admitted by Defendant, and further, any debt for disgorgement, prejudgment interest, civil penalty or other amounts due by Defendant under this Final Judgment or any other judgment, order, consent order, decree or settlement agreement entered in connection with this proceeding, is a debt for the violation by Michael Gastauer of the federal securities laws or any regulation or order issued under such laws, as set forth in Section 523(a)(19) of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. §523(a)(19). IX. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Final Judgment. X. There being no just reason for delay, pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Clerk is ordered to enter this Final Judgment forthwith and without further notice. Dated: March 23, 2022 ____________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Enterprise Services Center Accounts Receivable Branch 6500 South MacArthur Boulevard Oklahoma City, OK 73169 /s/ Richard G. Stearns Case 1:18-cv-12058-RGS Document 241 Filed 03/23/22 Page 9 of 9