2025-12-05 sec-litreleases complaint 244 KB 140 chars

SEC v. SHAHIN AHMED, No. 1:25-cv-06730, Eastern District of New York (Dec. 5, 2025) — Complaint

raw: SEC v. SHAHIN AHMED

SEC v. SHAHIN AHMED, No. 1:25-cv-06730 (Dec. 5, 2025)

Caption
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Ahmed
Source PDF JSON

Enriched metadata

Scheme
investment-adviser-fraud (100%)
Court
Eastern District of New York
Case No.
1:25-cv-06730
Victim loss
$300,000
Entity
SHAHIN AHMED
Classified investment-adviser-fraud(confidence 100%). EDGAR detection: forms ADV/ADV-E/ADV-W/Form D· recall 33% / precision 13%. detection rule →
Statutes
15 U.S.C. § 77q(a)15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)15 U.S.C. § 77t(d)15 U.S.C. § 80b15 U.S.C. § 77t(b)15 U.S.C. § 80b-915 U.S.C. § 77v(a)15 U.S.C. § 78aa15 U.S.C. § 80b-1415 U.S.C. § 80b-2(11)15 U.S.C. § 77t15 U.S.C. § 78u15 U.S.C. § 77t(e)17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5Section 17(a) of the Securities ActSection 10(b) of the Securities Exchange ActSections 206(1) and 206(2) of the Investment Advisers ActSections 206(1) and 206(2) of the Investment Advisers ActRule 10b-5
Parties
Securities and Exchange CommissionAhmed
Keywords
ahmedinvestorinvestment adviserinvestmentadviserhonest partnerssecuritiesaccountbrokerage accountbrokeragedocument pagepage pageidsecurities exchangedirectly indirectlyinvestor investor

Extracted insights

Entities 4
  • person SHAHIN AHMED ×2
  • company honest partners llc
  • company investors to deposit money into honest partners llc
  • agency Securities and Exchange Commission
Triples 14
  • Shahin Ahmed defrauded investors
  • Shahin Ahmed posed as a professional money manager
  • Shahin Ahmed was employed as a driver at Investment Adviser a
  • Shahin Ahmed organized Honest Partners LLC
  • Shahin Ahmed induced investors to deposit money into Honest Partners LLC
  • Shahin Ahmed induced investors to grant him control over their online brokerage accounts
  • Shahin Ahmed promised to guarantee investors' principal investment against trading losses
  • Shahin Ahmed provided fake written statements regarding the value of invested assets
  • Shahin Ahmed caused over $1 million in combined losses
  • Shahin Ahmed violated Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933
  • Shahin Ahmed violated Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
  • Shahin Ahmed violated Rule 10b-5
  • Shahin Ahmed violated Sections 206(1) and 206(2) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940
  • Securities And Exchange Commission sought a final judgment permanently enjoining Shahin Ahmed
PDF
SEC v. SHAHIN AHMED · Source
Text layers
Extracted body text (140c) 
[OCR_UNRECOVERABLE method=recover reason=missing_pdf ts=2026-09-29T14:13:06.969Z]