2020-09-28 sec-litreleases litigation_release 65 KB 2,068 chars

SEC v. Marcus Beam, No. LR-24921, Northern District of Illinois (Sept. 28, 2020) — Press Release

raw: Marcus Beam

Marcus Beam, No. LR-24921 (Sept. 28, 2020)

Caption
SEC v. Marcus Beam
summary

The SEC obtained a final judgment against Illinois investment adviser Marcus Beam for defrauding clients through misappropriated funds and fabricated statements.

paragraph

Marcus Beam was ordered to pay $219,921 in disgorgement and prejudgment interest plus a $207,000 civil penalty. The court entered a default final judgment after Beam misappropriated investor funds for personal and business expenses. He faces permanent injunctions against violating various antifraud provisions of the Securities Act, Securities Exchange Act, and Investment Advisers Act.

narrative

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois entered a default final judgment against Marcus Beam for defrauding advisory clients and stealing investment funds. Beam solicited money by promising to invest in pre-IPO shares and other securities but instead misappropriated the vast majority of funds for personal and business expenses. To conceal the fraud, he provided investors with fabricated account statements and failed to return funds when victims sought redemptions. The court ordered Beam to pay $219,921 in disgorgement and prejudgment interest, along with a $207,000 civil penalty. Additionally, Beam is permanently enjoined from violating several antifraud provisions of the Securities Act, Securities Exchange Act, and Investment Advisers Act. The SEC's litigation was supported by the FBI, the U.S. Postal Inspector Service, and the Illinois Secretary of State's Office.

Enriched metadata

Scheme
pre-ipo-fraud (100%)
Court
Northern District of Illinois
Disgorgement
$219,921
Civil penalty
$207,000
Entity
Marcus Beam
Classified pre-ipo-fraud(confidence 100%). EDGAR detection: forms S-1/Form D/1-A· recall 72% / precision 8%. detection rule →
Parties
Securities and Exchange CommissionMarcus Beam
Keywords
beammarcus beaminvestmentsecuritiesmarcussec'sfinal againstsecurities exchangenorthern illinoisfinallitigationseptemberillinoisfundsinvestor

Extracted insights

Dollar amounts 2
  • $220K $219,921 $100K–$1M
  • $207K $207,000 $100K–$1M
Entities 4
  • person advisory clients
  • person investment funds
  • person marcus beam
  • court u.s. district court for the northern district of illinois
Triples 39
  • U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois entered default final judgment against Marcus Beam
  • Marcus Beam defrauded advisory clients
  • Marcus Beam stole investment funds
  • SEC filed complaint on September 30, 2019
  • Marcus Beam solicited money from individuals
  • Marcus Beam obtained money from individuals
  • U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois entered default final judgment against Marcus Beam
  • Marcus Beam defrauded advisory clients
  • Marcus Beam stole investment funds
  • SEC filed complaint on September 30, 2019
  • Marcus Beam solicited money from individuals
  • Marcus Beam obtained money from individuals
  • Marcus Beam promised to invest the money in pre-IPOs
  • Marcus Beam defrauded advisory clients by soliciting and obtaining money under false pretenses of an investment advisory business
  • Marcus Beam stole investment funds from individuals who entrusted him with money for purported pre-IPO investments
  • SEC obtained final judgment against Marcus Beam for fraud and theft of investment funds
  • Marcus Beam defrauded advisory clients by soliciting and obtaining money under false pretenses of an investment advisory business
  • Marcus Beam stole investment funds from individuals who entrusted him with money for purported pre-IPO investments
  • SEC obtained final judgment against Marcus Beam for fraud and theft of investment funds
  • Marcus Beam defrauded advisory clients by soliciting and obtaining money under the pretense of an investment advisory business
  • Marcus Beam stole investment funds from individuals who entrusted him with their money
  • SEC obtained final judgment against Marcus Beam for fraud and theft of investment funds
  • U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois entered default final judgment against Marcus Beam
  • Marcus Beam defrauded advisory clients
  • Marcus Beam stealing investment funds
  • SEC obtained final judgment against IIIinois Investment Adviser
  • Marcus Beam solicited money from individuals
  • Marcus Beam obtained money from individuals
  • Marcus Beam defrauded advisory clients by soliciting and obtaining money under pretense of investment advisory services
  • Marcus Beam stole investment funds from individuals through a purported investment advisory business
  • SEC obtained final judgment against Marcus Beam for fraud and theft of investment funds
  • SEC obtains final judgment against IIIinois Investment Adviser
  • U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois entered default final judgment against Marcus Beam
  • SEC filed complaint
  • SEC obtains final judgment Marcus Beam
  • U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois entered default final judgment Marcus Beam
  • SEC's complaint filed September 30, 2019
  • Beam solicited and obtained money individuals
  • Beam promised to invest money in pre-IPO securities
View original SEC litigation releasesec.gov
Extracted body text (2,068c)
SEC Obtains Final Judgment Against IIIinois Investment Adviser Litigation Release No. 24921 / September 28, 2020 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Marcus Beam, Civil Action No. 19cv6458 (N.D. Ill.) On September 21, 2020, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois entered a default final judgment against Marcus Beam for defrauding advisory clients and stealing investment funds. According to the SEC's complaint, filed on September 30, 2019, Beam solicited and obtained money from individuals in connection with a purported investment advisory business, promising to invest the money in pre-IPO shares and other securities. According to the complaint, Beam misappropriated the vast majority of investor funds for personal and business expenses and provided investors fabricated account statements. The complaint further alleges that, when victims sought to redeem their investments, Beam failed to return the funds. The final judgment permanently enjoins Beam from violating the antifraud provisions of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Sections 206(1), 206(2), and 206(4) and Rule 206(4)-8 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. In addition, the Court ordered Beam to pay disgorgement and prejudgment interest of $219,921 and a civil penalty of $207,000. The SEC's litigation was led by Patrick R. Costello and supervised by Jan M. Folena. David Neuman, supervised by David A. Becker, of the SEC's Asset Management Unit assisted in the litigation. The SEC appreciates the assistance of the Securities Department-Enforcement Division of the Illinois Secretary of State's Office, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the U. S. Postal Inspector Service, and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Northern District of Illinois. The SEC's Retail Strategy Task Force and Office of Investor Education and Advocacy (OIEA) encourage investors to check the background of anyone selling or offering them an investment using the free and simple search tool on Investor.gov.
OCR text (2,068c · html-text · 99% conf)
SEC Obtains Final Judgment Against IIIinois Investment Adviser Litigation Release No. 24921 / September 28, 2020 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Marcus Beam, Civil Action No. 19cv6458 (N.D. Ill.) On September 21, 2020, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois entered a default final judgment against Marcus Beam for defrauding advisory clients and stealing investment funds. According to the SEC's complaint, filed on September 30, 2019, Beam solicited and obtained money from individuals in connection with a purported investment advisory business, promising to invest the money in pre-IPO shares and other securities. According to the complaint, Beam misappropriated the vast majority of investor funds for personal and business expenses and provided investors fabricated account statements. The complaint further alleges that, when victims sought to redeem their investments, Beam failed to return the funds. The final judgment permanently enjoins Beam from violating the antifraud provisions of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Sections 206(1), 206(2), and 206(4) and Rule 206(4)-8 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. In addition, the Court ordered Beam to pay disgorgement and prejudgment interest of $219,921 and a civil penalty of $207,000. The SEC's litigation was led by Patrick R. Costello and supervised by Jan M. Folena. David Neuman, supervised by David A. Becker, of the SEC's Asset Management Unit assisted in the litigation. The SEC appreciates the assistance of the Securities Department-Enforcement Division of the Illinois Secretary of State's Office, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the U. S. Postal Inspector Service, and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Northern District of Illinois. The SEC's Retail Strategy Task Force and Office of Investor Education and Advocacy (OIEA) encourage investors to check the background of anyone selling or offering them an investment using the free and simple search tool on Investor.gov.