SEC v. JOEL J. MARGULIES, No. 1:17-cv-07793, Southern District of New York (May 5, 2020) — Judgment
raw: FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT JOEL J. MARGULIES
FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT JOEL J. MARGULIES, No. 1:17-cv-07793 (May 5, 2020)
Joel J. Margulies consented to a final judgment and permanent injunction following SEC allegations of securities fraud involving untrue statements and material omissions.
The SEC obtained a final judgment against defendant Joel J. Margulies for violations of Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Section 17(a) of the Securities Act. Margulies consented to the court's jurisdiction and the entry of the judgment, which permanently enjoins him from engaging in fraudulent schemes or making material misstatements. The provided legal document does not specify the underlying factual misconduct or specific monetary penalties.
The Securities and Exchange Commission filed an action against Lisa Bershan, Barry B. Schwartz, and Joel J. Margulies for violating anti-fraud provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Securities Act of 1933. In a final judgment in the Southern District of New York, defendant Joel J. Margulies consented to the court's jurisdiction and the entry of the judgment. The court permanently restrained and enjoined Margulies from using any device or scheme to defraud, or making untrue statements of material fact, in connection with the purchase or sale of securities. This injunction also binds his agents, employees, and attorneys, as well as any persons acting in concert with him. While the judgment outlines the legal prohibitions against future violations, the excerpt does not disclose specific dollar amounts or the underlying factual details of the fraud.
Extracted insights
- person against joel j. margulies
- person defendant joel j. margulies
- person general appearance
- person joel j. margulies
- agency Securities and Exchange Commission
- organization Securities and Exchange Commission
- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION filed a Complaint
- Defendant Joel J. Margulies entered a general appearance
- Defendant Joel J. Margulies consented to the Court's jurisdiction
- Defendant Joel J. Margulies consented to entry of this Final Judgment
- Defendant Joel J. Margulies waived findings of fact and conclusions of law
- Defendant Joel J. Margulies waived any right to appeal
- Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
- Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Rule 10b-5
- Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933
- Securities and Exchange Commission filed a Complaint against Joel J. Margulies
- Joel J. Margulies consented to the Court's jurisdiction and entry of this Final Judgment
- Court restrained and enjoined Joel J. Margulies from violating Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
- Court restrained and enjoined Joel J. Margulies from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act
- Securities and Exchange Commission filed Complaint
- Joel J. Margulies entered general appearance
- Joel J. Margulies consented to Court's jurisdiction
- Joel J. Margulies consented to entry of Final Judgment
- Joel J. Margulies waived findings of fact and conclusions of law
- Joel J. Margulies waived right to appeal
- Court ordered permanent restraint and injunction against violating Section 10(b) of Exchange Act
- Court ordered permanent restraint and injunction against violating Rule 10b-5
- Court ordered permanent restraint and injunction against violating Section 17(a) of Securities Act
- Defendant restrained and enjoined from violating Section 10(b) of Exchange Act
- Defendant restrained and enjoined from violating Rule 10b-5
- Defendant restrained and enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of Securities Act
- Defendant employed device, scheme, or artifice to defraud
- Defendant made untrue statement of material fact
- Defendant omitted material fact necessary to make statements not misleading
- Defendant engaged in act, practice, or course of business operating as fraud
- Defendant obtained money or property by means of untrue statement
- Defendant obtained money or property by means of omission of material fact
- Court ordered judgment binds officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys of Defendant
- Court ordered judgment binds persons in active concert or participation with Defendant
- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION filed a Complaint
- Defendant Joel J. Margulies entered a general appearance
- Defendant Joel J. Margulies consented to the Court's jurisdiction over Defendant and the subject matter of this action
- Defendant Joel J. Margulies consented to entry of this Final Judgment
- Defendant Joel J. Margulies waived findings of fact and conclusions of law
- Defendant Joel J. Margulies waived any right to appeal from this Final Judgment
- Defendant Joel J. Margulies is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
- Defendant Joel J. Margulies is permanently restrained and enjoined from employing any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud
- Defendant Joel J. Margulies is permanently restrained and enjoined from making any untrue statement of a material fact or omitting a material fact
- Defendant Joel J. Margulies is permanently restrained and enjoined from engaging in any act, practice, or course of business that operates as fraud or deceit
- Defendant's officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys are bound by the Final Judgment
- Other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant are bound by the Final Judgment
- Defendant Joel J. Margulies is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933
- Defendant Joel J. Margulies is permanently restrained and enjoined from employing any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud in the offer or sale of any security
- Defendant Joel J. Margulies is permanently restrained and enjoined from obtaining money or property by means of any untrue statement or omission of a material fact
- Joel J. Margulies violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
- Joel J. Margulies violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933
- Joel J. Margulies restrained and enjoined from violating securities laws
- Securities and Exchange Commission filed a Complaint
- Joel J. Margulies entered a general appearance
- Joel J. Margulies consented to the Court's jurisdiction
- Joel J. Margulies waived findings of fact and conclusions of law
- Joel J. Margulies waived any right to appeal
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,
Plaintiff,
V.
LISA BERSHAN, BARRY B. SCHWARTZ, and
JOEL J. MARGULIES,
Defendants.
No. 17-CV-7793 (JGK)
FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT JOEL J. MARGULIES
The Securities and Exchange Commission having filed a Complaint and Defendant Joel
J. Margulies ("Defendant") having entered a general appearance; consented to the Court's
jurisdiction over Defendant and the subject matter of this action; consented to entry of this Final
Judgment; waived findings of fact and conclusions of law; and waived any right to appeal from
this Final Judgment:
I.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is
permanently restrained and enjoined from violating, directly or indirectly, Section l0(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") [15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)] and Rule l0b-5
promulgated thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 240.l0b-5], by using any means or instrumentality of
interstate commerce, or of the mails, or of any facility of any national securities exchange, in
connection with the purchase or sale of any security:
(a)
to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud;
(b)
to make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact
necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances
under which they were made, not misleading; or
( c)
to engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would
operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who
receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant's
officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or
participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a).
II.
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant
is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933
(the "Securities Act") [15 U.S.C. § 77q(a)] in the offer or sale of any security by the use of any
means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or by use of the
mails, directly or indirectly:
(a)
to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud;
(b)
to obtain money or property by means of any untrue statement of a material fact
or any omission of a material fact necessary in order to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading;
or
2
United States v. MarguliesUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,
Plaintiff,
V.
LISA BERSHAN, BARRY B. SCHWARTZ, and
JOEL J. MARGULIES,
Defendants.
No. 17-CV-7793 (JGK)
FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT JOEL J. MARGULIES
The Securities and Exchange Commission having filed a Complaint and Defendant Joel
J. Margulies ("Defendant") having entered a general appearance; consented to the Court's
jurisdiction over Defendant and the subject matter of this action; consented to entry of this Final
Judgment; waived findings of fact and conclusions of law; and waived any right to appeal from
this Final Judgment:
I.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is
permanently restrained and enjoined from violating, directly or indirectly, Section l0(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") [15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)] and Rule l0b-5
promulgated thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 240.l0b-5], by using any means or instrumentality of
interstate commerce, or of the mails, or of any facility of any national securities exchange, in
connection with the purchase or sale of any security:
(a) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud;
Case 1:17-cv-07793-JGK Document 43 Filed 04/17/20 Page 1 of 4
(b) to make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact
necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances
under which they were made, not misleading; or
( c) to engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would
operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who
receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant's
officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or
participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a).
II.
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant
is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933
(the "Securities Act") [15 U.S.C. § 77q(a)] in the offer or sale of any security by the use of any
means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or by use of the
mails, directly or indirectly:
(a) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud;
(b) to obtain money or property by means of any untrue statement of a material fact
or any omission of a material fact necessary in order to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading;
or
2
Case 1:17-cv-07793-JGK Document 43 Filed 04/17/20 Page 2 of 4
United States v. Margulies
Case 1:17-cv-07793-JGK Document 43 Filed 04/17/20 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:17-cv-07793-JGK Document 43 Filed 04/17/20 Page 4 of 4