SEC v. Sam A. Antar, No. LR-24694, Southern District of New York (Dec. 18, 2019) — Press Release
raw: Sam A. Antar
Sam A. Antar, No. 1:19-cv-11527 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 18, 2019)
Sam A. Antar defrauded investors, mostly from the Syrian Jewish community in New Jersey, out of at least $550,000, and faces SEC charges and parallel criminal charges.
Sam A. Antar allegedly defrauded investors by claiming he would invest in pre-public companies, but instead used the funds for personal expenses, including $550,000 spent on gambling, his daughter's wedding, and gifts. Antar is charged with violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5. The SEC seeks permanent injunctions, disgorgement of ill-gotten gains with prejudgment interest, and a civil penalty.
Sam A. Antar, a New York resident, was charged by the SEC with defrauding investors, primarily from the Syrian Jewish community in New Jersey, out of at least $550,000. Antar allegedly claimed he would invest in shares of companies that were not yet public, but instead used the funds for personal expenses, including gambling, his daughter's wedding, and gifts. He also made Ponzi-like payments to some early investors. The SEC alleges that Antar issued promissory notes or other agreements to investors to invest their money and return a profit to them from the purported gains on the stock transactions. Antar is charged with violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5. The SEC seeks permanent injunctions, disgorgement of ill-gotten gains with prejudgment interest, and a civil penalty. In a parallel action, the New Jersey Office of the Attorney General Division of Criminal Justice also announced criminal charges against Antar.
Exhibits & Attached Documents (1)
Extracted insights
- $550K $550,000 $100K–$1M
- person fraudulent scheme
- agency in securities and exchange commission v. sam a. antar
- person numerous investors
- agency Securities and Exchange Commission
- organization Securities and Exchange Commission
- Sam A. Antar defrauded investors in New Jersey Jewish community
- Sam A. Antar engaged in fraudulent scheme
- Sam A. Antar deceived numerous investors
- Sam A. Antar claimed to invest in shares of companies
- SEC charged Sam A. Antar
- SEC alleged fraudulent scheme involving at least $550,000
- Sam A. Antar was charged in Securities and Exchange Commission v. Sam A. Antar
- Sam A. Antar filed December 17, 2019
- Sam A. Antar defrauded investors many of whom were his friends and acquaintances in a Syrian Jewish community in New Jersey
- Sam A. Antar deceived investors out of at least $550,000
- Securities and Exchange Commission charged Sam A. Antar for defrauding investors in a fraudulent scheme
- Securities and Exchange Commission charged Sam A. Antar
- Securities and Exchange Commission alleges Antar engaged in a fraudulent scheme
- Antar defrauded investors
- Antar deceived investors
- Antar took $550,000
- Sam A. Antar charged for defrauding investors, many of whom were his friends and acquaintances in a Syrian Jewish community in New Jersey
- Sam A. Antar deceived numerous investors out of at least $550,000
- Sam A. Antar charged defrauding investors
- Sam A. Antar engaged fraudulent scheme
- Sam A. Antar deceived numerous investors
- Sam A. Antar claimed invest in shares of companies
- Securities and Exchange Commission charged Sam A. Antar
- Securities and Exchange Commission alleges Antar engaged in a fraudulent scheme
- Sam A. Antar victimizing New Jersey Jewish Community
- Sam A. Antar defrauded at least $550,000
SEC Charges Scheme Victimizing New Jersey Jewish Community Litigation Release No. 24694/December 18, 2019 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Sam A. Antar, No. 1:19-cv-11527 (S.D.N.Y. filed December 17, 2019) On December 17, 2019, the Securities and Exchange Commission charged Sam A. Antar for defrauding investors, many of whom were his friends and acquaintances in a Syrian Jewish community in New Jersey. The SEC alleges that Antar, of New York, New York, engaged in a fraudulent scheme that deceived numerous investors out of at least $550,000 while claiming he would invest in shares of companies that were not yet public. The complaint alleges that Antar told investors that he would use their funds to buy shares in emerging companies whose stock had not yet begun to trade publicly, and then sell those shares to already-identified buyers for a premium in a short period of time. Antar issued promissory notes or other agreements to investors to invest their money and return a profit to them from the purported gains on the stock transactions. In reality, the complaint alleges, Antar never used investor funds to purchase shares of emerging companies, or to make any other investment. Instead, Antar spent investor funds gambling, making gifts to family members, paying for his daughter's wedding, and making Ponzi-like payments to some early investors. In a parallel action, the New Jersey Office of the Attorney General Division of Criminal Justice also announced criminal charges against Antar. The SEC's complaint, filed in federal court in New York, charges Antar with violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The complaint seeks permanent injunctions, disgorgement of ill-gotten gains with prejudgment interest, and a civil penalty. The SEC appreciates the assistance of the New Jersey Office of the Attorney General Division of Criminal Justice. SEC Complaint
SEC Charges Scheme Victimizing New Jersey Jewish Community Litigation Release No. 24694/December 18, 2019 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Sam A. Antar, No. 1:19-cv-11527 (S.D.N.Y. filed December 17, 2019) On December 17, 2019, the Securities and Exchange Commission charged Sam A. Antar for defrauding investors, many of whom were his friends and acquaintances in a Syrian Jewish community in New Jersey. The SEC alleges that Antar, of New York, New York, engaged in a fraudulent scheme that deceived numerous investors out of at least $550,000 while claiming he would invest in shares of companies that were not yet public. The complaint alleges that Antar told investors that he would use their funds to buy shares in emerging companies whose stock had not yet begun to trade publicly, and then sell those shares to already-identified buyers for a premium in a short period of time. Antar issued promissory notes or other agreements to investors to invest their money and return a profit to them from the purported gains on the stock transactions. In reality, the complaint alleges, Antar never used investor funds to purchase shares of emerging companies, or to make any other investment. Instead, Antar spent investor funds gambling, making gifts to family members, paying for his daughter's wedding, and making Ponzi-like payments to some early investors. In a parallel action, the New Jersey Office of the Attorney General Division of Criminal Justice also announced criminal charges against Antar. The SEC's complaint, filed in federal court in New York, charges Antar with violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The complaint seeks permanent injunctions, disgorgement of ill-gotten gains with prejudgment interest, and a civil penalty. The SEC appreciates the assistance of the New Jersey Office of the Attorney General Division of Criminal Justice. SEC Complaint