2025-07-21 sec-litreleases judgment 97 KB 834 chars

SEC v. Suyun Gu, No. 1:21-cv-17578, District of New Jersey (July 21, 2025) — Judgment

raw: This matter having come before this Court on Plaintiff United States Securities and

This matter having come before this Court on Plaintiff United States Securities and, No. 1:21-cv-17578 (July 21, 2025)

Caption
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. Gu
Source PDF JSON
summary

The SEC successfully obtained summary judgment against Suyun Gu and others in a New Jersey civil action regarding alleged securities violations.

paragraph

The United States District Court for the District of New Jersey granted the SEC's motion for summary judgment against defendants Suyun Gu et al. on September 6, 2024. While the specific charges and dollar amounts were not detailed in the order, the court ruled in favor of the regulator. The decision was issued by Judge Susan D. Wigenton following the court's review of the parties' submissions.

narrative

The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) successfully moved for summary judgment in a civil action against Suyun Gu and other defendants. On September 6, 2024, Judge Susan D. Wigenton of the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey granted the SEC's motion. The court's decision was based on the reasoning provided in an accompanying opinion dated the same day. Although the specific nature of the underlying fraudulent schemes and exact monetary losses were not explicitly detailed in this specific order, the ruling effectively resolves the matter in favor of the SEC. This procedural outcome follows the SEC's efforts to hold the defendants liable for the alleged violations. The order concludes the motion phase of the litigation regarding these specific claims.

Enriched metadata

Scheme
unclassified
Court
District of New Jersey
Case No.
1:21-cv-17578
Classified unclassified. No EDGAR filing fingerprint (criminal/DOJ-side scheme). detection rule →
Statutes
15 U.S.C. § 77q(a)
Parties
Securities and Exchange CommissionGu
Keywords
matter havinghaving comecome securitieshavingsecuritiessecurities exchangeexchange commissionsusan wigentonmattercomeseptemberwigentonmotionexchangecommission

Extracted insights

Entities 6
  • person Susan D. Wigenton ×2
  • person André M. Espinosa
  • agency sec motion
  • agency Securities and Exchange Commission
  • person suyun gu
  • organization United States Securities And Exchange Commission
Triples 2
  • SEC Filed Motion For Summary Judgment
  • Susan D. Wigenton Granted SEC Motion
PDF
This matter having come before this Court on Plaintiff United States Securities and · Source
Text layers
Extracted body text (834c) 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

United States Securities and Exchange
Commission,

Plaintiff,
v.

Suyun Gu, et al.,

Defendants.

Civil Action No. 21-17578 (SDW) (AME)
ORDER

September 6, 2024

WIGENTON, District Judge.
 This  matter  having  come  before  this  Court  on  Plaintiff  United  States  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission’s  (“SEC”)  Motion  for  Summary  Judgment  pursuant  to  Federal  Rule  of
Civil Procedure 56 (“Motion”), and this Court having considered the parties’ submissions, for the
reasons stated in this Court’s Opinion dated September 6, 2024,
 IT IS on this 6
th
 day of September 2024,
ORDERED that the SEC’s Motion is GRANTED.
SO ORDERED.
 /s/ Susan D. Wigenton
  SUSAN D. WIGENTON, U.S.D.J.

Orig:     Clerk
cc:  André M. Espinosa, U.S.M.J.
Parties

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
OCR text (959c · tika · 95% conf) 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY 

 

United States Securities and Exchange 
Commission, 

 
Plaintiff, 

v. 
 
Suyun Gu, et al., 

 
Defendants. 

 
Civil Action No. 21-17578 (SDW) (AME) 

ORDER 
 
September 6, 2024 

 

WIGENTON, District Judge. 

 This matter having come before this Court on Plaintiff United States Securities and 

Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of 

Civil Procedure 56 (“Motion”), and this Court having considered the parties’ submissions, for the 

reasons stated in this Court’s Opinion dated September 6, 2024,  

 IT IS on this 6th day of September 2024, 

ORDERED that the SEC’s Motion is GRANTED. 

SO ORDERED.   

 /s/ Susan D. Wigenton  
  SUSAN D. WIGENTON, U.S.D.J. 

 
 
Orig:  Clerk 
cc:  André M. Espinosa, U.S.M.J.  

Parties 
 

NOT FOR PUBLICATION 

Case 2:21-cv-17578-SDW-AME     Document 85     Filed 09/06/24     Page 1 of 1 PageID: 4037

Related documents (3)