2019-05-17 sec-litreleases litigation_release 67 KB 3,239 chars

SEC v. Andrew I. Farmer; Scott R. Sieck; Eddie D. Austin, Jr.; Carolyn P. Austin; and John D. Brotherton, No. LR-24470, Southern District of Texas (May 17, 2019) — Press Release

raw: Andrew I. Farmer, Scott R. Sieck, Eddie D. Austin, Jr., Carolyn P. Austin, and John D. Brotherton

Andrew I. Farmer, Scott R. Sieck, Eddie D. Austin, Jr., Carolyn P. Austin, and John D. Brotherton, No. 4:19-cv-1774 (May 17, 2019)

Caption
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Andrew I. Farmer, Scott R. Sieck, Eddie D. Austin, Jr., Carolyn P. Austin, and John D. Brotherton
summary

Andrew I. Farmer, Scott R. Sieck, Eddie D. Austin, Jr., Carolyn P. Austin, and John D. Brotherton were charged with running a pump-and-dump scheme involving multiple penny stocks, generating $10.25 million in ill-gotten gains, and consented to pay disgorgement and prejudgment interest.

paragraph

The SEC charged five individuals with orchestrating a multi-year pump-and-dump scheme involving penny stocks from 2011 to 2017, generating over $10.25 million in ill-gotten gains. The defendants allegedly controlled shell companies to manipulate trading, artificially inflate stock prices through coordinated trades and misleading promotional campaigns. They consented to pay $10.25 million in disgorgement and $895,487 in prejudgment interest, and pleaded guilty in a parallel criminal action.

narrative

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) charged five individuals - Andrew I. Farmer, Scott R. Sieck, Eddie D. Austin, Jr., Carolyn P. Austin, and John D. Brotherton - with orchestrating a multi-year pump-and-dump scheme involving multiple penny stocks from May 2011 to May 2017. The defendants allegedly controlled shell companies to manipulate trading, artificially inflate stock prices through coordinated trades and misleading promotional campaigns, and then dumped shares on unsuspecting investors. The scheme generated over $10.25 million in ill-gotten gains, with an additional $895,487 in prejudgment interest ordered for disgorgement. The defendants consented to pay the disgorgement and prejudgment interest, and also pleaded guilty in a parallel criminal action. The settlement, pending court approval, followed a multi-agency investigation involving U.S. and international regulators. The SEC's investigation, which is continuing, has been led by Kelly V. Silverman and Christopher R. Mathews, supervised by Assistant Director J. Lee Buck, II, and assisted by Senior Trial Counsel Joshua E. Braunstein.

Enriched metadata

Scheme
pump-and-dump (99%)
Court
Southern District of Texas
Case No.
4:19-cv-1774
Outcome
pleaded
Disgorgement
$10,250,000
Entity
Andrew I. Farmer, Scott R. Sieck, Eddie D. Austin, Jr., Carolyn P. Austin, and John D. Brotherton
Classified pump-and-dump(confidence 99%). EDGAR detection: forms S-8/S-1/424B/8-K· recall 69% / precision 12%. detection rule →
Parties
Securities and Exchange CommissionAndrew I. FarmerScott R. SieckEddie D. Austin, Jr.Carolyn P. AustinJohn D. Brotherton
Keywords
austinsecuritiesstockandrew farmerscott sieckeddie austincarolyn austinjohn brothertonsecurities exchangesectexasfarmer scottsieck eddieaustin carolynaustin john

Exhibits & Attached Documents (2)

Extracted insights

Dollar amounts 2
  • $10.25M $10.25 million $10M–$100M
  • $895K $895,487 $100K–$1M
Entities 5
  • person andrew i. farmer
  • scheme_term a pump-and-dump scheme involving m
  • scheme_term pump-and-dump scheme
  • person settled charges
  • scheme_term with running a pump-and-dump scheme involving microcap stocks
Triples 20
  • SEC charged Andrew I. Farmer, Scott R. Sieck, Eddie D. Austin, Jr., Carolyn P. Austin, and John D. Brotherton
  • Andrew I. Farmer, Scott R. Sieck, Eddie D. Austin, Jr., Carolyn P. Austin, and John D. Brotherton ran a pump-and-dump scheme involving m
  • SEC charged five individuals with running a pump-and-dump scheme involving microcap stocks
  • Andrew I. Farmer orchestrated pump-and-dump scheme
  • Scott R. Sieck orchestrated pump-and-dump scheme
  • Eddie D. Austin, Jr. orchestrated pump-and-dump scheme
  • Carolyn P. Austin orchestrated pump-and-dump scheme
  • John D. Brotherton orchestrated pump-and-dump scheme
  • SEC filed settled charges
  • SEC charged five individuals
  • five individuals ran pump-and-dump scheme
  • SEC filed lawsuit Securities and Exchange Commission v. Andrew I. Farmer, Scott R. Sieck, Eddie D. Austin, Jr., Carolyn P. Austin, and John D. Brotherton
  • May 15, 2019 filed lawsuit
  • SEC Charges Five Individuals
  • SEC filed settled charges
  • five individuals orchestrating a fraudulent pump-and-dump scheme
  • Andrew I. Farmer filed charges pump-and-dump scheme
  • SEC charged Five Individuals
  • U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filed settled charges
  • Andrew I. Farmer, Scott R. Sieck, Eddie D. Austin, Jr., Carolyn P. Austin, and John D. Brotherton orchestrated fraudulent pump-and-dump scheme
PDF (from attached: complaint)
Text layers
Extracted body text (3,239c)
SEC Charges Five Individuals with Running a Pump-and-Dump Scheme Litigation Release No. 24470 / May 17, 2019 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Andrew I. Farmer, Scott R. Sieck, Eddie D. Austin, Jr., Carolyn P. Austin, and John D. Brotherton, No. 4:19-cv-1774, (S.D.T.X.) filed May 15, 2019 The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filed settled charges against five individuals for orchestrating a fraudulent pump-and-dump scheme involving multiple penny stocks. The SEC alleges that between May 2011 and May 2017, Andrew I. Farmer of Katy, Texas, Scott R. Sieck of Winter Park, Florida, Eddie D. Austin, Jr. of Houston, Texas, Carolyn P. Austin of Houston, Texas, and John D. Brotherton of Conroe, Texas ran a series of pump-and-dump frauds. According to the SEC's complaint, the Defendants engaged in a pattern of obtaining control of all the freely trading stock of a penny stock and then allocating the stock to foreign and domestic front companies they controlled. To create the false appearance of market interest in the penny stock and to set artificially elevated share prices, Defendants allegedly conducted coordinated trading between these front companies. Additionally, Defendants allegedly orchestrated materially misleading promotional campaigns via email blasts and internet advertising, which they timed to coincide with press releases they allegedly caused each issuer to disseminate. The SEC further alleges that Defendants took advantage of the resulting stock price and trading volume rises by unloading their worthless stock on unsuspecting investors. In 2017, the SEC suspended trading in Valmie Resources, Inc., which is one of the issuers allegedly involved in the Defendants' scheme. The SEC's complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, charges each of the Defendants with violating the registration and antifraud provisions of Sections 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and the antifraud provisions of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The Defendants have consented to the entry of final judgments which enjoin them from violating the charged provisions of the federal securities laws, enjoin them from future solicitation of the purchase or sale of securities, impose officer-and-director bars, impose penny stock bars, and order the Defendants to pay disgorgement of ill-gotten gains totaling $10.25 million and prejudgment interest totaling $895,487. The settlement is subject to Court approval. The Defendants have also pleaded guilty in a parallel criminal action. The SEC's investigation, which is continuing, has been led by Kelly V. Silverman and Christopher R. Mathews, supervised by Assistant Director J. Lee Buck, II, and assisted by Senior Trial Counsel Joshua E. Braunstein. The SEC appreciates the assistance of the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Texas, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission, the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority, the Ukrainian National Securities and Stock Market Commission, and the United Kingdom Financial Conduct Authority. SEC Complaint
OCR text (3,239c · html-text · 99% conf)
SEC Charges Five Individuals with Running a Pump-and-Dump Scheme Litigation Release No. 24470 / May 17, 2019 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Andrew I. Farmer, Scott R. Sieck, Eddie D. Austin, Jr., Carolyn P. Austin, and John D. Brotherton, No. 4:19-cv-1774, (S.D.T.X.) filed May 15, 2019 The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filed settled charges against five individuals for orchestrating a fraudulent pump-and-dump scheme involving multiple penny stocks. The SEC alleges that between May 2011 and May 2017, Andrew I. Farmer of Katy, Texas, Scott R. Sieck of Winter Park, Florida, Eddie D. Austin, Jr. of Houston, Texas, Carolyn P. Austin of Houston, Texas, and John D. Brotherton of Conroe, Texas ran a series of pump-and-dump frauds. According to the SEC's complaint, the Defendants engaged in a pattern of obtaining control of all the freely trading stock of a penny stock and then allocating the stock to foreign and domestic front companies they controlled. To create the false appearance of market interest in the penny stock and to set artificially elevated share prices, Defendants allegedly conducted coordinated trading between these front companies. Additionally, Defendants allegedly orchestrated materially misleading promotional campaigns via email blasts and internet advertising, which they timed to coincide with press releases they allegedly caused each issuer to disseminate. The SEC further alleges that Defendants took advantage of the resulting stock price and trading volume rises by unloading their worthless stock on unsuspecting investors. In 2017, the SEC suspended trading in Valmie Resources, Inc., which is one of the issuers allegedly involved in the Defendants' scheme. The SEC's complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, charges each of the Defendants with violating the registration and antifraud provisions of Sections 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and the antifraud provisions of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The Defendants have consented to the entry of final judgments which enjoin them from violating the charged provisions of the federal securities laws, enjoin them from future solicitation of the purchase or sale of securities, impose officer-and-director bars, impose penny stock bars, and order the Defendants to pay disgorgement of ill-gotten gains totaling $10.25 million and prejudgment interest totaling $895,487. The settlement is subject to Court approval. The Defendants have also pleaded guilty in a parallel criminal action. The SEC's investigation, which is continuing, has been led by Kelly V. Silverman and Christopher R. Mathews, supervised by Assistant Director J. Lee Buck, II, and assisted by Senior Trial Counsel Joshua E. Braunstein. The SEC appreciates the assistance of the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Texas, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission, the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority, the Ukrainian National Securities and Stock Market Commission, and the United Kingdom Financial Conduct Authority. SEC Complaint