SEC v. Direct Lending Investments, LLC, No. LR-24432, Central District of California (Mar. 25, 2019) — Press Release
raw: Direct Lending Investments, LLC
Direct Lending Investments, LLC, No. 2:19-cv-02188 (Mar. 25, 2019)
Direct Lending Investments, LLC and its owner Brendan Ross were charged with a multi-year fraud, resulting in $11 million in over-charges and a cumulative overstatement of $53 million, and agreed to a preliminary injunction and receiver appointment.
Direct Lending Investments, LLC, a registered investment adviser, and its owner Brendan Ross allegedly engaged in a multi-year fraud, falsifying borrower payment information and inflating private fund returns. The scheme resulted in a cumulative overstatement of the valuation of its QuarterSpot position by approximately $53 million and the collection of $11 million in excess management and performance fees. The SEC charged Direct Lending with violating antifraud provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Securities Act of 1933, and Investment Advisers Act of 1940.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) charged Direct Lending Investments, LLC, a registered investment adviser, and its owner Brendan Ross with a multi-year fraud involving the falsification of borrower payment data from QuarterSpot, Inc. The alleged scheme resulted in the inflation of fund valuations by $53 million and annual performance misrepresentations of 2-3%, leading to the improper collection of approximately $11 million in excess management and performance fees between 2014 and 2017. The SEC alleged violations of antifraud provisions under the Securities Exchange Act, Securities Act, and Investment Advisers Act. Without admitting guilt, Direct Lending agreed to a preliminary injunction and the appointment of a receiver to preserve investor assets. The SEC seeks disgorgement of ill-gotten gains, interest, monetary penalties, and permanent injunctions. The case was filed in the Central District of California, with litigation led by SEC attorneys Amy Jane Longo and Lynn Dean. The SEC's ongoing investigation is being conducted in the Los Angeles Regional Office.
Exhibits & Attached Documents (1)
Extracted insights
- $53.00M $53 million $10M–$100M
- $11.00M $11 million $10M–$100M
- company direct lending investments, llc
- agency Securities and Exchange Commission
- organization Securities and Exchange Commission
- SEC charged Direct Lending Investments, LLC with a multi-year fraud
- SEC obtains consent to appoint receiver to preserve investor assets
- Direct Lending Investments, LLC resulted in approximately $11 million in over-charges of management and performance fees to its private funds
- Direct Lending Investments, LLC charged with multi-year fraud resulting in approximately $11 million in over-charges of management and performance fees to its private funds
- Securities and Exchange Commission obtains consent to appoint receiver to preserve investor assets
- Securities and Exchange Commission filed suit against Direct Lending Investments, LLC
- Securities and Exchange Commission charged Direct Lending Investments, LLC
- Securities and Exchange Commission obtains Consent to Appoint Receiver
- Direct Lending Investments, LLC resulted in $11 million in over-charges
- Securities and Exchange Commission filed Securities and Exchange Commission v. Direct Lending Investments, LLC
- Securities and Exchange Commission charged Direct Lending Investments, LLC
- Direct Lending Investments, LLC committed multi-year fraud
- fraud resulted in $11 million in over-charges
- Securities and Exchange Commission obtained consent to appoint Receiver
- Direct Lending Investments, LLC charged with fraud
- Securities and Exchange Commission charged Direct Lending Investments, LLC
- Direct Lending Investments, LLC resulted in $11 million in over-charges
- Securities and Exchange Commission obtained consent appoint receiver
- Direct Lending Investments, LLC preserves investor assets
SEC Charges Investment Adviser with Long-Running Fraud and Obtains Consent to Appoint Receiver to Preserve Investor Assets Litigation Release No. 24432 / March 25, 2019 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Direct Lending Investments, LLC, No. 2:19-cv-02188 (C.D. Cal. filed March 22, 2019) On March 22, 2019, the Securities and Exchange Commission charged registered investment adviser Direct Lending Investments, LLC with a multi-year fraud that resulted in approximately $11 million in over-charges of management and performance fees to its private funds, as well as the inflation of the private funds' returns. According to the SEC's complaint, Direct Lending advises a combination of private funds that invest in various lending platforms, including QuarterSpot, Inc., an online small business lender. The SEC alleges that for years, Brendan Ross, DLI's owner and then-chief executive officer, arranged with QuarterSpot to falsify borrower payment information for QuarterSpot's loans and to falsely report to Direct Lending that borrowers made hundreds of monthly payments when, in fact, they had not. The SEC alleges that many of these loans should have been valued at zero, but instead were improperly valued at their full value, because of the false payments Ross helped engineer. As a result, between 2014 and 2017, Direct Lending cumulatively overstated the valuation of its QuarterSpot position by approximately $53 million and misrepresented the Funds' performance by approximately two to three percent annually. The SEC alleges that Direct Lending collected approximately $11 million in excess management and performance fees from the Funds that it would not have otherwise collected, had the QuarterSpot position been accurately valued. The SEC's complaint, which was filed in the Central District of California, charges Direct Lending with violating the antifraud provisions of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, and Sections 206(1), 206(2), and 207 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. Without admitting to any violations of federal law alleged in the SEC's action, Direct Lending has agreed to be preliminarily enjoined from violating these provisions and to the appointment of a receiver to marshal and preserve the assets of Direct Lending and the funds. The stipulated order is subject to court approval. The complaint also seeks disgorgement of allegedly ill-gotten gains along with interest, monetary penalties, and permanent injunctions. The SEC's ongoing investigation is being conducted in the Los Angeles Regional Office by Christopher A. Nowlin and supervised by Marc J. Blau, with assistance from the Office of Compliance, Inspections and Examinations. The SEC's litigation will be led by Amy Jane Longo and Lynn Dean. SEC Complaint
SEC Charges Investment Adviser with Long-Running Fraud and Obtains Consent to Appoint Receiver to Preserve Investor Assets Litigation Release No. 24432 / March 25, 2019 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Direct Lending Investments, LLC, No. 2:19-cv-02188 (C.D. Cal. filed March 22, 2019) On March 22, 2019, the Securities and Exchange Commission charged registered investment adviser Direct Lending Investments, LLC with a multi-year fraud that resulted in approximately $11 million in over-charges of management and performance fees to its private funds, as well as the inflation of the private funds' returns. According to the SEC's complaint, Direct Lending advises a combination of private funds that invest in various lending platforms, including QuarterSpot, Inc., an online small business lender. The SEC alleges that for years, Brendan Ross, DLI's owner and then-chief executive officer, arranged with QuarterSpot to falsify borrower payment information for QuarterSpot's loans and to falsely report to Direct Lending that borrowers made hundreds of monthly payments when, in fact, they had not. The SEC alleges that many of these loans should have been valued at zero, but instead were improperly valued at their full value, because of the false payments Ross helped engineer. As a result, between 2014 and 2017, Direct Lending cumulatively overstated the valuation of its QuarterSpot position by approximately $53 million and misrepresented the Funds' performance by approximately two to three percent annually. The SEC alleges that Direct Lending collected approximately $11 million in excess management and performance fees from the Funds that it would not have otherwise collected, had the QuarterSpot position been accurately valued. The SEC's complaint, which was filed in the Central District of California, charges Direct Lending with violating the antifraud provisions of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, and Sections 206(1), 206(2), and 207 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. Without admitting to any violations of federal law alleged in the SEC's action, Direct Lending has agreed to be preliminarily enjoined from violating these provisions and to the appointment of a receiver to marshal and preserve the assets of Direct Lending and the funds. The stipulated order is subject to court approval. The complaint also seeks disgorgement of allegedly ill-gotten gains along with interest, monetary penalties, and permanent injunctions. The SEC's ongoing investigation is being conducted in the Los Angeles Regional Office by Christopher A. Nowlin and supervised by Marc J. Blau, with assistance from the Office of Compliance, Inspections and Examinations. The SEC's litigation will be led by Amy Jane Longo and Lynn Dean. SEC Complaint