SEC v. Edward O’DONNELL; and Victor Bozzo, No. 1:23-cv-08543-AS, Southern District of New York (June 24, 2025) — Judgment
raw: Victor Bozzo having entered a general appearance; consented to the Court’s jurisdiction over
Victor Bozzo having entered a general appearance; consented to the Court’s jurisdiction over, No. 1:23-cv-08543-AS (S.D.N.Y. June 24, 2025)
Victor Bozzo entered a final judgment with the SEC, agreeing to a permanent injunction and a ban on serving as a public officer after engaging in securities fraud.
The SEC obtained a final judgment against Victor Bozzo for violations of the Securities Act and the Exchange Act involving fraudulent schemes and material misstatements. Bozzo was ordered to disgorge $225,000 in net profits, an obligation satisfied by a forfeiture order in a parallel criminal case. The court also imposed a permanent injunction against future securities fraud and prohibited him from serving as an officer or director of any reporting issuer.
The Securities and Exchange Commission obtained a final judgment against Victor Bozzo in the Southern District of New York for violations of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act. Bozzo consented to the judgment, which includes a permanent injunction against employing fraudulent devices or making material misstatements in securities offerings. The court ordered Bozzo to disgorge $225,000 in net profits, noting that this obligation was satisfied via a forfeiture order in the parallel criminal case, United States v. Victor Bozzo. Additionally, Bozzo is prohibited from serving as an officer or director of any issuer with registered securities or reporting requirements. By entering this judgment, Bozzo waived his right to appeal and admitted the allegations for the purposes of bankruptcy discharge exceptions.
Extracted insights
- $225K $225,000 $100K–$1M
- $225K $225,000 $100K–$1M
- person defendant victor bozzo
- person general appearance
- agency Securities and Exchange Commission
- Securities And Exchange Commission filed Complaint
- Defendant Victor Bozzo entered General Appearance
- Defendant Victor Bozzo consented To Court's Jurisdiction Over Defendant And Subject Matter
- Defendant Victor Bozzo waived Findings Of Fact And Conclusions Of Law
- Defendant Victor Bozzo waived Any Right To Appeal From This Final Judgment
- Defendant Victor Bozzo is restrained From Violating Section 17(a) Of The Securities Act Of 1933
- Defendant Victor Bozzo is restrained From Employing Any Device, Scheme, Or Artifice To Defraud
- Defendant Victor Bozzo is restrained From Obtaining Money Or Property By Untrue Statement Of a Material Fact
- Defendant Victor Bozzo is restrained From Engaging In Any Transaction, Practice, Or Course Of Business That Operates As Fraud Or Deceit
- Defendant Victor Bozzo is restrained From Violating Section 10(b) Of The Securities Exchange Act Of 1934
- Defendant Victor Bozzo is restrained From Making Any Untrue Statement Of a Material Fact
- Defendant Victor Bozzo is restrained From Engaging In Any Act, Practice, Or Course Of Business That Operates As Fraud Or Deceit
- Defendant’s Officers, Agents, Servants, Employees, And Attorneys are bound By This Final Judgment
- Other Persons In Active Concert Or Participation With Defendant are bound By This Final Judgment
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE : COMMISSION, : : Case No. 23-cv-8543 (AS) Plaintiff, : -against- : : EDWARD O’DONNELL and VICTOR : BOZZO, : : Defendants. : ------------------------------------------------------- FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT VICTOR BOZZO The Securities and Exchange Commission having filed a Complaint and Defendant Victor Bozzo having entered a general appearance; consented to the Court’s jurisdiction over Defendant and the subject matter of this action; consented to entry of this Final Judgment; waived findings of fact and conclusions of law; and waived any right to appeal from this Final Judgment: I. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 77q(a)] in the offer or sale of any security by the use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or by use of the mails, directly or indirectly: (a) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; (b) to obtain money or property by means of any untrue statement of a material fact or any omission of a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; 2 or (c) to engage in any transaction, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon the purchaser; by, directly or indirectly, including materially misleading information in filings with the Commission or omitting from those filings such further material information necessary to make statements therein not misleading. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a). II. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating, directly or indirectly, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)] and Exchange Act Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5], by using any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce, or of the mails, or of any facility of any national securities exchange, in connection with the purchase or sale of any security: (a) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; (b) to make any untrue statement of a material fact, or to omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading, or 3 (c) to engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person; by, directly or indirectly, including materially misleading information in filings with the Commission or omitting from those filings such further material information necessary to make statements therein not misleading. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a). III. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, pursuant to Section 21(d)(2) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)(2)] and Section 20(e) of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. § 77t(e)], Defendant is prohibited from acting as an officer or director of any issuer that has a class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78l] or that is required to file reports pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78o(d)]. IV. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is liable for disgorgement of $225,000, representing net profits gained as a result of the conduct alleged in the Complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant’s disgorgement obligation of $225,000 is deemed satisfied by the order of forfeiture 4 entered in the parallel criminal case, United States v. Victor Bozzo, Case No. 23-cr-00499-AS (S.D.N.Y.). V. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Consent is incorporated herein with the same force and effect as if fully set forth herein. VI. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, for purposes of exceptions to discharge set forth in Section 523 of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. §523, the allegations in the complaint are true and admitted by Defendant, and further, any debt for disgorgement, prejudgment interest, civil penalty or other amounts due by Defendant under this Final Judgment or any other judgment, order, consent order, decree or settlement agreement entered in connection with this proceeding, is a debt for the violation by Defendant of the federal securities laws or any regulation or order issued under such laws, as set forth in Section 523(a)(19) of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. §523(a)(19). VII. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Final Judgment. VIII. There being no just reason for delay, pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Clerk is ordered to enter this Final Judgment forthwith and without further notice. SO ORDERED Dated: New York, New York ARUN SUBRAMANIAN United States District Judge May 12, 2025
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE : COMMISSION, : : Case No. 23-cv-8543 (AS) Plaintiff, : -against- : : EDWARD O’DONNELL and VICTOR : BOZZO, : : Defendants. : ------------------------------------------------------- FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT VICTOR BOZZO The Securities and Exchange Commission having filed a Complaint and Defendant Victor Bozzo having entered a general appearance; consented to the Court’s jurisdiction over Defendant and the subject matter of this action; consented to entry of this Final Judgment; waived findings of fact and conclusions of law; and waived any right to appeal from this Final Judgment: I. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 77q(a)] in the offer or sale of any security by the use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or by use of the mails, directly or indirectly: (a) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; (b) to obtain money or property by means of any untrue statement of a material fact or any omission of a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; Case 1:23-cv-08543-AS Document 37 Filed 05/12/25 Page 1 of 4 2 or (c) to engage in any transaction, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon the purchaser; by, directly or indirectly, including materially misleading information in filings with the Commission or omitting from those filings such further material information necessary to make statements therein not misleading. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a). II. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating, directly or indirectly, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)] and Exchange Act Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5], by using any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce, or of the mails, or of any facility of any national securities exchange, in connection with the purchase or sale of any security: (a) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; (b) to make any untrue statement of a material fact, or to omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading, or Case 1:23-cv-08543-AS Document 34 Filed 05/12/25 Page 2 of 4Case 1:23-cv-08543-AS Document 37 Filed 05/12/25 Page 2 of 4 3 (c) to engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person; by, directly or indirectly, including materially misleading information in filings with the Commission or omitting from those filings such further material information necessary to make statements therein not misleading. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a). III. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, pursuant to Section 21(d)(2) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)(2)] and Section 20(e) of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. § 77t(e)], Defendant is prohibited from acting as an officer or director of any issuer that has a class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78l] or that is required to file reports pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78o(d)]. IV. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is liable for disgorgement of $225,000, representing net profits gained as a result of the conduct alleged in the Complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant’s disgorgement obligation of $225,000 is deemed satisfied by the order of forfeiture Case 1:23-cv-08543-AS Document 34 Filed 05/12/25 Page 3 of 4Case 1:23-cv-08543-AS Document 37 Filed 05/12/25 Page 3 of 4 4 entered in the parallel criminal case, United States v. Victor Bozzo, Case No. 23-cr-00499-AS (S.D.N.Y.). V. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Consent is incorporated herein with the same force and effect as if fully set forth herein. VI. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, for purposes of exceptions to discharge set forth in Section 523 of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. §523, the allegations in the complaint are true and admitted by Defendant, and further, any debt for disgorgement, prejudgment interest, civil penalty or other amounts due by Defendant under this Final Judgment or any other judgment, order, consent order, decree or settlement agreement entered in connection with this proceeding, is a debt for the violation by Defendant of the federal securities laws or any regulation or order issued under such laws, as set forth in Section 523(a)(19) of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. §523(a)(19). VII. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Final Judgment. VIII. There being no just reason for delay, pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Clerk is ordered to enter this Final Judgment forthwith and without further notice. SO ORDERED Dated: New York, New York ARUN SUBRAMANIAN United States District Judge Case 1:23-cv-08543-AS Document 34 Filed 05/12/25 Page 4 of 4 May 12, 2025 Case 1:23-cv-08543-AS Document 37 Filed 05/12/25 Page 4 of 4