2025-06-24 sec-litreleases judgment 233 KB 6,031 chars

SEC v. Edward O’DONNELL; and Victor Bozzo, No. 1:23-cv-08543-AS, Southern District of New York (June 24, 2025) — Judgment

raw: Victor Bozzo having entered a general appearance; consented to the Court’s jurisdiction over

Victor Bozzo having entered a general appearance; consented to the Court’s jurisdiction over, No. 1:23-cv-08543-AS (S.D.N.Y. June 24, 2025)

Caption
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Edward O'Donnell and Victor Bozzo
summary

Victor Bozzo entered a final judgment with the SEC, agreeing to a permanent injunction and a ban on serving as a public officer after engaging in securities fraud.

paragraph

The SEC obtained a final judgment against Victor Bozzo for violations of the Securities Act and the Exchange Act involving fraudulent schemes and material misstatements. Bozzo was ordered to disgorge $225,000 in net profits, an obligation satisfied by a forfeiture order in a parallel criminal case. The court also imposed a permanent injunction against future securities fraud and prohibited him from serving as an officer or director of any reporting issuer.

narrative

The Securities and Exchange Commission obtained a final judgment against Victor Bozzo in the Southern District of New York for violations of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act. Bozzo consented to the judgment, which includes a permanent injunction against employing fraudulent devices or making material misstatements in securities offerings. The court ordered Bozzo to disgorge $225,000 in net profits, noting that this obligation was satisfied via a forfeiture order in the parallel criminal case, United States v. Victor Bozzo. Additionally, Bozzo is prohibited from serving as an officer or director of any issuer with registered securities or reporting requirements. By entering this judgment, Bozzo waived his right to appeal and admitted the allegations for the purposes of bankruptcy discharge exceptions.

Enriched metadata

Scheme
accounting-fraud (70%)
Court
Southern District of New York
Case No.
1:23-cv-08543-AS
Disgorgement
$225,000
Classified accounting-fraud(confidence 70%). EDGAR detection: forms 10-K/10-Q/8-K/NT 10-K· recall 80% / precision 48%. detection rule →
Statutes
15 U.S.C. § 77q(a)15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)15 U.S.C. § 77t(e)15 U.S.C. § 78l15 U.S.C. § 78o(d)11 U.S.C. §52311 U.S.C. §523(a)17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5Section 17(a) of the Securities ActSection 10(b) of the Securities Exchange ActSection 20(e) of the Securities ActRule 10b-5
Parties
Securities and Exchange CommissionEdward O’DONNELLVictor Bozzo
Keywords
ordered adjudgedadjudged decreedfurther orderedfurtherdocument pageorderedvictor bozzoadjudgeddecreedsecuritiesexchangecv-finalsecurities exchangedirectly indirectly

Extracted insights

Dollar amounts 2
  • $225K $225,000 $100K–$1M
  • $225K $225,000 $100K–$1M
Entities 3
  • person defendant victor bozzo
  • person general appearance
  • agency Securities and Exchange Commission
Triples 14
  • Securities And Exchange Commission filed Complaint
  • Defendant Victor Bozzo entered General Appearance
  • Defendant Victor Bozzo consented To Court's Jurisdiction Over Defendant And Subject Matter
  • Defendant Victor Bozzo waived Findings Of Fact And Conclusions Of Law
  • Defendant Victor Bozzo waived Any Right To Appeal From This Final Judgment
  • Defendant Victor Bozzo is restrained From Violating Section 17(a) Of The Securities Act Of 1933
  • Defendant Victor Bozzo is restrained From Employing Any Device, Scheme, Or Artifice To Defraud
  • Defendant Victor Bozzo is restrained From Obtaining Money Or Property By Untrue Statement Of a Material Fact
  • Defendant Victor Bozzo is restrained From Engaging In Any Transaction, Practice, Or Course Of Business That Operates As Fraud Or Deceit
  • Defendant Victor Bozzo is restrained From Violating Section 10(b) Of The Securities Exchange Act Of 1934
  • Defendant Victor Bozzo is restrained From Making Any Untrue Statement Of a Material Fact
  • Defendant Victor Bozzo is restrained From Engaging In Any Act, Practice, Or Course Of Business That Operates As Fraud Or Deceit
  • Defendant’s Officers, Agents, Servants, Employees, And Attorneys are bound By This Final Judgment
  • Other Persons In Active Concert Or Participation With Defendant are bound By This Final Judgment
Text layers
Extracted body text (6,031c)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
-------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE :
COMMISSION,  :
: Case No. 23-cv-8543 (AS)
Plaintiff,     :
-against-               :
:
EDWARD O’DONNELL and VICTOR    :
BOZZO,                         :
:
Defendants.   :
-------------------------------------------------------
FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT VICTOR BOZZO
The Securities and Exchange Commission having filed a Complaint and Defendant
Victor Bozzo having entered a general appearance; consented to the Court’s jurisdiction over
Defendant and the subject matter of this action; consented to entry of this Final Judgment;
waived findings of fact and conclusions of law; and waived any right to appeal from this Final
Judgment:
I.
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant
is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933
(the “Securities Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 77q(a)] in the offer or sale of any security by the use of any
means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or by use of the
mails, directly or indirectly:
(a)   to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud;
(b)   to obtain money or property by means of any untrue statement of a material fact
or any omission of a material fact necessary in order to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading;

2

or
(c)   to engage in any transaction, practice, or course of business which operates or
would operate as a fraud or deceit upon the purchaser;
by, directly or indirectly, including materially misleading information in filings with the
Commission or omitting from those filings such further material information necessary to make
statements therein not misleading.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who
receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s
officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or
participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a).
II.
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is permanently
restrained and enjoined from violating, directly or indirectly, Section 10(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)] and Exchange Act Rule 10b-5
promulgated thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5], by using any means or instrumentality of
interstate commerce, or of the mails, or of any facility of any national securities exchange, in
connection with the purchase or sale of any security:
(a) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud;
(b) to make any untrue statement of a material fact, or to omit to state a material fact
necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances
under which they were made, not misleading, or

3
(c)   to engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would
operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person;
by, directly or indirectly, including materially misleading information in filings with the
Commission or omitting from those filings such further material information necessary to make
statements therein not misleading.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who
receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s
officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or
participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a).
III.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, pursuant to Section
21(d)(2) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)(2)] and Section 20(e) of the Securities Act [15
U.S.C. § 77t(e)], Defendant is prohibited from acting as an officer or director of any issuer that
has a class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78l]
or that is required to file reports pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. §
78o(d)].
IV.
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant
is liable for disgorgement of $225,000, representing net profits gained as a result of the conduct
alleged in the Complaint.  IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that
Defendant’s disgorgement obligation of $225,000 is deemed satisfied by the order of forfeiture

4
entered in the parallel criminal case, United States v. Victor Bozzo, Case No. 23-cr-00499-AS
(S.D.N.Y.).
V.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Consent is
incorporated herein with the same force and effect as if fully set forth herein.
VI.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, for purposes of
exceptions to discharge set forth in Section 523 of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. §523, the
allegations in the complaint are true and admitted by Defendant, and further, any debt for
disgorgement, prejudgment interest, civil penalty or other amounts due by Defendant under this
Final Judgment or any other judgment, order, consent order, decree or settlement agreement
entered in connection with this proceeding, is a debt for the violation by Defendant of the federal
securities laws or any regulation or order issued under such laws, as set forth in Section
523(a)(19) of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. §523(a)(19).
VII.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court shall retain
jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Final Judgment.
VIII.
There being no just reason for delay, pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure, the Clerk is ordered to enter this Final Judgment forthwith and without further notice.
SO ORDERED
Dated:
New York, New York
ARUN SUBRAMANIAN
United States District Judge

May 12, 2025
OCR text (6,698c · tika · 95% conf)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT  
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

------------------------------------------------------- 
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE : 
COMMISSION,  : 

: Case No. 23-cv-8543 (AS) 
Plaintiff,  : 

-against-   : 
: 

EDWARD O’DONNELL and VICTOR  : 
BOZZO,      : 

: 
Defendants.  : 

------------------------------------------------------- 

FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT VICTOR BOZZO 

The Securities and Exchange Commission having filed a Complaint and Defendant 

Victor Bozzo having entered a general appearance; consented to the Court’s jurisdiction over 

Defendant and the subject matter of this action; consented to entry of this Final Judgment; 

waived findings of fact and conclusions of law; and waived any right to appeal from this Final 

Judgment: 

I. 

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant 

is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 

(the “Securities Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 77q(a)] in the offer or sale of any security by the use of any 

means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or by use of the 

mails, directly or indirectly: 

(a) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud;

(b) to obtain money or property by means of any untrue statement of a material fact

or any omission of a material fact necessary in order to make the statements

made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading;

Case 1:23-cv-08543-AS     Document 37     Filed 05/12/25     Page 1 of 4



2 
 

or 

(c) to engage in any transaction, practice, or course of business which operates or 

would operate as a fraud or deceit upon the purchaser; 

by, directly or indirectly, including materially misleading information in filings with the 

Commission or omitting from those filings such further material information necessary to make 

statements therein not misleading. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who 

receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s 

officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or 

participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a). 

II. 

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is permanently 

restrained and enjoined from violating, directly or indirectly, Section 10(b) of the Securities 

Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)] and Exchange Act Rule 10b-5 

promulgated thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5], by using any means or instrumentality of 

interstate commerce, or of the mails, or of any facility of any national securities exchange, in 

connection with the purchase or sale of any security: 

(a) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud;   

(b) to make any untrue statement of a material fact, or to omit to state a material fact 

necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances 

under which they were made, not misleading, or 

Case 1:23-cv-08543-AS     Document 34     Filed 05/12/25     Page 2 of 4Case 1:23-cv-08543-AS     Document 37     Filed 05/12/25     Page 2 of 4



3 

(c) to engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would

operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person;

by, directly or indirectly, including materially misleading information in filings with the 

Commission or omitting from those filings such further material information necessary to make 

statements therein not misleading.  

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who 

receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s 

officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or 

participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a). 

III. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, pursuant to Section 

21(d)(2) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)(2)] and Section 20(e) of the Securities Act [15 

U.S.C. § 77t(e)], Defendant is prohibited from acting as an officer or director of any issuer that 

has a class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78l] 

or that is required to file reports pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 

78o(d)]. 

IV. 

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant 

is liable for disgorgement of $225,000, representing net profits gained as a result of the conduct 

alleged in the Complaint.  IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that 

Defendant’s disgorgement obligation of $225,000 is deemed satisfied by the order of forfeiture 

Case 1:23-cv-08543-AS     Document 34     Filed 05/12/25     Page 3 of 4Case 1:23-cv-08543-AS     Document 37     Filed 05/12/25     Page 3 of 4



4 

entered in the parallel criminal case, United States v. Victor Bozzo, Case No. 23-cr-00499-AS 

(S.D.N.Y.). 

V. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Consent is 

incorporated herein with the same force and effect as if fully set forth herein. 

VI. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, for purposes of 

exceptions to discharge set forth in Section 523 of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. §523, the 

allegations in the complaint are true and admitted by Defendant, and further, any debt for 

disgorgement, prejudgment interest, civil penalty or other amounts due by Defendant under this 

Final Judgment or any other judgment, order, consent order, decree or settlement agreement 

entered in connection with this proceeding, is a debt for the violation by Defendant of the federal 

securities laws or any regulation or order issued under such laws, as set forth in Section 

523(a)(19) of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. §523(a)(19). 

VII. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court shall retain 

jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Final Judgment. 

VIII. 

There being no just reason for delay, pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure, the Clerk is ordered to enter this Final Judgment forthwith and without further notice. 

SO ORDERED 

Dated:  
New York, New York 

ARUN SUBRAMANIAN  
United States District Judge 

Case 1:23-cv-08543-AS     Document 34     Filed 05/12/25     Page 4 of 4

May 12, 2025

Case 1:23-cv-08543-AS     Document 37     Filed 05/12/25     Page 4 of 4