In re ROSS B. SHAPIRO
Ross B. Shapiro, former head trader at Nomura Securities, was barred from the industry for making misleading statements to customers about RMBS prices and compensation, violating securities laws.
Ross B. Shapiro, former head trader on Nomura Securities' RMBS desk, was sanctioned by the SEC for making materially misleading statements to customers about RMBS pricing and firm compensation between 2009 and 2016. Shapiro was found to have violated Sections 17(a) of the Securities Act and 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5. He was barred from association with any broker-dealer, investment adviser, or related entities, and from participating in penny stock offerings, with the right to apply for reentry after two years.
Ross B. Shapiro, former head trader on Nomura Securities' RMBS desk, was sanctioned by the SEC for making materially misleading statements to customers about RMBS pricing and firm compensation between 2009 and 2016. The SEC's civil action, resolved by a consent judgment on October 3, 2018, found Shapiro violated Sections 17(a) of the Securities Act and 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5. Without admitting or denying the allegations, Shapiro consented to a permanent bar from association with any broker-dealer, investment adviser, or related entities, and from participating in penny stock offerings. The order allows him to apply for reentry after two years, subject to conditions including satisfaction of any disgorgement, arbitration awards, or restitution orders. The SEC imposed no monetary penalty, focusing instead on permanent industry exclusion as a remedial sanction to protect investors and uphold market integrity.
Extracted insights
- person respondent shapiro
- person ross b. shapiro
- agency Securities and Exchange Commission
- organization Securities and Exchange Commission
- agency the securities and exchange commission
- court united states district court
- organization United States District Court
- The Securities and Exchange Commission deems it appropriate public administrative proceedings be, and hereby are, instituted
- Respondent has submitted an Offer of Settlement
- Respondent consents to the entry this Order Instituting Administrative Proceedings
- The Commission finds Respondent was the head trader on the residential mortgage-backed securities ("RMBS") desk at Nomura Securities International, Inc.
- Respondent was a registered representative associated with Nomura
- a final judgment was entered against Respondent, permanently enjoining him from future violations
- The Commission’s complaint alleged Respondent repeatedly made materially misleading statements to customers about, among other things, the prices at which Nomura had bought and/or sold RMBS and the amount of the firm’s compensation for arranging the trades
- The Commission deems it appropriate to impose the sanctions agreed to in Respondent’s Offer
- Respondent Shapiro be barred from association with any broker, dealer, investment adviser, municipal securities dealer, municipal advisor, transfer agent, or nationally recognized statistical rating organization
- Respondent Shapiro be barred from participating in any offering of a penny stock
- Ross B. Shapiro made misleading statements to customers about prices and compensation for RMBS trades
- Securities and Exchange Commission entered judgment against Ross B. Shapiro for violations of Section 17(a) and Section 10(b)
- Ross B. Shapiro was head trader on the RMBS desk at Nomura Securities International
- Ross B. Shapiro was barred from association with brokers, dealers, investment advisers, and penny stock offerings
- Securities and Exchange Commission instituted proceedings against Ross B. Shapiro
- Ross B. Shapiro submitted offer of settlement
- Ross B. Shapiro consented to entry of Order
- Commission finds Respondent was head trader at Nomura
- Respondent made misleading statements to customers about RMBS prices and compensation
- United States District Court entered judgment against Ross B. Shapiro
- Commission imposed sanctions based on Offer
- Ross B. Shapiro barred from association with broker, dealer, investment adviser, or other regulated entity
- Ross B. Shapiro barred from participating in any offering of a penny stock
- Ross B. Shapiro was head trader Nomura Securities International, Inc.
- Ross B. Shapiro was associated with Nomura
- Ross B. Shapiro was permanently enjoined future violations of Section 17(a)
- Commission alleged Respondent made materially misleading statements
- Respondent made statements prices at which Nomura had bought and/or sold RMBS
- Respondent Shapiro is barred association with any broker, dealer, investment adviser
- Respondent Shapiro is barred participating in any offering of a penny stock
- Commission instituted proceedings Ross B. Shapiro
- Respondent submitted Offer of Settlement
- Commission accepted Offer of Settlement
- Ross B. Shapiro violated Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Release No. 84390 / October 10, 2018
INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF 1940
Release No. 5056 / October 10, 2018
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
File No. 3-18863
In the Matter of
ROSS B. SHAPIRO,
Respondent.
ORDER INSTITUTING
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS
PURSUANT TO SECTION 15(b) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
AND SECTION 203(f) OF THE
INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF 1940,
MAKING FINDINGS, AND IMPOSING
REMEDIAL SANCTIONS
I.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) deems it appropriate and in the
public interest that public administrative proceedings be, and hereby are, instituted pursuant to
Section 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) and Section 203(f) of the
Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (“Advisers Act”) against Ross B. Shapiro (“Respondent”).
II.
In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, Respondent has submitted an Offer
of Settlement (the “Offer”) which the Commission has determined to accept. Solely for the
purpose of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the
Commission, or to which the Commission is a party, and without admitting or denying the findings
herein, except as to the Commission’s jurisdiction over him and the subject matter of these
proceedings and the findings contained in paragraph III.2. below, which are admitted, Respondent
consents to the entry of this Order Instituting Administrative Proceedings Pursuant to Section 15(b)
2
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Section 203(f) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940,
Making Findings, and Imposing Remedial Sanctions (“Order”), as set forth below.
III.
On the basis of this Order and Respondent’s Offer, the Commission finds that
1. Respondent was the head trader on the residential mortgage-backed securities
(“RMBS”) desk at Nomura Securities International, Inc., a broker-dealer and investment adviser
registered with the Commission. From August 2009 through May 2016 Respondent was a
registered representative associated with Nomura.
2. On October 3, 2018, a final judgment was entered by consent against Respondent,
permanently enjoining him from future violations of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933
and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, in the civil action entitled
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Ross B. Shapiro, et al., Civil Action Number 15 Civ.
7045, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
3. The Commission’s complaint alleged that, in connection with the sale of RMBS at
Nomura, Respondent repeatedly made materially misleading statements to customers about, among
other things, the prices at which Nomura had bought and/or sold RMBS and the amount of the
firm’s compensation for arranging the trades.
IV.
In view of the foregoing, the Commission deems it appropriate and in the public interest to
impose the sanctions agreed to in Respondent’s Offer.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED pursuant to Section 15(b)(6) of the Exchange Act,
and Section 203(f) of the Advisers Act, that Respondent Shapiro be, and hereby is barred from
association with any broker, dealer, investment adviser, municipal securities dealer, municipal
advisor, transfer agent, or nationally recognized statistical rating organization; and
Pursuant to Section 15(b)(6) of the Exchange Act Respondent Shapiro be, and hereby is
barred from participating in any offering of a penny stock, including: acting as a promoter, finder,
consultant, agent or other person who engages in activities with a broker, dealer or issuer for
purposes of the issuance or trading in any penny stock, or inducing or attempting to induce the
purchase or sale of any penny stock; with the right to apply for reentry after two years to the
appropriate self-regulatory organization, or if there is none, to the Commission.
Any reapplication for association by the Respondent will be subject to the applicable laws
and regulations governing the reentry process, and reentry may be conditioned upon a number of
factors, including, but not limited to, the satisfaction of any or all of the following: (a) any
disgorgement ordered against the Respondent, whether or not the Commission has fully or partially
3
waived payment of such disgorgement; (b) any arbitration award related to the conduct that served
as the basis for the Commission order; (c) any self-regulatory organization arbitration award to a
customer, whether or not related to the conduct that served as the basis for the Commission order;
and (d) any restitution order by a self-regulatory organization, whether or not related to the conduct
that served as the basis for the Commission order.
For the Commission, by its Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority.
Brent J. Fields
Secretary
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Release No. 84390 / October 10, 2018
INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF 1940
Release No. 5056 / October 10, 2018
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
File No. 3-18863
In the Matter of
ROSS B. SHAPIRO,
Respondent.
ORDER INSTITUTING
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS
PURSUANT TO SECTION 15(b) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
AND SECTION 203(f) OF THE
INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF 1940,
MAKING FINDINGS, AND IMPOSING
REMEDIAL SANCTIONS
I.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) deems it appropriate and in the
public interest that public administrative proceedings be, and hereby are, instituted pursuant to
Section 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) and Section 203(f) of the
Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (“Advisers Act”) against Ross B. Shapiro (“Respondent”).
II.
In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, Respondent has submitted an Offer
of Settlement (the “Offer”) which the Commission has determined to accept. Solely for the
purpose of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the
Commission, or to which the Commission is a party, and without admitting or denying the findings
herein, except as to the Commission’s jurisdiction over him and the subject matter of these
proceedings and the findings contained in paragraph III.2. below, which are admitted, Respondent
consents to the entry of this Order Instituting Administrative Proceedings Pursuant to Section 15(b)
2
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Section 203(f) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940,
Making Findings, and Imposing Remedial Sanctions (“Order”), as set forth below.
III.
On the basis of this Order and Respondent’s Offer, the Commission finds that
1. Respondent was the head trader on the residential mortgage-backed securities
(“RMBS”) desk at Nomura Securities International, Inc., a broker-dealer and investment adviser
registered with the Commission. From August 2009 through May 2016 Respondent was a
registered representative associated with Nomura.
2. On October 3, 2018, a final judgment was entered by consent against Respondent,
permanently enjoining him from future violations of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933
and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, in the civil action entitled
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Ross B. Shapiro, et al., Civil Action Number 15 Civ.
7045, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
3. The Commission’s complaint alleged that, in connection with the sale of RMBS at
Nomura, Respondent repeatedly made materially misleading statements to customers about, among
other things, the prices at which Nomura had bought and/or sold RMBS and the amount of the
firm’s compensation for arranging the trades.
IV.
In view of the foregoing, the Commission deems it appropriate and in the public interest to
impose the sanctions agreed to in Respondent’s Offer.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED pursuant to Section 15(b)(6) of the Exchange Act,
and Section 203(f) of the Advisers Act, that Respondent Shapiro be, and hereby is barred from
association with any broker, dealer, investment adviser, municipal securities dealer, municipal
advisor, transfer agent, or nationally recognized statistical rating organization; and
Pursuant to Section 15(b)(6) of the Exchange Act Respondent Shapiro be, and hereby is
barred from participating in any offering of a penny stock, including: acting as a promoter, finder,
consultant, agent or other person who engages in activities with a broker, dealer or issuer for
purposes of the issuance or trading in any penny stock, or inducing or attempting to induce the
purchase or sale of any penny stock; with the right to apply for reentry after two years to the
appropriate self-regulatory organization, or if there is none, to the Commission.
Any reapplication for association by the Respondent will be subject to the applicable laws
and regulations governing the reentry process, and reentry may be conditioned upon a number of
factors, including, but not limited to, the satisfaction of any or all of the following: (a) any
disgorgement ordered against the Respondent, whether or not the Commission has fully or partially
3
waived payment of such disgorgement; (b) any arbitration award related to the conduct that served
as the basis for the Commission order; (c) any self-regulatory organization arbitration award to a
customer, whether or not related to the conduct that served as the basis for the Commission order;
and (d) any restitution order by a self-regulatory organization, whether or not related to the conduct
that served as the basis for the Commission order.
For the Commission, by its Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority.
Brent J. Fields
Secretary