2025-03-28 sec-litreleases judgment 158 KB 8,112 chars

SEC v. IVARS AUZINS, No. 1:21-cv-06693, Eastern District of New York (Mar. 28, 2025) — Judgment

raw: SEC v. IVARS AUZINS

SEC v. IVARS AUZINS, No. 1:21-cv-06693 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 28, 2025)

Caption
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Ivars Auzins
summary

Ivars Auzins, also known as Ron Ramsey, entered a final judgment with the SEC to resolve allegations of securities fraud and unregistered crypto asset offerings.

paragraph

The court ordered Ivars Auzins to pay $412,201.15, consisting of $300,000 in disgorgement and $112,201.15 in prejudgment interest, which was satisfied via a related criminal forfeiture order. Auzins was permanently enjoined from violating Sections 10(b) of the Exchange Act and 17(a) of the Securities Act. Additionally, the judgment imposes a ten-year prohibition on his participation in any crypto asset offerings sold as securities.

narrative

The Securities and Exchange Commission obtained a final judgment against Ivars Auzins, also known as Ron Ramsey, for violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Securities Act of 1933. The court permanently enjoined Auzins from engaging in fraudulent schemes, making untrue statements of material fact, and the unregistered sale of securities. Auzins was ordered to pay a total of $412,201.15, which includes $300,000 in disgorgement and $112,201.15 in prejudgment interest, though this amount was deemed satisfied by a related criminal forfeiture order. Furthermore, the judgment prohibits Auzins from participating in any crypto asset offerings sold as securities for a period of ten years. The defendant consented to the court's jurisdiction and the entry of the judgment, waiving his right to appeal. This resolution concludes the SEC's civil enforcement action regarding his fraudulent conduct.

Enriched metadata

Scheme
unregistered-securities (95%)
Court
Eastern District of New York
Case No.
1:21-cv-06693
Disgorgement
$300,000
Classified unregistered-securities(confidence 95%). EDGAR detection: forms Form D/S-1· recall 41% / precision 30%. detection rule →
Statutes
15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)15 U.S.C. § 77q(a)15 U.S.C. § 77e15 U.S.C. § 77h15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)15 U.S.C. § 77t(b)15 U.S.C. § 77t(e)15 U.S.C. § 78l15 U.S.C. § 78o(d)11 U.S.C. §52311 U.S.C. §523(a)17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange ActSection 17(a) of the Securities ActSection 5 of the Securities ActSection 8 of the Securities ActSection 20(b) of the Securities ActSection 20(e) of the Securities ActRule 10b-5
Parties
Securities and Exchange CommissionIVARS AUZINS
Keywords
ordered adjudgedadjudged decreedfurther orderedsecuritiesorderedadjudgeddecreedfurtherfinalldh-mmh documentdocument pagepage pageidsecurityexchangeinterstate commerce

Extracted insights

Dollar amounts 3
  • $412K $412,201 $100K–$1M
  • $300K $300,000 $100K–$1M
  • $112K $112,201 $100K–$1M
Entities 4
  • person ivars auzins ×2
  • person Daniel Gaines
  • person Ron Ramsey
  • agency Securities and Exchange Commission
Triples 7
  • Securities And Exchange Commission filed a Complaint Ivars Auzins
  • Ivars Auzins consented to the Court's jurisdiction over Defendant and the subject matter of this action
  • Ivars Auzins consented to entry of this Final Judgment and waived findings of fact and conclusions of law
  • Ivars Auzins waived any right to appeal from this Final Judgment
  • Court restrained and enjoined Defendant from violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
  • Court restrained and enjoined Defendant from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933
  • Court restrained and enjoined Defendant from violating Section 5 of the Securities Act
Text layers
Extracted body text (8,112c)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION,
Plaintiff,
-against-
IVARS AUZINS, A/K/A RON RAMSEY and
DANIEL GAINES,
Defendant.
21 Civ. 6693 (LDH) (MMH)
FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT AVARS AUZINS
The Securities and Exchange Commission having filed a Complaint and Defendant Ivars
Auzins (“Defendant”) having entered a general appearanc
e; consented to the Court’s jurisdiction
over Defendant and the subject matter of this action; consented to entry of this Final Judgment,
waived findings of fact and conclusions of law; and waived any right to appeal from this Final
Judgment:
I.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is
permanently restrained and enjoined from violating, directly or indirectly, Section 10(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)] and Rule 10b-5
promulgated thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5], by using any means or instrumentality of
interstate commerce, or of the mails, or of any facility of any national securities exchange, in
connection with the purchase or sale of any security:
(a)to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud;

2
(b)to make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact
necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances
under which they were made, not misleading; or
(c)to engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would
operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who
receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise:  (a) Defendant’s
officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or
participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a).
II.
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant
is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933
(the “Securities Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 77q(a)] in the offer or sale of any security by the use of any
means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or by use of the
mails, directly or indirectly:
(a)to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud;
(b)to obtain money or property by means of any untrue statement of a material fact
or any omission of a material fact necessary in order to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading;
or
(c)to engage in any transaction, practice, or course of business which operates or
would operate as a fraud or deceit upon the purchaser.

3
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who
receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise:  (a) Defendant’s
officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or
participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a).
III.
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant
is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 5 of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C.
§ 77e] by, directly or indirectly, in the absence of any applicable exemption:
(a)Unless a registration statement is in effect as to a security, making use of any
means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce
or of the mails to sell such security through the use or medium of any prospectus
or otherwise;
(b)Unless a registration statement is in effect as to a security, carrying or causing to
be carried through the mails or in interstate commerce, by any means or
instruments of transportation, any such security for the purpose of sale or for
delivery after sale; or
(c)Making use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in
interstate commerce or of the mails to offer to sell or offer to buy through the use
or medium of any prospectus or otherwise any security, unless a registration
statement has been filed with the Commission as to such security, or while the
registration statement is the subject of a refusal order or stop order or (prior to the
effective date of the registration statement) any public proceeding or examination

4
under Section 8 of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. § 77h].
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who
receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise:  (a) Defendant’s
officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or
participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a).
IV.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that pursuant to Sections
21(d)(1) and 21(d)(5) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)(1) and (5)], and Section 20(b) of
the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. § 77t(b)], Defendant is prohibited, for ten years following the date
of entry of this Final Judgment, from directly or indirectly participating in any offering of a
crypto asset offered and sold as a security, including engaging in activities with a broker, dealer,
or issuer for purposes of issuing, trading, or inducing or attempting to induce the purchase or sale
of any crypto asset offered and sold as a security, provided, however, that such injunction shall
not prevent Defendant from purchasing or selling crypto assets for his own personal account.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who
receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise:  (a) Defendant’s
officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or
participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a).
V.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, pursuant to Section
21(d)(2) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)(2)] and/or Section 20(e) of the Securities Act

5
[15 U.S.C. § 77t(e)], Defendant is prohibited, for ten years following the date of entry of this
Final Judgment, from acting as an officer or director of any issuer that has a class of securities
registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78l] or that is required to file
reports pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78o(d)].
VI.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is liable
for disgorgement of $300,000 together with prejudgment interest thereon in the amount
$112,201.15, for a total of $412,201.15.  Defendant’s obligation to pay this amount of
disgorgement and prejudgment interest is deemed satisfied by entry of the forfeiture order of
against him in the related criminal case, United States v. Auzins, 21-CR-00357 (E.D.N.Y.) (Dkt.
# 42).
VII.
IT
 IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, for purposes of
exceptions to discharge set forth in Section 523 of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. §523, the
allegations in the complaint are true and admitted by Defendant, and further, any debt for
disgorgement, prejudgment interest, civil penalty or other amounts due by Defendant under this
Final Judgment or any other judgment, order, consent order, decree or settlement agreement
entered in connection with this proceeding, is a debt for the violation by Defendant of the federal
securities laws or any regulation or order issued under such laws, as set forth in Section
523(a)(19) of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. §523(a)(19).

6
VIII.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court shall retain
jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Final Judgment.
Dated:  ______________, _____
____________________________________
HONORABLE LASHANN DEARCY HALL,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
February 5
2025
s/ LDH
OCR text (8,899c · tika · 95% conf)
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 
COMMISSION, 

Plaintiff, 

-against-

IVARS AUZINS, A/K/A RON RAMSEY and 
DANIEL GAINES, 

Defendant.  

21 Civ. 6693 (LDH) (MMH)     

FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT AVARS AUZINS

The Securities and Exchange Commission having filed a Complaint and Defendant Ivars 

Auzins (“Defendant”) having entered a general appearance; consented to the Court’s jurisdiction 

over Defendant and the subject matter of this action; consented to entry of this Final Judgment, 

waived findings of fact and conclusions of law; and waived any right to appeal from this Final 

Judgment: 

I. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is 

permanently restrained and enjoined from violating, directly or indirectly, Section 10(b) of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)] and Rule 10b-5 

promulgated thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5], by using any means or instrumentality of 

interstate commerce, or of the mails, or of any facility of any national securities exchange, in 

connection with the purchase or sale of any security: 

(a) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud;

Case 1:21-cv-06693-LDH-MMH     Document 18     Filed 02/07/25     Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 88



2 

(b) to make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact

necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances

under which they were made, not misleading; or

(c) to engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would

operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who 

receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise:  (a) Defendant’s 

officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or 

participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a). 

II. 

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant 

is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 

(the “Securities Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 77q(a)] in the offer or sale of any security by the use of any 

means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or by use of the 

mails, directly or indirectly: 

(a) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud;

(b) to obtain money or property by means of any untrue statement of a material fact

or any omission of a material fact necessary in order to make the statements

made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading;

or

(c) to engage in any transaction, practice, or course of business which operates or

would operate as a fraud or deceit upon the purchaser.

Case 1:21-cv-06693-LDH-MMH     Document 18     Filed 02/07/25     Page 2 of 6 PageID #: 89



3 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who 

receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise:  (a) Defendant’s 

officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or 

participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a). 

III. 

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant 

is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 5 of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. 

§ 77e] by, directly or indirectly, in the absence of any applicable exemption:

(a) Unless a registration statement is in effect as to a security, making use of any

means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce

or of the mails to sell such security through the use or medium of any prospectus

or otherwise;

(b) Unless a registration statement is in effect as to a security, carrying or causing to

be carried through the mails or in interstate commerce, by any means or

instruments of transportation, any such security for the purpose of sale or for

delivery after sale; or

(c) Making use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in

interstate commerce or of the mails to offer to sell or offer to buy through the use

or medium of any prospectus or otherwise any security, unless a registration

statement has been filed with the Commission as to such security, or while the

registration statement is the subject of a refusal order or stop order or (prior to the

effective date of the registration statement) any public proceeding or examination

Case 1:21-cv-06693-LDH-MMH     Document 18     Filed 02/07/25     Page 3 of 6 PageID #: 90



4 

under Section 8 of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. § 77h]. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who 

receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise:  (a) Defendant’s 

officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or 

participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a). 

IV. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that pursuant to Sections 

21(d)(1) and 21(d)(5) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)(1) and (5)], and Section 20(b) of 

the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. § 77t(b)], Defendant is prohibited, for ten years following the date 

of entry of this Final Judgment, from directly or indirectly participating in any offering of a 

crypto asset offered and sold as a security, including engaging in activities with a broker, dealer, 

or issuer for purposes of issuing, trading, or inducing or attempting to induce the purchase or sale 

of any crypto asset offered and sold as a security, provided, however, that such injunction shall 

not prevent Defendant from purchasing or selling crypto assets for his own personal account.  

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who 

receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise:  (a) Defendant’s 

officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or 

participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a). 

V. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, pursuant to Section 

21(d)(2) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)(2)] and/or Section 20(e) of the Securities Act 

Case 1:21-cv-06693-LDH-MMH     Document 18     Filed 02/07/25     Page 4 of 6 PageID #: 91



5 

[15 U.S.C. § 77t(e)], Defendant is prohibited, for ten years following the date of entry of this 

Final Judgment, from acting as an officer or director of any issuer that has a class of securities 

registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78l] or that is required to file 

reports pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78o(d)]. 

VI. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is liable 

for disgorgement of $300,000 together with prejudgment interest thereon in the amount 

$112,201.15, for a total of $412,201.15.  Defendant’s obligation to pay this amount of 

disgorgement and prejudgment interest is deemed satisfied by entry of the forfeiture order of 

against him in the related criminal case, United States v. Auzins, 21-CR-00357 (E.D.N.Y.) (Dkt. 

# 42). 

VII. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, for purposes of 

exceptions to discharge set forth in Section 523 of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. §523, the 

allegations in the complaint are true and admitted by Defendant, and further, any debt for 

disgorgement, prejudgment interest, civil penalty or other amounts due by Defendant under this 

Final Judgment or any other judgment, order, consent order, decree or settlement agreement 

entered in connection with this proceeding, is a debt for the violation by Defendant of the federal 

securities laws or any regulation or order issued under such laws, as set forth in Section 

523(a)(19) of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. §523(a)(19). 

Case 1:21-cv-06693-LDH-MMH     Document 18     Filed 02/07/25     Page 5 of 6 PageID #: 92



6 

VIII. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court shall retain 

jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Final Judgment. 

Dated:  ______________, _____ 

____________________________________ 
HONORABLE LASHANN DEARCY HALL,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

February 5 2025

s/ LDH

Case 1:21-cv-06693-LDH-MMH     Document 18     Filed 02/07/25     Page 6 of 6 PageID #: 93