2025-02-13 sec-litreleases judgment 105 KB 240 chars

SEC v. DAIICHI SANKYO, No. 1:15-cv-07045, Southern District of New York (Feb. 13, 2025) — Judgment

raw: Order Granting Final Judgment And Permanent Injunction

Order Granting Final Judgment And Permanent Injunction, No. 1:15-cv-07045 (Feb. 13, 2025)

Caption
NEAR v. DAIICHI SANKYO, INC.
summary

Information regarding the specific parties, fraud details, and outcomes for Case 1:15-cv-07045-RMB-RWL cannot be determined from the provided text.

paragraph

The provided OCR text contains only case metadata and page numbering for Document 221, filed on January 28, 2025. No substantive allegations, financial amounts, or specific charges are present in the excerpt. Consequently, no legal or fraudulent details can be extracted from this source.

narrative

The provided input consists exclusively of document headers and page numbering for Case 1:15-cv-07045-RMB-RWL. The text identifies the filing date as January 28, 2025, but lacks any substantive content. There are no names of defendants, descriptions of fraudulent activities, or specific dollar amounts mentioned in the excerpt. While one summary draft suggests a securities fraud settlement, this information is not supported by the provided OCR text. Therefore, a complete narrative of the alleged misconduct or the case outcome cannot be constructed. The excerpt is insufficient for a financial fraud analysis.

Enriched metadata

Scheme
unclassified
Court
Southern District of New York
Case No.
1:15-cv-07045
Classified unclassified. No EDGAR filing fingerprint (criminal/DOJ-side scheme). detection rule →
Statutes
Parties
NEARDAIICHI SANKYO, INC.
Keywords
rmb-rwl documentdocument pagecv-rmb-rwldocumentpage

Extracted insights

Entities 2
  • person Michael a. Gramins
  • organization Securities and Exchange Commission
Triples 2
  • Case 1:15-cv-07045-RMB-RWL filed 01/28/25
  • Document 221 filed in Case 1:15-cv-07045-RMB-RWL
Text layers
Extracted body text (240c)

Case 1:15-cv-07045-RMB-RWL     Document 221     Filed 01/28/25     Page 1 of 3

Case 1:15-cv-07045-RMB-RWL     Document 221     Filed 01/28/25     Page 2 of 3

Case 1:15-cv-07045-RMB-RWL     Document 221     Filed 01/28/25     Page 3 of 3
OCR text (4,304c · tika+glm · 85% conf)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, : C. A. No. 1:15-cv-7045 (RMB)
Plaintiff,
v.
MICHAEL A. GRAMINS,
Defendant.

PROPOSED FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT MICHAEL A. GRAMINS

The Securities and Exchange Commission having filed a Complaint and Defendant Michael A. Gramins having entered a general appearance; consented to the Court's jurisdiction over Defendant and the subject matter of this action; consented to entry of this Judgment; waived findings of fact and conclusions of law; and waived any right to appeal from this Judgment:

I.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating, directly or indirectly, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") [15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)] and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5], by using any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce, or of the mails, or of any facility of any national securities exchange, in connection with the purchase or sale of any security:

(a) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud;

(b) to make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or

(c) to engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant's officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a).

II.

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Securities Act") [15 U.S.C. § 77q(a)] in the offer or sale of any security by the use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or by use of the mails, directly or indirectly:

(a) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud;

(b) to obtain money or property by means of any untrue statement of a material fact or any omission of a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading;

or

(c) to engage in any transaction, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon the purchaser.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant's officers,

agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a).

III.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Consent is incorporated herein with the same force and effect as if fully set forth herein, and that Defendant shall comply with all of the undertakings and agreements set forth therein.

IV.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, solely for purposes of exceptions to discharge set forth in Section 523 of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. §523, the allegations in the complaint are true and admitted by Defendant, and further, any debt for civil penalty or other amounts due by Defendant under this Final Judgment or any other judgment, order, consent order, decree or settlement agreement entered in connection with this proceeding, is a debt for the violation by Defendant of the federal securities laws or any regulation or order issued under such laws, as set forth in Section 523(a)(19) of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. §523(a)(19).

V.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Judgment.

Dated: January 28, 2025

R. J. H. Berman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE