2014-12-17 sec-litreleases litigation_release 68 KB 4,538 chars

SEC v. Avon Products, Inc., No. LR-23159, Southern District of New York (Dec. 17, 2014) — Press Release

raw: Avon Products, Inc.

Avon Products, Inc., No. LR-23159 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 17, 2014)

Caption
SEC v. Avon Products, Inc
summary

SEC charged Avon with FCPA violations for $8M in improper payments to Chinese officials, resulting in a $67M settlement.

paragraph

The SEC charged Avon Products, Inc. with violating the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act for failing to maintain adequate internal controls and accurate books and records regarding approximately $8 million in improper payments to Chinese government officials between 2004 and 2008. These payments, which included cash, gifts, and entertainment, were made to secure regulatory approvals and maintain a direct selling license in China, with transactions often concealed as false business expenses. To resolve the charges, Avon agreed to pay a total of $67.36 million, comprising $52.85 million in disgorgement and $14.5 million in prejudgment interest, while also accepting an 18-month independent compliance monitor and a permanent injunction against future violations.

narrative

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) charged Avon Products, Inc. with violating the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) for failing to implement controls that could detect and prevent payments made to Chinese government officials by its subsidiary from 2004 through 2008. The alleged misconduct involved approximately $8 million in improper payments, including cash, gifts, and entertainment, intended to secure regulatory approvals and maintain a direct selling license in China. To resolve the civil charges, Avon agreed to pay $67.36 million in disgorgement and prejudgment interest, accept a permanent injunction, and retain an independent compliance monitor for 18 months. The settlement is subject to court approval and took into account the company's cooperation and remedial measures. In related criminal proceedings, the Department of Justice announced a deferred prosecution agreement with Avon, resulting in additional criminal penalties.

Enriched metadata

Scheme
fcpa (100%)
Court
Southern District of New York
Settlement
$67,000,000
Disgorgement
$52,850,000
Victim loss
$67,000,000
Entity
Avon Products, Inc.
Ticker
AVP
Classified fcpa(confidence 100%). No EDGAR filing fingerprint (criminal/DOJ-side scheme). detection rule →
Parties
Securities and Exchange CommissionAvon Products, Inc.
Keywords
avonpaymentsavon productsdirect sellingsecurities exchangechinese subsidiarychineseproductsfcpachinaexchange commissionpayments madebooks recordsincexchange

Exhibits & Attached Documents (1)

Extracted insights

Dollar amounts 5
  • $67.00M $67 million $10M–$100M
  • $52.85M $52,850,000 $10M–$100M
  • $14.52M $14,515,013 $10M–$100M
  • $8.00M $8 million $1M–$10M
  • $1.65M $1.65 million $1M–$10M
Entities 2
  • company Avon Products, Inc.
  • organization Avon Products, Inc.
Triples 1
  • Avon Products, Inc. charged with FCPA violations for failing to put in place controls to detect and prevent payments to Chinese government officials by employees and consultants
Text layers
Extracted body text (4,538c)
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Litigation Release No. 23159 / December 17, 2014 Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Release No. AAER-3616 / December 17, 2014 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Avon Products, Inc., Civil Action No. 14-cv-9956 (KPF) (S.D.N.Y.) SEC Charges Avon Products, Inc. with Fcpa Violations The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged Avon Products, Inc. (Avon), a global beauty products manufacturer and seller, with failing to put in place controls that could have detected and prevented payments made to Chinese government officials by employees and consultants at an Avon Chinese subsidiary from 2004 through the third quarter of 2008. In addition, Avon's books and records failed to accurately record the details and purpose of the payments. The SEC alleged that the conduct violated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA). Avon has agreed to pay more than $67 million in disgorgement and prejudgment interest to settle the SEC's charges. The SEC's complaint alleges that the Chinese subsidiary made $8 million worth of payments in cash, gifts, travel, and entertainment to various Chinese officials to gain access to officials drafting and implementing direct selling regulations in China, to be among the first allowed to test the regulations, to be the first to receive a direct selling license, and, subsequently to keep the clean corporate image required to retain the license. Avon received approval to test direct selling in China in 2005, and in March 2006, it received the first direct selling business license. Through an internal audit report, Avon management learned in late 2005 of potential FCPA problems in China. Management consulted an outside law firm, directed that reforms be instituted, and sent internal audit back to follow up. However, ultimately, no such reforms were instituted at the Chinese subsidiary. Avon began a full-blown internal investigation in 2008, after its CEO received a letter from a whistleblower in China. Some examples of payments alleged in the complaint include payments for travel within China or to the United States or Europe, corporate box tickets to the China Open tennis tournament, gifts of Louis Vuitton merchandise, Gucci bags, and Tiffany pens, and $1.65 million for meals and entertainment. The complaint also alleges payments made to avoid fines or negative news articles that might have impacted Avon's corporate image and affected the Chinese subsidiary's direct selling license. In some instances, the payments were concealed by falsely recording the transactions as employee business expenses or as re-imbursement of a third-party vendor. In other instances, the records for the payments set forth almost no detail at all. The resulting books and records did not allow a reviewer to ascertain the government official or state-owned entities that received the payments or the purpose for which the payments were made. The SEC's complaint charges Avon with violating Sections 13(b)(2)(A) and 13(b)(2)(B) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 -- the books and records and internal controls provisions of the FCPA. Avon consented to the entry of a proposed final judgment ordering the company to pay disgorgement of $52,850,000 in benefits resulting from the alleged misconduct, plus prejudgment interest of $14,515,013.13, permanently enjoining the company from violating Exchange Act Sections 13(b)(2)(A) and 13(b)(2)(B), and requiring the company to retain an independent compliance monitor to review its FCPA compliance program for a period of 18 months, followed by an 18-month period of self-reporting on its compliance efforts. The settlement is subject to the approval of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. In reaching the proposed settlement, the SEC took into account Avon's cooperation and significant remedial measures, including its implementation of an enhanced compliance program and worldwide FCPA training. In related criminal proceedings, the U.S. Department of Justice and the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York today announced a deferred prosecution agreement with Avon and criminal charges against Avon's Chinese subsidiary. Avon entities agreed to pay over $67 million in criminal penalties in connection with those proceedings. The SEC appreciates the assistance of the Fraud Section of the Department of Justice, the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. SEC Complaint
OCR text (4,538c · html-text · 99% conf)
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Litigation Release No. 23159 / December 17, 2014 Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Release No. AAER-3616 / December 17, 2014 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Avon Products, Inc., Civil Action No. 14-cv-9956 (KPF) (S.D.N.Y.) SEC Charges Avon Products, Inc. with Fcpa Violations The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged Avon Products, Inc. (Avon), a global beauty products manufacturer and seller, with failing to put in place controls that could have detected and prevented payments made to Chinese government officials by employees and consultants at an Avon Chinese subsidiary from 2004 through the third quarter of 2008. In addition, Avon's books and records failed to accurately record the details and purpose of the payments. The SEC alleged that the conduct violated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA). Avon has agreed to pay more than $67 million in disgorgement and prejudgment interest to settle the SEC's charges. The SEC's complaint alleges that the Chinese subsidiary made $8 million worth of payments in cash, gifts, travel, and entertainment to various Chinese officials to gain access to officials drafting and implementing direct selling regulations in China, to be among the first allowed to test the regulations, to be the first to receive a direct selling license, and, subsequently to keep the clean corporate image required to retain the license. Avon received approval to test direct selling in China in 2005, and in March 2006, it received the first direct selling business license. Through an internal audit report, Avon management learned in late 2005 of potential FCPA problems in China. Management consulted an outside law firm, directed that reforms be instituted, and sent internal audit back to follow up. However, ultimately, no such reforms were instituted at the Chinese subsidiary. Avon began a full-blown internal investigation in 2008, after its CEO received a letter from a whistleblower in China. Some examples of payments alleged in the complaint include payments for travel within China or to the United States or Europe, corporate box tickets to the China Open tennis tournament, gifts of Louis Vuitton merchandise, Gucci bags, and Tiffany pens, and $1.65 million for meals and entertainment. The complaint also alleges payments made to avoid fines or negative news articles that might have impacted Avon's corporate image and affected the Chinese subsidiary's direct selling license. In some instances, the payments were concealed by falsely recording the transactions as employee business expenses or as re-imbursement of a third-party vendor. In other instances, the records for the payments set forth almost no detail at all. The resulting books and records did not allow a reviewer to ascertain the government official or state-owned entities that received the payments or the purpose for which the payments were made. The SEC's complaint charges Avon with violating Sections 13(b)(2)(A) and 13(b)(2)(B) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 -- the books and records and internal controls provisions of the FCPA. Avon consented to the entry of a proposed final judgment ordering the company to pay disgorgement of $52,850,000 in benefits resulting from the alleged misconduct, plus prejudgment interest of $14,515,013.13, permanently enjoining the company from violating Exchange Act Sections 13(b)(2)(A) and 13(b)(2)(B), and requiring the company to retain an independent compliance monitor to review its FCPA compliance program for a period of 18 months, followed by an 18-month period of self-reporting on its compliance efforts. The settlement is subject to the approval of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. In reaching the proposed settlement, the SEC took into account Avon's cooperation and significant remedial measures, including its implementation of an enhanced compliance program and worldwide FCPA training. In related criminal proceedings, the U.S. Department of Justice and the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York today announced a deferred prosecution agreement with Avon and criminal charges against Avon's Chinese subsidiary. Avon entities agreed to pay over $67 million in criminal penalties in connection with those proceedings. The SEC appreciates the assistance of the Fraud Section of the Department of Justice, the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. SEC Complaint