SEC v. HOMELAND SAFETY INTERNATIONAL INC, No. 1:22-cv-03089, Northern District of Texas (Dec. 19, 2024)
raw: SEC v. HOMELAND SAFETY
SEC v. HOMELAND SAFETY, No. 1:22-cv-03089 (Dec. 19, 2024)
Petar D. Mihaylov and Yuri P. Markov entered a final judgment with the SEC, agreeing to disgorge $1,550,000 and accepting a permanent bar from penny stock offerings.
Defendants Petar D. Mihaylov and Yuri P. Markov were ordered to pay $1,550,000 in disgorgement to the SEC for profits gained through alleged fraudulent conduct. The judgment addresses violations of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including unregistered securities sales. The court also imposed a permanent bar preventing the defendants from participating in any penny stock offerings.
The Securities and Exchange Commission obtained a final judgment against Petar D. Mihaylov and Yuri P. Markov regarding their involvement with Homeland Safety International Inc. The defendants consented to the judgment without admitting or denying the allegations of violating Sections 10(b) and 17(a) of the Exchange Act and Section 5 of the Securities Act. The court ordered the defendants to disgorge $1,550,000 in profits gained from the alleged misconduct. Additionally, the defendants are permanently enjoined from future violations of federal securities laws and are barred from participating in any penny stock offerings. The judgment includes a specific payment schedule to satisfy the disgorgement obligation to the SEC.
Extracted insights
- $1.55M $1,550,000 $1M–$10M
- $1.55M $1,550,000 $1M–$10M
- $1.15M $1,150,000 $1M–$10M
- $1.15M $1,150,000 $1M–$10M
- $200K $200,000 $100K–$1M
- $200K $200,000 $100K–$1M
- court united states district court
- United States District Court Ordered Defendants Petar D. Mihaylov And Yuri P. Markov
- United States District Court Adjudged Defendants Petar D. Mihaylov And Yuri P. Markov
- United States District Court Decreed Defendants Petar D. Mihaylov And Yuri P. Markov
- Defendants Consented To The Court’s Jurisdiction Over Defendants And Over The Subject Matter Of This Action
- Defendants Consented To Entry Of This Final Judgment Without Admitting Or Denying The Allegations Of The Complaint
- Defendants Waived Findings Of Fact And Conclusions Of Law
- Defendants Waived Any Right To Appeal From This Final Judgment
- United States District Court Permanently Restrained And Enjoined Defendants From Violating Section10(b) Of The Securities Exchange Act Of 1934
- United States District Court Permanently Restrained And Enjoined Defendants From Violating Section 17(a) Of The Securities Act Of 1933
- United States District Court Permanently Restrained And Enjoined Defendants From Violating Section 5 Of The Securities Act
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. HOMELAND SAFETY INTERNATIONAL INC, et al., Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 3:08-cv-1197-O FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANTS PETAR D. MIHAYLOV AND YURI P. MARKOV Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission having filed a Complaint and Defendant Petar D. Mihaylov and Defendant Yuri P. Markov (collectively "Defendants") having entered a general appearance; consented to the Court’s jurisdiction over Defendants and over the subject matter of this action; consented to entry of this Final Judgment without admitting or denying the allegations of the Complaint (except as to jurisdiction); waived findings of fact and conclusions of law; and waived any right to appeal from this Final Judgment: I. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendants and Defendants’ agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all persons in active concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise are permanently restrained and enjoined from violating, directly or indirectly, Section10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") [15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)] and Rule 10b-5 1 promulgated thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5], by using any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce, or of the mails, or of any facility of any national securities exchange, in connection with the purchase or sale of any security: (a)to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; (b) to make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or (c)to engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person. II. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendants and Defendants’ agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all persons in active concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise are permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 77q(a)] in the offer or sale of any security by the use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or by use of the mails, directly or indirectly: (a)to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; (b)to obtain money or property by means of any untrue statement of a material fact or any omission of a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or 2 (c)to engage in any transaction, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon the purchaser. III. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendants and Defendants’ agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all persons in active concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise are permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 5 of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. § 77e] by, directly or indirectly, in the absence of any applicable exemption: (a)Unless a registration statement is in effect as to a security, making use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or of the mails to sell such security through the use or medium of any prospectus or otherwise; (b)Unless a registration statement is in effect as to a security, carrying or causing to be carried through the mails or in interstate commerce, by any means or instruments of transportation, any such security for the purpose of sale or for delivery after sale; or (c)Making use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or of the mails to offer to sell or offer to buy through the use or medium of any prospectus or otherwise any security, unless a registration statement has been filed with the Commission as to such security, or while the registration statement is the subject of a refusal order or stop order or (prior to the effective date of the registration statement) any public 3 proceeding or examination under Section 8 of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. § 77h]. IV. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendants are permanently barred from participating in an offering of penny stock, including engaging in activities with a broker, dealer, or issuer for purposes of issuing, trading, or inducing or attempting to induce the purchase or sale of any penny stock. A penny stock is any equity security that has a price of less than five dollars, except as provided in Rule 3a51-1 under the Exchange Act [17 C.F.R. 240.3a51-1]. V. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendants are liable for disgorgement of $1,550,000, representing profits gained as a result of the conduct alleged in the Complaint. Defendants shall satisfy this obligation by paying $1,550,000 to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the terms of the payment schedule set forth in paragraph VI below after entry of this Final Judgment. Defendants may transmit payment electronically to the Commission, which will provide detailed ACH transfer/Fedwire instructions upon request. Payment may also be made directly from a bank account via Pay.gov through the SEC website at http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/ofm.htm. Defendants may also pay by certified check, bank cashier's check, or United States postal money order payable to the Securities and Exchange Commission, which shall be delivered or mailed to Enterprise Services Center Accounts Receivable Branch 4 6500 South MacArthur Boulevard Oklahoma City, OK 73169 and shall be accompanied by a letter identifying the case title, civil action number, and name of this Court; identifying by name the Defendant making the payment; and specifying that payment is made pursuant to this Final Judgment. Defendants shall simultaneously transmit photocopies of evidence of payment and case identifying information to the Commission's counsel in this action. By making payment, Defendants relinquish all legal and equitable right, title, and interest in such funds and no part of the funds shall be returned to Defendants. The Commission shall hold the funds (collectively, the "Fund") and may propose a plan to distribute the Fund subject to the Court's approval. The Court shall retain jurisdiction over the administration of any distribution of the Fund. If the Commission staff determines that the Fund will not be distributed, the Commission shall send the funds paid pursuant to this Final Judgment to the United States Treasury. VI. Defendants shall pay the total of disgorgement due of $1,550,000 to the Commission according to the following schedule: (1) Defendants shall pay $1,150,000, jointly and severally, within 14 business days of entry of this Final Judgment; (2) Defendant Petar D. Mihaylov shall pay $200,000, severally, within two years after entry of this Final Judgment. (3) Defendant Yuri P. Markov shall pay $200,000, severally, within two years after entry of this Final Judgment. All payments shall be deemed made on the date they are received by the Commission and shall be applied first to any post-judgment interest, which begins to accrue pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961 fourteen (14) business days after the entry of Final Judgment on any unpaid portion of the 5 $1,150,000 amount owing and two years after entry of Final Judgment on any unpaid portion of the respective $200,000 amounts owing. If either of the Defendants fails to make any payment by the date agreed and/or in the amount agreed according to the schedule set forth above, all outstanding payments under this Final Judgment, including post-judgment interest, minus any payments made, shall become due and payable immediately at the discretion of the staff of the Commission without further application to the Court. Thereafter, the Commission may enforce the Court's judgment for disgorgement and prejudgment interest by moving for civil contempt (and/or through other collection procedures authorized by law). VII. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Consent is incorporated herein with the same force and effect as if fully set forth herein, and that Defendants shall comply with all of the undertakings and agreements set forth therein. VIII. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Final Judgment. IX. There being no just reason for delay, pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Clerk is ordered to enter this Final Judgment forthwith and without further notice. SO ORDERED on this 19th day of September, 2012. 6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. HOMELAND SAFETY INTERNATIONAL INC, et al., Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 3:08-cv-1197-O FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANTS PETAR D. MIHAYLOV AND YURI P. MARKOV Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission having filed a Complaint and Defendant Petar D. Mihaylov and Defendant Yuri P. Markov (collectively "Defendants") having entered a general appearance; consented to the Court’s jurisdiction over Defendants and over the subject matter of this action; consented to entry of this Final Judgment without admitting or denying the allegations of the Complaint (except as to jurisdiction); waived findings of fact and conclusions of law; and waived any right to appeal from this Final Judgment: I. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendants and Defendants’ agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all persons in active concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise are permanently restrained and enjoined from violating, directly or indirectly, Section10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") [15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)] and Rule 10b-5 1 Case 3:08-cv-01197-O Document 92 Filed 09/19/12 Page 1 of 6 PageID 4051 camachol Text Box FW-02993-B promulgated thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5], by using any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce, or of the mails, or of any facility of any national securities exchange, in connection with the purchase or sale of any security: (a) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; (b) to make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or (c) to engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person. II. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendants and Defendants’ agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all persons in active concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise are permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 77q(a)] in the offer or sale of any security by the use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or by use of the mails, directly or indirectly: (a) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; (b) to obtain money or property by means of any untrue statement of a material fact or any omission of a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or 2 Case 3:08-cv-01197-O Document 92 Filed 09/19/12 Page 2 of 6 PageID 4052 (c) to engage in any transaction, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon the purchaser. III. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendants and Defendants’ agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all persons in active concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise are permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 5 of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. § 77e] by, directly or indirectly, in the absence of any applicable exemption: (a) Unless a registration statement is in effect as to a security, making use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or of the mails to sell such security through the use or medium of any prospectus or otherwise; (b) Unless a registration statement is in effect as to a security, carrying or causing to be carried through the mails or in interstate commerce, by any means or instruments of transportation, any such security for the purpose of sale or for delivery after sale; or (c) Making use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or of the mails to offer to sell or offer to buy through the use or medium of any prospectus or otherwise any security, unless a registration statement has been filed with the Commission as to such security, or while the registration statement is the subject of a refusal order or stop order or (prior to the effective date of the registration statement) any public 3 Case 3:08-cv-01197-O Document 92 Filed 09/19/12 Page 3 of 6 PageID 4053 proceeding or examination under Section 8 of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. § 77h]. IV. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendants are permanently barred from participating in an offering of penny stock, including engaging in activities with a broker, dealer, or issuer for purposes of issuing, trading, or inducing or attempting to induce the purchase or sale of any penny stock. A penny stock is any equity security that has a price of less than five dollars, except as provided in Rule 3a51-1 under the Exchange Act [17 C.F.R. 240.3a51-1]. V. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendants are liable for disgorgement of $1,550,000, representing profits gained as a result of the conduct alleged in the Complaint. Defendants shall satisfy this obligation by paying $1,550,000 to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the terms of the payment schedule set forth in paragraph VI below after entry of this Final Judgment. Defendants may transmit payment electronically to the Commission, which will provide detailed ACH transfer/Fedwire instructions upon request. Payment may also be made directly from a bank account via Pay.gov through the SEC website at http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/ofm.htm. Defendants may also pay by certified check, bank cashier's check, or United States postal money order payable to the Securities and Exchange Commission, which shall be delivered or mailed to Enterprise Services Center Accounts Receivable Branch 4 Case 3:08-cv-01197-O Document 92 Filed 09/19/12 Page 4 of 6 PageID 4054 6500 South MacArthur Boulevard Oklahoma City, OK 73169 and shall be accompanied by a letter identifying the case title, civil action number, and name of this Court; identifying by name the Defendant making the payment; and specifying that payment is made pursuant to this Final Judgment. Defendants shall simultaneously transmit photocopies of evidence of payment and case identifying information to the Commission's counsel in this action. By making payment, Defendants relinquish all legal and equitable right, title, and interest in such funds and no part of the funds shall be returned to Defendants. The Commission shall hold the funds (collectively, the "Fund") and may propose a plan to distribute the Fund subject to the Court's approval. The Court shall retain jurisdiction over the administration of any distribution of the Fund. If the Commission staff determines that the Fund will not be distributed, the Commission shall send the funds paid pursuant to this Final Judgment to the United States Treasury. VI. Defendants shall pay the total of disgorgement due of $1,550,000 to the Commission according to the following schedule: (1) Defendants shall pay $1,150,000, jointly and severally, within 14 business days of entry of this Final Judgment; (2) Defendant Petar D. Mihaylov shall pay $200,000, severally, within two years after entry of this Final Judgment. (3) Defendant Yuri P. Markov shall pay $200,000, severally, within two years after entry of this Final Judgment. All payments shall be deemed made on the date they are received by the Commission and shall be applied first to any post-judgment interest, which begins to accrue pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961 fourteen (14) business days after the entry of Final Judgment on any unpaid portion of the 5 Case 3:08-cv-01197-O Document 92 Filed 09/19/12 Page 5 of 6 PageID 4055 $1,150,000 amount owing and two years after entry of Final Judgment on any unpaid portion of the respective $200,000 amounts owing. If either of the Defendants fails to make any payment by the date agreed and/or in the amount agreed according to the schedule set forth above, all outstanding payments under this Final Judgment, including post-judgment interest, minus any payments made, shall become due and payable immediately at the discretion of the staff of the Commission without further application to the Court. Thereafter, the Commission may enforce the Court's judgment for disgorgement and prejudgment interest by moving for civil contempt (and/or through other collection procedures authorized by law). VII. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Consent is incorporated herein with the same force and effect as if fully set forth herein, and that Defendants shall comply with all of the undertakings and agreements set forth therein. VIII. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Final Judgment. IX. There being no just reason for delay, pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Clerk is ordered to enter this Final Judgment forthwith and without further notice. SO ORDERED on this 19th day of September, 2012. 6 Case 3:08-cv-01197-O Document 92 Filed 09/19/12 Page 6 of 6 PageID 4056 OConnor Signature Block