2024-12-03 sec-litreleases judgment 158 KB 12,524 chars

SEC v. Dow Rockwell, LLC; and Richard Dow Rockwell, No. 3:22-cv-02069, Northern District of California (Dec. 3, 2024) — Judgment

raw: SEC v. DOW ROCKWELL

SEC v. DOW ROCKWELL, No. 3:22-cv-02069 (Dec. 3, 2024)

Caption
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Dow Rockwell LLC
summary

Richard Dow Rockwell consented to a final judgment for securities fraud and unregistered offerings, resulting in permanent injunctions and a total payment of $603,918.85.

paragraph

The SEC obtained a final judgment against Richard Dow Rockwell for violations of the Investment Advisers Act, Securities Act, and Exchange Act. Rockwell is liable for $402,075 in disgorgement, $121,843.85 in prejudgment interest, and an $80,000 civil penalty. The total amount of $603,918.85 must be paid to the SEC within 30 days of the judgment's entry.

narrative

The Securities and Exchange Commission obtained a final judgment against Richard Dow Rockwell and Dow Rockwell, LLC in the Northern District of California. The action involved violations of the Investment Advisers Act, the Securities Act, and the Exchange Act, including fraud, material misstatements, and the unregistered sale of securities. Rockwell consented to the judgment without admitting or denying the allegations and waived his right to appeal. The court imposed permanent injunctions restraining Rockwell from future violations of federal securities laws. As part of the settlement, Rockwell is liable for $402,075 in disgorgement, $121,843.85 in prejudgment interest, and an $80,000 civil penalty. The total payment of $603,918.85 is due to the SEC within 30 days of the judgment's entry.

Enriched metadata

Scheme
investment-adviser-fraud (100%)
Court
Northern District of California
Case No.
3:22-cv-02069
Outcome
settled
Disgorgement
$402,075
Civil penalty
$80,000
Classified investment-adviser-fraud(confidence 100%). EDGAR detection: forms ADV/ADV-E/ADV-W/Form D· recall 33% / precision 13%. detection rule →
Statutes
15 U.S.C. § 80b-715 U.S.C. § 77h15 U.S.C. § 78o(a)15 U.S.C. § 77t(d)15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)15 U.S.C. § 80b-928 U.S.C. § 300128 U.S.C. § 196111 U.S.C. § 52311 U.S.C. § 523(a)Sections 206(1) and 206(2) of the Investment Advisers ActSections 206(1) and 206(2) of the Investment Advisers ActSections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities ActSections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities ActSection 8 of the Securities ActSection 15(a)(1) of the Securities Exchange ActSection 15(a)(1) of the Securities Exchange ActSection 20(d) of the Securities Act
Parties
Securities and Exchange CommissionDow Rockwell LLCRichard Dow Rockwell
Keywords
dowrockwellfinalordered adjudgedadjudged decreedfurther orderedcv-mmccommissionfinal richardshallorderedfurtherseccivil

Extracted insights

Dollar amounts 4
  • $604K $603,918 $100K–$1M
  • $402K $402,075 $100K–$1M
  • $122K $121,843 $100K–$1M
  • $80K $80,000 $10K–$100K
Entities 5
  • person Richard Dow Rockwell ×2
  • company Dow Rockwell, LLC
  • court in the united states district court northern district of california
  • agency Securities and Exchange Commission
  • court united states district court northern district of california
Triples 7
  • Securities And Exchange Commission filed a Complaint Richard DOW Rockwell
  • Richard DOW Rockwell entered a general appearance in the United States District Court Northern District of California
  • Richard DOW Rockwell consented to the Court’s jurisdiction over Defendant and the subject matter of this action
  • Richard DOW Rockwell waived findings of fact and conclusions of law in the Final Judgment
  • Richard DOW Rockwell is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Sections 206(1) and 206(2) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940
  • Richard DOW Rockwell is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 207 of the Advisers Act
  • United States District Court Northern District of California issued Final Judgment as to Defendant Richard DOW Rockwell
Text layers
Extracted body text (12,524c)
FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO RICHARD DOW ROCKWELL

 SEC v. Dow Rockwell, LLC, et al.
C
ASE NO. 20-CV-02069-MMC

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
MONIQUE C. WINKLER (Cal. Bar No. 213031)
  [email protected]
BERNARD B. SMYTH (Cal. Bar No. 217741)
  [email protected]

Attorneys for Plaintiff
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
44 Montgomery Street, Suite 700
San Francisco, California  94104
Telephone:  (415) 705-2500
Facsimile:   (415) 705-2501
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v.

DOW ROCKWELL, LLC and RICHARD DOW
ROCKWELL,

Defendants.
Case No. 22-cv-02069-MMC

FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT
RICHARD DOW ROCKWELL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO RICHARD DOW ROCKWELL
1
SEC v. Dow Rockwell, LLC, et al.
C
ASE NO. 20-CV-02069-MMC

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT RICHARD DOW ROCKWELL
 The Securities and Exchange Commission having filed a Complaint and Defendant
Richard Dow Rockwell (“Defendant”) having entered a general appearance; consented to the
Court’s jurisdiction over Defendant and the subject matter of this action; consented to entry of
this Final Judgment without admitting or denying the allegations of the Complaint (except as to
jurisdiction and except as otherwise provided herein in paragraph VIII); waived findings of fact
and conclusions of law; and waived any right to appeal from this Final Judgment:
I.
 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is
permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Sections 206(1) and 206(2) of the
Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (“Advisers Act”) [15 U.S.C. §§ 80b-6(1) and (2)], by directly
or indirectly, by the use of any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce:
 (a) Employing any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud any client or prospective
client; or
 (b) Engaging in any transaction, practice or course of business which operates as a
fraud or deceit upon any client or prospective client.
 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who
receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s
officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or
participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a).
II.
 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is
permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 207 of the Advisers Act [15 U.S.C. §
80b-7] by, directly or indirectly, willfully making any untrue statement of material fact in any
registration application or report filed with the Commission under Section 203 or 204 of the

FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO RICHARD DOW ROCKWELL
2
SEC v. Dow Rockwell, LLC, et al.
C
ASE NO. 20-CV-02069-MMC

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Advisers Act, or willfully omitting to state in any such application or report any material fact
which is required to be stated therein.
 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who
receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s
officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or
participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a).
III.
 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is
permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act
of 1933 (“Securities Act”) [15 U.S.C. §§ 77e(a) and (c)] by directly or indirectly, in the absence
of any applicable exemption:
 (a) Unless a registration statement is in effect as to a security, making use of any
means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce
or of the mails to sell such security through the use or medium of any prospectus
or otherwise; or
            (b)
 (b) Making use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in
interstate commerce or of the mails to offer to sell or offer to buy through the use
or medium of any prospectus or otherwise any security, unless a registration
statement has been filed with the Commission as to such security, or while the
registration statement is the subject of a refusal order or stop order or (prior to the
effective date of the registration statement) any public proceeding or examination
under Section 8 of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. § 77h].
 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who
receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s

FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO RICHARD DOW ROCKWELL
3
SEC v. Dow Rockwell, LLC, et al.
C
ASE NO. 20-CV-02069-MMC

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or
participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a).
IV.
 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is
permanently enjoined and restrained from, directly or indirectly, violating Section 15(a)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 78o(a)(1)] by acting as a broker
or dealer unless registered as provided by law.
 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who
receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s
officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or
participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a).
V.
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant
is liable, jointly and severally with Defendant Dow Rockwell, LLC, for disgorgement of
$402,075, representing net profits gained as a result of the conduct alleged in the Complaint,
together with prejudgment interest thereon in the amount of $121,843.85, and a civil penalty in
the amount of $80,000 pursuant to Section 20(d) of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. § 77t(d)],
Section 21(d)(3) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)(3)], and Section 209 of the Advisers
Act [15 U.S.C. § 80b-9]. Defendant shall satisfy this obligation by paying $603,918.85 to the
Securities and Exchange Commission within 30 days after entry of this Final Judgment.
Defendant may transmit payment electronically to the Commission, which will provide
detailed ACH transfer/Fedwire instructions upon request. Payment may also be made directly
from a bank account via Pay.gov through the SEC website at
http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/ofm.htm. Defendant may also pay by certified check, bank
cashier’s check, or United States postal money order payable to the Securities and Exchange
Commission, which shall be delivered or mailed to

FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO RICHARD DOW ROCKWELL
4
SEC v. Dow Rockwell, LLC, et al.
C
ASE NO. 20-CV-02069-MMC

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Enterprise Services Center
Accounts Receivable Branch
6500 South MacArthur Boulevard
Oklahoma City, OK 73169
 and shall be accompanied by a letter identifying the case title, civil action number, and name of
this Court; Richard Dow Rockwell as a defendant in this action; and specifying that payment is
made pursuant to this Final Judgment.
Defendant shall simultaneously transmit photocopies of evidence of payment and case
identifying information to the Commission’s counsel in this action. By making this payment,
Defendant relinquishes all legal and equitable right, title, and interest in such funds and no part
of the funds shall be returned to Defendant.
The Commission may enforce the Court’s judgment for disgorgement and prejudgment
interest by using all collection procedures authorized by law, including, but not limited to,
moving for civil contempt at any time after 30 days following entry of this Final Judgment.
The Commission may enforce the Court’s judgment for penalties by the use of all
collection procedures authorized by law, including the Federal Debt Collection Procedures Act,
28 U.S.C. § 3001 et seq., and moving for civil contempt for the violation of any Court orders
issued in this action. Defendant shall pay post judgment interest on any amounts due after 30
days of the entry of this Final Judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961. The Commission shall
hold the funds, together with any interest and income earned thereon (collectively, the “Fund”),
pending further order of the Court.
The Commission may propose a plan to distribute the Fund subject to the Court’s
approval. Such a plan may provide that the Fund shall be distributed pursuant to the Fair Fund
provisions of Section 308(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The Court shall retain
jurisdiction over the administration of any distribution of the Fund and the Fund may only be
disbursed pursuant to an Order of the Court.
 Regardless of whether any such Fair Fund distribution is made, amounts ordered to be
paid as civil penalties pursuant to this Judgment shall be treated as penalties paid to the
government for all purposes, including all tax purposes. To preserve the deterrent effect of the

FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO RICHARD DOW ROCKWELL
5
SEC v. Dow Rockwell, LLC, et al.
C
ASE NO. 20-CV-02069-MMC

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
civil penalty, Defendant shall not, after offset or reduction of any award of compensatory
damages in any Related Investor Action based on Defendant’s payment of disgorgement in this
action, argue that he is entitled to, nor shall he further benefit by, offset or reduction of such
compensatory damages award by the amount of any part of Defendant’s payment of a civil
penalty in this action (“Penalty Offset”). If the court in any Related Investor Action grants such a
Penalty Offset, Defendant shall, within 30 days after entry of a final order granting the Penalty
Offset, notify the Commission’s counsel in this action and pay the amount of the Penalty Offset
to the United States Treasury or to a Fair Fund, as the Commission directs. Such a payment shall
not be deemed an additional civil penalty and shall not be deemed to change the amount of the
civil penalty imposed in this Judgment. For purposes of this paragraph, a “Related Investor
Action” means a private damages action brought against Defendant by or on behalf of one or
more investors based on substantially the same facts as alleged in the Complaint in this action.
VI.
 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Consent of
Defendant Richard Dow Rockwell is incorporated herein with the same force and effect as if
fully set forth herein, and that Defendant shall comply with all of the undertakings and
agreements set forth therein.
VII.
 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, solely for purposes
of exceptions to discharge set forth in Section 523 of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. § 523, the
allegations in the Complaint are true and admitted by Defendant, and further, any debt for
disgorgement, prejudgment interest, civil penalty or other amounts due by Defendant under this
Final Judgment or any other judgment, order, consent order, decree or settlement agreement
entered in connection with this proceeding, is a debt for the violation by Defendant of the federal
securities laws or any regulation or order issued under such laws, as set forth in Section
523(a)(19) of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(19).

FINAL JUDGMENT AS TORICHARD DOW ROCKWELL
6
SEC v. Dow Rockwell, LLC, et al.
C
ASE NO.20-CV-02069-MMC
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
VIII.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court shall retain
jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Final Judgment.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:  ______________, _____
____________________________________
The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney
United States District Judge
November 25     2024
______________________________________________________
he HoHHHnonononrable Maxine M. Chesneyyyy
niteddddStates District Judge
OCR text (13,840c · tika · 95% conf)
FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO RICHARD DOW ROCKWELL 
 

 SEC v. Dow Rockwell, LLC, et al. 
CASE NO. 20-CV-02069-MMC 

  

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

MONIQUE C. WINKLER (Cal. Bar No. 213031) 
  [email protected] 
BERNARD B. SMYTH (Cal. Bar No. 217741) 
  [email protected] 
 
Attorneys for Plaintiff  
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 
44 Montgomery Street, Suite 700 
San Francisco, California  94104 
Telephone:  (415) 705-2500 
Facsimile:   (415) 705-2501 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, 
 

Plaintiff, 
 

v. 
 
DOW ROCKWELL, LLC and RICHARD DOW 
ROCKWELL, 
 

Defendants. 

Case No. 22-cv-02069-MMC 
 
 
 
FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT 
RICHARD DOW ROCKWELL 

 

  
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

 
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

 

 

Case 3:22-cv-02069-MMC     Document 56     Filed 11/25/24     Page 1 of 7



 

FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO RICHARD DOW ROCKWELL 1 SEC v. Dow Rockwell, LLC, et al. 
CASE NO. 20-CV-02069-MMC 

 
  

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT RICHARD DOW ROCKWELL 

 The Securities and Exchange Commission having filed a Complaint and Defendant 

Richard Dow Rockwell (“Defendant”) having entered a general appearance; consented to the 

Court’s jurisdiction over Defendant and the subject matter of this action; consented to entry of 

this Final Judgment without admitting or denying the allegations of the Complaint (except as to 

jurisdiction and except as otherwise provided herein in paragraph VIII); waived findings of fact 

and conclusions of law; and waived any right to appeal from this Final Judgment: 

I. 

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is 

permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Sections 206(1) and 206(2) of the 

Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (“Advisers Act”) [15 U.S.C. §§ 80b-6(1) and (2)], by directly 

or indirectly, by the use of any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce: 

 (a) Employing any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud any client or prospective 

client; or 

 (b) Engaging in any transaction, practice or course of business which operates as a 

fraud or deceit upon any client or prospective client. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who 

receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s 

officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or 

participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a). 

II. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is 

permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 207 of the Advisers Act [15 U.S.C. § 

80b-7] by, directly or indirectly, willfully making any untrue statement of material fact in any 

registration application or report filed with the Commission under Section 203 or 204 of the 

Case 3:22-cv-02069-MMC     Document 56     Filed 11/25/24     Page 2 of 7



 

FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO RICHARD DOW ROCKWELL 2 SEC v. Dow Rockwell, LLC, et al. 
CASE NO. 20-CV-02069-MMC 

 
  

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Advisers Act, or willfully omitting to state in any such application or report any material fact 

which is required to be stated therein. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who 

receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s 

officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or 

participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a). 

III. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is 

permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act 

of 1933 (“Securities Act”) [15 U.S.C. §§ 77e(a) and (c)] by directly or indirectly, in the absence 

of any applicable exemption: 

 (a) Unless a registration statement is in effect as to a security, making use of any 

means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce 

or of the mails to sell such security through the use or medium of any prospectus 

or otherwise; or 

 (b) 

 (b) Making use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in 

interstate commerce or of the mails to offer to sell or offer to buy through the use 

or medium of any prospectus or otherwise any security, unless a registration 

statement has been filed with the Commission as to such security, or while the 

registration statement is the subject of a refusal order or stop order or (prior to the 

effective date of the registration statement) any public proceeding or examination 

under Section 8 of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. § 77h]. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who 

receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s 

Case 3:22-cv-02069-MMC     Document 56     Filed 11/25/24     Page 3 of 7



 

FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO RICHARD DOW ROCKWELL 3 SEC v. Dow Rockwell, LLC, et al. 
CASE NO. 20-CV-02069-MMC 

 
  

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or 

participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a). 

IV. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is 

permanently enjoined and restrained from, directly or indirectly, violating Section 15(a)(1) of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 78o(a)(1)] by acting as a broker 

or dealer unless registered as provided by law. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who 

receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s 

officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or 

participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a). 

V. 

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant 

is liable, jointly and severally with Defendant Dow Rockwell, LLC, for disgorgement of 

$402,075, representing net profits gained as a result of the conduct alleged in the Complaint, 

together with prejudgment interest thereon in the amount of $121,843.85, and a civil penalty in 

the amount of $80,000 pursuant to Section 20(d) of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. § 77t(d)], 

Section 21(d)(3) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)(3)], and Section 209 of the Advisers 

Act [15 U.S.C. § 80b-9]. Defendant shall satisfy this obligation by paying $603,918.85 to the 

Securities and Exchange Commission within 30 days after entry of this Final Judgment. 

Defendant may transmit payment electronically to the Commission, which will provide 

detailed ACH transfer/Fedwire instructions upon request. Payment may also be made directly 

from a bank account via Pay.gov through the SEC website at 

http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/ofm.htm. Defendant may also pay by certified check, bank 

cashier’s check, or United States postal money order payable to the Securities and Exchange 

Commission, which shall be delivered or mailed to  

Case 3:22-cv-02069-MMC     Document 56     Filed 11/25/24     Page 4 of 7



 

FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO RICHARD DOW ROCKWELL 4 SEC v. Dow Rockwell, LLC, et al. 
CASE NO. 20-CV-02069-MMC 

 
  

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Enterprise Services Center 
Accounts Receivable Branch 
6500 South MacArthur Boulevard 
Oklahoma City, OK 73169 

 and shall be accompanied by a letter identifying the case title, civil action number, and name of 

this Court; Richard Dow Rockwell as a defendant in this action; and specifying that payment is 

made pursuant to this Final Judgment.   

Defendant shall simultaneously transmit photocopies of evidence of payment and case 

identifying information to the Commission’s counsel in this action. By making this payment, 

Defendant relinquishes all legal and equitable right, title, and interest in such funds and no part 

of the funds shall be returned to Defendant.   

The Commission may enforce the Court’s judgment for disgorgement and prejudgment 

interest by using all collection procedures authorized by law, including, but not limited to, 

moving for civil contempt at any time after 30 days following entry of this Final Judgment.   

The Commission may enforce the Court’s judgment for penalties by the use of all 

collection procedures authorized by law, including the Federal Debt Collection Procedures Act, 

28 U.S.C. § 3001 et seq., and moving for civil contempt for the violation of any Court orders 

issued in this action. Defendant shall pay post judgment interest on any amounts due after 30 

days of the entry of this Final Judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961. The Commission shall 

hold the funds, together with any interest and income earned thereon (collectively, the “Fund”), 

pending further order of the Court.     

The Commission may propose a plan to distribute the Fund subject to the Court’s 

approval. Such a plan may provide that the Fund shall be distributed pursuant to the Fair Fund 

provisions of Section 308(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The Court shall retain 

jurisdiction over the administration of any distribution of the Fund and the Fund may only be 

disbursed pursuant to an Order of the Court.    

 Regardless of whether any such Fair Fund distribution is made, amounts ordered to be 

paid as civil penalties pursuant to this Judgment shall be treated as penalties paid to the 

government for all purposes, including all tax purposes. To preserve the deterrent effect of the 

Case 3:22-cv-02069-MMC     Document 56     Filed 11/25/24     Page 5 of 7



 

FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO RICHARD DOW ROCKWELL 5 SEC v. Dow Rockwell, LLC, et al. 
CASE NO. 20-CV-02069-MMC 

 
  

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

civil penalty, Defendant shall not, after offset or reduction of any award of compensatory 

damages in any Related Investor Action based on Defendant’s payment of disgorgement in this 

action, argue that he is entitled to, nor shall he further benefit by, offset or reduction of such 

compensatory damages award by the amount of any part of Defendant’s payment of a civil 

penalty in this action (“Penalty Offset”). If the court in any Related Investor Action grants such a 

Penalty Offset, Defendant shall, within 30 days after entry of a final order granting the Penalty 

Offset, notify the Commission’s counsel in this action and pay the amount of the Penalty Offset 

to the United States Treasury or to a Fair Fund, as the Commission directs. Such a payment shall 

not be deemed an additional civil penalty and shall not be deemed to change the amount of the 

civil penalty imposed in this Judgment. For purposes of this paragraph, a “Related Investor 

Action” means a private damages action brought against Defendant by or on behalf of one or 

more investors based on substantially the same facts as alleged in the Complaint in this action. 

VI. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Consent of 

Defendant Richard Dow Rockwell is incorporated herein with the same force and effect as if 

fully set forth herein, and that Defendant shall comply with all of the undertakings and 

agreements set forth therein. 

VII. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, solely for purposes 

of exceptions to discharge set forth in Section 523 of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. § 523, the 

allegations in the Complaint are true and admitted by Defendant, and further, any debt for 

disgorgement, prejudgment interest, civil penalty or other amounts due by Defendant under this 

Final Judgment or any other judgment, order, consent order, decree or settlement agreement 

entered in connection with this proceeding, is a debt for the violation by Defendant of the federal 

securities laws or any regulation or order issued under such laws, as set forth in Section 

523(a)(19) of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(19). 

Case 3:22-cv-02069-MMC     Document 56     Filed 11/25/24     Page 6 of 7



FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO RICHARD DOW ROCKWELL 6 SEC v. Dow Rockwell, LLC, et al.
CASE NO. 20-CV-02069-MMC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

VIII.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court shall retain 

jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Final Judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:  ______________, _____

____________________________________
The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney
United States District Judge

November 25     2024

___________ ______________________ _____________________
he HoHHH nononon rable Maxine M. Chesneyyyy
nitedddd States District Judge

Case 3:22-cv-02069-MMC     Document 56     Filed 11/25/24     Page 7 of 7