SEC v. HEDONOVA LLC, No. 2:24-cv-05293, Central District of California (Nov. 21, 2024)
raw: This matter came before the Court upon the Consent of Defendants and
This matter came before the Court upon the Consent of Defendants and, No. 2:24-cv-05293 (Nov. 21, 2024)
The SEC obtained a preliminary injunction against Hedonova LLC and Hedonova Advisors LLC for alleged violations of federal securities laws involving fraudulent practices.
The SEC charged Hedonova LLC and Hedonova Advisors LLC with violating the Securities Act of 1933, the Exchange Act of 1934, and the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. The defendants consented to a preliminary injunction without admitting or denying the allegations of fraud and deceptive practices. While the order does not specify a total dollar amount for the alleged fraud, it prohibits the defendants from engaging in further fraudulent transactions or making untrue statements of material fact.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission successfully obtained a stipulated preliminary injunction against Hedonova LLC and Hedonova Advisors LLC in the Central District of California. The SEC alleges that the defendants engaged in fraudulent schemes, including making untrue statements of material fact and employing deceptive practices in connection with the sale of securities. Specifically, the charges include violations of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act, Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act, and Section 206(4) of the Investment Advisers Act. Although the defendants did not admit or deny the allegations, they consented to the court's order to prevent further harm. The injunction prohibits the defendants from using any means of interstate commerce to defraud investors or omit material facts. This order remains in effect until the final resolution of the legal action.
Extracted insights
- company defendant hedonova advisors llc
- company hedonova advisors llc
- company Hedonova Fund LLC
- company hedonova llc
- agency Securities and Exchange Commission
- court united states district court
- United States District Court Has Jurisdiction Over The Parties To, And The Subject Matter Of, This Action
- Defendants Consented To Entry Of The Following Order
- Defendants Waived Any Objection To Enforcement Of This Order Of Preliminary Injunction
- Securities And Exchange Commission Is Likely To Succeed On The Merits Of Its Claim That Defendants Have Engaged In Violations Of Section 17(a) Of The Securities Act Of 1933 And Section 10(b) Of The Securities Exchange Act Of 1934 And Rule 10b-5 Thereunder
- Defendant Hedonova Advisors Llc Is Likely To Succeed On The Merits Of Its Claim That Defendant Has Engaged In Violations Of Section 206(4) Of The Investment Advisers Act Of 1940 And Rule 206(4)-8 Thereunder
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, vs. HEDONOVA LLC and HEDONOVA ADVISORS LLC, Defendants. Case No. 2:24-cv-05293-AB-E ORDER OF PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION This matter came before the Court upon the Consent of Defendants and Stipulation for Preliminary Injunction (“Consent and Stipulation”) by and between Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or “Commission”) and Defendants Hedonova Fund LLC and Hedonova Advisors LLC (collectively with Hedonova Fund LLC, the “Defendants”). The Court, having considered the Consent and Stipulation, as well as the Complaint (Dkt. 1), Amended Answer (Dkt. 45), and Docket Entry Nos. 13–15, 19, 24 and 46, finds that: 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 A. This Court has jurisdiction over the parties to, and the subject matter of, this action. B. Defendants have consented and the parties have stipulated to entry of the following Order. C. Defendants neither admit nor deny the allegations of the Complaint (except as to the Commission’s allegations concerning personal and subject matter jurisdiction, which Defendants admit), or that “Good cause” exists as stated in Paragraph E. Nothing in this Order precludes Defendants from contesting the allegations or claims in the SEC’s Complaint. D. Defendants will not oppose enforcement of this Order of Preliminary Injunction on the ground, if any exists, that it fails to comply with Rule 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or any statutes or judicial precedent regarding preliminary injunctions, and waive any such objection. E. For purposes of this Stipulated Order, good cause exists to believe that (1) the SEC is likely to succeed on the merits of its claim that Defendants Hedonova LLC and Hedonova Advisors LLC have engaged in, are engaging in, are about to engage in, and will continue to engage in transactions, acts, practices and courses of business that constitute violations of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 77q(a)]; Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)] and Rule 10b-5 thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5]; and that Defendant Hedonova Advisors LLC has engaged in, is engaging in, is about to engage in, and will continue to engage in transactions, acts, practices and courses of business that constitute violations of Section 206(4) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (“Advisers Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 80b-6(4)] and Rule 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 206(4)-8 thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 275.206(4)-8]; (2) irreparable harm will result in the absence of the emergency or preliminary relief; (3) the balance of equities tips in the SEC’s favor; and (4) an injunction is in the public interest. PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ORDER I. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Hedonova LLC and Hedonova Advisors LLC are preliminarily enjoined from violating, directly or indirectly, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 [15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)] and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5], by using any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce, or of the mails, or of any facility of any national securities exchange, in connection with the purchase or sale of any security: (a) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; (b) to make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or (c) to engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Preliminary Injunction Order (“Order”) by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendants’ officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendants or with anyone described in (a). II. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants Hedonova LLC and Hedonova Advisors LLC are preliminarily enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 [15 U.S.C. § 77q(a)] in the offer or sale of any security by 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 the use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or by use of the mails, directly or indirectly: (a) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; (b) to obtain money or property by means of any untrue statement of a material fact or any omission of a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or (c) to engage in any transaction, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon the purchaser. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Order by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendants’ officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendants or with anyone described in (a). III. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Hedonova Advisors LLC is preliminarily enjoined from violating Section 206(4) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 [15 U.S.C. §§ 80b-6(4)] and Rule 206(4)-8 thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 275.206(4)-8] while serving as an investment adviser to a pooled investment vehicle by the use of the mails or means and instrumentalities of interstate commerce or by use of the mails, directly or indirectly: (a) to make an untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading to any investor or prospective investor in the pooled investment vehicle; or (b) to engage in any act, practice, or course of business that is fraudulent, deceptive, or manipulative with respect to any investor or prospective investor in the pooled investment vehicle. 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Order by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant Hedonova Advisors LLC’s officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant Hedonova Advisors LLC or with anyone described in (a). IV. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants Hedonova LLC and Hedonova Advisors LLC are, pending resolution of this action, prohibited from participating on and after the date of this Order in the issuance, purchase, offer, or sale of securities, including but not limited to the solicitation or receipt of money for any investment opportunity however described, to any investor located in the United States. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Order by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendants’ officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendants or with anyone described in (a). V. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants Hedonova LLC and Hedonova Advisors LLC are, pending resolution of this action, required within 5 business days of the issuance of this order to post in a prominent place on the homepage of the website located at Hedonova.io, when accessed from the United States, as well as on the homepage of any website subsequently created by Defendants that is available to investors and prospective investors located in the United States, and in a prominent place in the mobile application software Defendants have made available to investors and prospective investors located in the 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 United States: (a) the following statement: “On June 24, 2024, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission filed a Complaint in the United States District Court for the Central District of California alleging that Hedonova LLC and Hedonova Advisors LLC (“Defendants”) violated certain anti-fraud provisions of the federal securities laws. On August 14, 2024, Defendants filed an Amended Answer denying in relevant part the allegations of the Complaint.”; (b) a hyperlink to a copy of the Commission’s Complaint (Dkt. 1); (c) a hyperlink to a copy of Defendants’ Amended Answer to the Complaint (Dkt. 45); and (d) a hyperlink to a copy of this Order of Preliminary Injunction (Dkt. __). IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Order by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendants’ officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendants or with anyone described in (a). VI. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Hedonova Advisors LLC must file an amended correct and accurate Form ADV with the Commission within 7 business days of the issuance of this order. 1 IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Order by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant Hedonova Advisors LLC’s officers, agents, servants, 1 Any revisions to the Form ADV may not be construed as an admission that prior statements as alleged in the Complaint were false or misleading. 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 employees, and attorneys, and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant Hedonova Advisors LLC or with anyone described in (a). VII. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that: A. The Court shall retain jurisdiction over this action for all purposes. B. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(c), no security is required of the Commission. C. This Preliminary Injunction shall remain in effect until entry of Final Judgment in, or other final disposition of, this action, or further Order of this Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 18, 2024 _______________________________________ HONORABLE ANDRÉ BIROTTE JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, vs. HEDONOVA LLC and HEDONOVA ADVISORS LLC, Defendants. Case No. 2:24-cv-05293-AB-E ORDER OF PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION This matter came before the Court upon the Consent of Defendants and Stipulation for Preliminary Injunction (“Consent and Stipulation”) by and between Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or “Commission”) and Defendants Hedonova Fund LLC and Hedonova Advisors LLC (collectively with Hedonova Fund LLC, the “Defendants”). The Court, having considered the Consent and Stipulation, as well as the Complaint (Dkt. 1), Amended Answer (Dkt. 45), and Docket Entry Nos. 13–15, 19, 24 and 46, finds that: Case 2:24-cv-05293-AB-E Document 51 Filed 11/18/24 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #:611 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 A. This Court has jurisdiction over the parties to, and the subject matter of, this action. B. Defendants have consented and the parties have stipulated to entry of the following Order. C. Defendants neither admit nor deny the allegations of the Complaint (except as to the Commission’s allegations concerning personal and subject matter jurisdiction, which Defendants admit), or that “Good cause” exists as stated in Paragraph E. Nothing in this Order precludes Defendants from contesting the allegations or claims in the SEC’s Complaint. D. Defendants will not oppose enforcement of this Order of Preliminary Injunction on the ground, if any exists, that it fails to comply with Rule 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or any statutes or judicial precedent regarding preliminary injunctions, and waive any such objection. E. For purposes of this Stipulated Order, good cause exists to believe that (1) the SEC is likely to succeed on the merits of its claim that Defendants Hedonova LLC and Hedonova Advisors LLC have engaged in, are engaging in, are about to engage in, and will continue to engage in transactions, acts, practices and courses of business that constitute violations of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 77q(a)]; Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)] and Rule 10b-5 thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5]; and that Defendant Hedonova Advisors LLC has engaged in, is engaging in, is about to engage in, and will continue to engage in transactions, acts, practices and courses of business that constitute violations of Section 206(4) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (“Advisers Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 80b-6(4)] and Rule Case 2:24-cv-05293-AB-E Document 51 Filed 11/18/24 Page 2 of 7 Page ID #:612 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 206(4)-8 thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 275.206(4)-8]; (2) irreparable harm will result in the absence of the emergency or preliminary relief; (3) the balance of equities tips in the SEC’s favor; and (4) an injunction is in the public interest. PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ORDER I. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Hedonova LLC and Hedonova Advisors LLC are preliminarily enjoined from violating, directly or indirectly, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 [15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)] and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5], by using any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce, or of the mails, or of any facility of any national securities exchange, in connection with the purchase or sale of any security: (a) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; (b) to make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or (c) to engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Preliminary Injunction Order (“Order”) by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendants’ officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendants or with anyone described in (a). II. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants Hedonova LLC and Hedonova Advisors LLC are preliminarily enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 [15 U.S.C. § 77q(a)] in the offer or sale of any security by Case 2:24-cv-05293-AB-E Document 51 Filed 11/18/24 Page 3 of 7 Page ID #:613 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 the use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or by use of the mails, directly or indirectly: (a) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; (b) to obtain money or property by means of any untrue statement of a material fact or any omission of a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or (c) to engage in any transaction, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon the purchaser. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Order by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendants’ officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendants or with anyone described in (a). III. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Hedonova Advisors LLC is preliminarily enjoined from violating Section 206(4) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 [15 U.S.C. §§ 80b-6(4)] and Rule 206(4)-8 thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 275.206(4)-8] while serving as an investment adviser to a pooled investment vehicle by the use of the mails or means and instrumentalities of interstate commerce or by use of the mails, directly or indirectly: (a) to make an untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading to any investor or prospective investor in the pooled investment vehicle; or (b) to engage in any act, practice, or course of business that is fraudulent, deceptive, or manipulative with respect to any investor or prospective investor in the pooled investment vehicle. Case 2:24-cv-05293-AB-E Document 51 Filed 11/18/24 Page 4 of 7 Page ID #:614 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Order by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant Hedonova Advisors LLC’s officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant Hedonova Advisors LLC or with anyone described in (a). IV. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants Hedonova LLC and Hedonova Advisors LLC are, pending resolution of this action, prohibited from participating on and after the date of this Order in the issuance, purchase, offer, or sale of securities, including but not limited to the solicitation or receipt of money for any investment opportunity however described, to any investor located in the United States. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Order by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendants’ officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendants or with anyone described in (a). V. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants Hedonova LLC and Hedonova Advisors LLC are, pending resolution of this action, required within 5 business days of the issuance of this order to post in a prominent place on the homepage of the website located at Hedonova.io, when accessed from the United States, as well as on the homepage of any website subsequently created by Defendants that is available to investors and prospective investors located in the United States, and in a prominent place in the mobile application software Defendants have made available to investors and prospective investors located in the Case 2:24-cv-05293-AB-E Document 51 Filed 11/18/24 Page 5 of 7 Page ID #:615 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 United States: (a) the following statement: “On June 24, 2024, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission filed a Complaint in the United States District Court for the Central District of California alleging that Hedonova LLC and Hedonova Advisors LLC (“Defendants”) violated certain anti-fraud provisions of the federal securities laws. On August 14, 2024, Defendants filed an Amended Answer denying in relevant part the allegations of the Complaint.”; (b) a hyperlink to a copy of the Commission’s Complaint (Dkt. 1); (c) a hyperlink to a copy of Defendants’ Amended Answer to the Complaint (Dkt. 45); and (d) a hyperlink to a copy of this Order of Preliminary Injunction (Dkt. __). IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Order by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendants’ officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendants or with anyone described in (a). VI. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Hedonova Advisors LLC must file an amended correct and accurate Form ADV with the Commission within 7 business days of the issuance of this order.1 IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Order by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant Hedonova Advisors LLC’s officers, agents, servants, 1 Any revisions to the Form ADV may not be construed as an admission that prior statements as alleged in the Complaint were false or misleading. Case 2:24-cv-05293-AB-E Document 51 Filed 11/18/24 Page 6 of 7 Page ID #:616 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 employees, and attorneys, and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant Hedonova Advisors LLC or with anyone described in (a). VII. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that: A. The Court shall retain jurisdiction over this action for all purposes. B. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(c), no security is required of the Commission. C. This Preliminary Injunction shall remain in effect until entry of Final Judgment in, or other final disposition of, this action, or further Order of this Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 18, 2024 _______________________________________ HONORABLE ANDRÉ BIROTTE JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE Case 2:24-cv-05293-AB-E Document 51 Filed 11/18/24 Page 7 of 7 Page ID #:617