In re PUBLIC RESOURCES ADVISORY
Public Resources Advisory Group, Inc. violated federal securities laws by failing to maintain and preserve written communications relating to municipal advisory activities, resulting in a $184,000 civil penalty.
Public Resources Advisory Group, Inc. failed to maintain and preserve written communications relating to municipal advisory activities, including text messages sent by employees using unapproved electronic communication methods, from July 2020 to September 2023. The firm's employees, including supervisors, routinely used these unmonitored methods, and its supervisory system was deemed inadequate. The SEC imposed a $184,000 civil penalty, with $46,000 transferred to the MSRB and $138,000 to the U.S. Treasury.
Public Resources Advisory Group, Inc., a registered municipal advisor, violated federal securities laws and MSRB rules by failing to preserve written communications related to municipal advisory activities, particularly through unapproved off-channel channels like text messages, from July 2020 to September 2023. The firm's employees, including supervisors and principals, routinely used non-approved platforms, and the company's supervisory system—relying solely on employee acknowledgments without monitoring or enforcement—was deemed inadequate. This resulted in willful violations of Exchange Act Sections 17(a) and 15B(c)(1), and MSRB Rules G-8, G-9, and G-44. The SEC imposed a $184,000 civil penalty, with $46,000 transferred to the MSRB and $138,000 to the U.S. Treasury. The firm was required to implement enhanced recordkeeping policies, conduct expert-led training, and provide certifications of compliance. Public Resources Advisory Group, Inc. consented to a cease-and-desist order and a censure without admitting or denying the findings. The firm agreed to pay the civil penalty and implement new policies and procedures to ensure compliance with recordkeeping requirements.
Extracted insights
- $184K $184,000 $100K–$1M
- $138K $138,000 $100K–$1M
- $46K $46,000 $10K–$100K
- company public resources advisory group, inc.
- person recordkeeping requirements
- agency Securities and Exchange Commission
- person written communications
- Securities And Exchange Commission instituted Administrative And Cease-And-Desist Proceedings
- Public Resources Advisory Group, Inc. submitted Offer Of Settlement
- Securities And Exchange Commission accepted Offer Of Settlement
- Public Resources Advisory Group, Inc. admitted Violations Of Federal Securities Laws
- Public Resources Advisory Group, Inc. consented to Order Instituting Administrative And Cease-And-Desist Proceedings
- Public Resources Advisory Group, Inc. failed to adhere to Recordkeeping Requirements
- Public Resources Advisory Group, Inc. failed to maintain Written Communications
- Public Resources Advisory Group, Inc. violated Section 17(a) Of The Exchange Act
- Public Resources Advisory Group, Inc. violated Rule 15Ba1-8
- Public Resources Advisory Group, Inc. violated MSRB Rules G-8 And G-9
- Public Resources Advisory Group, Inc. failed to implement System To Supervise Municipal Advisory Activities
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Release No. 101046 / September 17, 2024
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
File No. 3-22126
In the Matter of
PUBLIC RESOURCES ADVISORY
GROUP, INC.,
Respondent.
ORDER INSTITUTING
ADMINISTRATIVE AND CEASE-
AND-DESIST PROCEEDINGS
PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 15B AND
21C OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, MAKING
FINDINGS, AND IMPOSING
REMEDIAL SANCTIONS AND A
CEASE-AND-DESIST ORDER
I.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) deems it appropriate and in the
public interest that public administrative and cease-and-desist proceedings be, and hereby are,
instituted pursuant to Sections 15B and 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange
Act”) against Public Resources Advisory Group, Inc. (“Public Resources Advisory” or
“Respondent”).
II.
In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, Respondent has submitted an Offer of
Settlement (“Offer”) which the Commission has determined to accept. Respondent admits the
facts set forth in Section III below, acknowledges that its conduct violated the federal securities
laws, admits the Commission’s jurisdiction over it and the subject matter of these proceedings, and
consents to the entry of this Order Instituting Administrative and Cease-and-Desist Proceedings
Pursuant to Sections 15B and 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Making Findings, and
Imposing Remedial Sanctions and a Cease-and-Desist Order (“Order”), as set forth below.
III.
On the basis of this Order and Respondent’s Offer, the Commission finds
1
that:
1
The findings herein are made pursuant to Respondent’s Offer of Settlement and are not
binding on any other person or entity in this or any other proceeding.
2
Summary
1. The federal securities laws impose recordkeeping requirements on municipal advisors,
which are intended to facilitate the Commission’s inspections and examinations of municipal advisors
and assist the Commission in evaluating a municipal advisor’s compliance with the applicable federal
securities laws, including the rules of the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (“MSRB”). These
recordkeeping requirements require, among other things, that municipal advisors maintain and preserve
all written communications relating to municipal advisory activities for at least five years.
2. These proceedings arise out of the failure of Public Resources Advisory employees
throughout the firm, including at senior levels, to adhere to these recordkeeping requirements and the
firm’s own policies. Using unapproved electronic communication methods, these employees
communicated with regard to municipal advisory activities both internally and externally by text
messages (“off-channel communications”).
3. From at least July 2020 to September 2023 (the “relevant period”), multiple Public
Resources Advisory employees sent and received off-channel communications relating to municipal
advisory activities. Public Resources Advisory did not maintain or preserve these written
communications. Public Resources Advisory’s failure involved employees at various levels of authority,
including both municipal advisor representatives and municipal advisor principals.
2
As a result, Public
Resources Advisory violated Section 17(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 15Ba1-8 thereunder, and
MSRB Rules G-8 and G-9.
4. Some of Public Resources Advisory’s supervisors, who were responsible for preventing
this misconduct, themselves failed to comply with these recordkeeping requirements, as well as the
firm’s own policies by sending and receiving off-channel communications relating to municipal advisory
activities. Since at least July 2020, Public Resources Advisory failed to implement and maintain a
system to supervise the municipal advisory activities of the municipal advisor and its associated persons
that is reasonably designed to achieve compliance with applicable recordkeeping requirements. As a
result, Public Resources Advisory violated MSRB Rule G-44. By violating MSRB Rules G-8, G-9 and
G-44, Public Resources Advisory violated Section 15B(c)(1) of the Exchange Act.
Respondent
5. Public Resources Advisory Group, Inc. (“Public Resources Advisory”) is a New
York corporation with its principal office and place of business in New York, New York. Public
2
MSRB Rule G-3(d)(i)(A) defines a “municipal advisor representative” to mean a natural person
associated with a municipal advisor who engages in municipal advisory activities on the municipal advisor’s
behalf, other than a person performing only clerical, administrative, support or similar functions. MSRB
Rule G-3(e)(i) defines a “municipal advisor principal” to mean a natural person associated with a municipal
advisor who is directly engaged in the management, direction or supervision of the municipal advisory
activities of the municipal advisor and its associated persons.
3
Resources Advisory has been registered with the Commission and the MSRB as a municipal
advisor since July 2014 and was registered during the relevant time period.
Recordkeeping Requirements for Municipal Advisors
6. Section 17(a)(1) of the Exchange Act requires municipal advisors to make and keep
for prescribed periods such records, furnish such copies thereof, and make and disseminate such
reports as the Commission, by rule, prescribes as necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for
the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the Exchange Act. Exchange Act Rule
15Ba1-8 requires that municipal advisors make and keep true, accurate, and current originals or
copies of all written communications received, and originals or copies of all written
communications sent, by such municipal advisor relating to municipal advisory activities,
regardless of the format of such communications, and for such records to be maintained and
preserved for a period of not less than five years, the first two years in easily accessible places.
7. MSRB Rule G-8(h)(i) requires municipal advisors to make and keep current all
books and records described in Exchange Act Rule 15Ba1-8(a)(1)-(8), which includes all written
communications relating to municipal advisory activities. MSRB Rule G-9(h)(i) requires the
municipal advisor to preserve these records for a period of not less than five years.
8. Section 15B(c)(1) of the Exchange Act prohibits municipal advisors from engaging
in any act, practice, or course of business that is in contravention of any rule of the MSRB.
Policies and Procedures
9. During the relevant period, Public Resources Advisory maintained certain policies
and procedures designed to ensure the maintenance and retention of municipal advisory-related
records, including electronic communications, in compliance with the relevant recordkeeping
provisions.
10. Public Resources Advisory’s employees were advised that the use of unapproved
electronic communications methods to conduct Public Resources Advisory-related business was
generally not permitted unless such messages were retained in accordance with Public Resources
Advisory’s document retention policies.
11. Messages sent through firm-approved communications methods were monitored,
subject to review and archived. Messages sent through unapproved communications methods
were not monitored, subject to review or archived.
12. Public Resources Advisory had procedures for all employees, including
supervisors, requiring their written acknowledgment that they had read and understood Public
Resources Advisory’s electronic communications policies and were responsible for abiding by their
provisions. In addition, Public Resources Advisory conducted training and provided reminders to
employees regarding the requirements of its electronic communication policies. However, Public
4
Resources Advisory did not have processes in place to review, test or modify its reliance on
employees’ written acknowledgments.
13. All of Public Resources Advisory’s employees that sent or received off-channel
communications, including supervisors, acknowledged in writing that they understood the
electronic communications policies and were responsible for abiding with them, yet did not follow
these policies. Public Resources Advisory’s reliance on employees’ acknowledgment was not
reasonably designed to achieve compliance with the recordkeeping requirements because it was
not reliable absent appropriate follow-up measures. Accordingly, Public Resources Advisory’s
supervisory system was not reasonably designed to achieve compliance with recordkeeping
requirements.
Recordkeeping Failures
14. In July 2023, the Commission staff commenced a risk-based initiative to investigate
whether municipal advisors were properly retaining messages related to municipal advisory
activities that were sent and/or received by employees using unapproved electronic communication
methods. Public Resources Advisory cooperated with the investigation by voluntarily gathering,
reviewing and producing messages found on employees’ electronic devices.
15. The Commission staff’s investigation uncovered off-channel communications at all
seniority levels of Public Resources Advisory. The investigation determined that, during the
relevant period, multiple Public Resources Advisory personnel had engaged in off-channel
communications relating to municipal advisory activities involving both other employees of Public
Resources Advisory and external contacts that were not preserved.
16. For example, a municipal advisor representative of Public Resources Advisory
exchanged text messages with a municipal issuer client addressing credit ratings for an anticipated
municipal bond issuance. The text exchange also communicated information about a different
series of bonds, expected to be issued at the same time as the first series. The communication
about the second series of bonds described a lender’s response to the municipal issuer client’s
request for the deletion of an event of default in financing documents and the municipal advisor
representative’s response to the lender. For another example, a municipal advisor principal of
Public Resources Advisory texted a municipal issuer client describing improvement in municipal-
securities market conditions, a request from a placement agent to execute a Bond Purchase
Agreement and indicating approval that the client should proceed.
.
5
Violations
17. As a result of the conduct described above, during the relevant period, Public
Resources Advisory willfully
3
violated Section 17(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 15Ba1-8
thereunder and MSRB Rules G-8 and G-9, which require municipal advisors to make and preserve
for at least five years originals or copies of all written communications received or sent relating to
municipal advisory activities.
18. As a result of the conduct described above, during the relevant period, Public
Resources Advisory willfully violated MSRB Rule G-44, which requires municipal advisors to,
among other things, implement, and maintain a system to supervise the municipal advisory
activities of the municipal advisor and its associated persons that is reasonably designed to achieve
compliance with applicable securities laws and regulations, including applicable MSRB rules.
19. As a result of Public Resources Advisory’s willful violations of MSRB Rules G-8,
G-9 and G-44, Public Resources Advisory willfully violated Section 15B(c)(1) of the Exchange
Act, which prohibits municipal advisors from making use of the mails or any means or
instrumentality of interstate commerce to provide advice to or on behalf of a municipal entity or
obligated person with respect to municipal financial products, the issuance of municipal securities,
or to undertake a solicitation of a municipal entity or obligated person, in contravention of any rule
of the MSRB.
Remedial Efforts
20. In determining to accept the Offer, the Commission considered remedial steps
undertaken by Public Resources Advisory and the cooperation afforded the Commission staff. Prior to
this action, Public Resources Advisory conducted additional training and enhanced its policies and
procedures concerning the use of approved communications methods, including by requiring quarterly
attestations.
Undertakings
21. In addition, Public Resources Advisory has undertaken to:
3
“Willfully,” for purposes of imposing relief under Section 15B of the Exchange Act, “‘means no
more than that the person charged with the duty knows what he is doing.’” Wonsover v. SEC, 205 F.3d
408, 414 (D.C. Cir. 2000) (quoting Hughes v. SEC, 174 F.2d 969, 977 (D.C. Cir. 1949)). There is no
requirement that the actor “also be aware that he is violating one of the Rules or Acts.” Tager v. SEC, 344
F.2d 5, 8 (2d Cir. 1965). The decision in The Robare Group, Ltd. v. SEC, which construed the term
“willfully” for purposes of a differently structured statutory provision, does not alter that standard. 922
F.3d 468, 478-79 (D.C. Cir. 2019) (setting forth the showing required to establish that a person has
“willfully omit[ted]” material information from a required disclosure in violation of Section 207 of the
Advisers Act).
6
a. Within 180 days of the entry of this Order: (i) establish reasonably designed
written policies and procedures regarding the preservation of electronic communications;
(ii) conduct a training of all associated persons who engage in municipal advisory activities
regarding the preservation of electronic communications, to be provided by a person or
entity with relevant expertise in the preservation of electronic communications and
recordkeeping requirements under the Exchange Act, the rules and regulations thereunder,
and under MSRB Rules; and (iii) establish a program of periodic training of all associated
persons who engage in municipal advisory activities regarding the preservation of
electronic communications. The written policies and procedures should include the
designation of a municipal advisor principal at Respondent responsible for ensuring
compliance by Respondent with such policies and procedures and responsible for
implementing and maintaining a record (including attendance) of the initial training and the
periodic training program.
b. Certify, in writing, compliance with the undertakings set forth above. The
certification shall: (i) identify the undertakings; (ii) provide written evidence of compliance
with the undertakings in the form of a narrative; and (iii) be supported by exhibits sufficient
to demonstrate compliance with the undertakings. The Commission staff may make
reasonable requests for further evidence of compliance with the undertakings, and
Respondent agrees to provide such evidence at the time and in the manner specified by
Commission staff or advise the Commission staff of any request for further evidence that
Respondent considers unreasonable. The certification, written evidence of compliance and
supporting exhibits shall be submitted to LeeAnn Ghazil Gaunt, Chief, Public Finance
Abuse Unit, Securities and Exchange Commission, 33 Arch Street, 24
th
Floor, Boston, MA
02110, with a copy to the Office of Chief Counsel of the Enforcement Division, no later
than the one-year anniversary of the date of this order.
c. Deadlines. For good cause shown, the Commission staff may extend any of the
procedural dates relating to the undertakings. Deadlines for procedural dates shall be
counted in calendar days, except that if the last day falls on a weekend or federal holiday,
the next business day shall be considered to be the last day.
IV.
In view of the foregoing, the Commission deems it appropriate and in the public interest to
impose the sanctions agreed to in Respondent Public Resources Advisory’s Offer.
Accordingly, pursuant to Sections 15B and 21C of the Exchange Act, it is hereby
ORDERED that:
A. Respondent Public Resources Advisory cease and desist from committing or
causing any violations and any future violations of Section 17(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 15Ba1-
8 thereunder and Section 15B(c)(1) of the Exchange Act and MSRB Rules G-8, G-9 and G-44.
B. Respondent Public Resources Advisory is censured.
7
C. Respondent Public Resources Advisory shall comply with the undertakings
enumerated in paragraph 21.
D. Respondent Public Resources Advisory shall, within 10 days of the entry of this
Order, pay a civil money penalty in the amount of $184,000.00 to the Securities and Exchange
Commission, of which $46,000.00 shall be transferred to the Municipal Securities Rulemaking
Board in accordance with Section 15B(c)(9)(A) of the Exchange Act, and of which the remaining
$138,000.00 shall be transferred to the general fund of the United States Treasury, subject to
Exchange Act Section 21F(g)(3). If timely payment is not made, additional interest shall accrue
pursuant to 31 U.S.C. §3717. Payment must be made in one of the following ways:
(1) Respondent may transmit payment electronically to the Commission, which
will provide detailed ACH transfer/Fedwire instructions upon request;
(2) Respondent may make direct payment from a bank account via Pay.gov
through the SEC website at http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/ofm.htm; or
(3) Respondent may pay by certified check, bank cashier’s check, or United
States postal money order, made payable to the Securities and Exchange
Commission and hand-delivered or mailed to:
Enterprise Services Center
Accounts Receivable Branch
HQ Bldg., Room 181, AMZ-341
6500 South MacArthur Boulevard
Oklahoma City, OK 73169
Payments by check or money order must be accompanied by a cover letter identifying
Public Resources Advisory as the Respondent in these proceedings, and the file number of these
proceedings; a copy of the cover letter and check or money order must be sent to LeeAnn Ghazil
Gaunt, Chief, Public Finance Abuse Unit, Securities and Exchange Commission, Boston Regional
Office, 33 Arch Street, 24th Floor, Boston, MA 02110.
E. Amounts ordered to be paid as civil money penalties pursuant to this Order shall be
treated as penalties paid to the government for all purposes, including all tax purposes. To
preserve the deterrent effect of the civil penalty, Respondent agrees that in any Related Investor
Action, it shall not argue that it is entitled to, nor shall it benefit by, offset or reduction of any award
of compensatory damages by the amount of any part of Respondent’s payment of a civil penalty in
this action (“Penalty Offset”). If the court in any Related Investor Action grants such a Penalty
Offset, Respondent agrees that it shall, within 30 days after entry of a final order granting the
Penalty Offset, notify the Commission’s counsel in this action and pay the amount of the Penalty
Offset to the Securities and Exchange Commission. Such a payment shall not be deemed an
8
additional civil penalty and shall not be deemed to change the amount of the civil penalty imposed
in this proceeding. For purposes of this paragraph, a “Related Investor Action”
9
means a private damages action brought against Respondent by or on behalf of one or more
investors based on substantially the same facts as alleged in the Order instituted by the
Commission in this proceeding.
By the Commission.
Vanessa A. Countryman
Secretary UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Release No. 101046 / September 17, 2024
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
File No. 3-22126
In the Matter of
PUBLIC RESOURCES ADVISORY
GROUP, INC.,
Respondent.
ORDER INSTITUTING
ADMINISTRATIVE AND CEASE-
AND-DESIST PROCEEDINGS
PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 15B AND
21C OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, MAKING
FINDINGS, AND IMPOSING
REMEDIAL SANCTIONS AND A
CEASE-AND-DESIST ORDER
I.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) deems it appropriate and in the
public interest that public administrative and cease-and-desist proceedings be, and hereby are,
instituted pursuant to Sections 15B and 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange
Act”) against Public Resources Advisory Group, Inc. (“Public Resources Advisory” or
“Respondent”).
II.
In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, Respondent has submitted an Offer of
Settlement (“Offer”) which the Commission has determined to accept. Respondent admits the
facts set forth in Section III below, acknowledges that its conduct violated the federal securities
laws, admits the Commission’s jurisdiction over it and the subject matter of these proceedings, and
consents to the entry of this Order Instituting Administrative and Cease-and-Desist Proceedings
Pursuant to Sections 15B and 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Making Findings, and
Imposing Remedial Sanctions and a Cease-and-Desist Order (“Order”), as set forth below.
III.
On the basis of this Order and Respondent’s Offer, the Commission finds1 that:
1 The findings herein are made pursuant to Respondent’s Offer of Settlement and are not
binding on any other person or entity in this or any other proceeding.
2
Summary
1. The federal securities laws impose recordkeeping requirements on municipal advisors,
which are intended to facilitate the Commission’s inspections and examinations of municipal advisors
and assist the Commission in evaluating a municipal advisor’s compliance with the applicable federal
securities laws, including the rules of the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (“MSRB”). These
recordkeeping requirements require, among other things, that municipal advisors maintain and preserve
all written communications relating to municipal advisory activities for at least five years.
2. These proceedings arise out of the failure of Public Resources Advisory employees
throughout the firm, including at senior levels, to adhere to these recordkeeping requirements and the
firm’s own policies. Using unapproved electronic communication methods, these employees
communicated with regard to municipal advisory activities both internally and externally by text
messages (“off-channel communications”).
3. From at least July 2020 to September 2023 (the “relevant period”), multiple Public
Resources Advisory employees sent and received off-channel communications relating to municipal
advisory activities. Public Resources Advisory did not maintain or preserve these written
communications. Public Resources Advisory’s failure involved employees at various levels of authority,
including both municipal advisor representatives and municipal advisor principals.2 As a result, Public
Resources Advisory violated Section 17(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 15Ba1-8 thereunder, and
MSRB Rules G-8 and G-9.
4. Some of Public Resources Advisory’s supervisors, who were responsible for preventing
this misconduct, themselves failed to comply with these recordkeeping requirements, as well as the
firm’s own policies by sending and receiving off-channel communications relating to municipal advisory
activities. Since at least July 2020, Public Resources Advisory failed to implement and maintain a
system to supervise the municipal advisory activities of the municipal advisor and its associated persons
that is reasonably designed to achieve compliance with applicable recordkeeping requirements. As a
result, Public Resources Advisory violated MSRB Rule G-44. By violating MSRB Rules G-8, G-9 and
G-44, Public Resources Advisory violated Section 15B(c)(1) of the Exchange Act.
Respondent
5. Public Resources Advisory Group, Inc. (“Public Resources Advisory”) is a New
York corporation with its principal office and place of business in New York, New York. Public
2 MSRB Rule G-3(d)(i)(A) defines a “municipal advisor representative” to mean a natural person
associated with a municipal advisor who engages in municipal advisory activities on the municipal advisor’s
behalf, other than a person performing only clerical, administrative, support or similar functions. MSRB
Rule G-3(e)(i) defines a “municipal advisor principal” to mean a natural person associated with a municipal
advisor who is directly engaged in the management, direction or supervision of the municipal advisory
activities of the municipal advisor and its associated persons.
3
Resources Advisory has been registered with the Commission and the MSRB as a municipal
advisor since July 2014 and was registered during the relevant time period.
Recordkeeping Requirements for Municipal Advisors
6. Section 17(a)(1) of the Exchange Act requires municipal advisors to make and keep
for prescribed periods such records, furnish such copies thereof, and make and disseminate such
reports as the Commission, by rule, prescribes as necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for
the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the Exchange Act. Exchange Act Rule
15Ba1-8 requires that municipal advisors make and keep true, accurate, and current originals or
copies of all written communications received, and originals or copies of all written
communications sent, by such municipal advisor relating to municipal advisory activities,
regardless of the format of such communications, and for such records to be maintained and
preserved for a period of not less than five years, the first two years in easily accessible places.
7. MSRB Rule G-8(h)(i) requires municipal advisors to make and keep current all
books and records described in Exchange Act Rule 15Ba1-8(a)(1)-(8), which includes all written
communications relating to municipal advisory activities. MSRB Rule G-9(h)(i) requires the
municipal advisor to preserve these records for a period of not less than five years.
8. Section 15B(c)(1) of the Exchange Act prohibits municipal advisors from engaging
in any act, practice, or course of business that is in contravention of any rule of the MSRB.
Policies and Procedures
9. During the relevant period, Public Resources Advisory maintained certain policies
and procedures designed to ensure the maintenance and retention of municipal advisory-related
records, including electronic communications, in compliance with the relevant recordkeeping
provisions.
10. Public Resources Advisory’s employees were advised that the use of unapproved
electronic communications methods to conduct Public Resources Advisory-related business was
generally not permitted unless such messages were retained in accordance with Public Resources
Advisory’s document retention policies.
11. Messages sent through firm-approved communications methods were monitored,
subject to review and archived. Messages sent through unapproved communications methods
were not monitored, subject to review or archived.
12. Public Resources Advisory had procedures for all employees, including
supervisors, requiring their written acknowledgment that they had read and understood Public
Resources Advisory’s electronic communications policies and were responsible for abiding by their
provisions. In addition, Public Resources Advisory conducted training and provided reminders to
employees regarding the requirements of its electronic communication policies. However, Public
4
Resources Advisory did not have processes in place to review, test or modify its reliance on
employees’ written acknowledgments.
13. All of Public Resources Advisory’s employees that sent or received off-channel
communications, including supervisors, acknowledged in writing that they understood the
electronic communications policies and were responsible for abiding with them, yet did not follow
these policies. Public Resources Advisory’s reliance on employees’ acknowledgment was not
reasonably designed to achieve compliance with the recordkeeping requirements because it was
not reliable absent appropriate follow-up measures. Accordingly, Public Resources Advisory’s
supervisory system was not reasonably designed to achieve compliance with recordkeeping
requirements.
Recordkeeping Failures
14. In July 2023, the Commission staff commenced a risk-based initiative to investigate
whether municipal advisors were properly retaining messages related to municipal advisory
activities that were sent and/or received by employees using unapproved electronic communication
methods. Public Resources Advisory cooperated with the investigation by voluntarily gathering,
reviewing and producing messages found on employees’ electronic devices.
15. The Commission staff’s investigation uncovered off-channel communications at all
seniority levels of Public Resources Advisory. The investigation determined that, during the
relevant period, multiple Public Resources Advisory personnel had engaged in off-channel
communications relating to municipal advisory activities involving both other employees of Public
Resources Advisory and external contacts that were not preserved.
16. For example, a municipal advisor representative of Public Resources Advisory
exchanged text messages with a municipal issuer client addressing credit ratings for an anticipated
municipal bond issuance. The text exchange also communicated information about a different
series of bonds, expected to be issued at the same time as the first series. The communication
about the second series of bonds described a lender’s response to the municipal issuer client’s
request for the deletion of an event of default in financing documents and the municipal advisor
representative’s response to the lender. For another example, a municipal advisor principal of
Public Resources Advisory texted a municipal issuer client describing improvement in municipal-
securities market conditions, a request from a placement agent to execute a Bond Purchase
Agreement and indicating approval that the client should proceed.
.
5
Violations
17. As a result of the conduct described above, during the relevant period, Public
Resources Advisory willfully3 violated Section 17(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 15Ba1-8
thereunder and MSRB Rules G-8 and G-9, which require municipal advisors to make and preserve
for at least five years originals or copies of all written communications received or sent relating to
municipal advisory activities.
18. As a result of the conduct described above, during the relevant period, Public
Resources Advisory willfully violated MSRB Rule G-44, which requires municipal advisors to,
among other things, implement, and maintain a system to supervise the municipal advisory
activities of the municipal advisor and its associated persons that is reasonably designed to achieve
compliance with applicable securities laws and regulations, including applicable MSRB rules.
19. As a result of Public Resources Advisory’s willful violations of MSRB Rules G-8,
G-9 and G-44, Public Resources Advisory willfully violated Section 15B(c)(1) of the Exchange
Act, which prohibits municipal advisors from making use of the mails or any means or
instrumentality of interstate commerce to provide advice to or on behalf of a municipal entity or
obligated person with respect to municipal financial products, the issuance of municipal securities,
or to undertake a solicitation of a municipal entity or obligated person, in contravention of any rule
of the MSRB.
Remedial Efforts
20. In determining to accept the Offer, the Commission considered remedial steps
undertaken by Public Resources Advisory and the cooperation afforded the Commission staff. Prior to
this action, Public Resources Advisory conducted additional training and enhanced its policies and
procedures concerning the use of approved communications methods, including by requiring quarterly
attestations.
Undertakings
21. In addition, Public Resources Advisory has undertaken to:
3 “Willfully,” for purposes of imposing relief under Section 15B of the Exchange Act, “‘means no
more than that the person charged with the duty knows what he is doing.’” Wonsover v. SEC, 205 F.3d
408, 414 (D.C. Cir. 2000) (quoting Hughes v. SEC, 174 F.2d 969, 977 (D.C. Cir. 1949)). There is no
requirement that the actor “also be aware that he is violating one of the Rules or Acts.” Tager v. SEC, 344
F.2d 5, 8 (2d Cir. 1965). The decision in The Robare Group, Ltd. v. SEC, which construed the term
“willfully” for purposes of a differently structured statutory provision, does not alter that standard. 922
F.3d 468, 478-79 (D.C. Cir. 2019) (setting forth the showing required to establish that a person has
“willfully omit[ted]” material information from a required disclosure in violation of Section 207 of the
Advisers Act).
6
a. Within 180 days of the entry of this Order: (i) establish reasonably designed
written policies and procedures regarding the preservation of electronic communications;
(ii) conduct a training of all associated persons who engage in municipal advisory activities
regarding the preservation of electronic communications, to be provided by a person or
entity with relevant expertise in the preservation of electronic communications and
recordkeeping requirements under the Exchange Act, the rules and regulations thereunder,
and under MSRB Rules; and (iii) establish a program of periodic training of all associated
persons who engage in municipal advisory activities regarding the preservation of
electronic communications. The written policies and procedures should include the
designation of a municipal advisor principal at Respondent responsible for ensuring
compliance by Respondent with such policies and procedures and responsible for
implementing and maintaining a record (including attendance) of the initial training and the
periodic training program.
b. Certify, in writing, compliance with the undertakings set forth above. The
certification shall: (i) identify the undertakings; (ii) provide written evidence of compliance
with the undertakings in the form of a narrative; and (iii) be supported by exhibits sufficient
to demonstrate compliance with the undertakings. The Commission staff may make
reasonable requests for further evidence of compliance with the undertakings, and
Respondent agrees to provide such evidence at the time and in the manner specified by
Commission staff or advise the Commission staff of any request for further evidence that
Respondent considers unreasonable. The certification, written evidence of compliance and
supporting exhibits shall be submitted to LeeAnn Ghazil Gaunt, Chief, Public Finance
Abuse Unit, Securities and Exchange Commission, 33 Arch Street, 24th Floor, Boston, MA
02110, with a copy to the Office of Chief Counsel of the Enforcement Division, no later
than the one-year anniversary of the date of this order.
c. Deadlines. For good cause shown, the Commission staff may extend any of the
procedural dates relating to the undertakings. Deadlines for procedural dates shall be
counted in calendar days, except that if the last day falls on a weekend or federal holiday,
the next business day shall be considered to be the last day.
IV.
In view of the foregoing, the Commission deems it appropriate and in the public interest to
impose the sanctions agreed to in Respondent Public Resources Advisory’s Offer.
Accordingly, pursuant to Sections 15B and 21C of the Exchange Act, it is hereby
ORDERED that:
A. Respondent Public Resources Advisory cease and desist from committing or
causing any violations and any future violations of Section 17(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 15Ba1-
8 thereunder and Section 15B(c)(1) of the Exchange Act and MSRB Rules G-8, G-9 and G-44.
B. Respondent Public Resources Advisory is censured.
7
C. Respondent Public Resources Advisory shall comply with the undertakings
enumerated in paragraph 21.
D. Respondent Public Resources Advisory shall, within 10 days of the entry of this
Order, pay a civil money penalty in the amount of $184,000.00 to the Securities and Exchange
Commission, of which $46,000.00 shall be transferred to the Municipal Securities Rulemaking
Board in accordance with Section 15B(c)(9)(A) of the Exchange Act, and of which the remaining
$138,000.00 shall be transferred to the general fund of the United States Treasury, subject to
Exchange Act Section 21F(g)(3). If timely payment is not made, additional interest shall accrue
pursuant to 31 U.S.C. §3717. Payment must be made in one of the following ways:
(1) Respondent may transmit payment electronically to the Commission, which
will provide detailed ACH transfer/Fedwire instructions upon request;
(2) Respondent may make direct payment from a bank account via Pay.gov
through the SEC website at http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/ofm.htm; or
(3) Respondent may pay by certified check, bank cashier’s check, or United
States postal money order, made payable to the Securities and Exchange
Commission and hand-delivered or mailed to:
Enterprise Services Center
Accounts Receivable Branch
HQ Bldg., Room 181, AMZ-341
6500 South MacArthur Boulevard
Oklahoma City, OK 73169
Payments by check or money order must be accompanied by a cover letter identifying
Public Resources Advisory as the Respondent in these proceedings, and the file number of these
proceedings; a copy of the cover letter and check or money order must be sent to LeeAnn Ghazil
Gaunt, Chief, Public Finance Abuse Unit, Securities and Exchange Commission, Boston Regional
Office, 33 Arch Street, 24th Floor, Boston, MA 02110.
E. Amounts ordered to be paid as civil money penalties pursuant to this Order shall be
treated as penalties paid to the government for all purposes, including all tax purposes. To
preserve the deterrent effect of the civil penalty, Respondent agrees that in any Related Investor
Action, it shall not argue that it is entitled to, nor shall it benefit by, offset or reduction of any award
of compensatory damages by the amount of any part of Respondent’s payment of a civil penalty in
this action (“Penalty Offset”). If the court in any Related Investor Action grants such a Penalty
Offset, Respondent agrees that it shall, within 30 days after entry of a final order granting the
Penalty Offset, notify the Commission’s counsel in this action and pay the amount of the Penalty
Offset to the Securities and Exchange Commission. Such a payment shall not be deemed an
http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/ofm.htm
8
additional civil penalty and shall not be deemed to change the amount of the civil penalty imposed
in this proceeding. For purposes of this paragraph, a “Related Investor Action”
9
means a private damages action brought against Respondent by or on behalf of one or more
investors based on substantially the same facts as alleged in the Order instituted by the
Commission in this proceeding.
By the Commission.
Vanessa A. Countryman
Secretary
Undertakings
21. In addition, Public Resources Advisory has undertaken to:
a. Within 180 days of the entry of this Order: (i) establish reasonably designed written policies and procedures regarding the preservation of electronic communications; (ii) conduct a training of all associated persons who engage in municipal adviso...
b. Certify, in writing, compliance with the undertakings set forth above. The certification shall: (i) identify the undertakings; (ii) provide written evidence of compliance with the undertakings in the form of a narrative; and (iii) be supported by ...
c. Deadlines. For good cause shown, the Commission staff may extend any of the procedural dates relating to the undertakings. Deadlines for procedural dates shall be counted in calendar days, except that if the last day falls on a weekend or federal h...
IV.