In re The Huntington Investment
The SEC imposed a $1.25 million penalty and cease-and-desist order on The Huntington Investment Company, Huntington Securities, and Capstone Capital Markets for willfully failing to preserve business communications on personal devices from at least January 2019, violating federal recordkeeping rules and supervision obligations, after they self-reported the misconduct and agreed to remedial reforms.
The SEC found that The Huntington Investment Company, Huntington Securities, and Capstone Capital Markets violated Sections 17(a) and Rule 17a-4(b)(4) of the Exchange Act and HIC violated Section 204 and Rule 204-2(a)(7) of the Advisers Act by failing to maintain off-channel communications, primarily text messages on personal devices, related to broker-dealer and investment advisory activities from at least January 2019. Senior employees, including supervisors, routinely used unapproved platforms, undermining regulatory oversight and leading to failures in reasonable supervision under Sections 15(b)(4)(E) and 203(e)(6). As part of a settlement, the firms admitted fault, self-reported the conduct, paid a $1.25 million civil penalty, and agreed to implement comprehensive remedial measures including an independent compliance consultant and mandatory use of an approved texting platform since 2021.
The SEC instituted administrative and cease-and-desist proceedings against The Huntington Investment Company, Huntington Securities, and Capstone Capital Markets for widespread failures to preserve business communications conducted via personal devices and unapproved platforms from at least January 2019. Employees at all levels, including senior managers and supervisors, routinely communicated about broker-dealer and investment advisory business on personal text messages, violating Sections 17(a) and Rule 17a-4(b)(4) of the Exchange Act and HIC’s obligations under Section 204 and Rule 204-2(a)(7) of the Advisers Act. These failures stemmed from inadequate supervision and noncompliance with internal policies, directly impairing the SEC’s ability to conduct investigations, including during a prior records request. The firms proactively identified the misconduct, self-reported to the SEC, and cooperated fully, leading to a settlement that included a $1.25 million civil penalty and censure. As part of remediation, they implemented an approved on-channel texting application in 2021, retained an independent compliance consultant approved by the SEC, and agreed to adopt all recommended reforms within 90 days, with the option to challenge impractical recommendations within 45 days. They must fully cooperate with the consultant, prohibit their termination without SEC approval, pay reasonable fees, conduct internal audits, submit a One Year Report on progress, preserve compliance records for six years, and certify compliance in writing. The order also requires strict confidentiality and binding implementation deadlines to ensure lasting reform.
Extracted insights
- $1.25M $1,250,000 $1M–$10M
- person federal securities laws
- person huntington employees
- person internal investigation
- person recordkeeping requirements
- person remedial measures
- agency Securities and Exchange Commission
- company the huntington investment company
- SEC Institutes Administrative and Cease-and-Desist Proceedings
- The Huntington Investment Company Submitted Offers of Settlement
- The SEC Determined to Accept Offers of Settlement
- Respondents Admit Facts Set Forth in Section III
- Respondents Acknowledge Conduct Violated Federal Securities Laws
- Respondents Consent to Entry of Order
- Federal Securities Laws Impose Recordkeeping Requirements
- Huntington Employees Sent and Received Off-Channel Communications
- Huntington Conducted Internal Investigation
- Huntington Self-Reported Facts to Commission Staff
- Respondents Undertook Remedial Measures
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Release No. 99504 / February 9, 2024
INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF 1940
Release No. 6552 / February 9, 2024
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
File No. 3-21853
In the Matter of
The Huntington Investment
Company,
Huntington Securities, Inc., and
Capstone Capital Markets LLC,
Respondents.
ORDER INSTITUTING ADMINISTRATIVE
AND CEASE-AND-DESIST PROCEEDINGS
PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 15(b) AND 21C
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934 AND SECTIONS 203(e) AND 203(k) OF
THE INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF
1940, MAKING FINDINGS, AND IMPOSING
REMEDIAL SANCTIONS AND A CEASE-
AND-DESIST ORDER
I.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) deems it appropriate and in
the public interest that public administrative and cease-and-desist proceedings be, and hereby
are, instituted pursuant to Sections 15(b) and 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(“Exchange Act”) against The Huntington Investment Company (“HIC”), Huntington Securities,
Inc. (“HSI”), and Capstone Capital Markets LLC (“Capstone”) (collectively, “Respondents” or
“Huntington”) and Sections 203(e) and 203(k) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940
(“Advisers Act”) against HIC.
II.
In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, Respondents have submitted Offers
of Settlement (“Offers”) that the Commission has determined to accept. Respondents admit the
facts set forth in Section III below, acknowledge that their conduct violated the federal securities
laws, admit the Commission’s jurisdiction over them and the subject matter of these proceedings,
and consent to the entry of this Order Instituting Administrative and Cease-and-Desist
Proceedings, Pursuant to Sections 15(b) and 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
Sections 203(e) and 203(k) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, Making Findings, and
Imposing Remedial Sanctions and a Cease-and-Desist Order (“Order”), as set forth below.
2
III.
On the basis of this Order and Respondents’ Offers, the Commission finds
1
that:
Summary
1. The federal securities laws impose recordkeeping requirements on broker-dealers
and registered investment advisers to ensure that they responsibly discharge their crucial role in
our markets. The Commission has long said that compliance with these requirements is essential
to investor protection and the Commission’s efforts to further its mandate of protecting investors,
maintaining fair, orderly, and efficient markets, and facilitating capital formation. These
proceedings arise out of Huntington’s identification—and self-report—of widespread failures of
certain Huntington employees throughout the firms, including at senior levels, to adhere to
certain of these essential requirements and Huntington’s own policies. Using their personal
devices, these employees communicated both internally and externally by personal text messages
(“off-channel communications”).
2. After Huntington’s compliance staff identified business-related electronic
communications on a non-approved platform on personal devices, Huntington conducted an
internal investigation and self-reported the facts to Commission staff. Respondents proactively
identified key documents and facts, which assisted the Commission staff in efficiently
investigating the conduct. Prior to contacting the Division of Enforcement, since January 2019,
Respondents also undertook significant remedial measures relating to their recordkeeping
practices, policies and procedures, and related supervisory practices, including, in 2021, making
an on-channel texting application available.
3. From at least January 2019, Huntington employees sent and received off-channel
communications that related to HIC’s, HSI’s and Capstone’s broker-dealer businesses and with
respect to HIC’s investment advisory business, off-channel communications related to
recommendations made or proposed to be made and advice given or proposed to be given.
Respondents did not maintain or preserve the substantial majority of these written
communications. Respondents’ failures were firm-wide and involved employees at various
levels of authority. As a result, Respondents violated Section 17(a) of the Exchange Act and
Rule 17a-4(b)(4) thereunder and HIC violated Section 204 of the Advisers Act and Rule 204-
2(a)(7) thereunder.
4. Huntington’s supervisors, who were responsible for supervising junior employees,
routinely communicated on a non-approved platform using their personal devices. In fact, senior
managers and officers responsible for supervising junior employees themselves failed to comply
with HIC’s, HSI’s, and Capstone’s policies by communicating using non-HIC, HSI, and
Capstone approved methods on their personal devices about HIC, HSI and Capstone’s broker-
dealers and HIC’s investment adviser business.
1
The findings herein are made pursuant to Respondents’ Offers of Settlement and are not
binding on any other person or entity in this or any other proceeding.
3
5. HIC’s, HSI’s, and Capstone’s widespread failure to implement their policies and
procedures that prohibit such communications led to their failure reasonably to supervise their
employees within the meaning of Section 15(b)(4)(E) of the Exchange Act as to each of the
Respondents, as well as Section 203(e)(6) of the Advisers Act as to HIC.
6. During the time period that HIC failed to maintain and preserve off-channel
communications that its employees sent and received related to the broker-dealer business and
investment adviser business, HIC received and responded to a Commission records request in a
Commission investigation. As a result, HIC’s recordkeeping failures likely impacted the
Commission’s ability to carry out its regulatory functions and investigate violations of the
federal securities laws in that investigation.
7. After Huntington initiated a review of its recordkeeping efforts, HIC, HSI, and
Capstone identified failures and self-reported their conduct, and further enhanced their ongoing
programs of remediation. As set forth in the Undertakings below, HIC, HSI and Capstone will
retain an independent compliance consultant to review and assess HIC’s, HSI’s and Capstone’s
remedial steps relating to HIC’s HSI’s and Capstone’s recordkeeping practices, policies and
procedures, related supervisory practices, and employment actions.
Respondents
8. The Huntington Investment Company is an Ohio corporation with its principal
office in Columbus, Ohio, and is registered with the Commission as a broker-dealer and
investment adviser. It is a wholly owned subsidiary of Huntington Bancshares Incorporated, a
publicly held regional bank holding company incorporated in Ohio.
9. Huntington Securities, Inc. is a Delaware corporation with its principal office in
Columbus, Ohio, and is registered with the Commission as a broker-dealer and municipal advisor.
It is also a wholly owned subsidiary of Huntington Bancshares Incorporated.
10. Capstone Capital Markets LLC is a Delaware limited liability company with its
principal office in Boston, Massachusetts, and is registered with the Commission as a
broker-dealer. Capstone was acquired by Huntington Bancshares Incorporated in June 2022 as a
wholly owned subsidiary.
Recordkeeping Requirements under the Exchange and Advisers Acts
11. Section 17(a)(1) of the Exchange Act and Section 204 of the Advisers Act
authorize the Commission to issue rules requiring, respectively, broker-dealers and investment
advisers to make and keep for prescribed periods, and furnish copies of, such records as
necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors or otherwise in
furtherance of the purposes of the Exchange Act and the Advisers Act.
12. The Commission adopted Rule 17a-4 under the Exchange Act and Rule 204-2
under the Advisers Act pursuant to this authority. These rules specify the manner and length of
time that the records created in accordance with Commission rules, and certain other records
4
produced by broker-dealers or investment advisers, must be maintained and produced promptly
to Commission representatives.
13. The rules adopted under Section 17(a)(1) of the Exchange Act, including Rule
17a-4(b)(4), require that broker-dealers preserve in an easily accessible place originals of all
communications received and copies of all communications sent relating to a firm’s business as
such. These rules impose minimum recordkeeping requirements that are based on standards a
prudent broker-dealer should follow in the normal course of business.
14. The rules adopted under Advisers Act Section 204, including Advisers Act Rule
204-2(a)(7), require that investment advisers preserve in an easily accessible place originals of all
communications received and copies of all written communications sent relating to, among other
things, any recommendation made or proposed to be made and any advice given or proposed to be
given.
15. The Commission previously has stated that these and other recordkeeping
requirements “are an integral part of the investor protection function of the Commission, and
other securities regulators, in that the preserved records are the primary means of monitoring
compliance with applicable securities laws, including antifraud provisions and financial
responsibility standards.” Commission Guidance to Broker-Dealers on the Use of Electronic
Storage Media under the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act of 2000
with Respect to Rule 17a-4(f), 17 C.F.R. Part 241, Exchange Act Rel. No. 44238 (May 1, 2001).
HIC’s, HSI’s, and Capstone’s Policies and Procedures
16. HIC, HSI, and Capstone maintained certain policies and procedures designed to
ensure the retention of business-related records, including electronic communications, in
compliance with the relevant recordkeeping provisions.
17. HIC, HSI, and Capstone employees were advised that the use of unapproved
electronic communications methods, including on their personal devices, was not permitted, and
they should not use personal email, chats or text messaging applications for business purposes, or
forward work-related communications to their personal devices. After 2021, Huntington
employees were advised that they were required to use an approved platform for business related
communications on any personal device.
18. Messages sent through HIC, HSI, and Capstone -approved communications
methods were monitored, subject to review, and, when appropriate, archived. Messages sent
through unapproved communications methods, such as text messaging or, after 2021,
unapproved applications on personal devices, were not monitored, subject to review or archived.
19. HIC’s, HSI’s, and Capstone’s policies were designed to address supervisors’
supervision of employees’ training in HIC’s, HSI’s, and Capstone’s communications policies
and adherence to HIC’s, HSI’s, and Capstone’s books and recordkeeping requirements.
Supervisory policies notified employees that electronic communications were subject to
surveillance by HIC, HSI, and Capstone. HIC, HSI, and Capstone had procedures for all
employees, including supervisors, requiring annual self-attestations of compliance.
5
20. HIC, HSI, and Capstone, however, failed to implement a system of follow-up and
review to determine that supervisors were reasonably following HIC’s, HSI’s, and Capstone’s
policies. While permitting employees to use approved communications methods, including, after
2021, an approved platform on personal phones, for business communications, HIC, HSI, and
Capstone failed to implement sufficient monitoring to assure that their recordkeeping and
communications policies were being followed.
Respondents’ Recordkeeping Failures Across Their Businesses
21. In September 2021, the Commission staff commenced a risk-based initiative to
investigate whether broker-dealers were properly retaining business-related messages sent and
received on personal devices. In September 2023, Huntington voluntarily contacted the staff
regarding certain off-channel communications that it had identified related to the businesses of
HIC, HSI, and Capstone. Huntington cooperated with the staff’s investigation by proactively
gathering communications from the personal devices of its personnel and responding to the staff’s
requests for additional information. As reported to the Commission staff, Huntington personnel
who had engaged in the use of off-channel communications included senior managers and officers
across each firm.
22. Huntington alerted the Commission staff to numerous off-channel
communications at various seniority levels of Huntington’s broker-dealers. In addition, HIC’s
investigation uncovered the use of off-channel communications within HIC’s investment adviser
business. Respondents collected data from a sampling of broker-dealer and investment adviser
personnel and found that some had engaged in at least some level of off-channel communications
since January 2019. Overall, these personnel sent and received numerous off-channel
communications, involving other Huntington personnel and external contacts in the securities
industry. As disclosed to the Commission staff, within Huntington, a number of senior leaders
participated in off-channel communications.
23. From at least January 2019, HIC, HSI, and Capstone personnel sent and received
off-channel messages that concerned the businesses of the broker-dealers. During this period,
HIC investment adviser personnel sent and received off-channel messages related to, among
other things, providing and recommending investment advice to clients.
24. For example, from January 2019 to March 2023, a HIC director exchanged
off-channel messages on at least 68 occasions, including with junior employees under their
supervision. These messages related to the HIC’s broker-dealer business as such.
25. In another example, in 2022, a HIC officer communicated via text message with a
HIC regional manager. These messages related to, among other things, investment advice given
or proposed to be given to investment advisory clients.
26. In an additional example, in August 2021 HSI employees exchanged numerous
off-channel messages with each other. These messages related to HSI’s broker-dealer business
as such.
6
27. In a final example, in September 2021 and October 2021, a Capstone employee
exchanged off-channel messages with a Capstone customer. These messages related to
Capstone’s broker-dealer business as such.
HIC’s Failure to Preserve Required Records Potentially
Compromised and Delayed a Commission Matter
28. Between January 2019 and the present, HIC received and responded to a
Commission records request in a Commission investigation. By failing to maintain and preserve
required records relating to its business, HIC likely deprived the Commission of off-channel
communications in that investigation.
Respondents’ Violations and Failure to Supervise
29. As a result of the conduct described above, from at least January 2019 through the
date of this Order, HIC, HSI, and Capstone willfully
2
violated Section 17(a) of the Exchange Act
and Rule 17a-4(b)(4) thereunder, which require broker-dealers to preserve for at least three years
originals of all communications received and copies of all communications sent relating to their
business as such.
30. As a result of the conduct described above, from at least January 2019 through the
date of this Order, HIC willfully violated Section 204 of the Advisers Act and Rule 204-2(a)(7)
thereunder, which require investment advisers to preserve in an easily accessible place originals of
all written communications r eceived and copies of all written communications sent relating to,
among other things, any recommendation made or proposed to be made and any advice given or
proposed to be given.
31. As a result of the conduct described above, HIC, HSI, and Capstone failed
reasonably to supervise their employees with a view to preventing or detecting certain of their
employees’ aiding and abetting violations of Section 17(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 17a-
4(b)(4) thereunder, within the meaning of Section 15(b)(4)(E) of the Exchange Act.
32. As a result of the conduct described above, HIC failed reasonably to supervise its
employees with a view to preventing or detecting certain of its employees’ aiding and abetting
2
“Willfully,” for purposes of imposing relief under Section 15(b) of the Exchange Act and
Section 203(e) of the Advisers Act “‘means no more than that the person charged with the duty
knows what he is doing.’” See Wonsover v. SEC, 205 F.3d 408, 414 (D.C. Cir 2000) (quoting
Hughes v. SEC, 174 F.2d 969, 977 (D.C. Cir. 1949)). There is no requirement that the actor
“also be aware that he is violating one of the Rules or Acts.” Tager v. SEC, 344 F.2d 5, 8 (2d
Cir. 1965). The decision in The Robare Group, Ltd. v. SEC, which construed the term
“willfully” for purposes of a differently structured statutory provision, does not alter that
standard. 922 F.3d 468, 478-79 (D.C. Cir. 2019) (setting forth the showing required to establish
that a person has “willfully omit[ted]” material information from a required disclosure in
violation of Section 207 of the Advisers Act).
7
violations of Section 204 of the Advisers Act and Rule 204-2(a)(7) thereunder, within the
meaning of Section 203(e)(6) of the Advisers Act.
HIC’s, HSI’s, and Capstone’s Remedial and Cooperation Efforts
33. In determining to accept the Offers, the Commission considered HIC’s, HSI’s, and
Capstone’s self-report, cooperation afforded to Commission staff, and remediation. After
identifying off-channel communications, Respondents conducted an internal investigation and self-
reported the facts to Commission staff. Prior to approaching Commission staff, since at least
January 2019, HIC, HSI, and Capstone had begun a program of remediation, which included
strengthening their policies and procedures by making investments in new technologies to improve
surveillance and retention efforts; increasing the number of trainings and sending firm-wide
reminders that emphasized the importance of complying with recordkeeping obligations, and, in
2021, making an on-channel texting platform available. HIC, HSI, and Capstone also took
proactive steps to collect and preserve off-channel communications.
Undertakings
34. Prior to this action, HIC, HSI, and Capstone enhanced their policies and
procedures, and increased training concerning the use of approved communications methods,
including on personal devices, and began implementing significant changes to the technology
available to employees. In addition, HIC, HSI, and Capstone have undertaken to:
35. Independent Compliance Consultant.
a. HIC, HSI, and Capstone shall each retain, within thirty (30) days of the entry
of this Order, the services of an independent compliance consultant (“Compliance
Consultant”) that is not unacceptable to the Commission staff. The Compliance
Consultant’s compensation and expenses shall be borne exclusively by HIC, HSI, and
Capstone.
b. HIC, HSI, and Capstone will oversee the work of the Compliance Consultant.
c. HIC, HSI, and Capstone shall provide to the Commission staff, within sixty
(60) days of the entry of this Order, a copy of the engagement letter detailing the
Compliance Consultant’s responsibilities, which shall include a comprehensive
compliance review as described below. HIC, HSI, and Capstone shall require that, within
ninety (90) days of the date of the engagement letter, the Compliance Consultant conduct:
i. A comprehensive review of HIC’s, HSI’s, and Capstone’s supervisory,
compliance, and other policies and procedures designed to ensure that HIC’s,
HSI’s, and Capstone’s electronic communications, including those found on
personal electronic devices, including without limitation, cellular phones
(“Personal Devices”), are preserved in accordance with the requirements of the
federal securities laws.
8
ii. A comprehensive review of training conducted by HIC, HSI, and
Capstone to ensure personnel are complying with the requirements regarding the
preservation of electronic communications, including those found on Personal
Devices, in accordance with the requirements of the federal securities laws,
including by ensuring that HIC, HSI, and Capstone personnel certify in writing on
a quarterly basis that they are complying with preservation requirements.
iii. An assessment of the surveillance program measures implemented by
HIC, HSI, and Capstone to ensure compliance, on an ongoing basis, with the
requirements found in the federal securities laws to preserve electronic
communications, including those found on Personal Devices.
iv. An assessment of the technological solutions that HIC, HSI, and
Capstone have begun implementing to meet the record retention requirements of
the federal securities laws, including an assessment of the likelihood that HIC,
HSI, and Capstone personnel will use the technological solutions going forward
and a review of the measures employed by HIC, HSI, and Capstone to track
employee usage of new technological solutions.
v. An assessment of the measures used by HIC, HSI, and Capstone to
prevent the use of unauthorized communications methods for business
communications by employees. This assessment should include, but not be
limited to, a review of HIC’s, HSI’s, and Capstone’s policies and procedures to
ascertain if they provide for any significant technology and/or behavioral
restrictions that help prevent the risk of the use of unapproved communications
methods on Personal Devices (e.g., trading floor restrictions).
vi. A review of HIC’s, HSI’s, and Capstone’s electronic communications
surveillance routines to ensure that electronic communications through approved
communications methods found on Personal Devices are incorporated into HIC’s,
HSI’s, and Capstone’s overall communications surveillance program.
vii. A comprehensive review of the framework adopted by HIC, HSI, and
Capstone to address instances of non-compliance by HIC, HSI, and Capstone
employees with HIC’s, HSI’s, and Capstone’s policies and procedures concerning
the use of Personal Devices to communicate about HIC, HSI, and Capstone
business in the past. This review shall include a survey of how HIC, HSI, and
Capstone determined which employees failed to comply with HIC’s, HSI’s, and
Capstone’s policies and procedures, the corrective action carried out, an
evaluation of who violated policies and why, what penalties were imposed, and
whether penalties were handed out consistently across business lines and seniority
levels.
d. HIC, HSI, and Capstone shall require that, within forty-five (45) days after
completion of the review set forth in sub-paragraphs 35.c.i. through c.vii. above, the
Compliance Consultant shall submit a detailed written report of its findings to HIC, HSI,
9
and Capstone, and to the Commission staff (the “Report”). HIC, HSI, and Capstone shall
require that the Report include a description of the review performed, the names of the
individuals who performed the review, the conclusions reached, the Compliance
Consultant’s recommendations for changes in or improvements to HIC’s, HSI’s, and
Capstone’s policies and procedures, and a summary of the plan for implementing the
recommended changes in or improvements to HIC’s, HSI’s, and Capstone’s policies and
procedures.
e. HIC, HSI, and Capstone shall adopt all recommendations contained in the
Report within ninety (90) days of the date of the Report; provided, however, that within
forty-five (45) days after the date of the Report, HIC, HSI, and Capstone shall advise the
Compliance Consultant and the Commission staff in writing of any recommendations that
HIC, HSI, and/or Capstone considers to be unduly burdensome, impractical, or
inappropriate. With respect to any recommendation that HIC, HSI, and/or Capstone
considers unduly burdensome, impractical, or inappropriate, HIC, HSI, and/or Capstone
need not adopt such recommendation at that time, but shall propose in writing an
alternative policy, procedure, or disclosure designed to achieve the same objective or
purpose.
f. As to any recommendation concerning HIC’s, HSI’s, and Capstone’s policies
or procedures on which HIC, HSI, and Capstone and the Compliance Consultant do not
agree, HIC, HSI, and Capstone and the Compliance Consultant shall attempt in good faith
to reach an agreement within sixty (60) days after the date of the Report. Within fifteen
(15) days after the conclusion of the discussion and evaluation by HIC, HSI, and
Capstone and the Compliance Consultant, HIC, HSI, and Capstone shall require that the
Compliance Consultant inform HIC, HSI, and Capstone and the Commission staff in
writing of the Compliance Consultant’s final determination concerning any
recommendation that HIC, HSI, and/or Capstone consider to be unduly burdensome,
impractical, or inappropriate. HIC, HSI, and Capstone shall abide by the determinations
of the Compliance Consultant and, within sixty (60) days after final agreement between
HIC, HSI, and Capstone and the Compliance Consultant or final determination by the
Compliance Consultant, whichever occurs first, HIC, HSI, and Capstone shall adopt and
implement all of the recommendations that the Compliance Consultant deems
appropriate.
g. HIC, HSI, and Capstone shall cooperate fully with the Compliance Consultant
and shall provide the Compliance Consultant with access to such of HIC’s, HSI’s, and
Capstone’s files, books, records, and personnel as are reasonably requested by the
Compliance Consultant for review.
h. HIC, HSI, and Capstone shall not have the authority to terminate the
Compliance Consultant or substitute another compliance consultant for the initial
Compliance Consultant, without the prior written approval of the Commission staff.
HIC, HSI, and Capstone shall compensate the Compliance Consultant and persons
engaged to assist the Compliance Consultant for services rendered under this Order at
their reasonable and customary rates.
10
i. For the period of engagement and for a period of two years from completion of
the engagement, HIC, HSI, and Capstone shall not (i) retain the Compliance Consultant
for any other professional services outside of the services described in this Order; (ii)
enter into any other professional relationship with the Compliance Consultant, including
any employment, consultant, attorney-client, auditing or other professional relationship;
or (iii) enter, without prior written consent of the Commission staff, into any such
professional relationship with any of the Compliance Consultant’s present or former
affiliates, employers, directors, officers, employees, or agents acting in their capacity as
such.
j. The Report by the Compliance Consultant will likely include confidential
financial, proprietary, competitive business or commercial information. Public disclosure
of the Report could discourage cooperation, impede pending or potential government
investigations or undermine the objectives of the reporting requirement. For these
reasons, among others, the Report and the contents thereof are intended to remain and
shall remain non-public, except (1) pursuant to court order, (2) as agreed to by the parties
in writing, (3) to the extent that the Commission determines in its sole discretion that
disclosure would be in furtherance of the Commission’s discharge of its duties and
responsibilities, or (4) as otherwise required by law.
36. One-Year Evaluation. HIC, HSI, and Capstone shall each require the Compliance
Consultant to assess HIC’s, HSI’s, and Capstone’s program for the preservation, as required
under the federal securities laws, of electronic communications, including those found on
Personal Devices, commencing one year after submitting the Report required by Paragraph 35.d
above. HIC, HSI, and Capstone shall require this review to evaluate HIC’s, HSI’s, and
Capstone’s progress in the areas described in Paragraph 35.c.i through 35.c.vii above. After this
review, Huntington shall require the Compliance Consultant to submit a report (the “One Year
Report”) to each of HIC, HSI, and Capstone, and the Commission staff and shall ensure that the
One Year Report includes an updated assessment of HIC’s, HSI’s, and Capstone’s policies and
procedures with regard to the preservation of electronic communications (including those found
on Personal Devices), training, surveillance programs, and technological solutions implemented
in the prior year period.
37. R
eporting Discipline Imposed. For two years following the entry of this Order,
HIC, HSI, and Capstone shall notify the Commission staff as follows upon the imposition of any
discipline imposed by HIC, HSI, and Capstone, including, but not limited to, written warnings,
loss of any pay, bonus, or incentive compensation, or the termination of employment, with respect
to any employee found to have violated HIC’s, HSI’s, and Capstone’s policies and procedures
concerning the preservation of electronic communications, including those found on Personal
Devices: at least 48 hours before the filing of a Form U-5, or within ten (10) days of the
imposition of other discipline.
38. I
nternal Audit. In addition to the Compliance Consultant’s review and issuance of
the One Year Report, HIC, HSI, and Capstone will each also have its respective Internal Audit
function conduct a separate audit(s) to assess HIC’s, HSI’s, and Capstone’s progress in the areas
11
described in Paragraph 35.c.i through 35.c.vii above. After completion of this audit(s), HIC, HSI,
and Capstone shall ensure that Internal Audit submits a report to each of HIC, HSI, and Capstone,
and to the Commission staff.
39. Recordkeeping. HIC, HSI, and Capstone shall each preserve, for a period of not
less than six (6) years from the end of the fiscal year last used, the first two (2) years in an easily
accessible place, any record of compliance with these undertakings. HIC shall also preserve any
record of compliance with these undertakings in an easily accessible place for a period of not less
than five (5) years from the end of the fiscal year during which the entry was made on such record,
the first two (2) years in an appropriate office of HIC.
40. Deadlines. For good cause shown, the Commission staff may extend any of the
procedural dates relating to the undertakings. Deadlines for procedural dates shall be counted in
calendar days, except that if the last day falls on a weekend or federal holiday, the next business
day shall be considered to be the last day.
41. C
ertification. HIC, HSI, and Capstone shall each certify, in writing, compliance
with the undertakings set forth above. The certification shall identify the undertakings, provide
written evidence of compliance in the form of a narrative, and be supported by exhibits sufficient
to demonstrate compliance. The Commission staff may make reasonable requests for further
evidence of compliance, and Respondents agree to provide such evidence. The certification and
supporting material shall be submitted to Amy S. Cotter, Assistant Regional Director, Division of
Enforcement, Chicago Regional Office, 175 West Jackson Boulevard, Suite 1450, Chicago, Illinois
60604, or such other person as the Commission staff may request, with a copy to the Office of
Chief Counsel of the Enforcement Division, no later than sixty (60) days from the date of the
completion of the undertakings.
IV.
In view of the foregoing, the Commission deems it appropriate and in the public interest
to impose the sanctions agreed to in Respondents’ Offers.
Accordingly, pursuant to Sections 15(b) and 21C of the Exchange Act as to HIC, HSI and
Capstone and Sections 203(e) and 203(k) of the Advisers Act as to HIC, it is hereby ORDERED
that:
A. HIC, HSI, and Capstone cease and desist from committing or causing any
violations and any future violations of Section 17(a) of the Exchange Act and
Rule 17a-4 thereunder.
B. HIC cease and desist from committing or causing any violations and any future
violations of Section 204 of the Advisers Act and Rule 204-2 thereunder.
C. Respondents are censured.
D. Respondents shall comply with the undertakings enumerated in paragraphs 34 to
41 above.
12
E. Respondents shall, jointly and severally, within 14 days of the entry of this Order,
pay a civil money penalty in the amount of $1,250,000 to the Securities and
Exchange Commission for transfer to the general fund of the United States
Treasury, subject to Exchange Act Section 21F(g)(3). If timely payment is not
made, additional interest shall accrue pursuant to 31 U.S.C. § 3717.
Payment must be made in one of the following ways:
(1) Respondents may transmit payment electronically to the Commission,
which will provide detailed ACH transfer/Fedwire instructions upon
request;
(2) Respondents may make direct payment from a bank account via Pay.gov
through the SEC website at http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/ofm.htm; or
(3) Respondents may pay by certified check, bank cashier’s check, or United
States postal money order, made payable to the Securities and Exchange
Commission and hand-delivered or mailed to:
Enterprise Services Center
Accounts Receivable Branch
HQ Bldg., Room 181, AMZ-341
6500 South MacArthur Boulevard
Oklahoma City, OK 73169
Payments by check or money order must be accompanied by a cover letter identifying
HIC, HSI and Capstone as Respondents in these proceedings, and the file number of these
proceedings; a copy of the cover letter and check or money order must be sent to Amy S. Cotter,
Assistant Regional Director, Division of Enforcement, Chicago Regional Office, 175 West Jackson
Boulevard, Suite 1450, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
F. Amounts ordered to be paid as civil money penalties pursuant to this Order shall
be treated as penalties paid to the government for all purposes, including all tax purposes. To
preserve the deterrent effect of the civil penalty, Respondents agree that in any Related Investor
Action, they shall not argue that they are entitled to, nor shall they benefit by, offset or reduction
of any award of compensatory damages by the amount of any part of Respondents’ payment of a
civil penalty in this action (“Penalty Offset”). If the court in any Related Investor Action grants
such a Penalty Offset, Respondents agree that they shall, within 30 days after entry of a final
order granting the Penalty Offset, notify the Commission’s counsel in this action and pay the
amount of the Penalty Offset to the Securities and Exchange Commission. Such a payment shall
not be deemed an additional civil penalty and shall not be deemed to change the amount of the
civil penalty imposed in this proceeding. For purposes of this paragraph, a “Related Investor
13
Action” means a private damages action brought against Respondents by or on behalf of one or
more investors based on substantially the same facts as alleged in the Order instituted by the
Commission in this proceeding.
By the Commission.
Vanessa A. Countryman
Secretary UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Release No. 99504 / February 9, 2024
INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF 1940
Release No. 6552 / February 9, 2024
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
File No. 3-21853
In the Matter of
The Huntington Investment
Company,
Huntington Securities, Inc., and
Capstone Capital Markets LLC,
Respondents.
ORDER INSTITUTING ADMINISTRATIVE
AND CEASE-AND-DESIST PROCEEDINGS
PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 15(b) AND 21C
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934 AND SECTIONS 203(e) AND 203(k) OF
THE INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF
1940, MAKING FINDINGS, AND IMPOSING
REMEDIAL SANCTIONS AND A CEASE-
AND-DESIST ORDER
I.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) deems it appropriate and in
the public interest that public administrative and cease-and-desist proceedings be, and hereby
are, instituted pursuant to Sections 15(b) and 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(“Exchange Act”) against The Huntington Investment Company (“HIC”), Huntington Securities,
Inc. (“HSI”), and Capstone Capital Markets LLC (“Capstone”) (collectively, “Respondents” or
“Huntington”) and Sections 203(e) and 203(k) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940
(“Advisers Act”) against HIC.
II.
In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, Respondents have submitted Offers
of Settlement (“Offers”) that the Commission has determined to accept. Respondents admit the
facts set forth in Section III below, acknowledge that their conduct violated the federal securities
laws, admit the Commission’s jurisdiction over them and the subject matter of these proceedings,
and consent to the entry of this Order Instituting Administrative and Cease-and-Desist
Proceedings, Pursuant to Sections 15(b) and 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
Sections 203(e) and 203(k) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, Making Findings, and
Imposing Remedial Sanctions and a Cease-and-Desist Order (“Order”), as set forth below.
2
III.
On the basis of this Order and Respondents’ Offers, the Commission finds1 that:
Summary
1. The federal securities laws impose recordkeeping requirements on broker-dealers
and registered investment advisers to ensure that they responsibly discharge their crucial role in
our markets. The Commission has long said that compliance with these requirements is essential
to investor protection and the Commission’s efforts to further its mandate of protecting investors,
maintaining fair, orderly, and efficient markets, and facilitating capital formation. These
proceedings arise out of Huntington’s identification—and self-report—of widespread failures of
certain Huntington employees throughout the firms, including at senior levels, to adhere to
certain of these essential requirements and Huntington’s own policies. Using their personal
devices, these employees communicated both internally and externally by personal text messages
(“off-channel communications”).
2. After Huntington’s compliance staff identified business-related electronic
communications on a non-approved platform on personal devices, Huntington conducted an
internal investigation and self-reported the facts to Commission staff. Respondents proactively
identified key documents and facts, which assisted the Commission staff in efficiently
investigating the conduct. Prior to contacting the Division of Enforcement, since January 2019,
Respondents also undertook significant remedial measures relating to their recordkeeping
practices, policies and procedures, and related supervisory practices, including, in 2021, making
an on-channel texting application available.
3. From at least January 2019, Huntington employees sent and received off-channel
communications that related to HIC’s, HSI’s and Capstone’s broker-dealer businesses and with
respect to HIC’s investment advisory business, off-channel communications related to
recommendations made or proposed to be made and advice given or proposed to be given.
Respondents did not maintain or preserve the substantial majority of these written
communications. Respondents’ failures were firm-wide and involved employees at various
levels of authority. As a result, Respondents violated Section 17(a) of the Exchange Act and
Rule 17a-4(b)(4) thereunder and HIC violated Section 204 of the Advisers Act and Rule 204-
2(a)(7) thereunder.
4. Huntington’s supervisors, who were responsible for supervising junior employees,
routinely communicated on a non-approved platform using their personal devices. In fact, senior
managers and officers responsible for supervising junior employees themselves failed to comply
with HIC’s, HSI’s, and Capstone’s policies by communicating using non-HIC, HSI, and
Capstone approved methods on their personal devices about HIC, HSI and Capstone’s broker-
dealers and HIC’s investment adviser business.
1 The findings herein are made pursuant to Respondents’ Offers of Settlement and are not
binding on any other person or entity in this or any other proceeding.
3
5. HIC’s, HSI’s, and Capstone’s widespread failure to implement their policies and
procedures that prohibit such communications led to their failure reasonably to supervise their
employees within the meaning of Section 15(b)(4)(E) of the Exchange Act as to each of the
Respondents, as well as Section 203(e)(6) of the Advisers Act as to HIC.
6. During the time period that HIC failed to maintain and preserve off-channel
communications that its employees sent and received related to the broker-dealer business and
investment adviser business, HIC received and responded to a Commission records request in a
Commission investigation. As a result, HIC’s recordkeeping failures likely impacted the
Commission’s ability to carry out its regulatory functions and investigate violations of the
federal securities laws in that investigation.
7. After Huntington initiated a review of its recordkeeping efforts, HIC, HSI, and
Capstone identified failures and self-reported their conduct, and further enhanced their ongoing
programs of remediation. As set forth in the Undertakings below, HIC, HSI and Capstone will
retain an independent compliance consultant to review and assess HIC’s, HSI’s and Capstone’s
remedial steps relating to HIC’s HSI’s and Capstone’s recordkeeping practices, policies and
procedures, related supervisory practices, and employment actions.
Respondents
8. The Huntington Investment Company is an Ohio corporation with its principal
office in Columbus, Ohio, and is registered with the Commission as a broker-dealer and
investment adviser. It is a wholly owned subsidiary of Huntington Bancshares Incorporated, a
publicly held regional bank holding company incorporated in Ohio.
9. Huntington Securities, Inc. is a Delaware corporation with its principal office in
Columbus, Ohio, and is registered with the Commission as a broker-dealer and municipal advisor.
It is also a wholly owned subsidiary of Huntington Bancshares Incorporated.
10. Capstone Capital Markets LLC is a Delaware limited liability company with its
principal office in Boston, Massachusetts, and is registered with the Commission as a
broker-dealer. Capstone was acquired by Huntington Bancshares Incorporated in June 2022 as a
wholly owned subsidiary.
Recordkeeping Requirements under the Exchange and Advisers Acts
11. Section 17(a)(1) of the Exchange Act and Section 204 of the Advisers Act
authorize the Commission to issue rules requiring, respectively, broker-dealers and investment
advisers to make and keep for prescribed periods, and furnish copies of, such records as
necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors or otherwise in
furtherance of the purposes of the Exchange Act and the Advisers Act.
12. The Commission adopted Rule 17a-4 under the Exchange Act and Rule 204-2
under the Advisers Act pursuant to this authority. These rules specify the manner and length of
time that the records created in accordance with Commission rules, and certain other records
4
produced by broker-dealers or investment advisers, must be maintained and produced promptly
to Commission representatives.
13. The rules adopted under Section 17(a)(1) of the Exchange Act, including Rule
17a-4(b)(4), require that broker-dealers preserve in an easily accessible place originals of all
communications received and copies of all communications sent relating to a firm’s business as
such. These rules impose minimum recordkeeping requirements that are based on standards a
prudent broker-dealer should follow in the normal course of business.
14. The rules adopted under Advisers Act Section 204, including Advisers Act Rule
204-2(a)(7), require that investment advisers preserve in an easily accessible place originals of all
communications received and copies of all written communications sent relating to, among other
things, any recommendation made or proposed to be made and any advice given or proposed to be
given.
15. The Commission previously has stated that these and other recordkeeping
requirements “are an integral part of the investor protection function of the Commission, and
other securities regulators, in that the preserved records are the primary means of monitoring
compliance with applicable securities laws, including antifraud provisions and financial
responsibility standards.” Commission Guidance to Broker-Dealers on the Use of Electronic
Storage Media under the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act of 2000
with Respect to Rule 17a-4(f), 17 C.F.R. Part 241, Exchange Act Rel. No. 44238 (May 1, 2001).
HIC’s, HSI’s, and Capstone’s Policies and Procedures
16. HIC, HSI, and Capstone maintained certain policies and procedures designed to
ensure the retention of business-related records, including electronic communications, in
compliance with the relevant recordkeeping provisions.
17. HIC, HSI, and Capstone employees were advised that the use of unapproved
electronic communications methods, including on their personal devices, was not permitted, and
they should not use personal email, chats or text messaging applications for business purposes, or
forward work-related communications to their personal devices. After 2021, Huntington
employees were advised that they were required to use an approved platform for business related
communications on any personal device.
18. Messages sent through HIC, HSI, and Capstone -approved communications
methods were monitored, subject to review, and, when appropriate, archived. Messages sent
through unapproved communications methods, such as text messaging or, after 2021,
unapproved applications on personal devices, were not monitored, subject to review or archived.
19. HIC’s, HSI’s, and Capstone’s policies were designed to address supervisors’
supervision of employees’ training in HIC’s, HSI’s, and Capstone’s communications policies
and adherence to HIC’s, HSI’s, and Capstone’s books and recordkeeping requirements.
Supervisory policies notified employees that electronic communications were subject to
surveillance by HIC, HSI, and Capstone. HIC, HSI, and Capstone had procedures for all
employees, including supervisors, requiring annual self-attestations of compliance.
5
20. HIC, HSI, and Capstone, however, failed to implement a system of follow-up and
review to determine that supervisors were reasonably following HIC’s, HSI’s, and Capstone’s
policies. While permitting employees to use approved communications methods, including, after
2021, an approved platform on personal phones, for business communications, HIC, HSI, and
Capstone failed to implement sufficient monitoring to assure that their recordkeeping and
communications policies were being followed.
Respondents’ Recordkeeping Failures Across Their Businesses
21. In September 2021, the Commission staff commenced a risk-based initiative to
investigate whether broker-dealers were properly retaining business-related messages sent and
received on personal devices. In September 2023, Huntington voluntarily contacted the staff
regarding certain off-channel communications that it had identified related to the businesses of
HIC, HSI, and Capstone. Huntington cooperated with the staff’s investigation by proactively
gathering communications from the personal devices of its personnel and responding to the staff’s
requests for additional information. As reported to the Commission staff, Huntington personnel
who had engaged in the use of off-channel communications included senior managers and officers
across each firm.
22. Huntington alerted the Commission staff to numerous off-channel
communications at various seniority levels of Huntington’s broker-dealers. In addition, HIC’s
investigation uncovered the use of off-channel communications within HIC’s investment adviser
business. Respondents collected data from a sampling of broker-dealer and investment adviser
personnel and found that some had engaged in at least some level of off-channel communications
since January 2019. Overall, these personnel sent and received numerous off-channel
communications, involving other Huntington personnel and external contacts in the securities
industry. As disclosed to the Commission staff, within Huntington, a number of senior leaders
participated in off-channel communications.
23. From at least January 2019, HIC, HSI, and Capstone personnel sent and received
off-channel messages that concerned the businesses of the broker-dealers. During this period,
HIC investment adviser personnel sent and received off-channel messages related to, among
other things, providing and recommending investment advice to clients.
24. For example, from January 2019 to March 2023, a HIC director exchanged
off-channel messages on at least 68 occasions, including with junior employees under their
supervision. These messages related to the HIC’s broker-dealer business as such.
25. In another example, in 2022, a HIC officer communicated via text message with a
HIC regional manager. These messages related to, among other things, investment advice given
or proposed to be given to investment advisory clients.
26. In an additional example, in August 2021 HSI employees exchanged numerous
off-channel messages with each other. These messages related to HSI’s broker-dealer business
as such.
6
27. In a final example, in September 2021 and October 2021, a Capstone employee
exchanged off-channel messages with a Capstone customer. These messages related to
Capstone’s broker-dealer business as such.
HIC’s Failure to Preserve Required Records Potentially
Compromised and Delayed a Commission Matter
28. Between January 2019 and the present, HIC received and responded to a
Commission records request in a Commission investigation. By failing to maintain and preserve
required records relating to its business, HIC likely deprived the Commission of off-channel
communications in that investigation.
Respondents’ Violations and Failure to Supervise
29. As a result of the conduct described above, from at least January 2019 through the
date of this Order, HIC, HSI, and Capstone willfully2 violated Section 17(a) of the Exchange Act
and Rule 17a-4(b)(4) thereunder, which require broker-dealers to preserve for at least three years
originals of all communications received and copies of all communications sent relating to their
business as such.
30. As a result of the conduct described above, from at least January 2019 through the
date of this Order, HIC willfully violated Section 204 of the Advisers Act and Rule 204-2(a)(7)
thereunder, which require investment advisers to preserve in an easily accessible place originals of
all written communications received and copies of all written communications sent relating to,
among other things, any recommendation made or proposed to be made and any advice given or
proposed to be given.
31. As a result of the conduct described above, HIC, HSI, and Capstone failed
reasonably to supervise their employees with a view to preventing or detecting certain of their
employees’ aiding and abetting violations of Section 17(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 17a-
4(b)(4) thereunder, within the meaning of Section 15(b)(4)(E) of the Exchange Act.
32. As a result of the conduct described above, HIC failed reasonably to supervise its
employees with a view to preventing or detecting certain of its employees’ aiding and abetting
2 “Willfully,” for purposes of imposing relief under Section 15(b) of the Exchange Act and
Section 203(e) of the Advisers Act “‘means no more than that the person charged with the duty
knows what he is doing.’” See Wonsover v. SEC, 205 F.3d 408, 414 (D.C. Cir 2000) (quoting
Hughes v. SEC, 174 F.2d 969, 977 (D.C. Cir. 1949)). There is no requirement that the actor
“also be aware that he is violating one of the Rules or Acts.” Tager v. SEC, 344 F.2d 5, 8 (2d
Cir. 1965). The decision in The Robare Group, Ltd. v. SEC, which construed the term
“willfully” for purposes of a differently structured statutory provision, does not alter that
standard. 922 F.3d 468, 478-79 (D.C. Cir. 2019) (setting forth the showing required to establish
that a person has “willfully omit[ted]” material information from a required disclosure in
violation of Section 207 of the Advisers Act).
7
violations of Section 204 of the Advisers Act and Rule 204-2(a)(7) thereunder, within the
meaning of Section 203(e)(6) of the Advisers Act.
HIC’s, HSI’s, and Capstone’s Remedial and Cooperation Efforts
33. In determining to accept the Offers, the Commission considered HIC’s, HSI’s, and
Capstone’s self-report, cooperation afforded to Commission staff, and remediation. After
identifying off-channel communications, Respondents conducted an internal investigation and self-
reported the facts to Commission staff. Prior to approaching Commission staff, since at least
January 2019, HIC, HSI, and Capstone had begun a program of remediation, which included
strengthening their policies and procedures by making investments in new technologies to improve
surveillance and retention efforts; increasing the number of trainings and sending firm-wide
reminders that emphasized the importance of complying with recordkeeping obligations, and, in
2021, making an on-channel texting platform available. HIC, HSI, and Capstone also took
proactive steps to collect and preserve off-channel communications.
Undertakings
34. Prior to this action, HIC, HSI, and Capstone enhanced their policies and
procedures, and increased training concerning the use of approved communications methods,
including on personal devices, and began implementing significant changes to the technology
available to employees. In addition, HIC, HSI, and Capstone have undertaken to:
35. Independent Compliance Consultant.
a. HIC, HSI, and Capstone shall each retain, within thirty (30) days of the entry
of this Order, the services of an independent compliance consultant (“Compliance
Consultant”) that is not unacceptable to the Commission staff. The Compliance
Consultant’s compensation and expenses shall be borne exclusively by HIC, HSI, and
Capstone.
b. HIC, HSI, and Capstone will oversee the work of the Compliance Consultant.
c. HIC, HSI, and Capstone shall provide to the Commission staff, within sixty
(60) days of the entry of this Order, a copy of the engagement letter detailing the
Compliance Consultant’s responsibilities, which shall include a comprehensive
compliance review as described below. HIC, HSI, and Capstone shall require that, within
ninety (90) days of the date of the engagement letter, the Compliance Consultant conduct:
i. A comprehensive review of HIC’s, HSI’s, and Capstone’s supervisory,
compliance, and other policies and procedures designed to ensure that HIC’s,
HSI’s, and Capstone’s electronic communications, including those found on
personal electronic devices, including without limitation, cellular phones
(“Personal Devices”), are preserved in accordance with the requirements of the
federal securities laws.
8
ii. A comprehensive review of training conducted by HIC, HSI, and
Capstone to ensure personnel are complying with the requirements regarding the
preservation of electronic communications, including those found on Personal
Devices, in accordance with the requirements of the federal securities laws,
including by ensuring that HIC, HSI, and Capstone personnel certify in writing on
a quarterly basis that they are complying with preservation requirements.
iii. An assessment of the surveillance program measures implemented by
HIC, HSI, and Capstone to ensure compliance, on an ongoing basis, with the
requirements found in the federal securities laws to preserve electronic
communications, including those found on Personal Devices.
iv. An assessment of the technological solutions that HIC, HSI, and
Capstone have begun implementing to meet the record retention requirements of
the federal securities laws, including an assessment of the likelihood that HIC,
HSI, and Capstone personnel will use the technological solutions going forward
and a review of the measures employed by HIC, HSI, and Capstone to track
employee usage of new technological solutions.
v. An assessment of the measures used by HIC, HSI, and Capstone to
prevent the use of unauthorized communications methods for business
communications by employees. This assessment should include, but not be
limited to, a review of HIC’s, HSI’s, and Capstone’s policies and procedures to
ascertain if they provide for any significant technology and/or behavioral
restrictions that help prevent the risk of the use of unapproved communications
methods on Personal Devices (e.g., trading floor restrictions).
vi. A review of HIC’s, HSI’s, and Capstone’s electronic communications
surveillance routines to ensure that electronic communications through approved
communications methods found on Personal Devices are incorporated into HIC’s,
HSI’s, and Capstone’s overall communications surveillance program.
vii. A comprehensive review of the framework adopted by HIC, HSI, and
Capstone to address instances of non-compliance by HIC, HSI, and Capstone
employees with HIC’s, HSI’s, and Capstone’s policies and procedures concerning
the use of Personal Devices to communicate about HIC, HSI, and Capstone
business in the past. This review shall include a survey of how HIC, HSI, and
Capstone determined which employees failed to comply with HIC’s, HSI’s, and
Capstone’s policies and procedures, the corrective action carried out, an
evaluation of who violated policies and why, what penalties were imposed, and
whether penalties were handed out consistently across business lines and seniority
levels.
d. HIC, HSI, and Capstone shall require that, within forty-five (45) days after
completion of the review set forth in sub-paragraphs 35.c.i. through c.vii. above, the
Compliance Consultant shall submit a detailed written report of its findings to HIC, HSI,
9
and Capstone, and to the Commission staff (the “Report”). HIC, HSI, and Capstone shall
require that the Report include a description of the review performed, the names of the
individuals who performed the review, the conclusions reached, the Compliance
Consultant’s recommendations for changes in or improvements to HIC’s, HSI’s, and
Capstone’s policies and procedures, and a summary of the plan for implementing the
recommended changes in or improvements to HIC’s, HSI’s, and Capstone’s policies and
procedures.
e. HIC, HSI, and Capstone shall adopt all recommendations contained in the
Report within ninety (90) days of the date of the Report; provided, however, that within
forty-five (45) days after the date of the Report, HIC, HSI, and Capstone shall advise the
Compliance Consultant and the Commission staff in writing of any recommendations that
HIC, HSI, and/or Capstone considers to be unduly burdensome, impractical, or
inappropriate. With respect to any recommendation that HIC, HSI, and/or Capstone
considers unduly burdensome, impractical, or inappropriate, HIC, HSI, and/or Capstone
need not adopt such recommendation at that time, but shall propose in writing an
alternative policy, procedure, or disclosure designed to achieve the same objective or
purpose.
f. As to any recommendation concerning HIC’s, HSI’s, and Capstone’s policies
or procedures on which HIC, HSI, and Capstone and the Compliance Consultant do not
agree, HIC, HSI, and Capstone and the Compliance Consultant shall attempt in good faith
to reach an agreement within sixty (60) days after the date of the Report. Within fifteen
(15) days after the conclusion of the discussion and evaluation by HIC, HSI, and
Capstone and the Compliance Consultant, HIC, HSI, and Capstone shall require that the
Compliance Consultant inform HIC, HSI, and Capstone and the Commission staff in
writing of the Compliance Consultant’s final determination concerning any
recommendation that HIC, HSI, and/or Capstone consider to be unduly burdensome,
impractical, or inappropriate. HIC, HSI, and Capstone shall abide by the determinations
of the Compliance Consultant and, within sixty (60) days after final agreement between
HIC, HSI, and Capstone and the Compliance Consultant or final determination by the
Compliance Consultant, whichever occurs first, HIC, HSI, and Capstone shall adopt and
implement all of the recommendations that the Compliance Consultant deems
appropriate.
g. HIC, HSI, and Capstone shall cooperate fully with the Compliance Consultant
and shall provide the Compliance Consultant with access to such of HIC’s, HSI’s, and
Capstone’s files, books, records, and personnel as are reasonably requested by the
Compliance Consultant for review.
h. HIC, HSI, and Capstone shall not have the authority to terminate the
Compliance Consultant or substitute another compliance consultant for the initial
Compliance Consultant, without the prior written approval of the Commission staff.
HIC, HSI, and Capstone shall compensate the Compliance Consultant and persons
engaged to assist the Compliance Consultant for services rendered under this Order at
their reasonable and customary rates.
10
i. For the period of engagement and for a period of two years from completion of
the engagement, HIC, HSI, and Capstone shall not (i) retain the Compliance Consultant
for any other professional services outside of the services described in this Order; (ii)
enter into any other professional relationship with the Compliance Consultant, including
any employment, consultant, attorney-client, auditing or other professional relationship;
or (iii) enter, without prior written consent of the Commission staff, into any such
professional relationship with any of the Compliance Consultant’s present or former
affiliates, employers, directors, officers, employees, or agents acting in their capacity as
such.
j. The Report by the Compliance Consultant will likely include confidential
financial, proprietary, competitive business or commercial information. Public disclosure
of the Report could discourage cooperation, impede pending or potential government
investigations or undermine the objectives of the reporting requirement. For these
reasons, among others, the Report and the contents thereof are intended to remain and
shall remain non-public, except (1) pursuant to court order, (2) as agreed to by the parties
in writing, (3) to the extent that the Commission determines in its sole discretion that
disclosure would be in furtherance of the Commission’s discharge of its duties and
responsibilities, or (4) as otherwise required by law.
36. One-Year Evaluation. HIC, HSI, and Capstone shall each require the Compliance
Consultant to assess HIC’s, HSI’s, and Capstone’s program for the preservation, as required
under the federal securities laws, of electronic communications, including those found on
Personal Devices, commencing one year after submitting the Report required by Paragraph 35.d
above. HIC, HSI, and Capstone shall require this review to evaluate HIC’s, HSI’s, and
Capstone’s progress in the areas described in Paragraph 35.c.i through 35.c.vii above. After this
review, Huntington shall require the Compliance Consultant to submit a report (the “One Year
Report”) to each of HIC, HSI, and Capstone, and the Commission staff and shall ensure that the
One Year Report includes an updated assessment of HIC’s, HSI’s, and Capstone’s policies and
procedures with regard to the preservation of electronic communications (including those found
on Personal Devices), training, surveillance programs, and technological solutions implemented
in the prior year period.
37. Reporting Discipline Imposed. For two years following the entry of this Order,
HIC, HSI, and Capstone shall notify the Commission staff as follows upon the imposition of any
discipline imposed by HIC, HSI, and Capstone, including, but not limited to, written warnings,
loss of any pay, bonus, or incentive compensation, or the termination of employment, with respect
to any employee found to have violated HIC’s, HSI’s, and Capstone’s policies and procedures
concerning the preservation of electronic communications, including those found on Personal
Devices: at least 48 hours before the filing of a Form U-5, or within ten (10) days of the
imposition of other discipline.
38. Internal Audit. In addition to the Compliance Consultant’s review and issuance of
the One Year Report, HIC, HSI, and Capstone will each also have its respective Internal Audit
function conduct a separate audit(s) to assess HIC’s, HSI’s, and Capstone’s progress in the areas
11
described in Paragraph 35.c.i through 35.c.vii above. After completion of this audit(s), HIC, HSI,
and Capstone shall ensure that Internal Audit submits a report to each of HIC, HSI, and Capstone,
and to the Commission staff.
39. Recordkeeping. HIC, HSI, and Capstone shall each preserve, for a period of not
less than six (6) years from the end of the fiscal year last used, the first two (2) years in an easily
accessible place, any record of compliance with these undertakings. HIC shall also preserve any
record of compliance with these undertakings in an easily accessible place for a period of not less
than five (5) years from the end of the fiscal year during which the entry was made on such record,
the first two (2) years in an appropriate office of HIC.
40. Deadlines. For good cause shown, the Commission staff may extend any of the
procedural dates relating to the undertakings. Deadlines for procedural dates shall be counted in
calendar days, except that if the last day falls on a weekend or federal holiday, the next business
day shall be considered to be the last day.
41. Certification. HIC, HSI, and Capstone shall each certify, in writing, compliance
with the undertakings set forth above. The certification shall identify the undertakings, provide
written evidence of compliance in the form of a narrative, and be supported by exhibits sufficient
to demonstrate compliance. The Commission staff may make reasonable requests for further
evidence of compliance, and Respondents agree to provide such evidence. The certification and
supporting material shall be submitted to Amy S. Cotter, Assistant Regional Director, Division of
Enforcement, Chicago Regional Office, 175 West Jackson Boulevard, Suite 1450, Chicago, Illinois
60604, or such other person as the Commission staff may request, with a copy to the Office of
Chief Counsel of the Enforcement Division, no later than sixty (60) days from the date of the
completion of the undertakings.
IV.
In view of the foregoing, the Commission deems it appropriate and in the public interest
to impose the sanctions agreed to in Respondents’ Offers.
Accordingly, pursuant to Sections 15(b) and 21C of the Exchange Act as to HIC, HSI and
Capstone and Sections 203(e) and 203(k) of the Advisers Act as to HIC, it is hereby ORDERED
that:
A. HIC, HSI, and Capstone cease and desist from committing or causing any
violations and any future violations of Section 17(a) of the Exchange Act and
Rule 17a-4 thereunder.
B. HIC cease and desist from committing or causing any violations and any future
violations of Section 204 of the Advisers Act and Rule 204-2 thereunder.
C. Respondents are censured.
D. Respondents shall comply with the undertakings enumerated in paragraphs 34 to
41 above.
12
E. Respondents shall, jointly and severally, within 14 days of the entry of this Order,
pay a civil money penalty in the amount of $1,250,000 to the Securities and
Exchange Commission for transfer to the general fund of the United States
Treasury, subject to Exchange Act Section 21F(g)(3). If timely payment is not
made, additional interest shall accrue pursuant to 31 U.S.C. § 3717.
Payment must be made in one of the following ways:
(1) Respondents may transmit payment electronically to the Commission,
which will provide detailed ACH transfer/Fedwire instructions upon
request;
(2) Respondents may make direct payment from a bank account via Pay.gov
through the SEC website at http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/ofm.htm; or
(3) Respondents may pay by certified check, bank cashier’s check, or United
States postal money order, made payable to the Securities and Exchange
Commission and hand-delivered or mailed to:
Enterprise Services Center
Accounts Receivable Branch
HQ Bldg., Room 181, AMZ-341
6500 South MacArthur Boulevard
Oklahoma City, OK 73169
Payments by check or money order must be accompanied by a cover letter identifying
HIC, HSI and Capstone as Respondents in these proceedings, and the file number of these
proceedings; a copy of the cover letter and check or money order must be sent to Amy S. Cotter,
Assistant Regional Director, Division of Enforcement, Chicago Regional Office, 175 West Jackson
Boulevard, Suite 1450, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
F. Amounts ordered to be paid as civil money penalties pursuant to this Order shall
be treated as penalties paid to the government for all purposes, including all tax purposes. To
preserve the deterrent effect of the civil penalty, Respondents agree that in any Related Investor
Action, they shall not argue that they are entitled to, nor shall they benefit by, offset or reduction
of any award of compensatory damages by the amount of any part of Respondents’ payment of a
civil penalty in this action (“Penalty Offset”). If the court in any Related Investor Action grants
such a Penalty Offset, Respondents agree that they shall, within 30 days after entry of a final
order granting the Penalty Offset, notify the Commission’s counsel in this action and pay the
amount of the Penalty Offset to the Securities and Exchange Commission. Such a payment shall
not be deemed an additional civil penalty and shall not be deemed to change the amount of the
civil penalty imposed in this proceeding. For purposes of this paragraph, a “Related Investor
13
Action” means a private damages action brought against Respondents by or on behalf of one or
more investors based on substantially the same facts as alleged in the Order instituted by the
Commission in this proceeding.
By the Commission.
Vanessa A. Countryman
Secretary
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In the Matter of
Respondents.
I.
II.
III.
Summary
Respondents
Recordkeeping Requirements under the Exchange and Advisers Acts
HIC’s, HSI’s, and Capstone’s Policies and Procedures
Respondents’ Recordkeeping Failures Across Their Businesses
HIC’s Failure to Preserve Required Records Potentially Compromised and Delayed a Commission Matter
Respondents’ Violations and Failure to Supervise
HIC’s, HSI’s, and Capstone’s Remedial and Cooperation Efforts
Undertakings
IV.