2022-11-29 sec-litreleases judgment 123 KB 276 chars

SEC v. BARNES, No. 1:20-cv-03997, Northern District of Georgia (Nov. 29, 2022) — Judgment

raw: Stipulation And Order Of Settlement

Stipulation And Order Of Settlement, No. 1:20-cv-03997 (Nov. 29, 2022)

Caption
Hutton v. Barnes, Jr.
summary

Information regarding the specific parties and details of the fraud in Case 1:20-cv-03997-JGK cannot be determined as the provided text contains only filing metadata.

paragraph

The provided OCR excerpt contains only document headers and page numbers for Case 1:20-cv-03997-JGK, filed on November 28, 2022. No substantive legal text, financial amounts, or specific charges are present in the source material. Therefore, no factual allegations or outcomes can be verified from the provided text.

narrative

The provided document excerpt consists exclusively of filing metadata and page headers for Case 1:20-cv-03997-JGK, Document 27, dated November 28, 2022. While one draft summary suggests a securities fraud case involving $50 million in losses, this information is not supported by the actual OCR text provided. The OCR text lacks any substantive details regarding the defendants, the nature of the misconduct, or the specific charges. Consequently, it is impossible to confirm the identities of the parties involved or the resolution of the case. The available data is limited to the case number and the filing date. No financial figures or legal outcomes can be extracted from the source material.

Enriched metadata

Scheme
non-corporate (90%)
Court
Northern District of Georgia
Case No.
1:20-cv-03997
Classified non-corporate(confidence 90%). No EDGAR filing fingerprint (criminal/DOJ-side scheme). detection rule →
Statutes
15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)15 U.S.C. § 77q(a)15 U.S.C. § 77u(d)11 U.S.C. § 52311 U.S.C. § 523(a)17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange ActSection 17(a) of the Securities ActRule 10b-5
Parties
HuttonThomas Ray Barnes, Jr.Joshua HuttonCity of Chicago, a municipal corporation
Keywords
document pagecv-jgkdocumentpage

Extracted insights

Entities 2
  • organization Securities and Exchange Commission
  • person William Sadleir
Triples 1
  • Document 27 Filed 11/28/22
Text layers
Extracted body text (276c)

Case 1:20-cv-03997-JGK   Document 27   Filed 11/28/22   Page 1 of 4

Case 1:20-cv-03997-JGK   Document 27   Filed 11/28/22   Page 2 of 4

Case 1:20-cv-03997-JGK   Document 27   Filed 11/28/22   Page 3 of 4

Case 1:20-cv-03997-JGK   Document 27   Filed 11/28/22   Page 4 of 4
OCR text (5,746c · tika+glm · 85% conf)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,
Plaintiff,
v.
WILLIAM SADLEIR,
Defendant.

20-civ-3997 (JGK)

[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO
DEFENDANT WILLIAM SADLEIR

The Securities and Exchange Commission having filed a complaint and Defendant William Sadleir (“Defendant”) having entered a general appearance; consented to the Court’s jurisdiction over Defendant and the subject matter of this action; waived findings of fact and conclusions of law; and waived any right to appeal from this Final Judgment:

I.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating, directly or indirectly, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)] and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5], by using any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce, or of the mails, or of any facility of any national securities exchange, in connection with the purchase or sale of any security:

(a) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud;

(b) to make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or

(c) to engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant's officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a).

II.

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Securities Act") [15 U.S.C. § 77q(a)] in the offer or sale of any security by the use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or by use of the mails, directly or indirectly:

(a) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud;

(b) to obtain money or property by means of any untrue statement of a material fact or any omission of a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or

(c) to engage in any transaction, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon the purchaser.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a).

III.

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from directly or indirectly, including, but not limited to through any entity he owns or controls, participating in the issuance, offer, or sale of any security, provided, however, that such injunction shall not prevent Defendant from purchasing or selling securities for his own personal account pursuant to Section 21(d)(5) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 77u(d)(5)].

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a).

IV.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is liable for disgorgement of $13,834,239.00 representing profits gained as a result of the conduct alleged in the Complaint, together with prejudgment interest thereon in the amount of $3,979,139.59, for a total of $17,813,378.59. Defendant’s $17,813,378.59 payment obligation shall be deemed satisfied in light of the September 9, 2022, Order of Restitution for the amount of $31,597,000.00 entered against Defendant in United States v. Sadleir, 20-CR-320-PAE (SDNY).

V.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Consent is incorporated herein with the same force and effect as if fully set forth herein, and that Defendant shall comply with all of the undertakings and agreements set forth therein.

VI.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, for purposes of exceptions to discharge set forth in Section 523 of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. § 523, the allegations in the Complaint are true and admitted by Defendant, and further, any debt for disgorgement, prejudgment interest, civil penalty or other amounts due by Defendant under this Final Judgment or any other judgment, order, consent order, decree or settlement agreement entered in connection with this proceeding, is a debt for the violation by Defendant of the federal securities laws or any regulation or order issued under such laws, as set forth in Section 523(a)(19) of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(19).

VII.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Final Judgment.

Dated: 11/25/22

HON. JOHN G. KOELTL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE