2025-09-25 sec-litreleases litigation_release 66 KB 3,632 chars

SEC v. Taino Adrian Lopez; Alexander Farhang Mehr; and Maya Rose Burkenroad, No. LR-26413, Southern District of Florida (Sept. 25, 2025) — Press Release

raw: Taino Adrian Lopez, Alexander Farhang Mehr, and Maya Rose Burkenroad

Taino Adrian Lopez, Alexander Farhang Mehr, and Maya Rose Burkenroad, No. 1:25-cv-24356 (Sept. 25, 2025)

Caption
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Lopez
summary

SEC officials charged Retail Ecommerce Ventures co-founders Taino Lopez and Alexander Mehr and COO Maya Burkenroad with orchestrating a $112 million Ponzi scheme and misappropriating $16.1 million.

paragraph

The SEC charged Taino Lopez, Alexander Mehr, and Maya Burkenroad with conducting fraudulent securities offerings that raised approximately $112 million for Retail Ecommerce Ventures. The defendants are accused of misappropriating $16.1 million for personal use and utilizing $5.9 million for Ponzi-like investor payments. Charges include violations of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, with the SEC seeking injunctions, penalties, and officer-and-director bars.

narrative

The SEC has charged Taino Lopez, Alexander Mehr, and Maya Burkenroad of Retail Ecommerce Ventures (REV) with operating a fraudulent scheme that raised $112 million between 2020 and 2022. The defendants allegedly used misleading statements about the profitability of REV’s retail brands to sell securities promising high annualized returns. Beyond misrepresenting business success, they misappropriated $16.1 million for personal use and transferred $5.9 million between portfolio companies contrary to investor representations. Additionally, $5.9 million in investor returns were identified as Ponzi-like payments funded by new investor capital. The SEC is pursuing permanent injunctions, civil penalties, and officer-and-director bars for all three defendants. Lopez and Mehr also face additional requirements for disgorgement and prejudgment interest.

Enriched metadata

Scheme
ponzi (97%)
Court
Southern District of Florida
Case No.
1:25-cv-24356
Victim loss
$112,000,000
Entity
Retail Ecommerce Ventures LLC
CIK
0001849958
Classified ponzi(confidence 97%). EDGAR detection: forms Form D· recall 35% / precision 15%. detection rule →
Parties
Securities and Exchange CommissionTaino Adrian LopezAlexander Farhang MehrMaya Rose Burkenroad
Keywords
securities exchangelopezsecuritieslopez mehrmehrrevexchangeinvestorstaino adrianadrian lopezlopez alexanderexchange commissionretailer brandsexchange thereunderburkenroad

Exhibits & Attached Documents (1)

Extracted insights

Dollar amounts 3
  • $112.00M $112 million $100M–$1B
  • $16.10M $16.1 million $10M–$100M
  • $5.90M $5.9 million $1M–$10M
Entities 5
  • person brian theophilus james
  • company retail ecommerce ventures llc
  • agency Securities and Exchange Commission
  • agency the sec’s investigation
  • agency the sec’s litigation
Triples 15
  • Securities And Exchange Commission charged Taino Lopez, Alexander Mehr, and Maya Burkenroad with conducting fraudulent securities offerings, misusing investor funds, and making Ponzi-like payments
  • Retail Ecommerce Ventures Llc purchased distressed retail companies with name brand recognition
  • Defendants raised approximately $112 million from hundreds of investors through fraudulent offerings
  • Defendants sold securities in the form of unsecured notes promising up to 25% annualized returns and equity with a monthly preferential dividend
  • Lopez And Mehr made material misstatements about the success and profitability of REV’s business model
  • Defendants transferred at least $5.9 million in investor proceeds directly between portfolio companies
  • Returns Distributed To Investors were Ponzi-like payments funded by other investors
  • Defendants misappropriated approximately $16.1 million in investor funds for Lopez’s and Mehr’s personal use
  • Securities And Exchange Commission charged Lopez and Mehr with violations of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
  • Securities And Exchange Commission charged Burkenroad with violations of Sections 17(a)(1) and (3) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act
  • Securities And Exchange Commission charged Burkenroad with aiding and abetting Lopez’s and Mehr’s violations
  • Complaint seeks permanent injunctions, civil penalties, and officer-and-director bars
  • Complaint seeks disgorgement and prejudgment interest as to Lopez and Mehr
  • Brian Theophilus James conducted the SEC’s investigation
  • Alise Johnson And Russell Koonin led the SEC’s litigation
Text layers
Extracted body text (3,632c)
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Litigation Release No. 26413 / September 25, 2025 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Taino Adrian Lopez, et. al., No. 1:25-cv-24356 (S.D. Fla. filed Sept. 25, 2025) SEC Charges Co-Founders and COO of Florida Holding Company with Misappropriating Investor Money and Operating a Ponzi Scheme On September 25, 2025, the Securities and Exchange Commission charged Taino Lopez and Alexander Mehr, co-founders of Retail Ecommerce Ventures LLC (“REV”), and its Chief Operating Officer, Maya Burkenroad (collectively, “Defendants”), with conducting a series of fraudulent securities offerings, misusing investor funds, and making Ponzi-like payments to investors. According to the SEC’s complaint, REV’s primary business was purchasing distressed retail companies with name brand recognition and converting them into e-commerce only businesses, and serving as the holding company and manager of the REV retailer brands. From approximately April 2020 through November 2022, the Defendants raised approximately $112 million from hundreds of investors through fraudulent offerings in eight REV portfolio companies, including Pier 1 Imports Online, Inc., Dress Barn Online, LLC, Linens ‘N Things Online, Inc., and RadioShack Online, LLC (the “REV Retailer Brands”). The complaint alleges that the Defendants sold securities in the form of unsecured notes promising up to 25% annualized returns, as well as equity (membership units) with a monthly preferential dividend as high as 2.083%. The purported purpose of the offerings was to raise capital to acquire the predecessor of and raise additional operating capital for each particular REV Retailer Brand. However, according to the complaint, Lopez and Mehr made material misstatements in connection with these offerings about the success and profitability of REV’s business model and the REV Retailer Brands, as well as the safety of investors’ investments. The complaint further alleges that Defendants transferred at least $5.9 million in investor proceeds directly between portfolio companies, contrary to the written and oral representations made to investors about the use of proceeds; that at least $5.9 million of the returns distributed to investors were, in reality, Ponzi-like payments funded by other investors; and that Defendants misappropriated approximately $16.1 million in investor funds for Lopez’s and Mehr’s personal use. The SEC’s complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, charges defendants Lopez and Mehr with violations of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The complaint also charges defendant Burkenroad with violations of Sections 17(a)(1) and (3) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5(a) and (c) thereunder. Finally, the complaint charges Burkenroad with aiding and abetting Lopez’s and Mehr’s violations of Section 17(a)(2) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5(b) thereunder. The complaint seeks permanent injunctions, civil penalties, and officer-and-director bars as to each Defendant. In addition, the complaint seeks disgorgement and prejudgment interest as to Lopez and Mehr. The SEC’s investigation was conducted by Brian Theophilus James, and supervised by Sean M. O’Neill and Glenn S. Gordon with the assistance of Fernado Torres, all of the Miami Regional Office. The SEC’s litigation will be led by Alise Johnson and Russell Koonin and supervised by Teresa J. Verges, also of the Miami Regional Office.
OCR text (3,632c · html-text · 99% conf)
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Litigation Release No. 26413 / September 25, 2025 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Taino Adrian Lopez, et. al., No. 1:25-cv-24356 (S.D. Fla. filed Sept. 25, 2025) SEC Charges Co-Founders and COO of Florida Holding Company with Misappropriating Investor Money and Operating a Ponzi Scheme On September 25, 2025, the Securities and Exchange Commission charged Taino Lopez and Alexander Mehr, co-founders of Retail Ecommerce Ventures LLC (“REV”), and its Chief Operating Officer, Maya Burkenroad (collectively, “Defendants”), with conducting a series of fraudulent securities offerings, misusing investor funds, and making Ponzi-like payments to investors. According to the SEC’s complaint, REV’s primary business was purchasing distressed retail companies with name brand recognition and converting them into e-commerce only businesses, and serving as the holding company and manager of the REV retailer brands. From approximately April 2020 through November 2022, the Defendants raised approximately $112 million from hundreds of investors through fraudulent offerings in eight REV portfolio companies, including Pier 1 Imports Online, Inc., Dress Barn Online, LLC, Linens ‘N Things Online, Inc., and RadioShack Online, LLC (the “REV Retailer Brands”). The complaint alleges that the Defendants sold securities in the form of unsecured notes promising up to 25% annualized returns, as well as equity (membership units) with a monthly preferential dividend as high as 2.083%. The purported purpose of the offerings was to raise capital to acquire the predecessor of and raise additional operating capital for each particular REV Retailer Brand. However, according to the complaint, Lopez and Mehr made material misstatements in connection with these offerings about the success and profitability of REV’s business model and the REV Retailer Brands, as well as the safety of investors’ investments. The complaint further alleges that Defendants transferred at least $5.9 million in investor proceeds directly between portfolio companies, contrary to the written and oral representations made to investors about the use of proceeds; that at least $5.9 million of the returns distributed to investors were, in reality, Ponzi-like payments funded by other investors; and that Defendants misappropriated approximately $16.1 million in investor funds for Lopez’s and Mehr’s personal use. The SEC’s complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, charges defendants Lopez and Mehr with violations of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The complaint also charges defendant Burkenroad with violations of Sections 17(a)(1) and (3) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5(a) and (c) thereunder. Finally, the complaint charges Burkenroad with aiding and abetting Lopez’s and Mehr’s violations of Section 17(a)(2) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5(b) thereunder. The complaint seeks permanent injunctions, civil penalties, and officer-and-director bars as to each Defendant. In addition, the complaint seeks disgorgement and prejudgment interest as to Lopez and Mehr. The SEC’s investigation was conducted by Brian Theophilus James, and supervised by Sean M. O’Neill and Glenn S. Gordon with the assistance of Fernado Torres, all of the Miami Regional Office. The SEC’s litigation will be led by Alise Johnson and Russell Koonin and supervised by Teresa J. Verges, also of the Miami Regional Office.