SEC v. Voyager Pacific Capital Management, LLC; Roger David Hardcastle; John Giarmarco; and Vanessa Lung Medlock, No. LR-26534, Eastern District of California (Apr. 21, 2026) — Press Release
raw: Voyager Pacific Capital Management, LLC; Roger David Hardcastle; John Giarmarco; Vanessa Lung Medlock; and Relief Defendants Adagio SPE LLC; Andante SPE LLC; Brighton Cove LLC; Cayucos Dream, LLC; GSD Equities, LLC; HGM Holdings LLC; Kastlemark LLC; Martin-Taylor Company LLC; Premier Property Management Group, LLC
Voyager Pacific Capital Management, LLC; Roger David Hardcastle; John Giarmarco; Vanessa Lung Medlock; and Relief Defendants Adagio SPE LLC; Andante SPE LLC; Brighton Cove LLC; Cayucos Dream, LLC; GSD Equities, LLC; HGM Holdings LLC; Kastlemark LLC; Martin-Taylor Company LLC; Premier Property Management Group, LLC, No. 1:26-cv-02985-JLT (Apr. 21, 2026)
The SEC charged Voyager Pacific Capital Management and its executives with a multi-year scheme to divert millions in real estate funds and use $15 million in new capital for Ponzi-like payments.
Voyager Pacific Capital Management, CEO Roger David Hardcastle, former CFO John Giarmarco, and former COO Vanessa Lung-Medlock are charged with violating federal antifraud provisions. The defendants allegedly used over $15 million in new investor money to fund Ponzi-like payments and diverted millions more to entities controlled by Hardcastle and Giarmarco. Hardcastle and Giarmarco have agreed to bifurcated settlements, while Hardcastle also pleaded guilty to criminal wire fraud.
The SEC charged Voyager Pacific Capital Management, LLC, and its executives—Roger David Hardcastle, John Giarmarco, and Vanessa Lung-Medlock—with a multi-year fraud scheme spanning from 2020 to 2024. The defendants allegedly misappropriated millions of dollars to entities owned by Hardcastle and Giarmarco and used over $15 million in new investor capital to facilitate Ponzi-like payments to existing investors. The SEC is seeking permanent injunctions, disgorgement, and civil penalties against the defendants and several relief defendants. Hardcastle and Giarmarco have already agreed to bifurcated settlements involving permanent injunctions and conduct-based bans. Additionally, Hardcastle has pleaded guilty to a criminal count of conspiring to commit wire fraud in a parallel proceeding. The scheme resulted in significant losses for the real estate investment fund and its investors.
Exhibits & Attached Documents (1)
Extracted insights
- $15.00M $15 million $10M–$100M
- person john giarmarco
- person roger david hardcastle
- agency Securities and Exchange Commission
- company voyager pacific capital management, llc
- Securities and Exchange Commission charged Voyager Pacific Capital Management, LLC
- Securities and Exchange Commission charged Roger David Hardcastle
- Securities and Exchange Commission charged John Giarmarco
- Securities and Exchange Commission charged Vanessa Lung-Medlock
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONLitigation Release No. 26534 / April 21, 2026Securities and Exchange Commission v. Voyager Pacific Capital Management, LLC, et al., Civil Action No. 1:26-cv-02985-JLT-SAB (E.D. Cal. filed April 20, 2026)SEC Charges Real Estate Fund Manager and Three California Residents in Alleged Multimillion Dollar Fraud SchemeThe Securities and Exchange Commission charged Voyager Pacific Capital Management, LLC, its CEO, Roger David Hardcastle, its former CFO, John Giarmarco, and its then-COO, Vanessa Lung-Medlock, with allegedly engaging in a multi-year fraudulent scheme in connection with a real-estate investment fund managed by Voyager. Hardcastle and Giarmarco have agreed to bifurcated settlements in connection with this civil enforcement action.The SEC’s complaint, filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, alleges that, from September 2020 through March 2024, rather than investing equity investor money as promised, Hardcastle, Giarmarco, and Medlock caused Voyager to use more than $15 million dollars in new investor money to pay current investors in Ponzi-like fashion. According to the complaint, these Ponzi-like payments were necessary, in part, because Hardcastle and Giarmarco had taken millions of dollars of investor money from the real-estate investment fund and given that money to entities that they owned or controlled in a series of undisclosed and prohibited transactions. The complaint alleges that, in total, millions of dollars of investor funds were not invested as promised, resulting in losses to the fund, and ultimately its investors.Voyager, Hardcastle, and Giarmarco are charged with violating the antifraud provisions of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder and Medlock is charged with violating the antifraud provisions of Section 17(a)(1) and (3) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5(a) and (c) thereunder. The complaint seeks permanent injunctions, disgorgement with prejudgment interest, civil penalties, and a conduct-based injunction against each of the individual defendants permanently enjoining each from participating in the issuance, purchase, offer, or sale of any security except for purchases or sales for the defendant’s own personal accounts. The complaint also names Adagio SPE LLC, Andante SPE LLC, Brighton Cove LLC, Cayucos Dream, LLC, GSD Equities, LLC, HGM Holdings LLC, Kastlemark LLC, Martin-Taylor Company LLC, and Premier Property Management Group, LLC as relief defendants and seeks disgorgement of ill-gotten gains with prejudgment interest from each.Hardcastle consented to the entry of a judgment, subject to court approval, in which he agreed (1) to be permanently enjoined from violating the charged provisions of the federal securities laws, (2) to be permanently enjoined pursuant to the conduct-based injunction described above, and (3) that, upon motion of the Commission, the Court shall determine whether it is appropriate to order disgorgement of ill-gotten gains and/or a civil penalty. Giarmarco, without admitting or denying the allegations made in the complaint, consented to the entry of a judgment, subject to court approval, containing the same injunctive and monetary relief agreed to by Hardcastle.In a parallel criminal proceeding, United States v. David Hardcastle, 1:25-cr-00016-JLT-SKO (E.D. Cal. filed Feb. 18, 2026), David Hardcastle pleaded guilty to one count of conspiring to commit wire fraud.The SEC’s investigation was conducted by Grace M. Osberg and Tracy W. Bowen, and was supervised by Kimberly L. Frederick and Nicholas P. Heinke, all of the SEC’s Denver Regional Office. The litigation is being conducted by Jacqueline M. Moessner and Ms. Osberg, and supervised by Gregory A. Kasper.The SEC appreciates the assistance of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of California and the Federal Bureau of Investigation's Sacramento Field Office.
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONLitigation Release No. 26534 / April 21, 2026Securities and Exchange Commission v. Voyager Pacific Capital Management, LLC, et al., Civil Action No. 1:26-cv-02985-JLT-SAB (E.D. Cal. filed April 20, 2026)SEC Charges Real Estate Fund Manager and Three California Residents in Alleged Multimillion Dollar Fraud SchemeThe Securities and Exchange Commission charged Voyager Pacific Capital Management, LLC, its CEO, Roger David Hardcastle, its former CFO, John Giarmarco, and its then-COO, Vanessa Lung-Medlock, with allegedly engaging in a multi-year fraudulent scheme in connection with a real-estate investment fund managed by Voyager. Hardcastle and Giarmarco have agreed to bifurcated settlements in connection with this civil enforcement action.The SEC’s complaint, filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, alleges that, from September 2020 through March 2024, rather than investing equity investor money as promised, Hardcastle, Giarmarco, and Medlock caused Voyager to use more than $15 million dollars in new investor money to pay current investors in Ponzi-like fashion. According to the complaint, these Ponzi-like payments were necessary, in part, because Hardcastle and Giarmarco had taken millions of dollars of investor money from the real-estate investment fund and given that money to entities that they owned or controlled in a series of undisclosed and prohibited transactions. The complaint alleges that, in total, millions of dollars of investor funds were not invested as promised, resulting in losses to the fund, and ultimately its investors.Voyager, Hardcastle, and Giarmarco are charged with violating the antifraud provisions of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder and Medlock is charged with violating the antifraud provisions of Section 17(a)(1) and (3) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5(a) and (c) thereunder. The complaint seeks permanent injunctions, disgorgement with prejudgment interest, civil penalties, and a conduct-based injunction against each of the individual defendants permanently enjoining each from participating in the issuance, purchase, offer, or sale of any security except for purchases or sales for the defendant’s own personal accounts. The complaint also names Adagio SPE LLC, Andante SPE LLC, Brighton Cove LLC, Cayucos Dream, LLC, GSD Equities, LLC, HGM Holdings LLC, Kastlemark LLC, Martin-Taylor Company LLC, and Premier Property Management Group, LLC as relief defendants and seeks disgorgement of ill-gotten gains with prejudgment interest from each.Hardcastle consented to the entry of a judgment, subject to court approval, in which he agreed (1) to be permanently enjoined from violating the charged provisions of the federal securities laws, (2) to be permanently enjoined pursuant to the conduct-based injunction described above, and (3) that, upon motion of the Commission, the Court shall determine whether it is appropriate to order disgorgement of ill-gotten gains and/or a civil penalty. Giarmarco, without admitting or denying the allegations made in the complaint, consented to the entry of a judgment, subject to court approval, containing the same injunctive and monetary relief agreed to by Hardcastle.In a parallel criminal proceeding, United States v. David Hardcastle, 1:25-cr-00016-JLT-SKO (E.D. Cal. filed Feb. 18, 2026), David Hardcastle pleaded guilty to one count of conspiring to commit wire fraud.The SEC’s investigation was conducted by Grace M. Osberg and Tracy W. Bowen, and was supervised by Kimberly L. Frederick and Nicholas P. Heinke, all of the SEC’s Denver Regional Office. The litigation is being conducted by Jacqueline M. Moessner and Ms. Osberg, and supervised by Gregory A. Kasper.The SEC appreciates the assistance of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of California and the Federal Bureau of Investigation's Sacramento Field Office.