SEC v. Joseph M. Dupont; Shawn P. Cronin; Stanley Kaplan; Paul Feldman; and Jarett G. Mendoza, No. 1:23-cv-05565, Southern District of New York (Jan. 3, 2025) — Judgment
raw: SEC v. JOSEPH M. DUPONT
SEC v. JOSEPH M. DUPONT, No. 1:23-cv-05565 (Jan. 3, 2025)
Paul Feldman consented to a final judgment in an SEC action for securities fraud and tender offer violations involving the use of material nonpublic information.
The SEC obtained a final judgment against Paul Feldman in the Southern District of New York for violations of the Exchange Act, including Section 10(b) and Rule 14e-3. Feldman consented to the court's jurisdiction and the entry of the judgment, which permanently enjoins him from future securities fraud and tender offer misconduct. The court also prohibited him from serving as an officer or director of any registered issuer.
The Securities and Exchange Commission filed a complaint against Paul Feldman and several co-defendants for securities fraud and tender offer violations. The allegations involved using material nonpublic information to trade securities and communicating confidential information regarding tender offers in breach of fiduciary duties. In a final judgment entered in the Southern District of New York, Feldman consented to the order and waived his right to appeal. The court imposed a permanent injunction against violating Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 of the Exchange Act, as well as Section 14(e) and Rule 14e-3. Additionally, the judgment prohibits Feldman from serving as an officer or director of any registered issuer. While the document outlines these permanent restrictions, it does not specify particular monetary penalties or restitution amounts.
Extracted insights
- person defendant paul feldman
- person final judgment
- agency Securities and Exchange Commission
- Securities And Exchange Commission Filed a Complaint Defendant Paul Feldman
- Defendant Paul Feldman Entered a General Appearance The Court
- Defendant Paul Feldman Consented To Jurisdiction The Court
- Defendant Paul Feldman Consented To Entry Final Judgment
- Defendant Paul Feldman Waived Findings Of Fact And Conclusions Of Law
- Defendant Paul Feldman Waived Any Right To Appeal Final Judgment
- The Court Ordered And Decreed Defendant Is Permanently Restrained And Enjoined From Violating Section 10(b) Of The Securities Exchange Act Of 1934
- The Court Ordered And Decreed Defendant Is Permanently Restrained And Enjoined From Violating Rule 10b-5 Promulgated Thereunder
- The Court Ordered And Decreed Defendant Is Permanently Restrained And Enjoined From Engaging In Fraud Or Deceit Upon Any Person
- The Court Ordered And Decreed Defendant Is Permanently Restrained And Enjoined From Violating Section 14(e) Of The Exchange Act
- The Court Ordered And Decreed Defendant Is Permanently Restrained And Enjoined From Violating Rule 14e-3 Promulgated Thereunder
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, -against- JOSEPH M. DUPONT, SHAWN P. CRONIN, STANLEY KAPLAN, PAUL FELDMAN and JARETT G. MENDOZA Defendants. 23 Civ. 5565 (VM) F INAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT PAUL FELDMAN The Securities and Exchange Commission having filed a Complaint and Defendant Paul Feldman having entered a general appearance; consented to the Court’s jurisdiction over Defendant and the subject matter of this action; consented to entry of this Final Judgment; waived findings of fact and conclusions of law; and waived any right to appeal from this Final Judgment: I. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating, directly or indirectly, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)] and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5], by using any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce, or of the mails, or of any facility of any national securities exchange, in connection with the purchase or sale of any security: (a)to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; 12/23/2024 2 (b)to make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or (c)to engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person by: (i) buying or selling a security of any issuer, on the basis of material nonpublic information, in breach of a fiduciary duty or other duty of trust or confidence that is owed directly, indirectly, or derivatively, to the issuer of that security or the shareholders of that issuer, or to any other person who is the source of the information; or (ii) by communicating material nonpublic information about a security or issuer, in breach of a fiduciary duty or other duty of trust or confidence, to another person or persons for purposes of buying or selling any security. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a). II. I T IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 14(e) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78n(e)] and Rule 14e-3 [17 C.F.R. § 240.14e-3] promulgated thereunder, in connection with any tender offer or request or invitation for tenders, from engaging in any fraudulent, deceptive, or manipulative act or practice, by: 3 (a)purchasing or selling or causing to be purchased or sold the securities sought or to be sought in such tender offer, securities convertible into or exchangeable for any such securities or any option or right to obtain or dispose of any of the foregoing securities while in possession of material information relating to such tender offer that Defendant knows or has reason to know is nonpublic and knows or has reason to know has been acquired directly or indirectly from the offering person; the issuer of the securities sought or to be sought by such tender offer; or any officer, director, partner, employee or other person acting on behalf of the offering person or such issuer, unless within a reasonable time prior to any such purchase or sale such information and its source are publicly disclosed by press release or otherwise; or (b)communicating material, nonpublic information relating to a tender offer, which Defendant knows or has reason to know is nonpublic and knows or has reason to know has been acquired directly or indirectly from the offering person; the issuer of the securities sought or to be sought by such tender offer; or any officer, director, partner, employee, advisor, or other person acting on behalf of the offering person of such issuer, to any person under circumstances in which it is reasonably foreseeable that such communication is likely to result in the purchase or sale of securities in the manner described in subparagraph (a) above, except that this paragraph shall not apply to a communication made in good faith (i)to the officers, directors, partners or employees of the offering person, to its advisors or to other persons, involved in the planning, financing, preparation or execution of such tender offer; 4 (ii)to the issuer whose securities are sought or to be sought by such tender offer, to its officers, directors, partners, employees or advisors or to other persons involved in the planning, financing, preparation or execution of the activities of the issuer with respect to such tender offer; or (iii)to any person pursuant to a requirement of any statute or rule or regulation promulgated thereunder. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a). III. I T IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, pursuant to Section 21(d)(2) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)(2)], Defendant is prohibited from acting as an officer or director of any issuer that has a class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78l] or that is required to file reports pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78o(d)]. IV. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Consent is incorporated herein with the same force and effect as if fully set forth herein, and that Defendant shall comply with all of the undertakings and agreements set forth therein. 5 ____________________________________ VICTOR MARRERO, U.S.D.J. V. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that for pur poses of exceptions to discharge set forth in Section 523 of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. §523, the allegations in the complaint are true and admitted by Defendant, and further, any debt for civil penalty or other amounts due by Defendant under this Final Judgment or any other judgment, order, consent order, decree or settlement agreement entered in connection wi th this proceeding, is a debt for the violation by Defendant of the federal securities laws or any regulation or order issued under such laws, as set forth in Section 523(a)(19) of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. §523(a)(19). VI. IT IS FURTHER ORDE RED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Final Judgment. VII. There being no just reason for delay, pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Clerk is ordered to enter this Final Judgment forthwith and without further notice. Dated: December 23, 2024
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, -against- JOSEPH M. DUPONT, SHAWN P. CRONIN, STANLEY KAPLAN, PAUL FELDMAN and JARETT G. MENDOZA Defendants. 23 Civ. 5565 (VM) FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT PAUL FELDMAN The Securities and Exchange Commission having filed a Complaint and Defendant Paul Feldman having entered a general appearance; consented to the Court’s jurisdiction over Defendant and the subject matter of this action; consented to entry of this Final Judgment; waived findings of fact and conclusions of law; and waived any right to appeal from this Final Judgment: I. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating, directly or indirectly, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)] and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5], by using any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce, or of the mails, or of any facility of any national securities exchange, in connection with the purchase or sale of any security: (a) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; 12/23/2024 Case 1:23-cv-05565-VM Document 38 Filed 12/23/24 Page 1 of 5 http://www.google.com/search?q=17+c.f.r.++240.10b-5 http://www.google.com/search?q=15+u.s.c.++78j(b) 2 (b) to make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or (c) to engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person by: (i) buying or selling a security of any issuer, on the basis of material nonpublic information, in breach of a fiduciary duty or other duty of trust or confidence that is owed directly, indirectly, or derivatively, to the issuer of that security or the shareholders of that issuer, or to any other person who is the source of the information; or (ii) by communicating material nonpublic information about a security or issuer, in breach of a fiduciary duty or other duty of trust or confidence, to another person or persons for purposes of buying or selling any security. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a). II. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 14(e) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78n(e)] and Rule 14e-3 [17 C.F.R. § 240.14e-3] promulgated thereunder, in connection with any tender offer or request or invitation for tenders, from engaging in any fraudulent, deceptive, or manipulative act or practice, by: Case 1:23-cv-05565-VM Document 38 Filed 12/23/24 Page 2 of 5 http://www.google.com/search?q=FRCP+65(d)(2) http://www.google.com/search?q=17+c.f.r.++240.14e-3 http://www.google.com/search?q=15++u.s.c.++78n(e) http://www.google.com/search?q=15++u.s.c.++78n(e) 3 (a) purchasing or selling or causing to be purchased or sold the securities sought or to be sought in such tender offer, securities convertible into or exchangeable for any such securities or any option or right to obtain or dispose of any of the foregoing securities while in possession of material information relating to such tender offer that Defendant knows or has reason to know is nonpublic and knows or has reason to know has been acquired directly or indirectly from the offering person; the issuer of the securities sought or to be sought by such tender offer; or any officer, director, partner, employee or other person acting on behalf of the offering person or such issuer, unless within a reasonable time prior to any such purchase or sale such information and its source are publicly disclosed by press release or otherwise; or (b) communicating material, nonpublic information relating to a tender offer, which Defendant knows or has reason to know is nonpublic and knows or has reason to know has been acquired directly or indirectly from the offering person; the issuer of the securities sought or to be sought by such tender offer; or any officer, director, partner, employee, advisor, or other person acting on behalf of the offering person of such issuer, to any person under circumstances in which it is reasonably foreseeable that such communication is likely to result in the purchase or sale of securities in the manner described in subparagraph (a) above, except that this paragraph shall not apply to a communication made in good faith (i) to the officers, directors, partners or employees of the offering person, to its advisors or to other persons, involved in the planning, financing, preparation or execution of such tender offer; Case 1:23-cv-05565-VM Document 38 Filed 12/23/24 Page 3 of 5 4 (ii) to the issuer whose securities are sought or to be sought by such tender offer, to its officers, directors, partners, employees or advisors or to other persons involved in the planning, financing, preparation or execution of the activities of the issuer with respect to such tender offer; or (iii) to any person pursuant to a requirement of any statute or rule or regulation promulgated thereunder. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a). III. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, pursuant to Section 21(d)(2) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)(2)], Defendant is prohibited from acting as an officer or director of any issuer that has a class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78l] or that is required to file reports pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78o(d)]. IV. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Consent is incorporated herein with the same force and effect as if fully set forth herein, and that Defendant shall comply with all of the undertakings and agreements set forth therein. Case 1:23-cv-05565-VM Document 38 Filed 12/23/24 Page 4 of 5 http://www.google.com/search?q=FRCP+65(d)(2) http://www.google.com/search?q=15+u.s.c.++78u(d)(2) http://www.google.com/search?q=15+u.s.c.++78l http://www.google.com/search?q=15+u.s.c.++78o(d) 5 ____________________________________ VICTOR MARRERO, U.S.D.J. V. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that for purposes of exceptions to discharge set forth in Section 523 of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. §523, the allegations in the complaint are true and admitted by Defendant, and further, any debt for civil penalty or other amounts due by Defendant under this Final Judgment or any other judgment, order, consent order, decree or settlement agreement entered in connection with this proceeding, is a debt for the violation by Defendant of the federal securities laws or any regulation or order issued under such laws, as set forth in Section 523(a)(19) of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. §523(a)(19). VI. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Final Judgment. VII. There being no just reason for delay, pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Clerk is ordered to enter this Final Judgment forthwith and without further notice. Dated: December 23, 2024 Case 1:23-cv-05565-VM Document 38 Filed 12/23/24 Page 5 of 5 http://www.google.com/search?q=11+u.s.c.+523 http://www.google.com/search?q=11+u.s.c.++523(a)(19) http://www.google.com/search?q=11+u.s.c.++523(a)(19)