SEC v. JOSEPH M. DUPONT; SHAWN P. CRONIN; STANLEY KAPLAN; PAUL FELDMAN; and JARETT G. MENDOZA, No. 1:23-cv-05565, Southern District of New York (Jan. 3, 2025) — Judgment
raw: SEC v. JOSEPH M. DUPONT
SEC v. JOSEPH M. DUPONT, No. 1:23-cv-05565 (Jan. 3, 2025)
Stanley Kaplan entered a final judgment with the SEC, agreeing to permanent injunctions against securities fraud and a bar from serving as an officer or director of a public company.
The SEC obtained a final judgment against Stanley Kaplan for violations of the Exchange Act, including fraudulent schemes and tender offer insider trading. Kaplan consented to the court's jurisdiction and the entry of the judgment, waiving his right to appeal. The settlement imposes a permanent bar preventing him from serving as an officer or director of any issuer with registered securities.
The Securities and Exchange Commission secured a final judgment against Stanley Kaplan in the Southern District of New York regarding violations of Sections 10(b) and 14(e) of the Exchange Act. Kaplan, alongside several co-defendants, was charged with engaging in deceptive practices and using material nonpublic information related to tender offers. By entering this judgment, Kaplan consented to the court's jurisdiction and waived his rights to findings of fact, conclusions of law, and any right to appeal. The court permanently enjoined him from committing further securities fraud or violating rules related to tender offers. Additionally, the judgment imposes a permanent bar prohibiting Kaplan from serving as an officer or director of any issuer with registered or reporting securities. While the specific monetary penalties were incorporated via a separate consent agreement, the judgment establishes the legal framework for his permanent restrictions.
Extracted insights
- person stanley kaplan ×2
- court in the united states district court southern district of new york
- person jarett g. mendoza
- person joseph m. dupont
- person paul feldman
- agency Securities and Exchange Commission
- person shawn p. cronin
- Securities And Exchange Commission filed a Complaint against Joseph M. Dupont, Shawn P. Cronin, Stanley Kaplan, Paul Feldman and Jarett G. Mendoza
- Stanley Kaplan entered a general appearance in the United States District Court Southern District of New York
- Stanley Kaplan consented to the Court’s jurisdiction over Defendant and the subject matter of this action
- Stanley Kaplan consented to entry of this Final Judgment by waiving findings of fact and conclusions of law
- Court ordered, adjudged, and decreed Stanley Kaplan is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5
- Court ordered, adjudged, and decreed Stanley Kaplan is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 14(e) of the Exchange Act and Rule 14e-3
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, -against- JOSEPH M. DUPONT, SHAWN P. CRONIN, STANLEY KAPLAN, PAUL FELDMAN and JARETT G. MENDOZA Defendants. 23 Civ. 5565 (VM) F INAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT STANLEY KAPLAN The Securities and Exchange Commission having filed a Complaint and Defendant Stanley Kaplan having entered a general appearance; consented to the Court’s jurisdiction over Defendant and the subject matter of this action; consented to entry of this Final Judgment; waived findings of fact and conclusions of law; and waived any right to appeal from this Final Judgment: I. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating, directly or indirectly, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)] and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5], by using any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce, or of the mails, or of any facility of any national securities exchange, in connection with the purchase or sale of any security: (a)to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; 12/23/2024 2 (b)to make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or (c)to engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a). II. I T IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 14(e) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78n(e)] and Rule 14e-3 [17 C.F.R. § 240.14e-3] promulgated thereunder, in connection with any tender offer or request or invitation for tenders, from engaging in any fraudulent, deceptive, or manipulative act or practice, by: (a)purchasing or selling or causing to be purchased or sold the securities sought or to be sought in such tender offer, securities convertible into or exchangeable for any such securities or any option or right to obtain or dispose of any of the foregoing securities while in possession of material information relating to such tender offer that Defendant knows or has reason to know is nonpublic and knows or has reason to know has been acquired directly or indirectly from the offering person; the issuer of the securities sought or to be sought by such tender offer; or any 3 officer, director, partner, employee or other person acting on behalf of the offering person or such issuer, unless within a reasonable time prior to any such purchase or sale such information and its source are publicly disclosed by press release or otherwise; or (b)communicating material, nonpublic information relating to a tender offer, which Defendant knows or has reason to know is nonpublic and knows or has reason to know has been acquired directly or indirectly from the offering person; the issuer of the securities sought or to be sought by such tender offer; or any officer, director, partner, employee, advisor, or other person acting on behalf of the offering person of such issuer, to any person under circumstances in which it is reasonably foreseeable that such communication is likely to result in the purchase or sale of securities in the manner described in subparagraph (a) above, except that this paragraph shall not apply to a communication made in good faith (i)to the officers, directors, partners or employees of the offering person, to its advisors or to other persons, involved in the planning, financing, preparation or execution of such tender offer; (ii)to the issuer whose securities are sought or to be sought by such tender offer, to its officers, directors, partners, employees or advisors or to other persons involved in the planning, financing, preparation or execution of the activities of the issuer with respect to such tender offer; or (iii)to any person pursuant to a requirement of any statute or rule or regulation promulgated thereunder. 4 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a). III. I T IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, pursuant to Section 21(d)(2) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)(2)], Defendant is prohibited from acting as an officer or director of any issuer that has a class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78l] or that is required to file reports pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78o(d)]. IV. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Consent is incorporated herein with the same force and effect as if fully set forth herein, and that Defendant shall comply with all of the undertakings and agreements set forth therein. V. I T IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, for purposes of exceptions to discharge set forth in Section 523 of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. § 523, the allegations in the complaint are true and admitted by Defendant, and further, any debt for disgorgement, prejudgment interest, civil penalty or other amounts due by Defendant under this Judgment or any other judgment, order, consent order, decree or settlement agreement entered in 5 ____________________________________ VICTOR MARRERO, U.S.D.J. connection with this proceeding, is a debt for the violation by Defendant of the federal securities laws or any regulation or order issued under such laws, as set forth in Section 523(a)(19) of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(19). VI. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Final Judgment. VII. There being no just reason for delay, pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Clerk is ordered to enter this Final Judgment forthwith and without further notice. Dated: December 23, 2024
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, -against- JOSEPH M. DUPONT, SHAWN P. CRONIN, STANLEY KAPLAN, PAUL FELDMAN and JARETT G. MENDOZA Defendants. 23 Civ. 5565 (VM) FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT STANLEY KAPLAN The Securities and Exchange Commission having filed a Complaint and Defendant Stanley Kaplan having entered a general appearance; consented to the Court’s jurisdiction over Defendant and the subject matter of this action; consented to entry of this Final Judgment; waived findings of fact and conclusions of law; and waived any right to appeal from this Final Judgment: I. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating, directly or indirectly, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)] and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5], by using any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce, or of the mails, or of any facility of any national securities exchange, in connection with the purchase or sale of any security: (a) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; 12/23/2024 Case 1:23-cv-05565-VM Document 41 Filed 12/23/24 Page 1 of 5 http://www.google.com/search?q=17+c.f.r.++240.10b-5 http://www.google.com/search?q=15+u.s.c.++78j(b) 2 (b) to make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or (c) to engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a). II. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 14(e) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78n(e)] and Rule 14e-3 [17 C.F.R. § 240.14e-3] promulgated thereunder, in connection with any tender offer or request or invitation for tenders, from engaging in any fraudulent, deceptive, or manipulative act or practice, by: (a) purchasing or selling or causing to be purchased or sold the securities sought or to be sought in such tender offer, securities convertible into or exchangeable for any such securities or any option or right to obtain or dispose of any of the foregoing securities while in possession of material information relating to such tender offer that Defendant knows or has reason to know is nonpublic and knows or has reason to know has been acquired directly or indirectly from the offering person; the issuer of the securities sought or to be sought by such tender offer; or any Case 1:23-cv-05565-VM Document 41 Filed 12/23/24 Page 2 of 5 http://www.google.com/search?q=FRCP+65(d)(2) http://www.google.com/search?q=17+c.f.r.++240.14e-3 http://www.google.com/search?q=15++u.s.c.++78n(e) http://www.google.com/search?q=15++u.s.c.++78n(e) 3 officer, director, partner, employee or other person acting on behalf of the offering person or such issuer, unless within a reasonable time prior to any such purchase or sale such information and its source are publicly disclosed by press release or otherwise; or (b) communicating material, nonpublic information relating to a tender offer, which Defendant knows or has reason to know is nonpublic and knows or has reason to know has been acquired directly or indirectly from the offering person; the issuer of the securities sought or to be sought by such tender offer; or any officer, director, partner, employee, advisor, or other person acting on behalf of the offering person of such issuer, to any person under circumstances in which it is reasonably foreseeable that such communication is likely to result in the purchase or sale of securities in the manner described in subparagraph (a) above, except that this paragraph shall not apply to a communication made in good faith (i) to the officers, directors, partners or employees of the offering person, to its advisors or to other persons, involved in the planning, financing, preparation or execution of such tender offer; (ii) to the issuer whose securities are sought or to be sought by such tender offer, to its officers, directors, partners, employees or advisors or to other persons involved in the planning, financing, preparation or execution of the activities of the issuer with respect to such tender offer; or (iii) to any person pursuant to a requirement of any statute or rule or regulation promulgated thereunder. Case 1:23-cv-05565-VM Document 41 Filed 12/23/24 Page 3 of 5 4 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a). III. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, pursuant to Section 21(d)(2) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)(2)], Defendant is prohibited from acting as an officer or director of any issuer that has a class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78l] or that is required to file reports pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78o(d)]. IV. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Consent is incorporated herein with the same force and effect as if fully set forth herein, and that Defendant shall comply with all of the undertakings and agreements set forth therein. V. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, for purposes of exceptions to discharge set forth in Section 523 of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. § 523, the allegations in the complaint are true and admitted by Defendant, and further, any debt for disgorgement, prejudgment interest, civil penalty or other amounts due by Defendant under this Judgment or any other judgment, order, consent order, decree or settlement agreement entered in Case 1:23-cv-05565-VM Document 41 Filed 12/23/24 Page 4 of 5 http://www.google.com/search?q=FRCP+65(d)(2) http://www.google.com/search?q=15+u.s.c.++78u(d)(2) http://www.google.com/search?q=15+u.s.c.++78l http://www.google.com/search?q=15+u.s.c.++78o(d) http://www.google.com/search?q=11+u.s.c.++523 5 ____________________________________ VICTOR MARRERO, U.S.D.J. connection with this proceeding, is a debt for the violation by Defendant of the federal securities laws or any regulation or order issued under such laws, as set forth in Section 523(a)(19) of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(19). VI. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Final Judgment. VII. There being no just reason for delay, pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Clerk is ordered to enter this Final Judgment forthwith and without further notice. Dated: December 23, 2024 Case 1:23-cv-05565-VM Document 41 Filed 12/23/24 Page 5 of 5 http://www.google.com/search?q=11+u.s.c.++523(a)(19)